The result of the discussion was speedy keep. This looks like the continuation of the same Kurdish-related disruption campaign that saw me protect many tens of related articles. It is apparent that not a single established user in this discussion has expressed a preference to see this template deleted. At any case, Trappist the monk's explanation is more than thorough. Note that mass removal of this template from pages will be responded to harshly. El_C 16:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
This template is confusing: First it is a redirect to Kurdish languages because Kurdish language is also a redirect to Kurdish languages. Therefore the template should be named and linked correctly to Kurdish languages. Second, which of the Kurdish languages is meant here and which script is used? For example Kurds from Iraq and Turkey use different scriptes. Thirdly, according to this source only Gurani and Sulaymani is called Kurdi. The other languages spoken by Kurds have different names. [1] I think in this state it should be deleted. Marcel Schelzer ( talk) 15:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
ku
) which the ISO 639 custodians have defined to be Kurdish. The template cannot and should not invent more specifics than that. At
Kurdish languages, the individual language codes associated with ISO 639-2/-3 (kur
) are:
{{
lang-hac}}
template but this code is supported by {{lang}}
{{lang-??}}
templates have |script=
which takes an
ISO 15924 script code.{{
lang-kmr}}
, {{
lang-ckb}}
, {{
lang-sdh}}
etc.) are accurate, precise and completely sufficient. But with this misleading template, should you sometimes choose between Kurmanji, or Sorani or Laki? —
Futebul (
talk) 19:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
No documentation shown. -- Bank Bank Robbery started a robbery ( 🚨) 09:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
The individual shows were deemed not notable at this mass AfD, and were all deleted and turned into redirects to the parent article, Sydney New Year's Eve. Since the individual events are all now redirects to the parent, the navbox is no longer necessary. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:45, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet the criteria at WP:NAVBOX. One giveaway is that there is no main topic article at Black cartoons or a similar title (at least none that I could find). These articles are fine in subcategories of Category:Black cartoons. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 02:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
If not for the navigation template, an editor would be inclined to link many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles.) and the scope is broad enough that the template would eventually become enormous if properly populated. — MarkH21 talk 05:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:44, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
The template groups the sub-articles in a manner consistent with 18th and 19th century Biblical terminology for race, which is now obsolete (as sourced at Semitic peoples). The only non-obsolete use of the term is in linguistics, and we already have two relevant navboxes for those ( Template:Semitic languages and Template:Modern Semitic languages). I have not notified others as all three of the creator and the other two top editors of the template are blocked editors. Onceinawhile ( talk) 00:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. This looks like the continuation of the same Kurdish-related disruption campaign that saw me protect many tens of related articles. It is apparent that not a single established user in this discussion has expressed a preference to see this template deleted. At any case, Trappist the monk's explanation is more than thorough. Note that mass removal of this template from pages will be responded to harshly. El_C 16:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
This template is confusing: First it is a redirect to Kurdish languages because Kurdish language is also a redirect to Kurdish languages. Therefore the template should be named and linked correctly to Kurdish languages. Second, which of the Kurdish languages is meant here and which script is used? For example Kurds from Iraq and Turkey use different scriptes. Thirdly, according to this source only Gurani and Sulaymani is called Kurdi. The other languages spoken by Kurds have different names. [1] I think in this state it should be deleted. Marcel Schelzer ( talk) 15:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
ku
) which the ISO 639 custodians have defined to be Kurdish. The template cannot and should not invent more specifics than that. At
Kurdish languages, the individual language codes associated with ISO 639-2/-3 (kur
) are:
{{
lang-hac}}
template but this code is supported by {{lang}}
{{lang-??}}
templates have |script=
which takes an
ISO 15924 script code.{{
lang-kmr}}
, {{
lang-ckb}}
, {{
lang-sdh}}
etc.) are accurate, precise and completely sufficient. But with this misleading template, should you sometimes choose between Kurmanji, or Sorani or Laki? —
Futebul (
talk) 19:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
No documentation shown. -- Bank Bank Robbery started a robbery ( 🚨) 09:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
The individual shows were deemed not notable at this mass AfD, and were all deleted and turned into redirects to the parent article, Sydney New Year's Eve. Since the individual events are all now redirects to the parent, the navbox is no longer necessary. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:45, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet the criteria at WP:NAVBOX. One giveaway is that there is no main topic article at Black cartoons or a similar title (at least none that I could find). These articles are fine in subcategories of Category:Black cartoons. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 02:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
If not for the navigation template, an editor would be inclined to link many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles.) and the scope is broad enough that the template would eventually become enormous if properly populated. — MarkH21 talk 05:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:44, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
The template groups the sub-articles in a manner consistent with 18th and 19th century Biblical terminology for race, which is now obsolete (as sourced at Semitic peoples). The only non-obsolete use of the term is in linguistics, and we already have two relevant navboxes for those ( Template:Semitic languages and Template:Modern Semitic languages). I have not notified others as all three of the creator and the other two top editors of the template are blocked editors. Onceinawhile ( talk) 00:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)