This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 915 | ← | Archive 920 | Archive 921 | Archive 922 | Archive 923 | Archive 924 | Archive 925 |
Hi,
I submitted a page for review in late January and I wanted to ask if there's anything else I need to do in order for the page to be published and searchable via Google, etc.
If a link to the page is needed: /info/en/?search=User:TenTonKodiak/sandbox
Please let me know what I need to do in order to contribute and finalize the page for publication.
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TenTonKodiak ( talk • contribs) 17:50, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Why has vandalism been so high for the past few months. I'm pretty new here so I am wondering if this is normal. Doublethink1954 ( talk) 20:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Why is there not an article for the n-word pass. The least we could do is mention it. It is the most culturally significant thing to date.— Preceding unsigned comment added by NinetyNinja34 ( talk • contribs)
Hello,
I am looking to insert a table of contents into a article I am creating, as the article has around 6 or 7 seperate headings. Is there a specific piece of code required to write this, or does Wikipedia do this automatically.
Thank you for your help,
( Greentree21 ( talk) 18:13, 13 March 2019 (UTC))
Approved via AfC as article Constantine Plan. Not bad (very good!) as a student assignment. Congratulations. David notMD ( talk) 20:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Creating an article for The T34 Tank but certain lines on the infobox will not display/update such as Main Gun, Armor, and Engine. Ive had this problem before and cannot solve it can i please get some help???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaunWhick01 ( talk • contribs) 19:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
My page Wikipedia:Outreach_Dashboard/University_of_Derby/5PU506_Content_Development_(January_2019) has been flagged for speedy deletion, under criteria G8 - and I'm not sure why, or what I've done wrong here, or how to fix it. Can anyone help?
Thanks!
Cbderbylib ( talk) 18:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Tea house,
I feel we have a biased wikipedia editor in the house and I really need your help to curtail his actions. There is an apparent lack of neutrality and destructive actions on his part. His name is Matthew hk ( talk)
History: 1) I first bumped into Matthew HK when I added Raiffeisen news related to the Holocaust and Mafia to this page /info/en/?search=Raiffeisen_Bank_International The same news was already on /info/en/?search=Raiffeisen_Zentralbank (the parent company of Raiffeisen Bank Intl). I determined that the content should be on both pages since they are IN FACT the same company / owner. I pointed out that many companies in Germany who had Holocaust news e,g, Bayer, Hoechst, BASF and other subsidiaries of IG Farben /info/en/?search=IG_Farben followed the same treatment. Matthew HK deleted my edits and brought this issue to the dispute board and /info/en/?search=User:Robert_McClenon User:Robert_McClenon presided. Matthew HK never responded to my point about IG Farben and now I cannot find the original dispute on the board. It seems to have disappeared mysteriously.
2) Now Matthew HK is trying to change the name of Raiffeiisen Zentralbank to disassociate itself from Raiffeisen Bank International. Please see /info/en/?search=Talk:Raiffeisen_Zentralbank He is trying to use 2 sources do do this never mind there are thousands of tier one sources and wikipedia article sources that refer to Raiffeisen Zentralbank as the parent company of Raiffeisen Bank International. We have to question Matthew HK independence on this Raiffeisen issue.
3) To further censure my work Matthew HK is now trying to bring Sock Puppetry violations against me. I have had the same IP and same account, nothing has changed. If he can prove that I used another account while I was using my current Josephintechnicolor account I would like to see the proof. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mohamed_Ouda [[Sockpuppet_investigations/Mohamed_Ouda ]]
4) A smaller issue came up when I created the RZB Securities LLC page which was a subsidiary of Raiffeisen Group of Companies (Raiffeisen Zentral Bank and Raiffeisen Bank International) and Matthew HK placed a deletion tag on the page. I accepted his deletion and offered a solution to add RZB Securities to the Raiffeisen Bank International page, this has not been done yet.
Conclusion: Matthew hk does not seem like an independent person on the topic of Raiffeisen wikipedia articles and he needs to declare himself as such. He is trying to change the Raiffeisen name and corporate structure with 2 ambiguous sources where there are thousands that say the opposite. He is not following normal wikipedia protocol with regards to the parent companies / subsidiaries and their shared news. He has aggressively been harassing my attempts to put properly sourced news on Raiffeisen's wikipedia articles. Matthew HK does not follow up on statements I made to defend my actions on the dispute board when it was HE Himself who made the disputed page on Raiffeisen in the first place. Matthew HK is overtly defending and removing Raiffeisen wikipedia pages of content/news sources. My news sources represent millions of people and many reporters who have been affected by Raiffeisen past actions and the truth should be upheld as it is for IG Farben and many others like them. I feel matthew HK is disruptive to wikipedia and should be banned.
All of these entities are related and their news is related. Matthew HK has a HIDDEN agenda to clean up Raiffeisen's past. /info/en/?search=Raiffeisenbank /info/en/?search=Friedrich_Wilhelm_Raiffeisen /info/en/?search=Raiffeisen_Zentralbank /info/en/?search=Raiffeisen_Bank_International
02:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC) Josephintechnicolor ( talk)
Please help!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loc - Xinchao ( talk • contribs) 13:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
If you look at the revision history of Enclosure, you will see edits by 3 users since 11 March. These edits take the article in a direction that I regard as off-subject (yes, I might be wrong!!). The 3 users have not edited any other articles. Does this look suspicious? If so, is there any recommended course of action? ThoughtIdRetired ( talk) 22:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am Veronicah
I am really looking for the day I will get an article accepted and approved by Wikipedia. I have submitted several and every time I get a decline message. So disapointing. but I am so much into this and I need to get the skills to get an article approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vkangethe ( talk • contribs) 01:26, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
This video shows an inside look of the production of the film Despicable Me 2, and I was asking if it can be used as a source to the corresponding article - Gouleg ( Talk • Contribs) 23:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
I had been compensated to write several Wikipedia articles by a particular client without knowing that I had to disclose this fact on Wikipedia. Two editors recently pointed this out to me and I now have inserted the Connected Contributor tag on the appropriate Talk pages. However, in this case, the problem is not about adding new edits to these articles, since I have finished my work on them. Rather, the question is what will happen to these articles and all the edits that have already been made to them?
