The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User page. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears ( talk) 20:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:User page mbox and
Template:User talk page mbox with
Template:User page.
Template:User page/sandbox can now support this style with the parameter |style=no
. See
Template:User page/testcases#Default Mbox look for examples.
Gonnym (
talk)
12:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 17. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears ( talk) 21:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 20. Primefac ( talk) 14:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Digestive system and abdomen symptoms and signs. Primefac ( talk) 19:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Eponymous medical signs for digestive system and general abdominal signs with
Template:Digestive system and abdomen symptoms and signs.
In line with the general approach to merge eponymous medical signs and symptoms templates, I propose that these are merged. Benefits are:
A merged template can be well organised and, whilst expanding in size, is likely to be of much greater help to readers than the current unhelpful division. Tom (LT) ( talk) 02:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was split as proposed, reasonable nomination and no opposition. Primefac ( talk) 19:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
This very broad template should be deleted and split into two smaller templates with a more narrow range. This will help the content be organised, help narrow the scope, and make the navboxes easier for readers to access and use:
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Reasonable nomination, no opposition. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac ( talk) 19:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
This template should be deleted. It is a list of tumours that, when viewed under a microscope, appear small and blue. This does not lead to any meaningful links between the topics and only really helps as an aid to diagnosis for histopathologists. In doing this, it violates WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. This template should simply be deleted. The contents are already contained within the article Small-blue-round-cell tumor. Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was split as proposed; no opposition, reasonable nomination. Primefac ( talk) 19:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
I propose this template is deleted, because it is very broad and difficult to use to navigate. That's because it contains two conceptually different concepts. It should be split to reflect this into:
Following this, the template will be much easier to use for navigation, as well as more targeted. Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User page. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears ( talk) 20:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:User page mbox and
Template:User talk page mbox with
Template:User page.
Template:User page/sandbox can now support this style with the parameter |style=no
. See
Template:User page/testcases#Default Mbox look for examples.
Gonnym (
talk)
12:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 17. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears ( talk) 21:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 20. Primefac ( talk) 14:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Digestive system and abdomen symptoms and signs. Primefac ( talk) 19:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Eponymous medical signs for digestive system and general abdominal signs with
Template:Digestive system and abdomen symptoms and signs.
In line with the general approach to merge eponymous medical signs and symptoms templates, I propose that these are merged. Benefits are:
A merged template can be well organised and, whilst expanding in size, is likely to be of much greater help to readers than the current unhelpful division. Tom (LT) ( talk) 02:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was split as proposed, reasonable nomination and no opposition. Primefac ( talk) 19:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
This very broad template should be deleted and split into two smaller templates with a more narrow range. This will help the content be organised, help narrow the scope, and make the navboxes easier for readers to access and use:
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Reasonable nomination, no opposition. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac ( talk) 19:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
This template should be deleted. It is a list of tumours that, when viewed under a microscope, appear small and blue. This does not lead to any meaningful links between the topics and only really helps as an aid to diagnosis for histopathologists. In doing this, it violates WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. This template should simply be deleted. The contents are already contained within the article Small-blue-round-cell tumor. Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was split as proposed; no opposition, reasonable nomination. Primefac ( talk) 19:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
I propose this template is deleted, because it is very broad and difficult to use to navigate. That's because it contains two conceptually different concepts. It should be split to reflect this into:
Following this, the template will be much easier to use for navigation, as well as more targeted. Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)