The result of the discussion was deleted by User:Fastily. Primefac ( talk) 02:58, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused, not clearly explained how to use it. — SamB ( talk) 20:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 02:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Barely used, (one 1 talk page, by its creator) and I believe it has several flaws.
In short, this seems to have been created to claim victory in the great battle over notability rather than serving a legitimate, policy based purpose. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 03:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
There were six links other than the subject's article. The five albums were redirected as non-notable and the other entry doesn't mention the subject. No navigation required. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:19, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 01:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
All unused. Non notable bus routes (and unlikely to ever be). Ajf773 ( talk) 10:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was deleted by User:Fastily. Primefac ( talk) 02:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Not used in any articles, redundant and we don't generally list every stop for bus routes. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 02:58, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no need nor precedent to have a track listing for every album a song appears on within the infobox of the articles of those songs. Just think if someone tried to do this for songs by the Who or the Beach Boys.
There can be some justification for such templates for the original album but it is excessive to include compilations. Such navigation is better provided by {{ Westlife singles}}. Someone interested in the tracklisting can just go to those album pages rather than clutter up infoboxes with multiple templates such as these. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 00:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was deleted by User:Fastily. Primefac ( talk) 02:58, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused, not clearly explained how to use it. — SamB ( talk) 20:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 02:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Barely used, (one 1 talk page, by its creator) and I believe it has several flaws.
In short, this seems to have been created to claim victory in the great battle over notability rather than serving a legitimate, policy based purpose. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac ( talk) 03:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
There were six links other than the subject's article. The five albums were redirected as non-notable and the other entry doesn't mention the subject. No navigation required. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:19, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 01:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
All unused. Non notable bus routes (and unlikely to ever be). Ajf773 ( talk) 10:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was deleted by User:Fastily. Primefac ( talk) 02:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Not used in any articles, redundant and we don't generally list every stop for bus routes. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac ( talk) 02:58, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no need nor precedent to have a track listing for every album a song appears on within the infobox of the articles of those songs. Just think if someone tried to do this for songs by the Who or the Beach Boys.
There can be some justification for such templates for the original album but it is excessive to include compilations. Such navigation is better provided by {{ Westlife singles}}. Someone interested in the tracklisting can just go to those album pages rather than clutter up infoboxes with multiple templates such as these. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 00:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)