The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 02:27, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
S-line templates for the Cape Cod and Hyannis Railroad, Cape Cod Central Railroad, and Amtrak's Cape Codder. Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Cape Cod and Hyannis Railroad, Module:Adjacent stations/Cape Cod Central Railroad, and Module:Adjacent stations/Amtrak. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with no parent article. WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unsued navbox. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox. WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with mostly redlinks and plaintext Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. NPASR if a different rationale is used. Primefac ( talk) 19:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with only 2 links. WP:NENAN. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Borgarde has added it to multiple articles. No reason to delete now. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox that violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with mostly redlinks. Violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with mostly redlinks. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 21. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 01:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 21. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 09:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused subpage that seems to be replaced by /sandbox Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 24. Primefac ( talk) 14:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with only redlinks. Violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with only 3 links Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with mostly redlinks and plaintext. Violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with only 1 link Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. The template was renamed to Template:Hapur district among other things. (non-admin closure) – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 22:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with only redlinks. Violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with no parent article and mostly redlinks Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 01:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox that violates WP:ACCESS Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 02:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Boston Surface Railroad. All transclusions updated. Mackensen (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. From the discussion, it appears that this template (or at least its content) are (or could be) useful, and the debate is really about whether said content should be "properly" transcluded (not linked) or merged/integrated into a different location. On this front no one seems to agree; a wider audience may be required to make that decision. Primefac ( talk) 14:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Ununsed template, no reason to keep it around. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus for outright deletion, consensus for a wrapper. There are several arguments being made on both sides of this discussion, some more relevant than others (listed below).
Taking the above into consideration, there are about even numbers for keeping and deleting, with (oddly enough) about half of each camp stating that a wrapper might be an acceptable compromise. Since converting to a wrapper is fairly close to a "true merge" (i.e. converting to a redirect after merging any missing params), this swings the overall consensus in that direction. Per my standard suggestion for large/complex cases such as this one, I encourage both sides of the debate to discuss the implementation of the wrapper creation on the talk page in order to ensure that everything important is included in the final product. Primefac ( talk) 14:53, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Replace with {{ Infobox settlement}}. At the very least this should be converted to a wrapper template. Yes this was previously nominated 10 years ago, but lots has changed since then. Additionally, it is not likely that there will be any new US states so shouldn't need to be maintained on new pages. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country .... US states clearly are
subdivision[s] below the level of a country. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 21:55, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Slowly all of the templates that should be merged, will get nominated, I specifically said nominated, which was in response to Bilcat, who said
Just as we still have Template:Infobox French region and Template:Infobox province or territory of Canada, etc, which oddly aren't being proposed for merger. As I said, slowly the big list is being nominated, whether those pass or not is a different story, but opposing as two templates haven't been nominated yet is just missing the whole point. -- Gonnym ( talk) 22:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country ...? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I agree with the earlier statements that U.S. states are not settlements.- it was not claimed in the proposal that they are. 78.54.186.169 ( talk) 06:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
"for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Additionally, it is not likely that there will be any new US states so shouldn't need to be maintained on new pages.[ emphasis added. I don't consider it to be as valid a reason to replace as the arguement that it is redundant. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 20:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
I just think it's odd just to single out them as a redundant template- is that the reason behind your vote? It has not been done, so you can change your vote. To the contrary, the articles about the U.S. states belong to the very few articles about territorial entities that have an infobox which is not rendered by Infobox settlement. 89.12.172.247 ( talk) 09:42, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
|anthem=
(could also make a |state_song=
so it will replace the text when used); Capital -> |seat=
(see
Bavaria); LargestCity and LargestMetro can be relevant for a lot of other places and is not something unique to a US state; AdmittanceDate and AdmittanceOrder as been pointed out above are useful for other places and is not something that is unique to a US state; AreaRank, PopRank, DensityRank and IncomeRank might be the only unique parameters for a US state (haven't checked this, so this could also be relevant to other places). But these two can be added. --
Gonnym (
talk)
21:02, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
|population_rank=
already exists, as do |population_density_rank=
, |area_rank=
. For next time, if you argue a parameter does not exist, please actually check so others don't need to do it for you. Seeing as how all but income already exists or is useful for other locations and are not unique to a US state, your argument for uniqueness does not hold water. --
Gonnym (
talk)
12:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
|OfficialLang =
, |Languages =
, |LargestCity=
, |LargestMetro =
, |MedianHouseholdIncome =
, |IncomeRank=
, |Former=
, |AdmittanceDate =
, |AdmittanceOrder =
, |Legislature =
, |Upperchamber =
, |Lowerchamber =
, |Senators =
, |Representatives =
, and |TradAbbreviation =
? Or are you saying add those fields to IB settlement, where they will be used by 50 pages and not used by 499,950+?
