The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
The majority of this template's function was deleted in an earlier TFD in 2020
Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_October_27#Template:ACR_top. Now it is a simple {{{2|}}}
, which does not need a template.
Izno (
talk)
19:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Template for a process marked historical 5 years ago and which hasn't apparently been used in 15 years. Izno ( talk) 18:13, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Not generally necessary. In today's day and age users are expected to be WP:BOLD and archive things themselves, or avail themselves of the standard archiving bot functionality to archive the contents of a section.
Current use indicates no one is using it (with only 3 ancient transclusions). Izno ( talk) 17:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
per the current convention for Olympics and Paralympics articles, the game and standings templates should be hosted in the parent article, and not in individual templates. if consensus changes over LST vs templates, we can always put all the matches and standings into a single template with a switch so we don't need to watch 20 templates per event. Frietjes ( talk) 15:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Used only about a dozen times, all in the 2009-2010 timeframe. Clearly this has fallen out of favor, if it ever was in favor. Izno ( talk) 02:38, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Unused in over 15 years. Izno ( talk) 02:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Used only twice in nearly a decade of existence. A handmade note is sufficient, at most. Izno ( talk) 02:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Not generally necessary; template editors are sufficiently knowledgeable that this template isn't needed, and for everywhere else it might actually be needed a wikitext comment will suffice (I don't expect those to exist). Izno ( talk) 02:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Used on 3 pages in the past 15 years. Clearly not a needed template and ultimately more complicated than simply linking to a specific archive with normal wikitext. Izno ( talk) 02:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Apparently a very special case version of {{ discussion top}} to close WP:MULTI discussions, but in the decade it's existed it's been used on 3 pages. Clearly unneeded. Izno ( talk) 02:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 14. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 14. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
No transclusions. Redundant template. – Aidan721 ( talk) 00:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
The majority of this template's function was deleted in an earlier TFD in 2020
Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_October_27#Template:ACR_top. Now it is a simple {{{2|}}}
, which does not need a template.
Izno (
talk)
19:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Template for a process marked historical 5 years ago and which hasn't apparently been used in 15 years. Izno ( talk) 18:13, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Not generally necessary. In today's day and age users are expected to be WP:BOLD and archive things themselves, or avail themselves of the standard archiving bot functionality to archive the contents of a section.
Current use indicates no one is using it (with only 3 ancient transclusions). Izno ( talk) 17:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
per the current convention for Olympics and Paralympics articles, the game and standings templates should be hosted in the parent article, and not in individual templates. if consensus changes over LST vs templates, we can always put all the matches and standings into a single template with a switch so we don't need to watch 20 templates per event. Frietjes ( talk) 15:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Used only about a dozen times, all in the 2009-2010 timeframe. Clearly this has fallen out of favor, if it ever was in favor. Izno ( talk) 02:38, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Unused in over 15 years. Izno ( talk) 02:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Used only twice in nearly a decade of existence. A handmade note is sufficient, at most. Izno ( talk) 02:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Not generally necessary; template editors are sufficiently knowledgeable that this template isn't needed, and for everywhere else it might actually be needed a wikitext comment will suffice (I don't expect those to exist). Izno ( talk) 02:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Used on 3 pages in the past 15 years. Clearly not a needed template and ultimately more complicated than simply linking to a specific archive with normal wikitext. Izno ( talk) 02:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Apparently a very special case version of {{ discussion top}} to close WP:MULTI discussions, but in the decade it's existed it's been used on 3 pages. Clearly unneeded. Izno ( talk) 02:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 14. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 14. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
No transclusions. Redundant template. – Aidan721 ( talk) 00:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)