The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Doubtfull if this is a usefull template. Night of the Big Wind talk 12:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Consensus that the template was too complex and so inhibited editor involvement. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Over-engineered boilerplate generator which adds bullet points to a see also section. It is vastly simpler both conceptually and technically simply to take the article title, stick the words "Outline of" or "Index of" in front of it, and to manually construct the links than it it to have to remember this template exists, remember its syntax, and have said template perform a half-dozen operations to spit out the three bullets it's primarily used for. Pretty much all additional functionality is overkill, best handled by manual editing. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 11:56, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with {{Sar}}, {{Portal}}, and {{Wikipedia books}}.
The result of the discussion was redirect to {{ Osmrelation-inline}} or move {{ Osmrelation-inline}} to {{ Osmrelation}}. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Completely non-standard large box cluttering the external links section and making the impression that this is a WMF project. Per Wikipedia:External links: "Do not create large, graphical templates for non-WMF websites, even if these websites are also wikis." Eleassar my talk 09:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:52, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Only one transclusion, easily replaced by cite book Crisco 1492 ( talk) 07:51, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Redundant to {{
w-screen|static=true}}
. —
This, that, and
the other (talk)
02:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
W-screen}}
. In fact, I have requested speedy deletion.
RockMagnetist (
talk)
02:30, 6 April 2012 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Unused and unnecessary since this is covered by {{ Fooian fooers}}. Pichpich ( talk) 00:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Doubtfull if this is a usefull template. Night of the Big Wind talk 12:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. Consensus that the template was too complex and so inhibited editor involvement. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Over-engineered boilerplate generator which adds bullet points to a see also section. It is vastly simpler both conceptually and technically simply to take the article title, stick the words "Outline of" or "Index of" in front of it, and to manually construct the links than it it to have to remember this template exists, remember its syntax, and have said template perform a half-dozen operations to spit out the three bullets it's primarily used for. Pretty much all additional functionality is overkill, best handled by manual editing. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 11:56, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with {{Sar}}, {{Portal}}, and {{Wikipedia books}}.
The result of the discussion was redirect to {{ Osmrelation-inline}} or move {{ Osmrelation-inline}} to {{ Osmrelation}}. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Completely non-standard large box cluttering the external links section and making the impression that this is a WMF project. Per Wikipedia:External links: "Do not create large, graphical templates for non-WMF websites, even if these websites are also wikis." Eleassar my talk 09:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:52, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Only one transclusion, easily replaced by cite book Crisco 1492 ( talk) 07:51, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Redundant to {{
w-screen|static=true}}
. —
This, that, and
the other (talk)
02:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
W-screen}}
. In fact, I have requested speedy deletion.
RockMagnetist (
talk)
02:30, 6 April 2012 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Unused and unnecessary since this is covered by {{ Fooian fooers}}. Pichpich ( talk) 00:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)