< October 29 | October 31 > |
---|
The result of the debate was delete -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 06:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
This template is a bad idea as it targets regular editors who are known to respond better to personal notes than to templated warnings (per WP:Don't template the regulars.) Binksternet ( talk) 20:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
It appears there has been a complete misuderstanding of what I meant. It's meant to be inserted into long discussions to give editors something to chew on while they discuss and work. The "broken code" requires substitution to be "fixed" so old templates can be identified and removed to keep them from piling up. The idea for the name was (in an American or German context) like going to a pub or bar to chat and ordering a round of beer to drink while you chat. It's also like reading a newspaper while chatting with someone at a coffie shop. It was a little idea to keep editors from dying of bordom during long discussions. Another idea would be to give a signpost subscription during a discussion. Read over the actual template and I think you will see what I mean.-- Ipatrol ( talk) 02:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
It's not meant to cool anything down. It's ment as something to chew on, like WikiJerky in essence. Hust an off the cuff, non topic thing. It would'nt be related to a discussion and it's not ment to be. It's usually used in non-debative, technecal discussions, like an attempt to satisfy a request.-- Ipatrol ( talk) 21:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. -- Conti| ✉ 16:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Superceded by Template:UEFA Cup 2008-09, we don't have one template for every season, only the current season. Punkmorten ( talk) 09:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 07:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Unused in articlespace and unliikely to be in future owing to the niche, in-universe nature of the content it applies to. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was G8 by Orangemike, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters •( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Template for a non-notable artist deleted under CSD A7. Newsaholic ( talk) 05:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 06:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
The template:Infobox Legislation already exists as a catchall national template. NorthernThunder ( talk) 05:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Just for clarification, the last one was more no consensus than keep...which defaults to keep. -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 07:04, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Unnecessary template as each network (CBS, NBC, etc.) has their own template and then the "market" template with it's information. PA is the only state to all it's stations listed on one template. This state list of television stations also makes this template unnecessary. NeutralHomer • Talk • October 30, 2008 @ 02:36
The result of the debate was Delete all -- Magioladitis ( talk) 15:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Depth charts are only being transcluded on a single article. Also, the depth charts for the end of a season don't really make sense. Why is the last day of the season more important than the first, or some random day in the middle? Labeling players as "injured" when they are no longer injured seems strange too. — X96lee15 ( talk) 02:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. -- Conti| ✉ 22:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
There is no other templates like this, especially for running backs, so it should not exist-- Yankees10 02:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
< October 29 | October 31 > |
---|
The result of the debate was delete -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 06:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
This template is a bad idea as it targets regular editors who are known to respond better to personal notes than to templated warnings (per WP:Don't template the regulars.) Binksternet ( talk) 20:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
It appears there has been a complete misuderstanding of what I meant. It's meant to be inserted into long discussions to give editors something to chew on while they discuss and work. The "broken code" requires substitution to be "fixed" so old templates can be identified and removed to keep them from piling up. The idea for the name was (in an American or German context) like going to a pub or bar to chat and ordering a round of beer to drink while you chat. It's also like reading a newspaper while chatting with someone at a coffie shop. It was a little idea to keep editors from dying of bordom during long discussions. Another idea would be to give a signpost subscription during a discussion. Read over the actual template and I think you will see what I mean.-- Ipatrol ( talk) 02:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
It's not meant to cool anything down. It's ment as something to chew on, like WikiJerky in essence. Hust an off the cuff, non topic thing. It would'nt be related to a discussion and it's not ment to be. It's usually used in non-debative, technecal discussions, like an attempt to satisfy a request.-- Ipatrol ( talk) 21:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. -- Conti| ✉ 16:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Superceded by Template:UEFA Cup 2008-09, we don't have one template for every season, only the current season. Punkmorten ( talk) 09:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 07:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Unused in articlespace and unliikely to be in future owing to the niche, in-universe nature of the content it applies to. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was G8 by Orangemike, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters •( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Template for a non-notable artist deleted under CSD A7. Newsaholic ( talk) 05:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 06:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
The template:Infobox Legislation already exists as a catchall national template. NorthernThunder ( talk) 05:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. Just for clarification, the last one was more no consensus than keep...which defaults to keep. -- Woohookitty Woohoo! 07:04, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Unnecessary template as each network (CBS, NBC, etc.) has their own template and then the "market" template with it's information. PA is the only state to all it's stations listed on one template. This state list of television stations also makes this template unnecessary. NeutralHomer • Talk • October 30, 2008 @ 02:36
The result of the debate was Delete all -- Magioladitis ( talk) 15:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Depth charts are only being transcluded on a single article. Also, the depth charts for the end of a season don't really make sense. Why is the last day of the season more important than the first, or some random day in the middle? Labeling players as "injured" when they are no longer injured seems strange too. — X96lee15 ( talk) 02:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. -- Conti| ✉ 22:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
There is no other templates like this, especially for running backs, so it should not exist-- Yankees10 02:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)