The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused poorly designed map template. Can't aid in navigating through the articles. Should be left to any relevant navboxes. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused railway route templates with no mainspace for use. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused and the topic is already better covered by Template:Jews in Greece that has all the same links for the specific topic. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused tracklist that's not necessary as the articles are already better navigated by Template:Red Velvet - Irene & Seulgi. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Nothing but redlinks. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
An unused template with no direct links to any tabletop games. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
A unnecessary navbox with no real links to any events. Redundant to Template:Basketball at the 1992 Summer Olympics. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 23. Izno ( talk) 23:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
An unused duplicate of Template:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Omaha at least for the links which are featured in the latter template. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused template with no text other than two categories. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused chart tree and navbox that's unnecessary as Template:Mughal Empire features all the same links to the emperors' articles.
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused navbox and fails NEAN with only three links. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
World Soccer is a magazine and its rankings are not notable in the truest sense that it deserves navboxes for its rankings for what they consider the greatest individuals in the sport's history. This falls under Francruft and is not needed. Nor are these awards templates despite being categorized as such, but also the information is already featured in list format on World Soccer's article. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused sidebar that's not used at all currently for good article nominations. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused navbox for a sports team that didn't win a championship but qualified for a tournament it didn't end up winning. This isn't needed. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Only links to two articles. Doesn't seem to serve any functional purpose. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 18:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Not a standard template and was probably a test. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 17:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Only edit was creation in 2012. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Only substantive edit was creation in 2006. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Only edit was creation in 2016. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
These are user-specific templates that have duplicates at User:Denimadept/Da-not1 and User:Denimadept/Da-vandal1, both of which work fine. See User talk:Denimadept#Unusual templates for my attempt to explain to this editor why these pages do not need to exist, and should not exist, in Template space. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 16:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused, redlinks, and too early as we're not anywhere near 2024. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused templates that are not topic templates. These just link to the countries in the respective geographical divisions of Asia. And we don't each geographical region topic templates when the main continent-based topic templates cover the entire continent already. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
[Note: I have commented out some template examples below in order to fix the PEIS expansion limit problem on the TFD page. Editors can copy the examples to their sandboxes to see how these unused templates are intended to work. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused table format template. Not sure if the table deserves to be in template format because its scope is pretty limited. One article, Carolean 1719, is not a deadly storm. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 16:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused and fails NEAN. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 16:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused with the only major edit being its creation. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 16:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused with a sea full of redlinks. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Redundant to Template:Police brutality topics sidebar which is being used. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 14:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 23. Izno ( talk) 16:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
All are now unused. Other templates from this set nominated here and here. Gonnym ( talk) 11:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 06:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This type of template is no longer in use because WP:NIQQUD has been resolved. Q28 ( talk) 05:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 06:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Not used since 2017.,,, Q28 ( talk) 05:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 06:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Oh, okay, but the template is not used. Q28 ( talk) 05:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. As a passing completely unrelated note, expanding templates in Lua is relatively expensive; from what I know the module of interest in this discussion has had issues hitting the Lua timeout, so this would be an easy win for performance. Izno ( talk) 06:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused. The embedded content of this template is 0 due to an error in the module. Please fix this error and then I can withdraw a nomination. Q28 ( talk) 05:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
|machine code=dagger
):
getTaxonInfoItem
in
Module:Autotaxobox. In particular, it should be noted that the code there essentially turns requests for the dagger
item into an alternate rendering of the extinct
item (much like the template this TfD is about does). So effectively
Template:Don't edit this line dagger is unused (although it does function properly as
Peter coxhead mentioned above). I see no real bugs. That said, I also see very little usefulness of the entire variant set. In a fashion similar to how getTaxonInfoItem
handles dagger
, it could be made to make requests for all such data items as alternative renderings of all
and we could be done with all of those templates except the main one and all
(although it might make more sense to make a different one for the "all" to keep; perhaps |machine code=json
and then put the result through mw.text.jsonDecode
to auto parse into a Lua table). Use of such to fetch the data could also be entirely dispensed with if the module code just directly parsed the content of the taxonomy templates itself (via something like mw.title.new("Template:Taxonomy"):subPageTitle(taxon):getContent()
). Of course parsing general wikitext can be non-trivial. —
Uzume (
talk)
17:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)getTaxonInfoItem
. I'm also not clear why parsing the entire taxonomy template every time a single field is required would be more efficient or effective that the present use of a separate template for each field.The result of the discussion was redirect to User:DYKUpdateBot/REMOVE THIS LINE. Izno ( talk) 06:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
It was confirmed that the template was no longer used because it was superseded by User:DYKUpdateBot/REMOVE THIS LINE. Q28 ( talk) 05:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete per G7. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 19:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This template is no longer used because of some functional changes. Q28 ( talk) 04:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
According to the existing data, the template has not been used since 2015. Q28 ( talk) 04:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 16:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused election table template. Gonnym ( talk) 13:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
15:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused templates that group together two or more templates that are being used. Don't see the necessity in grouping these templates under the ATC subject when the individual templates are already doing the job. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 23. Izno ( talk) 07:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 23. Izno ( talk) 07:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused poorly designed map template. Can't aid in navigating through the articles. Should be left to any relevant navboxes. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused railway route templates with no mainspace for use. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused and the topic is already better covered by Template:Jews in Greece that has all the same links for the specific topic. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused tracklist that's not necessary as the articles are already better navigated by Template:Red Velvet - Irene & Seulgi. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Nothing but redlinks. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
An unused template with no direct links to any tabletop games. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
A unnecessary navbox with no real links to any events. Redundant to Template:Basketball at the 1992 Summer Olympics. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 23. Izno ( talk) 23:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
An unused duplicate of Template:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Omaha at least for the links which are featured in the latter template. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused template with no text other than two categories. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused chart tree and navbox that's unnecessary as Template:Mughal Empire features all the same links to the emperors' articles.
