The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
This isn't a navigation aid between related articles, it's an assorted collection of topics vaguely having to do with MH370, all already linked and discussed on the main article, but unrelated to the others. Only the main article and the absurd conspiracy theory article are directly about the disappearance, while the rest are as generic as bodies of water and the U.S. NTSB. This does not meet the criteria of WP:NAVBOX, as they are not specifically related to the disaster, though the disaster may have (barely) involved them; very few of the articles linked mention MH370; almost none of the articles refer to each other at all; and these wouldn't be linked in a see also section, they're just mentioned in MH370 article body and for some reason duplicated here. Reywas92 Talk 00:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Nina Sky songs with
Template:Nina Sky.
Filing this on behalf of a user who incorrectly placed a PROD on this template and suggested that the template could be merged with
Template:Nina Sky. At the moment, I personally have no position as to whether to keep, merge or delete. I will notify that person so he can make a comment here if he wishes.
Safiel (
talk)
19:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NENAN with just three relevant links (the links to related articles and the link to the parent article are usually not counted as "relevant link") The Banner talk 10:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus and wrong venue since redirects are discussed at RFD. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
[Not sure if TfD is the best forum for this; please feel free to suggest alternatives]
This template is currently a short redirect for {{
smiley}}:
I propose to re-purpose if for Wikidata properties, as a primary usage (that's also how it's used on Wikidata). My plan of action would be:
-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Template should be deleted since the team does not exist anymore. GoPurple 'n Gold24 07:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:39, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
This template is used to track information only about active storms, and is then replaced once the storm is over. In attempting to resolve a prior TFD merge decision for this template and some similar ones, I instead began incorporating its functions into the main {{ Infobox hurricane}}, which has an almost identical (but larger) selection of fields, and needed only a few modifications to support "current" storm information. The results can be seen in this testcases section, where you can also see that the "current" template uses a non-typical infobox style, which I've attempted to standardize as part of the merge, while preserving its basic requirements. Since this function can now be fully served by using an existing template (and to settle the issue with some editors that "just don't like it"), I recommend deletion. Netoholic @ 02:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
infobox hurricane}}
and this template) that do not share a common use case, and as a result make no real sense to place together. Netoholic's changes would be welcome to {{
infobox hurricane current}}
, but his insistence on changing existing editorial processes because of
WP:ILIKEIT is becoming disruptive to the point where
users are considering referring him to AN/I.
Titoxd(
?!? -
cool stuff)
02:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
{{Infobox typhoon current}}
to {{Infobox tropical cyclone current}}
– The template has served well, and it has a better appearance when used (the template remains at an acceptably narrow width even when changing computers). However, I wouldn't object to merging with {{
Infobox typhoon current}}
to {{
Infobox tropical cyclone current}}
. That would be the most accurate title in my opinion.
Dustin
(talk)
03:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
This isn't a navigation aid between related articles, it's an assorted collection of topics vaguely having to do with MH370, all already linked and discussed on the main article, but unrelated to the others. Only the main article and the absurd conspiracy theory article are directly about the disappearance, while the rest are as generic as bodies of water and the U.S. NTSB. This does not meet the criteria of WP:NAVBOX, as they are not specifically related to the disaster, though the disaster may have (barely) involved them; very few of the articles linked mention MH370; almost none of the articles refer to each other at all; and these wouldn't be linked in a see also section, they're just mentioned in MH370 article body and for some reason duplicated here. Reywas92 Talk 00:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Nina Sky songs with
Template:Nina Sky.
Filing this on behalf of a user who incorrectly placed a PROD on this template and suggested that the template could be merged with
Template:Nina Sky. At the moment, I personally have no position as to whether to keep, merge or delete. I will notify that person so he can make a comment here if he wishes.
Safiel (
talk)
19:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NENAN with just three relevant links (the links to related articles and the link to the parent article are usually not counted as "relevant link") The Banner talk 10:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus and wrong venue since redirects are discussed at RFD. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
[Not sure if TfD is the best forum for this; please feel free to suggest alternatives]
This template is currently a short redirect for {{
smiley}}:
I propose to re-purpose if for Wikidata properties, as a primary usage (that's also how it's used on Wikidata). My plan of action would be:
-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Template should be deleted since the team does not exist anymore. GoPurple 'n Gold24 07:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:39, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
This template is used to track information only about active storms, and is then replaced once the storm is over. In attempting to resolve a prior TFD merge decision for this template and some similar ones, I instead began incorporating its functions into the main {{ Infobox hurricane}}, which has an almost identical (but larger) selection of fields, and needed only a few modifications to support "current" storm information. The results can be seen in this testcases section, where you can also see that the "current" template uses a non-typical infobox style, which I've attempted to standardize as part of the merge, while preserving its basic requirements. Since this function can now be fully served by using an existing template (and to settle the issue with some editors that "just don't like it"), I recommend deletion. Netoholic @ 02:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
infobox hurricane}}
and this template) that do not share a common use case, and as a result make no real sense to place together. Netoholic's changes would be welcome to {{
infobox hurricane current}}
, but his insistence on changing existing editorial processes because of
WP:ILIKEIT is becoming disruptive to the point where
users are considering referring him to AN/I.
Titoxd(
?!? -
cool stuff)
02:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
{{Infobox typhoon current}}
to {{Infobox tropical cyclone current}}
– The template has served well, and it has a better appearance when used (the template remains at an acceptably narrow width even when changing computers). However, I wouldn't object to merging with {{
Infobox typhoon current}}
to {{
Infobox tropical cyclone current}}
. That would be the most accurate title in my opinion.
Dustin
(talk)
03:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)