- The following discussion is an archived record of a
request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- A summary of the debate may be found at the bottom of the discussion.
 | This template is used on approximately 2,400 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them. |
This template is used to close a Request for comment (RfC) on a talk page or a noticeboard.
When used on a talk page this template should only be used by uninvolved editors or administrators in conjunction with the talk page guidelines and relevant advice at refactoring. It should not be used by involved parties to end a 'Request for discussion' over the objections of other editors.
Usage
Place the {{
closed rfc top}} template below the header containing the discussion, then place {{
closed rfc bottom}} at the end of the discussion.
Again: Place it below the header. Do not include the header, it will break archiving bots!
It is important to use the direct transclusions {{
closed rfc top}}/{{
closed rfc bottom}} since if the redirects {{rfc top}}/{{rfc bottom}} are used,
Legobot (
talk ·
contribs) can interpret them as open RfCs, making
edits like these with
this result.
Parameter
This template employs just a single parameter, used for describing the result of the discussion.
Examples
== RfC header ==
{{closed rfc top|1=The result of this discussion was that there appears to be a clear consensus in '''support''' of the proposal... [[User:Example|Example]] ([[User talk:Example|talk]])}}
I suggest that we make a template to close completed RfC discussions. {{User|Example2}}
* I think it should be called ''Rfc top'' and ''Rfc bottom''! -{{User|Example3}}
{{closed rfc bottom}}
Would produce:
- The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I suggest that we make a template to close completed RfC discussions. Example2 ( talk · contribs)
See also
- {{ Archive top}} "This discussion has been closed ..." with a floating text box for discussion results
- {{ Discussion top}} "The following discussion is closed ..."
- {{ Hidden archive top}} "This discussion has been closed ..." with a collapse box around the discussion
- {{ Collapse top}} "Extended content" with a collapse box around the talk page discussion
- {{ Archive top red}} and {{ Archive top green}}, for archival templates in a color other than the default of blue
- The following discussion is an archived record of a
request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- A summary of the debate may be found at the bottom of the discussion.
| This template is used on approximately 2,400 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them. |
This template is used to close a Request for comment (RfC) on a talk page or a noticeboard.
When used on a talk page this template should only be used by uninvolved editors or administrators in conjunction with the talk page guidelines and relevant advice at refactoring. It should not be used by involved parties to end a 'Request for discussion' over the objections of other editors.
Usage
Place the {{
closed rfc top}} template below the header containing the discussion, then place {{
closed rfc bottom}} at the end of the discussion.
Again: Place it below the header. Do not include the header, it will break archiving bots!
It is important to use the direct transclusions {{
closed rfc top}}/{{
closed rfc bottom}} since if the redirects {{rfc top}}/{{rfc bottom}} are used,
Legobot (
talk ·
contribs) can interpret them as open RfCs, making
edits like these with
this result.
Parameter
This template employs just a single parameter, used for describing the result of the discussion.
Examples
== RfC header ==
{{closed rfc top|1=The result of this discussion was that there appears to be a clear consensus in '''support''' of the proposal... [[User:Example|Example]] ([[User talk:Example|talk]])}}
I suggest that we make a template to close completed RfC discussions. {{User|Example2}}
* I think it should be called ''Rfc top'' and ''Rfc bottom''! -{{User|Example3}}
{{closed rfc bottom}}
Would produce:
- The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I suggest that we make a template to close completed RfC discussions. Example2 ( talk · contribs)
See also
- {{ Archive top}} "This discussion has been closed ..." with a floating text box for discussion results
- {{ Discussion top}} "The following discussion is closed ..."
- {{ Hidden archive top}} "This discussion has been closed ..." with a collapse box around the discussion
- {{ Collapse top}} "Extended content" with a collapse box around the talk page discussion
- {{ Archive top red}} and {{ Archive top green}}, for archival templates in a color other than the default of blue
Templates for archiving | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended |
| ||||||
| Side box |
| ||||||
| Headers |
| ||||||
| Content formatting |
| ||||||
| Lists |
| ||||||
| Discussion |
| ||||||
| Automatic archiving systems |
| ||||||