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 23:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused navbox and fails NEAN with only three links. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
World Soccer is a magazine and its rankings are not notable in the truest sense that it deserves navboxes for its rankings for what they consider the greatest individuals in the sport's history. This falls under Francruft and is not needed. Nor are these awards templates despite being categorized as such, but also the information is already featured in list format on World Soccer's article. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused sidebar that's not used at all currently for good article nominations. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused navbox for a sports team that didn't win a championship but qualified for a tournament it didn't end up winning. This isn't needed. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Only links to two articles. Doesn't seem to serve any functional purpose. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 18:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Not a standard template and was probably a test. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 17:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Only edit was creation in 2012. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Only substantive edit was creation in 2006. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Only edit was creation in 2016. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
These are user-specific templates that have duplicates at User:Denimadept/Da-not1 and User:Denimadept/Da-vandal1, both of which work fine. See User talk:Denimadept#Unusual templates for my attempt to explain to this editor why these pages do not need to exist, and should not exist, in Template space. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 16:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused, redlinks, and too early as we're not anywhere near 2024. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused templates that are not topic templates. These just link to the countries in the respective geographical divisions of Asia. And we don't each geographical region topic templates when the main continent-based topic templates cover the entire continent already. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
[Note: I have commented out some template examples below in order to fix the PEIS expansion limit problem on the TFD page. Editors can copy the examples to their sandboxes to see how these unused templates are intended to work. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 19:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 20:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused table format template. Not sure if the table deserves to be in template format because its scope is pretty limited. One article, Carolean 1719, is not a deadly storm. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 16:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused and fails NEAN. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 16:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused with the only major edit being its creation. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 16:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused with a sea full of redlinks. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Redundant to Template:Police brutality topics sidebar which is being used. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 14:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 23. Izno ( talk) 16:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
All are now unused. Other templates from this set nominated here and here. Gonnym ( talk) 11:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 06:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
This type of template is no longer in use because WP:NIQQUD has been resolved. Q28 ( talk) 05:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 06:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Not used since 2017.,,, Q28 ( talk) 05:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 06:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Oh, okay, but the template is not used. Q28 ( talk) 05:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. As a passing completely unrelated note, expanding templates in Lua is relatively expensive; from what I know the module of interest in this discussion has had issues hitting the Lua timeout, so this would be an easy win for performance. Izno ( talk) 06:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused. The embedded content of this template is 0 due to an error in the module. Please fix this error and then I can withdraw a nomination. Q28 ( talk) 05:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
|machine code=dagger
):
getTaxonInfoItem
in
Module:Autotaxobox. In particular, it should be noted that the code there essentially turns requests for the dagger
item into an alternate rendering of the extinct
item (much like the template this TfD is about does). So effectively
Template:Don't edit this line dagger is unused (although it does function properly as
Peter coxhead mentioned above). I see no real bugs. That said, I also see very little usefulness of the entire variant set. In a fashion similar to how getTaxonInfoItem
handles dagger
, it could be made to make requests for all such data items as alternative renderings of all
and we could be done with all of those templates except the main one and all
(although it might make more sense to make a different one for the "all" to keep; perhaps |machine code=json
and then put the result through mw.text.jsonDecode
to auto parse into a Lua table). Use of such to fetch the data could also be entirely dispensed with if the module code just directly parsed the content of the taxonomy templates itself (via something like mw.title.new("Template:Taxonomy"):subPageTitle(taxon):getContent()
). Of course parsing general wikitext can be non-trivial. —
Uzume (
talk)
17:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)getTaxonInfoItem
. I'm also not clear why parsing the entire taxonomy template every time a single field is required would be more efficient or effective that the present use of a separate template for each field.The result of the discussion was redirect to User:DYKUpdateBot/REMOVE THIS LINE. Izno ( talk) 06:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
It was confirmed that the template was no longer used because it was superseded by User:DYKUpdateBot/REMOVE THIS LINE. Q28 ( talk) 05:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete per G7. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 19:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This template is no longer used because of some functional changes. Q28 ( talk) 04:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
According to the existing data, the template has not been used since 2015. Q28 ( talk) 04:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 16:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused election table template. Gonnym ( talk) 13:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk)
15:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused templates that group together two or more templates that are being used. Don't see the necessity in grouping these templates under the ATC subject when the individual templates are already doing the job. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 23. Izno ( talk) 07:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 23. Izno ( talk) 07:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)