The result of the discussion was no consensus. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 06:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Already covered by "disruptive editing" so we don't need this poorly worded, almost entirely unused template. There is no "highjacking" policy so this isn't backed by anything really. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/NICTD and Module:Adjacent stations/Chicago South Shore and South Bend Railroad. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 18:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 29. Primefac ( talk) 18:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. Valid reasons were given for getting rid of the module coding as unnecessary. Primefac ( talk) 18:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Mli,
Template:Mlix,
Template:Module link and
Template:Mlx.
{{
mlx}} and {{
mlix}} have the same function, {{
module link}}/{{
ml}} and {{
mlx}} should also have the same function ({{
module link}} shouldn't have the code tags it currently has, as {{
mlx}} is meant for that). We should keep the documentations pages of {{
mlix}} and {{
mli}} as they are more complete but we should keep {{
module link}}/{{
ml}} and {{
mlx}} as the names are shorter and follow similar naming to the {{
tl}} family of templates. I'm also proposing that {{
mlx}} should be replaced with {{#invoke:Module link|link}} and {{
module link}} should be replaced with {{#invoke:Module link|link|code=yes}} to take advantage of
Module:Module link. The module provides several advantages including allowing for an unlimited number to parameters and removing Module: and module: from the input. –
BrandonXLF
(t@lk)
20:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
<code>...</code>
. –
BrandonXLF
(t@lk)
04:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. The lack of use after 3+ years tips the scales ever so slightly into a weak consensus to delete. Primefac ( talk) 17:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
This is unused and this is not a barnstar; it is a picture with a caption. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 20:39, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 29. Primefac ( talk) 04:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused. Intended for use with {{ Infobox station}}; they were all created on the same day by a user who has made no other edits. Mackensen (talk) 00:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 06:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Already covered by "disruptive editing" so we don't need this poorly worded, almost entirely unused template. There is no "highjacking" policy so this isn't backed by anything really. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/NICTD and Module:Adjacent stations/Chicago South Shore and South Bend Railroad. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 18:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 29. Primefac ( talk) 18:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge. Valid reasons were given for getting rid of the module coding as unnecessary. Primefac ( talk) 18:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Mli,
Template:Mlix,
Template:Module link and
Template:Mlx.
{{
mlx}} and {{
mlix}} have the same function, {{
module link}}/{{
ml}} and {{
mlx}} should also have the same function ({{
module link}} shouldn't have the code tags it currently has, as {{
mlx}} is meant for that). We should keep the documentations pages of {{
mlix}} and {{
mli}} as they are more complete but we should keep {{
module link}}/{{
ml}} and {{
mlx}} as the names are shorter and follow similar naming to the {{
tl}} family of templates. I'm also proposing that {{
mlx}} should be replaced with {{#invoke:Module link|link}} and {{
module link}} should be replaced with {{#invoke:Module link|link|code=yes}} to take advantage of
Module:Module link. The module provides several advantages including allowing for an unlimited number to parameters and removing Module: and module: from the input. –
BrandonXLF
(t@lk)
20:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
<code>...</code>
. –
BrandonXLF
(t@lk)
04:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. The lack of use after 3+ years tips the scales ever so slightly into a weak consensus to delete. Primefac ( talk) 17:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
This is unused and this is not a barnstar; it is a picture with a caption. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 20:39, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 29. Primefac ( talk) 04:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused. Intended for use with {{ Infobox station}}; they were all created on the same day by a user who has made no other edits. Mackensen (talk) 00:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)