- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Pages created in error (G6). Opabinia regalis ( talk) 06:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Template for DOI that does not exist. The template was created due to a typo -
doi:
10.1027//1016-9040.4.4.233 was mistakenly entered as
doi:
10.1027//1016-9040.4.4.233. If you'll follow the two links, you'll see that the former exists, while the latter does not. The cite DOI template for the proper DOI, {{
cite doi/10.1027.2F.2F1016-9040.4.4.233}}, has been created and is in use. This template is no longer necessary.
cymru.lass (
talk •
contribs)
18:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Pages created in error (G6). Opabinia regalis ( talk) 06:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Cite doi/10.1038.2Fnj7550-113aPublished ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template for DOI that does not exist. The template was created due to a typo -
doi:
10.1038/nj7550-113a was mistakenly entered as
doi:
10.1038/nj7550-113aPublished. If you'll follow the two links, you'll see that the former exists, while the latter does not. The cite DOI template for the proper DOI, {{
cite doi/10.1038.2Fnj7550-113a}}, has been created and is in use. This template is no longer necessary.
cymru.lass (
talk •
contribs)
17:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Pages created in error (G6). Opabinia regalis ( talk) 06:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Template for DOI that does not exist. The template was created due to a typo -
doi:
10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.072 was mistakenly entered as
doi:
10.1016/cub.2007.05.072. If you'll follow the two links, you'll see that the former exists, while the latter does not. The cite DOI template for the proper DOI, {{
cite doi/10.1016.2Fj.cub.2007.05.072}}, has been created and is in use. This template is no longer necessary.
cymru.lass (
talk •
contribs)
17:40, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 June 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 June 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:CBBALL long-standing consensus, season team roster navboxes should not exist. Only that season's NCAA Division I national champion teams get these. This Iowa State is navbox creep. Jrcla2 ( talk) 13:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- delete per precedent. Frietjes ( talk) 13:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per well-established precedent of WikiProject College Basketball: we don't do navboxes for team rosters of non-championship teams. Period. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 13:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Not sure if this is meant as a single-season or a "current roster" template that would be updated every year, but in either case there is well-established consensus not to have these for college teams with the exception of NCAA championship teams. The idea is that college athletes generally aren't notable. I have my doubts as to if some of the newly-created articles linked on this template truly meet GNG, but that is a discussion for another day. Rikster2 ( talk) 14:32, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per consensus. Like Rikster, I don't know if Abdel Nader and Hallice Cooke are notable but I only afd'd the four least notable guys ( Nick Babb etc.). ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 15:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete A long standing precedent that should be supported.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was moving to sandbox. I will move this to Template:Sustainable energy/sandbox. Feel free to merge anything useful. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Well intended, but way too large, unused, and redundant to the more compact Template:Sustainable energy. ELEKHH T 10:40, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- delete, unused. Frietjes ( talk) 13:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, Weak Merge Yes, Template:Sustainable energy 1 is redundant to the older Template:Sustainable energy, but some of the links in the former might do well to go into the latter. 96.52.0.249 ( talk) 17:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Merge to
Template:Sustainable energy, which is lacking several of the links.
Or, merge Template:Sustainable energy into this template. When the images are omitted, the template is actually rather short. More pertinent links = building an encyclopedia. Using a more compact template with less pertinent links = limiting knowledge possibilities for readers. North America 1000 08:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Well, of course, don't merge
Template:Sustainable energy into
Template:Sustainable energy 1.
Template:Sustainable energy is the original, and the name is shorter.
96.52.0.249 (
talk)
18:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Struck part of my !vote above. North America 1000 06:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Well, of course, don't merge
Template:Sustainable energy into
Template:Sustainable energy 1.
Template:Sustainable energy is the original, and the name is shorter.
96.52.0.249 (
talk)
18:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Pages created in error (G6). Opabinia regalis ( talk) 06:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Template for DOI that does not exist. The template was created due to a typo -
doi:
10.1027//1016-9040.4.4.233 was mistakenly entered as
doi:
10.1027//1016-9040.4.4.233. If you'll follow the two links, you'll see that the former exists, while the latter does not. The cite DOI template for the proper DOI, {{
cite doi/10.1027.2F.2F1016-9040.4.4.233}}, has been created and is in use. This template is no longer necessary.
cymru.lass (
talk •
contribs)
18:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Pages created in error (G6). Opabinia regalis ( talk) 06:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Cite doi/10.1038.2Fnj7550-113aPublished ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template for DOI that does not exist. The template was created due to a typo -
doi:
10.1038/nj7550-113a was mistakenly entered as
doi:
10.1038/nj7550-113aPublished. If you'll follow the two links, you'll see that the former exists, while the latter does not. The cite DOI template for the proper DOI, {{
cite doi/10.1038.2Fnj7550-113a}}, has been created and is in use. This template is no longer necessary.
cymru.lass (
talk •
contribs)
17:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Pages created in error (G6). Opabinia regalis ( talk) 06:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Template for DOI that does not exist. The template was created due to a typo -
doi:
10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.072 was mistakenly entered as
doi:
10.1016/cub.2007.05.072. If you'll follow the two links, you'll see that the former exists, while the latter does not. The cite DOI template for the proper DOI, {{
cite doi/10.1016.2Fj.cub.2007.05.072}}, has been created and is in use. This template is no longer necessary.
cymru.lass (
talk •
contribs)
17:40, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 June 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 June 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:CBBALL long-standing consensus, season team roster navboxes should not exist. Only that season's NCAA Division I national champion teams get these. This Iowa State is navbox creep. Jrcla2 ( talk) 13:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- delete per precedent. Frietjes ( talk) 13:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per well-established precedent of WikiProject College Basketball: we don't do navboxes for team rosters of non-championship teams. Period. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 13:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Not sure if this is meant as a single-season or a "current roster" template that would be updated every year, but in either case there is well-established consensus not to have these for college teams with the exception of NCAA championship teams. The idea is that college athletes generally aren't notable. I have my doubts as to if some of the newly-created articles linked on this template truly meet GNG, but that is a discussion for another day. Rikster2 ( talk) 14:32, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per consensus. Like Rikster, I don't know if Abdel Nader and Hallice Cooke are notable but I only afd'd the four least notable guys ( Nick Babb etc.). ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 15:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete A long standing precedent that should be supported.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was moving to sandbox. I will move this to Template:Sustainable energy/sandbox. Feel free to merge anything useful. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Well intended, but way too large, unused, and redundant to the more compact Template:Sustainable energy. ELEKHH T 10:40, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- delete, unused. Frietjes ( talk) 13:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, Weak Merge Yes, Template:Sustainable energy 1 is redundant to the older Template:Sustainable energy, but some of the links in the former might do well to go into the latter. 96.52.0.249 ( talk) 17:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Merge to
Template:Sustainable energy, which is lacking several of the links.
Or, merge Template:Sustainable energy into this template. When the images are omitted, the template is actually rather short. More pertinent links = building an encyclopedia. Using a more compact template with less pertinent links = limiting knowledge possibilities for readers. North America 1000 08:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Well, of course, don't merge
Template:Sustainable energy into
Template:Sustainable energy 1.
Template:Sustainable energy is the original, and the name is shorter.
96.52.0.249 (
talk)
18:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Struck part of my !vote above. North America 1000 06:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Well, of course, don't merge
Template:Sustainable energy into
Template:Sustainable energy 1.
Template:Sustainable energy is the original, and the name is shorter.
96.52.0.249 (
talk)
18:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.