The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
unused, duplicates table in article Frietjes ( talk) 22:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Electricity delivery. Izno ( talk) 22:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused: no transclusions or incoming links. Appears to have been replaced by {{ Electricity delivery}}. A bold redirect to that template might not be out of line, as this template has a reasonable name. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 21:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused S-line templates with over one year since the most recent edit. Nominating for deletion per this discussion; articles using S-line templates are being migrated to use Template:Adjacent stations. Also see the most recent related TFD, from October 2021. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 05:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
These are all single-use tables which could be easily merged with the parent article. There is no need to keep the table outside of the article when it could be included in the article directly. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The Baltic Fleet templates can be deleted as the respective article already has the same information in table format. The rest should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 8. Primefac ( talk) 12:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The Turgai Electoral District vote, 1917 template should be substituted onto its respective election article as it's single-use. The rest should be substituted on such articles and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Only two are used on the respective election articles and should be substituted on there. The rest should be substituted on such articles and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac ( talk) 11:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Only used on two articles and should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. While there was no participation at this particular discussion, those of similar templates above and below (Kaluga and Altai) have very similar nomination rationales and a consensus to keep. Primefac ( talk) 11:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The Caspian template can be deleted as it doesn't contain enough information. The rest should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:11, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac ( talk) 11:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Only used on two articles and should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
CPU time usage: 2.598 seconds Real time usage: 3.034 seconds Preprocessor visited node count: 15684/1000000 Post‐expand include size: 515313/2097152 bytes Template argument size: 18879/2097152 bytes Highest expansion depth: 9/40 Expensive parser function count: 1/500 Unstrip recursion depth: 1/20 Unstrip post‐expand size: 358878/5000000 bytes Lua time usage: 0.766/10.000 seconds Lua memory usage: 6344031/52428800 bytes
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
The above group are all unused table election templates created by Piyyas almost a year and half ago. Gonnym ( talk) 15:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:42, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:19, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Per the deletion discussion for gram per cubic metre, this isn't a useful template. UCUM is a standard for exchanging information about units between computer systems, not a system of units itself. The fact that it can include essentially ANY unit means that having a template for the units it can exchange is meaningless. All of these templates are unused, and that is unlikely to change. PianoDan ( talk) 19:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
I question the value of this template. There is no such thing as a "UCUM unit". UCUM is a coding system, meant to allow the representation of all units. It is not a system of units analogous to SI.. Likewise, Srleffler posted similar comments in the talk pages of other templates also. But he/she did not post at Template talk:UCUM base quantities and Template talk:UCUM base quantities/table, but he/she did make some edits at Template:UCUM base quantities and Template:UCUM base quantities/table, Template:UCUM base quantities/table. Srleffler has not said anything about Template:UCUM electromagnetism units. Neel.arunabh ( talk) 19:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused. is in the early stages of development
since 2018 with no sign of progress. See also
#Template:Unblock new/1 below.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused navigation templates for parishes that no longer exist after administrative reform of 2017. See this link (in Estonian) for details related to at least some of the parishes. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by MSGJ ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
No incoming links, no transclusions. Appears to be an abandoned experiment from 2012. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 8. Primefac ( talk) 11:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Rugby league squad start but preserve rls as a redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Rls with
Template:Rugby league squad start.
These three templates are various versions of the same template and should be merged together and/or redirected to {{
Rugby league squad start}} to avoid confusion and decentralised formatting. Note that {{
Rls start}} is pretty much unused and {{
Rls}} is the primary template, so the choice to merge to {{
rugby league squad start}} is mainly so that the final name is the most clear version (i.e. I expect everything to be merged to {{
rls}} and then that template gets moved).
Primefac (
talk) 13:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
should be transferred to the [new] template; they're still valid template names. Primefac ( talk) 10:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
{{rls}}
as a redirect.
