The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused, unlikely to happen, overly polemic. Just use {{ Unreliable fringe source}} or {{ dubious}} and keep political neologisms like "fake news" out of this. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused. Just make it a table Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused, unclear usage Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused, all content redirects to main page Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused and overly specific Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:18, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused fork of {{ cleanup}} and {{ POV}}. Has been around since 2018. Seems too specific Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused single-use template. The Teen Wolf articles already have better formatted wikitables with the same info Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused track listing template. Not needed Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused, possibly hoax templates. One of the two was created by a user with no other edits. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused. Though subst'ed, the text " One of your recent edits broke the page formatting" doesn't turn up any results, suggesting this has never been used. There are better warning templates anyway. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused topic-specific version of "update needed" template. Seems too specific for use. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 13. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused template from 2009 with unclear usage Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 22:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused and only one article. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
18:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused (2 transclusions substituted). Tennis statistics pages use dozens of colors, so abstracting this singular color to a template provides no value. Sod25 ( talk) 15:47, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused (only transclusion substituted), and not how external links are made on tennis tournament articles nowadays. Sod25 ( talk) 13:39, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Substituted on the only page it was transcluded ( 2010 ATP Challenger Tour). No other year's article uses a template. Sod25 ( talk) 13:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. But, feel free to create a redirect to Template:Performance key if you feel it is useful. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused. Redundant to Template:Performance key Sod25 ( talk) 11:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This template is used to only show content in user space. It is currently used in 31 pages. 10 of them are in article space. Those 10 uses are actually very harmful as they hide actual article content. The sandbox uses seem to originate from Template:Article templates/generic article. I don't think having a box telling the editor that the article ends halfway into a page is correct, when the see also sections, ref, bib and everything else is also part of the article. It just seems pointless, just as it would be to place a box at the top stating "article starts here".
Finally Template:User other already does the logic of this template. I propose to delete the template and all current usages, while making sure the article content does not get deleted, only this template around it. Gonnym ( talk) 09:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
I agree, it is not needed any more, the comments show now in a way that they are enough for what the template had been created for. ManosHacker talk 07:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It's not used, and it's not clear what it's used for. Did Q28 make a mess today? 06:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
There are plenty of legitimate reasons to have alternate texts (one user may prefer the -short text over the -default text) and those alternate versions should be considered separately on their merits. But having a template randomly selected is pointless and silly. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It seems to be a remnant of the previous welcome template tfd. --Did Q28
make a mess today?
05:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Well, we may need to delete it because it is never used. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
I don't know the purpose of this template, it may be a template for testing. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Only one entry is in use, and that entry has been replaced. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:42, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No one uses is the point and although the template document says it's for comparison, almost no one uses it for comparison. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:39, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
{{cite <whatever>/old}}
templates listed on this page (could the proposer not have lumped them together into a single nomination?): Yes, they are rarely used but they are the historical wikisource references against which the initial Lua implementation of cs1 was judged and against which the current implementation may be compared. It is not necessary to publish a page with {{
cite compare}}
using one of these ~/old templates in order to see the comparison so I rarely do unless it is in discussion at
Help talk:Citation Style 1. Do not delete these templates.{{
cite compare}}
has been modified so that ~/old cs1 templates are not automatically included in its rendering:Wikitext | {{cite DVD notes
|
---|---|
Old | Title (Liner notes). |
Live | Title (Media notes). |
Sandbox | Title (Media notes). |
{{cite <whatever>/old}}
cs1 templates:![]() | Cite <whatever>/old is preserved as an historical reference against which current Lua-based cs1|2 templates may be compared. |
{{
mbox}}
was an attempt to forestall future tfds for those templates. Clearly that did not work. Do not delete these templates.
Q28, please withdraw these nominations.To answer them, I can state without offering any proof that what these editors claim is incorrect/inaccurate/.... Why should they believe me when I give them no proof? They would not have come to WT:CS1 were they not absolutely certain that their claim is correct so therefore, whatever I say is wrong unless I can demonstrate otherwise. Using the ~/old versions to render an example of{{cite <whatever>}}
used to render or support or ... some|<parameter>=
or something ... What happend? / Why doesn't it ... anymore?
