The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Article was deleted. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 20:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ahnentafel. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:S-fam with
Template:Ahnentafel.
Template:Ahnentafel is a result of a merge of previous similar templates for different numbers of ancestors to include. Then there is the old
Template:S-fam, used as seen in
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Genealogy#Templates. However, one could argue that one, standardised ancestry chart is sufficient for convenience. Possibily - but I hesitate -
Template:Ahnentafel could include style elements of the
Template:S-fam solution (in fact
Template:S-anc, more properly speaking). Either way, though, it seems to me that the
Template:S-fam could and should be dropped altogether. Shouldn't one solution suffice, with a standardised look agreed upon? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
PPEMES (
talk •
contribs)
00:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
{{
ahnentafel}}
they are free to do so whether this template exists or not. However if it is deleted then editors are no longer able to choose to use this style. I fail to see what advantage to the project is gained by reducing editor choice. --
PBS (
talk)
19:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC){{
ahnentafel}}
can handle right to left trees (like this one does). Add code to {{
ahnentafel}}
and then discuss deletion of this template. --
PBS (
talk)
19:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)The result of the discussion was Convert to {{ Infobox settlement}} wrapper. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
This infobox can be turned into an {{ Infobox settlement}} wrapper; see the test cases. (Not a deletion proposal). eh bien mon prince ( talk) 18:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Zero active links -- wooden superman 13:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
One active link. -- wooden superman 13:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:23, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
One active link -- wooden superman 13:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
No active links -- wooden superman 13:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Links to zero articles -- wooden superman 13:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. See above — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:25, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Template is a sea of redlinks. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Little navigational use: of 6 entries, 2 are redlinks and 2 are off topic relating to the US rather than Guam. Jellyman ( talk) 20:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 7. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Article was deleted. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 20:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ahnentafel. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:S-fam with
Template:Ahnentafel.
Template:Ahnentafel is a result of a merge of previous similar templates for different numbers of ancestors to include. Then there is the old
Template:S-fam, used as seen in
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Genealogy#Templates. However, one could argue that one, standardised ancestry chart is sufficient for convenience. Possibily - but I hesitate -
Template:Ahnentafel could include style elements of the
Template:S-fam solution (in fact
Template:S-anc, more properly speaking). Either way, though, it seems to me that the
Template:S-fam could and should be dropped altogether. Shouldn't one solution suffice, with a standardised look agreed upon? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
PPEMES (
talk •
contribs)
00:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
{{
ahnentafel}}
they are free to do so whether this template exists or not. However if it is deleted then editors are no longer able to choose to use this style. I fail to see what advantage to the project is gained by reducing editor choice. --
PBS (
talk)
19:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC){{
ahnentafel}}
can handle right to left trees (like this one does). Add code to {{
ahnentafel}}
and then discuss deletion of this template. --
PBS (
talk)
19:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)The result of the discussion was Convert to {{ Infobox settlement}} wrapper. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
This infobox can be turned into an {{ Infobox settlement}} wrapper; see the test cases. (Not a deletion proposal). eh bien mon prince ( talk) 18:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Zero active links -- wooden superman 13:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
One active link. -- wooden superman 13:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:23, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
One active link -- wooden superman 13:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
No active links -- wooden superman 13:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Links to zero articles -- wooden superman 13:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. See above — JJMC89 ( T· C) 04:25, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Template is a sea of redlinks. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Little navigational use: of 6 entries, 2 are redlinks and 2 are off topic relating to the US rather than Guam. Jellyman ( talk) 20:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 7. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)