Frietjes (
talk) 19:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Redirected all films into main film article, no longer of use Dronebogus ( talk) 12:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused sport color template Gonnym ( talk) 11:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure this template is particularly useful - all it seems to do is list one big station per EU member state using some unspecified criteria - is it supposed to be largest number of passengers? departures? something else? Either way, an uninformed reader who comes across this template might get the incorrect idea that Paris-Nord, Budapest-Keleti or Madrid-Atocha are the one and only "main station" in their respective cities which is very much misleading. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 10:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused election table template. Gonnym ( talk) 09:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused election table template. Gonnym ( talk) 09:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused election table template. Gonnym ( talk) 09:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
The above templates were started over 4 years ago by an editor that a month later stopped editing. They are all unused except in the creator's sandbox. Since they've haven't edited in over 4 years there is no point in moving this into their sandbox. Gonnym ( talk) 09:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused template with a sea of red links and a few blue links. All blue links lead to two articles National Basketball League of Canada and List of NBL Canada statistical leaders by season, both of which appear in Template:National Basketball League of Canada Gonnym ( talk) 08:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
This template is no longer in use today. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
This template should now be deleted because it is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 07:00, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Completely unnecessary, this template is not used and should be removed. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
wikipedia ads|ad=240}}
{{
WikiProject Mauritius-ad}}
{{
wikipedia ads|ad=240}}
--
65.92.246.43 (
talk) 17:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Since the template is not used, I personally feel that it should be deleted. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
There is no need for this template to exist because it is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
It is not necessary because it is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
It is not used and useless. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Not used because the template has been replaced by another template. -- Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted because it is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Could not be used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 6. Izno ( talk) 22:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
This template is unused and therefore needs to be deleted. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
No one is using the template. Maybe we should delete it. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 03:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
unused, duplicates table in article Frietjes ( talk) 22:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Electricity delivery. Izno ( talk) 22:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused: no transclusions or incoming links. Appears to have been replaced by {{ Electricity delivery}}. A bold redirect to that template might not be out of line, as this template has a reasonable name. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 21:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused S-line templates with over one year since the most recent edit. Nominating for deletion per this discussion; articles using S-line templates are being migrated to use Template:Adjacent stations. Also see the most recent related TFD, from October 2021. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 05:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
These are all single-use tables which could be easily merged with the parent article. There is no need to keep the table outside of the article when it could be included in the article directly. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The Baltic Fleet templates can be deleted as the respective article already has the same information in table format. The rest should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 8. Primefac ( talk) 12:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
All should be substituted directly on the articles for the individual election results as that is the more relevant space and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election. All the information belongs as part of the article and not on a separate space as this is really article content and should be treated as such. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The Turgai Electoral District vote, 1917 template should be substituted onto its respective election article as it's single-use. The rest should be substituted on such articles and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. See close at #Template:Caspian Electoral District deputies, 1917 below. A broader discussion of this template group as a whole may be needed. Primefac ( talk) 11:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Only two are used on the respective election articles and should be substituted on there. The rest should be substituted on such articles and be removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac ( talk) 11:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Only used on two articles and should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. While there was no participation at this particular discussion, those of similar templates above and below (Kaluga and Altai) have very similar nomination rationales and a consensus to keep. Primefac ( talk) 11:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The Caspian template can be deleted as it doesn't contain enough information. The rest should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:11, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac ( talk) 11:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Only used on two articles and should be substituted on the specific election article and removed from the Results of the 1917 Russian Constituent Assembly election due to the article being extremely long as substitution may cause article size issues. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
