The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The team no longer exists; it ceased operations after the 2017 season. The template is no longer used or needed. NatureBoyMD ( talk) 22:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:15, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Unnecessary; just use a #ifeq
statement on
the template on which it is used
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk)
15:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Just confirmed with tests, template code gives same limit with #ifeq
, I agree for deletion, indeed they are unnecessary.
ManosHacker
talk
16:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Navbox and sidebar (adjacent TfD nomination) are largely duplicative and consist mostly of non-notable entries, the result of premature splits from their parent article. Most have been redirected. There aren't enough child items to warrant a navigation template, nevertheless two. czar 14:56, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Sidebar and navbox (adjacent TfD nomination) are largely duplicative and consist mostly of non-notable entries, the result of premature splits from their parent article. Most have been redirected. There aren't enough child items to warrant a navigation template, nevertheless two. czar 14:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete one and don't delete the other one Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:8TeamBracket-2Legs with
Template:8TeamBracket-2Leg-NoSeeds.
These two template are the same usage.
Hhhhhkohhhhh (
talk)
16:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
|noseeds=y
as shown
here and replace {{
8TeamBracket-2Leg-NoSeeds}} with {{
8TeamBracket-2Leg}} with |noseeds=y
or make it a simple pass-through wrapper.
Frietjes (
talk)
17:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 21. (non-admin closure) Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 20:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. No opposition. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac ( talk) 13:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Help fix malformed TfD: Dagupan is no longer a metropolis as per definitions by the National Economic and Development Authority - ERAMnc 08:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 07:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The new Article Wizard does not produce the option for pages to be created directly in mainspace or in Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ space. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 20:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Some support !votes, but there is consensus to keep (i.e. opposing the merging proposal). (non-admin closure) Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 20:06, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Connected contributor (paid) with
Template:Connected contributor.
Almost totally duplicate functionality, but the formatting of the original template is more helpful (the "(paid)" version is diverging from it), and all the additional features of the "(paid)" version can be implmented in the main template and be triggered by a |Ux-paid=y
switch, which (if we want to retain the nominated template as a wrapper) can simply be passed by
Template:Connected contributor (paid) to
Template:Connected contributor as parameters. We do not need two separate and forking codebases and sets of documentation for exactly the same thing aside from the addition of "paid". Merging them will also allow us to use one template at one article talk page for both paid and non-paid CoI contributors, instead of stacked templates (both templates support multiple editors, but they are presently for different classes of editors, for no practical reason). See the top of
Talk:Realtor.com for a one-above-the-other output comparison. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
11:14, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
WikiWriter2458 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.
John Smith (talk · contribs)
Janet Doe (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. All edits by them should be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN.
xx (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.}}
How are you going to code this template?
Very easy. I’m a coder. That’s easy. I code templates that are - can I tell you what’s more complicated? What’s more complicated is coding a ::template that’s 95 lines long. O.K.?. If I have time this week I may write a working model Galobtter ( pingó mió) 06:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Jacedc (
talk)
23:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC){{ Connected contributor (paid)}} should only be used on talk pages.
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
"Terms of use require editors to..."; "with respect to any paid contribution..."; "Posytyv has been paid...". The bottom box speaks using the language of uncertainty:
:"The following contributors may be professionally connected..."; "Relevant guidelines may include...". In fact, the only language of certainty expressed by the bottom box has nothing to do with confirming a COI (
"This user has contributed to the article."). The other editors who have spoken here warning of confusion if the two boxes were merged are quite right in wondering how the two differently-sounding messages could be combined into one coherent box. Would the merged example take the tone of certainty or doubt? Spintendo 12:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The team no longer exists; it ceased operations after the 2017 season. The template is no longer used or needed. NatureBoyMD ( talk) 22:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:15, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Unnecessary; just use a #ifeq
statement on
the template on which it is used
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk)
15:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Just confirmed with tests, template code gives same limit with #ifeq
, I agree for deletion, indeed they are unnecessary.
ManosHacker
talk
16:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Navbox and sidebar (adjacent TfD nomination) are largely duplicative and consist mostly of non-notable entries, the result of premature splits from their parent article. Most have been redirected. There aren't enough child items to warrant a navigation template, nevertheless two. czar 14:56, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Sidebar and navbox (adjacent TfD nomination) are largely duplicative and consist mostly of non-notable entries, the result of premature splits from their parent article. Most have been redirected. There aren't enough child items to warrant a navigation template, nevertheless two. czar 14:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete one and don't delete the other one Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:8TeamBracket-2Legs with
Template:8TeamBracket-2Leg-NoSeeds.
These two template are the same usage.
Hhhhhkohhhhh (
talk)
16:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
|noseeds=y
as shown
here and replace {{
8TeamBracket-2Leg-NoSeeds}} with {{
8TeamBracket-2Leg}} with |noseeds=y
or make it a simple pass-through wrapper.
Frietjes (
talk)
17:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 21. (non-admin closure) Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 20:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. No opposition. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac ( talk) 13:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Help fix malformed TfD: Dagupan is no longer a metropolis as per definitions by the National Economic and Development Authority - ERAMnc 08:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh ( talk) 07:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The new Article Wizard does not produce the option for pages to be created directly in mainspace or in Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ space. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 20:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Some support !votes, but there is consensus to keep (i.e. opposing the merging proposal). (non-admin closure) Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 20:06, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Connected contributor (paid) with
Template:Connected contributor.
Almost totally duplicate functionality, but the formatting of the original template is more helpful (the "(paid)" version is diverging from it), and all the additional features of the "(paid)" version can be implmented in the main template and be triggered by a |Ux-paid=y
switch, which (if we want to retain the nominated template as a wrapper) can simply be passed by
Template:Connected contributor (paid) to
Template:Connected contributor as parameters. We do not need two separate and forking codebases and sets of documentation for exactly the same thing aside from the addition of "paid". Merging them will also allow us to use one template at one article talk page for both paid and non-paid CoI contributors, instead of stacked templates (both templates support multiple editors, but they are presently for different classes of editors, for no practical reason). See the top of
Talk:Realtor.com for a one-above-the-other output comparison. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼
11:14, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
WikiWriter2458 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.
John Smith (talk · contribs)
Janet Doe (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. All edits by them should be reverted on sight, per WP:REVERTBAN.
xx (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.}}
How are you going to code this template?
Very easy. I’m a coder. That’s easy. I code templates that are - can I tell you what’s more complicated? What’s more complicated is coding a ::template that’s 95 lines long. O.K.?. If I have time this week I may write a working model Galobtter ( pingó mió) 06:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Jacedc (
talk)
23:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC){{ Connected contributor (paid)}} should only be used on talk pages.
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
"Terms of use require editors to..."; "with respect to any paid contribution..."; "Posytyv has been paid...". The bottom box speaks using the language of uncertainty:
:"The following contributors may be professionally connected..."; "Relevant guidelines may include...". In fact, the only language of certainty expressed by the bottom box has nothing to do with confirming a COI (
"This user has contributed to the article."). The other editors who have spoken here warning of confusion if the two boxes were merged are quite right in wondering how the two differently-sounding messages could be combined into one coherent box. Would the merged example take the tone of certainty or doubt? Spintendo 12:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)