The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:59, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Only 289 transclusions; looks like a subset of {{ Infobox person}}, into which the few unique fields should be merged, if needed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:36, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
{{Infobox person}}
; and {{Infobox person}}
has a whole raft of parameters relevant to medical people, but which are not in this template. The generic benefits of merging, in reducing maintenance overheads are already well-rehearsed.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
23:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. Already in the infobox of the article for Mylo Xyloto. Template is unnecessary here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 17:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Used on only one article. No navigational benefit. Can just link to Follow the Leader (Korn album) for more detailed info on album and its track listing. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 16:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
This template is not used and is not needed; OTRS agents correspond via email with people submitting permissions. Even if it were not redundant to existing systems (which actually categorize material for admin review on the necessary dates, while this does nothing), the red X is bitey. See OTRS discussion at the OTRS noticeboard ( permanent diff). Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
{{
OTRS received}}
). If somehow communication did break down so badly there was no chance of confirming permission now or in the future, the file would need to be deleted immediately by the OTRS agent or an administrator. —
madman
15:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. DH85868993 ( talk) 07:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. DH85868993 ( talk) 07:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. DH85868993 ( talk) 07:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Each only transcluded by their own talk pages. DH85868993 ( talk) 07:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. Redundant to {{s-rail|title=Manila LRT}}. DH85868993 ( talk) 06:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Created in 2007. Contains the text "Template to be used in conjunction with User:EagleImageResizeBot. Please do not delete this, as I'm currently using this for testing. —— Eagle101 11:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)." Template creator User:Eagle 101 (now User:Nixeagle) has not edited since September 2011. User:EagleImageResizeBot made 1 edit (creating their own userpage), in 2007. DH85868993 ( talk) 05:50, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:57, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This is not necessary for navigation. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
{{ Toyota vehicle}} and {{ Toyota engine}} are each only used in 1 article ( Toyota Celica). These templates allow you to write "{{Toyota vehicle|Celica|A20}}" instead of "[[Toyota Celica#A20|Celica]]" or "{{Toyota engine|18|R|GE}}" instead of "[[Toyota R engine#18R-GE|18R-GE]]". The pre-nomination discussion at WP:CARS suggests the templates should either be deleted (due to offering insufficient advantage over standard links) or generalised to support other makes. DH85868993 ( talk) 11:55, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
{{
vehicle}}
as a generalised form of 'Toyota vehicle'. It can be used as '{{vehicle|Toyota|Celica|A20}}' to give
Celica. The saving of the old format is small but the new form is less error prone and easier to understand.{{
anchor}}
) in each Toyota engine articles so that links to them do not break. Perhaps you are thinking of linking to section titles. Linking to section titles does indeed tend to break but linking to true anchors like I have set up tends to be very robust.{{
anchor}}
provides the other end of the link. These templates will happily link to any anchor or section title.
Stepho
talk
23:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
User talk page message template, created in 2009. Appears to have been substed into one user talk page ( User talk:92.8.10.225) in 2009. Is linked from another user talk page ( User talk:Vetocapstone), but I'm not sure if that was a deliberate usage. Subst and delete? Or maybe userfy if the creator would still find the template useful? DH85868993 ( talk) 02:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. Doesn't appear to be part of a rail transport template series - there are no matching "stations" or "colors" templates. DH85868993 ( talk) 02:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. Why not linking?
The Banner
talk
01:53, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep - Without the navbox:
There are now 6 links in the navbox, one more than WP:NENAN requires, plus 2-3 additional albums that can be expanded into articles.-- Jax 0677 ( talk) 03:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:59, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Only 289 transclusions; looks like a subset of {{ Infobox person}}, into which the few unique fields should be merged, if needed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:36, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
{{Infobox person}}
; and {{Infobox person}}
has a whole raft of parameters relevant to medical people, but which are not in this template. The generic benefits of merging, in reducing maintenance overheads are already well-rehearsed.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
23:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. Already in the infobox of the article for Mylo Xyloto. Template is unnecessary here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 17:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Used on only one article. No navigational benefit. Can just link to Follow the Leader (Korn album) for more detailed info on album and its track listing. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 16:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
This template is not used and is not needed; OTRS agents correspond via email with people submitting permissions. Even if it were not redundant to existing systems (which actually categorize material for admin review on the necessary dates, while this does nothing), the red X is bitey. See OTRS discussion at the OTRS noticeboard ( permanent diff). Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
{{
OTRS received}}
). If somehow communication did break down so badly there was no chance of confirming permission now or in the future, the file would need to be deleted immediately by the OTRS agent or an administrator. —
madman
15:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. DH85868993 ( talk) 07:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. DH85868993 ( talk) 07:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. DH85868993 ( talk) 07:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Each only transcluded by their own talk pages. DH85868993 ( talk) 07:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. Redundant to {{s-rail|title=Manila LRT}}. DH85868993 ( talk) 06:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Created in 2007. Contains the text "Template to be used in conjunction with User:EagleImageResizeBot. Please do not delete this, as I'm currently using this for testing. —— Eagle101 11:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)." Template creator User:Eagle 101 (now User:Nixeagle) has not edited since September 2011. User:EagleImageResizeBot made 1 edit (creating their own userpage), in 2007. DH85868993 ( talk) 05:50, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:57, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This is not necessary for navigation. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
{{ Toyota vehicle}} and {{ Toyota engine}} are each only used in 1 article ( Toyota Celica). These templates allow you to write "{{Toyota vehicle|Celica|A20}}" instead of "[[Toyota Celica#A20|Celica]]" or "{{Toyota engine|18|R|GE}}" instead of "[[Toyota R engine#18R-GE|18R-GE]]". The pre-nomination discussion at WP:CARS suggests the templates should either be deleted (due to offering insufficient advantage over standard links) or generalised to support other makes. DH85868993 ( talk) 11:55, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
{{
vehicle}}
as a generalised form of 'Toyota vehicle'. It can be used as '{{vehicle|Toyota|Celica|A20}}' to give
Celica. The saving of the old format is small but the new form is less error prone and easier to understand.{{
anchor}}
) in each Toyota engine articles so that links to them do not break. Perhaps you are thinking of linking to section titles. Linking to section titles does indeed tend to break but linking to true anchors like I have set up tends to be very robust.{{
anchor}}
provides the other end of the link. These templates will happily link to any anchor or section title.
Stepho
talk
23:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
User talk page message template, created in 2009. Appears to have been substed into one user talk page ( User talk:92.8.10.225) in 2009. Is linked from another user talk page ( User talk:Vetocapstone), but I'm not sure if that was a deliberate usage. Subst and delete? Or maybe userfy if the creator would still find the template useful? DH85868993 ( talk) 02:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused. Doesn't appear to be part of a rail transport template series - there are no matching "stations" or "colors" templates. DH85868993 ( talk) 02:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. Why not linking?
The Banner
talk
01:53, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep - Without the navbox:
There are now 6 links in the navbox, one more than WP:NENAN requires, plus 2-3 additional albums that can be expanded into articles.-- Jax 0677 ( talk) 03:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)