CPU time usage: 2.598 seconds Real time usage: 3.034 seconds Preprocessor visited node count: 15684/1000000 Post‐expand include size: 515313/2097152 bytes Template argument size: 18879/2097152 bytes Highest expansion depth: 9/40 Expensive parser function count: 1/500 Unstrip recursion depth: 1/20 Unstrip post‐expand size: 358878/5000000 bytes Lua time usage: 0.766/10.000 seconds Lua memory usage: 6344031/52428800 bytes
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
The above group are all unused table election templates created by Piyyas almost a year and half ago. Gonnym ( talk) 15:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 19:42, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:19, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Per the deletion discussion for gram per cubic metre, this isn't a useful template. UCUM is a standard for exchanging information about units between computer systems, not a system of units itself. The fact that it can include essentially ANY unit means that having a template for the units it can exchange is meaningless. All of these templates are unused, and that is unlikely to change. PianoDan ( talk) 19:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
I question the value of this template. There is no such thing as a "UCUM unit". UCUM is a coding system, meant to allow the representation of all units. It is not a system of units analogous to SI.. Likewise, Srleffler posted similar comments in the talk pages of other templates also. But he/she did not post at Template talk:UCUM base quantities and Template talk:UCUM base quantities/table, but he/she did make some edits at Template:UCUM base quantities and Template:UCUM base quantities/table, Template:UCUM base quantities/table. Srleffler has not said anything about Template:UCUM electromagnetism units. Neel.arunabh ( talk) 19:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused. is in the early stages of development
since 2018 with no sign of progress. See also
#Template:Unblock new/1 below.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused navigation templates for parishes that no longer exist after administrative reform of 2017. See this link (in Estonian) for details related to at least some of the parishes. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by MSGJ ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
No incoming links, no transclusions. Appears to be an abandoned experiment from 2012. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 8. Primefac ( talk) 11:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Rugby league squad start but preserve rls as a redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Rls with
Template:Rugby league squad start.
These three templates are various versions of the same template and should be merged together and/or redirected to {{
Rugby league squad start}} to avoid confusion and decentralised formatting. Note that {{
Rls start}} is pretty much unused and {{
Rls}} is the primary template, so the choice to merge to {{
rugby league squad start}} is mainly so that the final name is the most clear version (i.e. I expect everything to be merged to {{
rls}} and then that template gets moved).
Primefac (
talk) 13:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
should be transferred to the [new] template; they're still valid template names. Primefac ( talk) 10:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
{{rls}}
as a redirect.
Frietjes (
talk) 19:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Redirected all films into main film article, no longer of use Dronebogus ( talk) 12:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused sport color template Gonnym ( talk) 11:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure this template is particularly useful - all it seems to do is list one big station per EU member state using some unspecified criteria - is it supposed to be largest number of passengers? departures? something else? Either way, an uninformed reader who comes across this template might get the incorrect idea that Paris-Nord, Budapest-Keleti or Madrid-Atocha are the one and only "main station" in their respective cities which is very much misleading. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 10:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused election table template. Gonnym ( talk) 09:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused election table template. Gonnym ( talk) 09:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused election table template. Gonnym ( talk) 09:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
The above templates were started over 4 years ago by an editor that a month later stopped editing. They are all unused except in the creator's sandbox. Since they've haven't edited in over 4 years there is no point in moving this into their sandbox. Gonnym ( talk) 09:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused template with a sea of red links and a few blue links. All blue links lead to two articles National Basketball League of Canada and List of NBL Canada statistical leaders by season, both of which appear in Template:National Basketball League of Canada Gonnym ( talk) 08:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
This template is no longer in use today. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
This template should now be deleted because it is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 07:00, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Completely unnecessary, this template is not used and should be removed. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
wikipedia ads|ad=240}}
{{
WikiProject Mauritius-ad}}
{{
wikipedia ads|ad=240}}
--
65.92.246.43 (
talk) 17:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Since the template is not used, I personally feel that it should be deleted. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
There is no need for this template to exist because it is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
It is not necessary because it is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
It is not used and useless. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Not used because the template has been replaced by another template. -- Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted because it is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Could not be used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 6. Izno ( talk) 22:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 06:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
This template is unused and therefore needs to be deleted. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
No one is using the template. Maybe we should delete it. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 03:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)