Leviv
ich
16:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus with a lean towards keeping (6 to 3 for keep with the opposition making valid points). There is NPASR if the RFC on storing template data determines that these sorts of templates should not be used. Primefac ( talk) 20:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a valid way to store data. The population should either be directly placed on the page or stored in WikiData. Not maintained in this sort of template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
"© Thüringer Landesamt für Statistik, Europaplatz 3, 99091 Erfurt – Postfach 90 01 63, 99104 Erfurt". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
"very useful system where we can easily put data, instantly updating all relevant articles where the data is transcluded [...] efficiency"Yes, you describe Wikidata perfectly. Multiple templates on individual Wikipedias is not efficient. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:00, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
"there is no central database on Wikidata "Wikidata is a database; as I told you in this very thread, on 23 February. It includes data on all municipalities in the German states, and much more besides. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
<ref>...</ref>
generated are bare and not in line with best practice formatting of references. --
Michael Bednarek (
talk)
01:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)References
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 02:27, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
S-line templates for the Cape Cod and Hyannis Railroad, Cape Cod Central Railroad, and Amtrak's Cape Codder. Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Cape Cod and Hyannis Railroad, Module:Adjacent stations/Cape Cod Central Railroad, and Module:Adjacent stations/Amtrak. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with no parent article. WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with no parent article. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unsued navbox. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox. WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with mostly redlinks and plaintext Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. NPASR if a different rationale is used. Primefac ( talk) 19:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with only 2 links. WP:NENAN. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Borgarde has added it to multiple articles. No reason to delete now. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox that violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with mostly redlinks. Violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with mostly redlinks. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 21. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 01:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 21. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 09:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused subpage that seems to be replaced by /sandbox Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 24. Primefac ( talk) 14:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with only redlinks. Violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with only 3 links Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with mostly redlinks and plaintext. Violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with only 1 link Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. The template was renamed to Template:Hapur district among other things. (non-admin closure) – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 22:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with only redlinks. Violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with no parent article and mostly redlinks Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 01:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox that violates WP:ACCESS Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with no parent article Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 02:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Boston Surface Railroad. All transclusions updated. Mackensen (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 March 9. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. From the discussion, it appears that this template (or at least its content) are (or could be) useful, and the debate is really about whether said content should be "properly" transcluded (not linked) or merged/integrated into a different location. On this front no one seems to agree; a wider audience may be required to make that decision. Primefac ( talk) 14:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Ununsed template, no reason to keep it around. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus for outright deletion, consensus for a wrapper. There are several arguments being made on both sides of this discussion, some more relevant than others (listed below).
Taking the above into consideration, there are about even numbers for keeping and deleting, with (oddly enough) about half of each camp stating that a wrapper might be an acceptable compromise. Since converting to a wrapper is fairly close to a "true merge" (i.e. converting to a redirect after merging any missing params), this swings the overall consensus in that direction. Per my standard suggestion for large/complex cases such as this one, I encourage both sides of the debate to discuss the implementation of the wrapper creation on the talk page in order to ensure that everything important is included in the final product. Primefac ( talk) 14:53, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Replace with {{ Infobox settlement}}. At the very least this should be converted to a wrapper template. Yes this was previously nominated 10 years ago, but lots has changed since then. Additionally, it is not likely that there will be any new US states so shouldn't need to be maintained on new pages. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country .... US states clearly are
subdivision[s] below the level of a country. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 21:55, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Slowly all of the templates that should be merged, will get nominated, I specifically said nominated, which was in response to Bilcat, who said
Just as we still have Template:Infobox French region and Template:Infobox province or territory of Canada, etc, which oddly aren't being proposed for merger. As I said, slowly the big list is being nominated, whether those pass or not is a different story, but opposing as two templates haven't been nominated yet is just missing the whole point. -- Gonnym ( talk) 22:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country ...? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I agree with the earlier statements that U.S. states are not settlements.- it was not claimed in the proposal that they are. 78.54.186.169 ( talk) 06:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
"for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Additionally, it is not likely that there will be any new US states so shouldn't need to be maintained on new pages.[ emphasis added. I don't consider it to be as valid a reason to replace as the arguement that it is redundant. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 20:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
I just think it's odd just to single out them as a redundant template- is that the reason behind your vote? It has not been done, so you can change your vote. To the contrary, the articles about the U.S. states belong to the very few articles about territorial entities that have an infobox which is not rendered by Infobox settlement. 89.12.172.247 ( talk) 09:42, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
|anthem=
(could also make a |state_song=
so it will replace the text when used); Capital -> |seat=
(see
Bavaria); LargestCity and LargestMetro can be relevant for a lot of other places and is not something unique to a US state; AdmittanceDate and AdmittanceOrder as been pointed out above are useful for other places and is not something that is unique to a US state; AreaRank, PopRank, DensityRank and IncomeRank might be the only unique parameters for a US state (haven't checked this, so this could also be relevant to other places). But these two can be added. --
Gonnym (
talk)
21:02, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
|population_rank=
already exists, as do |population_density_rank=
, |area_rank=
. For next time, if you argue a parameter does not exist, please actually check so others don't need to do it for you. Seeing as how all but income already exists or is useful for other locations and are not unique to a US state, your argument for uniqueness does not hold water. --
Gonnym (
talk)
12:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
|OfficialLang =
, |Languages =
, |LargestCity=
, |LargestMetro =
, |MedianHouseholdIncome =
, |IncomeRank=
, |Former=
, |AdmittanceDate =
, |AdmittanceOrder =
, |Legislature =
, |Upperchamber =
, |Lowerchamber =
, |Senators =
, |Representatives =
, and |TradAbbreviation =
? Or are you saying add those fields to IB settlement, where they will be used by 50 pages and not used by 499,950+?
Leviv
ich
16:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus with a lean towards keeping (6 to 3 for keep with the opposition making valid points). There is NPASR if the RFC on storing template data determines that these sorts of templates should not be used. Primefac ( talk) 20:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Not a valid way to store data. The population should either be directly placed on the page or stored in WikiData. Not maintained in this sort of template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
"© Thüringer Landesamt für Statistik, Europaplatz 3, 99091 Erfurt – Postfach 90 01 63, 99104 Erfurt". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
"very useful system where we can easily put data, instantly updating all relevant articles where the data is transcluded [...] efficiency"Yes, you describe Wikidata perfectly. Multiple templates on individual Wikipedias is not efficient. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:00, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
"there is no central database on Wikidata "Wikidata is a database; as I told you in this very thread, on 23 February. It includes data on all municipalities in the German states, and much more besides. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
<ref>...</ref>
generated are bare and not in line with best practice formatting of references. --
Michael Bednarek (
talk)
01:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)References