{{cite <whatever>}}
is as close to a definitive demonstration of how the template once rendered as is possible to achieve. Yeah, sure, these editors can:
{{cite <whatever>}}
history for a pre-lua version of the template{{cite <whatever>}}
and put that article's title in the Preview page with this template boxThe result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused maps and very hard to navigate with to know the information the maps display. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:16, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep the maps are very useful in the context of territorial control. Alhanuty ( talk) 19:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep They are used to help make the maps on the actual articles Wowzers122 ( talk) 01:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep It is very useful to know who controls smaller places than the big cities, which sometimes is hard to find out.-- Andres arg ( talk) 22:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep Template detailed maps are essential in order to understand the evolution of territorial control during conflicts.-- HC PUNXKID 20:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional comments should address the rationale for deletion and nomination as well as related policy on use (or lack thereof) of templates.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
If the problem is that they are not in any article, anyone can add it on their respective page, then do so if you believe it belongs there. That's a true test to see if the community wants that template on the page. If it gets removed, then you get your answer. Gonnym ( talk) 00:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep These are extremely useful for determining near real-time data. the War maps Haven't been updated in months and sometimes years while the Telepate is updated quite often so it's great when trying to make a map for people both in and out of the Wikipedia community.-- Garmin21 ( talk) 20:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:United States fire departments. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Only one, the Wisconsin template, is unused. The rest contain fewer than five links needed for a navbox. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused and only links to categories which is not what navboxes are for. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:42, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
c3 and c5 are unused. C1, 2, 4 have one to two uses and should be substituted where used. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Youth Olympic venues. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
The first template is unused and contains either red links or non-related links. The four for the specific sports don't have the necessary amount of links to navigate with not counting the years of the events linked in the templates. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was userfy. Izno ( talk) 20:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure what this template is for, so delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
There aren't any drafts that use that hint right now, so maybe we can get delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It seems to be almost useless and probably obsolete. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It was supposed to be used for user discussion, but it was abandoned because no one maintained it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:47, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Never used because no one remembered him. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It looks like a mistake. It is not used, so I think it should be deleted. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:44, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused and no updates in almost 10 years. BLAIXX 03:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused, unlikely to happen, overly polemic. Just use {{ Unreliable fringe source}} or {{ dubious}} and keep political neologisms like "fake news" out of this. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused. Just make it a table Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused, unclear usage Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused, all content redirects to main page Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused and overly specific Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:18, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused fork of {{ cleanup}} and {{ POV}}. Has been around since 2018. Seems too specific Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused single-use template. The Teen Wolf articles already have better formatted wikitables with the same info Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused track listing template. Not needed Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused, possibly hoax templates. One of the two was created by a user with no other edits. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused. Though subst'ed, the text " One of your recent edits broke the page formatting" doesn't turn up any results, suggesting this has never been used. There are better warning templates anyway. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused topic-specific version of "update needed" template. Seems too specific for use. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 13. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused template from 2009 with unclear usage Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 22:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused and only one article. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
18:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused (2 transclusions substituted). Tennis statistics pages use dozens of colors, so abstracting this singular color to a template provides no value. Sod25 ( talk) 15:47, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused (only transclusion substituted), and not how external links are made on tennis tournament articles nowadays. Sod25 ( talk) 13:39, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Substituted on the only page it was transcluded ( 2010 ATP Challenger Tour). No other year's article uses a template. Sod25 ( talk) 13:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. But, feel free to create a redirect to Template:Performance key if you feel it is useful. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused. Redundant to Template:Performance key Sod25 ( talk) 11:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This template is used to only show content in user space. It is currently used in 31 pages. 10 of them are in article space. Those 10 uses are actually very harmful as they hide actual article content. The sandbox uses seem to originate from Template:Article templates/generic article. I don't think having a box telling the editor that the article ends halfway into a page is correct, when the see also sections, ref, bib and everything else is also part of the article. It just seems pointless, just as it would be to place a box at the top stating "article starts here".
Finally Template:User other already does the logic of this template. I propose to delete the template and all current usages, while making sure the article content does not get deleted, only this template around it. Gonnym ( talk) 09:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
I agree, it is not needed any more, the comments show now in a way that they are enough for what the template had been created for. ManosHacker talk 07:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It's not used, and it's not clear what it's used for. Did Q28 make a mess today? 06:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
There are plenty of legitimate reasons to have alternate texts (one user may prefer the -short text over the -default text) and those alternate versions should be considered separately on their merits. But having a template randomly selected is pointless and silly. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It seems to be a remnant of the previous welcome template tfd. --Did Q28
make a mess today?
05:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Well, we may need to delete it because it is never used. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
I don't know the purpose of this template, it may be a template for testing. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Only one entry is in use, and that entry has been replaced. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:42, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No one uses is the point and although the template document says it's for comparison, almost no one uses it for comparison. Did Q28 make a mess today? 05:39, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
{{cite <whatever>/old}}
templates listed on this page (could the proposer not have lumped them together into a single nomination?): Yes, they are rarely used but they are the historical wikisource references against which the initial Lua implementation of cs1 was judged and against which the current implementation may be compared. It is not necessary to publish a page with {{
cite compare}}
using one of these ~/old templates in order to see the comparison so I rarely do unless it is in discussion at
Help talk:Citation Style 1. Do not delete these templates.{{
cite compare}}
has been modified so that ~/old cs1 templates are not automatically included in its rendering:Wikitext | {{cite DVD notes
|
---|---|
Old | Title (Liner notes). |
Live | Title (Media notes). |
Sandbox | Title (Media notes). |
{{cite <whatever>/old}}
cs1 templates:![]() | Cite <whatever>/old is preserved as an historical reference against which current Lua-based cs1|2 templates may be compared. |
{{
mbox}}
was an attempt to forestall future tfds for those templates. Clearly that did not work. Do not delete these templates.
Q28, please withdraw these nominations.To answer them, I can state without offering any proof that what these editors claim is incorrect/inaccurate/.... Why should they believe me when I give them no proof? They would not have come to WT:CS1 were they not absolutely certain that their claim is correct so therefore, whatever I say is wrong unless I can demonstrate otherwise. Using the ~/old versions to render an example of{{cite <whatever>}}
used to render or support or ... some|<parameter>=
or something ... What happend? / Why doesn't it ... anymore?
{{cite <whatever>}}
is as close to a definitive demonstration of how the template once rendered as is possible to achieve. Yeah, sure, these editors can:
{{cite <whatever>}}
history for a pre-lua version of the template{{cite <whatever>}}
and put that article's title in the Preview page with this template boxThe result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused maps and very hard to navigate with to know the information the maps display. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:16, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep the maps are very useful in the context of territorial control. Alhanuty ( talk) 19:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep They are used to help make the maps on the actual articles Wowzers122 ( talk) 01:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep It is very useful to know who controls smaller places than the big cities, which sometimes is hard to find out.-- Andres arg ( talk) 22:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep Template detailed maps are essential in order to understand the evolution of territorial control during conflicts.-- HC PUNXKID 20:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional comments should address the rationale for deletion and nomination as well as related policy on use (or lack thereof) of templates.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
If the problem is that they are not in any article, anyone can add it on their respective page, then do so if you believe it belongs there. That's a true test to see if the community wants that template on the page. If it gets removed, then you get your answer. Gonnym ( talk) 00:44, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep These are extremely useful for determining near real-time data. the War maps Haven't been updated in months and sometimes years while the Telepate is updated quite often so it's great when trying to make a map for people both in and out of the Wikipedia community.-- Garmin21 ( talk) 20:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:United States fire departments. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Only one, the Wisconsin template, is unused. The rest contain fewer than five links needed for a navbox. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused and only links to categories which is not what navboxes are for. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:42, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
c3 and c5 are unused. C1, 2, 4 have one to two uses and should be substituted where used. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Youth Olympic venues. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
The first template is unused and contains either red links or non-related links. The four for the specific sports don't have the necessary amount of links to navigate with not counting the years of the events linked in the templates. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was userfy. Izno ( talk) 20:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
05:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure what this template is for, so delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
There aren't any drafts that use that hint right now, so maybe we can get delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It seems to be almost useless and probably obsolete. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It was supposed to be used for user discussion, but it was abandoned because no one maintained it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:47, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Never used because no one remembered him. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
It looks like a mistake. It is not used, so I think it should be deleted. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:44, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused and no updates in almost 10 years. BLAIXX 03:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)