The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 25. Primefac ( talk) 14:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac ( talk) 14:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused. Useddenim ( talk) 22:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Request withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Infobox frazione with
Template:Infobox Italian comune.
The two tepmlates are virtually the same (there is only one parameter that is different) and are both wrappers of {{
Infobox settlement}}. There are not that many standalone articles about
frazioni (compared to
comuni) and there are no parameters that are necessary for frazioni that are not currently part of the comune template. (The only one would be the comune
parameter, which could be easily added to {{
Infobox Italian comune}}, and also an ability to set "comune" to "frazione" at the top of the template.
Ergo Sum
19:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. An unused template that might be used in the future (if X Y and Z happen) can be restored when it's actually needed. Primefac ( talk) 14:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
unused Frietjes ( talk) 15:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 25. Primefac ( talk) 14:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was subst and delete. While past discussions have allowed for the storing of article text for use in multiple articles, this family of templates as discussed is only used on one article per template. Additionally, each is simply a wrapper for {{ Television Rotten Tomatoes scores}}, which is not in and of itself a huge template. Were these graphs not part of the other template (and thus substitution would put a huge chunk of code on the page) this discussion would probably be closed as "no consensus", but as the function of these templates (as discussed by the "merge" camp) can be easily replaced by other existing templates there is little reason to "hide" the information away from other editors (the "it prevents vandalism" argument has been debated to no end with no clear consensus either way). Primefac ( talk) 15:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
single-use templates, should be merged with the articles; there is no need to keep the scores in separate templates Frietjes ( talk) 15:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 06:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
weird grab bag of different countries whose judiciaries don't necessarily have anything much in common Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 09:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep – withdrawn by nominator, userfying. ( non-admin closure) Corky 18:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:EXISTING... the program was created in 2009 with only two coaches so far. Navbox can be re-created once there have been four persons to coach the team. Corky 01:30, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 25. Primefac ( talk) 14:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac ( talk) 14:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused. Useddenim ( talk) 22:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Request withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Infobox frazione with
Template:Infobox Italian comune.
The two tepmlates are virtually the same (there is only one parameter that is different) and are both wrappers of {{
Infobox settlement}}. There are not that many standalone articles about
frazioni (compared to
comuni) and there are no parameters that are necessary for frazioni that are not currently part of the comune template. (The only one would be the comune
parameter, which could be easily added to {{
Infobox Italian comune}}, and also an ability to set "comune" to "frazione" at the top of the template.
Ergo Sum
19:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. An unused template that might be used in the future (if X Y and Z happen) can be restored when it's actually needed. Primefac ( talk) 14:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
unused Frietjes ( talk) 15:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 25. Primefac ( talk) 14:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was subst and delete. While past discussions have allowed for the storing of article text for use in multiple articles, this family of templates as discussed is only used on one article per template. Additionally, each is simply a wrapper for {{ Television Rotten Tomatoes scores}}, which is not in and of itself a huge template. Were these graphs not part of the other template (and thus substitution would put a huge chunk of code on the page) this discussion would probably be closed as "no consensus", but as the function of these templates (as discussed by the "merge" camp) can be easily replaced by other existing templates there is little reason to "hide" the information away from other editors (the "it prevents vandalism" argument has been debated to no end with no clear consensus either way). Primefac ( talk) 15:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
single-use templates, should be merged with the articles; there is no need to keep the scores in separate templates Frietjes ( talk) 15:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 06:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
weird grab bag of different countries whose judiciaries don't necessarily have anything much in common Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 09:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep – withdrawn by nominator, userfying. ( non-admin closure) Corky 18:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:EXISTING... the program was created in 2009 with only two coaches so far. Navbox can be re-created once there have been four persons to coach the team. Corky 01:30, 12 January 2018 (UTC)