One of the editors who had questioned me in the first place about the paid edits suggested on the articles' Talk pages that a neutral editor volunteer to review these articles I had worked on... and actually, I agree with that.
So I have two questions: a) what is the procedure for having a neutral editor review these articles?; and b) since the first editor's comments on the articles' Talk pages were so sneeringly (and in my view totally unfairly) insulting about the articles in question, how can I prevent the reviewing editor from being biased by those comments?
Thank you for your feedback. Dylanexpert ( talk) 02:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Is there a way to collapse only a portion of a table? We are trying to make a box in a table that could then be expanded to show more details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walkyo ( talk • contribs) 13:55, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
I am really dumb when it comes to editing a Wicki page and would appreciate it if someone could make an edit for me. The page listing the oldest Americans is incorrect, my mother turned 111 January 28 and I would like to see her listed. Her name is Doris Jablonsky Sperber. She was born in NYC on 1/28/1908 and now lives in San Francisco. I have any number of references, including an article that ran in the San Francisco Chronicle on 1.22.2018 (sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/SF-woman-is-well-into-her-2nd-century-12512397.php). The page that needs editing is
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_American_supercentenarians&action=edit§ion=1
Thanks very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brooklyn39 ( talk • contribs) 06:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
In between 2011 and 2015, American pornstar Riley Reid published posts on twitter and her personal website detailing her self-described raping of her highschool boyfriend. As she is a pornstar and was relatively new at the time, no major news outlet reported this, as far as I can tell. Nevertheless, there exist images of her now-deleted tweets. For your reference, she said the following things in her tweets and on her website:
I beleive a section in Riley Reid's page should mention this, and I edited the page to include a paraphrased version of what she said in her own tweets, as well as including direct quotes. I also included as sources: 1) images of the self-published writings; and 2) a website called naughtynews which I can't link in this question because it keeps getting flagged by Wikipedia's algorithm. The entire section was eventually deleted by another user, who stated that the website is not reliable and the self-published sources are not sufficient.
My questions are: 1) Are the self-publiushed sources allowed?; 2) Are the self-published sources sufficient as the sole sources?; 3) Is the website allowed to be an additional source (if not, why)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cynwniloc ( talk • contribs)
My father, 92 years old this month, is writing a memoir in which he wants to use an image where we can't read the media description page; it’s in Russian ( https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Махлуп,_Фриц#/media/File:Махлуп,_Фриц.jpg). Must we find someone who can read it, or is there an easier way to find out what’s needed in order to use this image in my father's book? -- KWW52 ( talk) 04:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Tea house, Greetings Kindly requesting help editing a previously rejected article/page. I am new here and have no idea how to go about writing an article that will be approved by Wikipedia. Thanks and looking forward to any kind of assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athienorachel2 ( talk • contribs) 09:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I am digital marketer. I write content and market them on digital platform for various client. But, wikipedia doesnt allow me to publish the content for my clients business. I although its genuine content and client want it to publish on their behalf.
Regards Aduber.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aduber Digital ( talk • contribs) 11:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Im finishing up an article but the main info box will not show Armament and Armor data underneath even after removing and re adding. And yes I added the information to it twice but it refuses to show any new data. JaunWhick01 ( talk) 00:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)JaunWhick01
|primary_weapon=
in the infobox, but use |primary_armament=
instead. One mistaken parameter can sometimes cause others to not work properly. --
Marchjuly (
talk)
01:12, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, i created an account with Wikipedia and i even confirm my email,i also have edited some contributions about myself but when some my boss and some acquaintance search for my name on Wikipedia they couldn't find me(am i not visible to the public) what am to do because i want to be visible to the general public, i will be glad to get a reply soon, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foretv ( talk • contribs) 08:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Suddenly everything changes size and color. I must have done something, but I can't figure out what. I need help; its really annoying. Creuzbourg ( talk) 10:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there,
Could you point me to where I can update my email to the account pls? Thank you! -- Redzebras ( talk) 07:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! Redzebras ( talk) 14:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi
I am preparing a final version to re-submit a page for Traka, which was previously removed. There are a couple of points that I can't find a reference online other than a press release, which I know isn't accepted. Should i leave the reference off?
Currently, I have in place: 4. ASSA ABLOY acquires Traka Plc in the United Kingdom https://www.professionalsecurity.co.uk/news/press-releases/assa-abloy-acquires-traka-plc-in-the-united-kingdom/
11. Justin Sasse appointed as Managing Director for Traka https://www.psimagazine.co.uk/justin-sasse-appointed-as-managing-director-for-traka/
Please let me know and any advice welcome.
Thanks Lydia LydiaFionaLewis ( talk) 10:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The listing for The Bull diverts to the Susi Earnshaw Theatre School. Whilst both businesses are based in the same building they are in fact separate businesses. Is it possible to have these split out on Wikipedia please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clpcreativemanagement ( talk • contribs) 13:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
How do I ask for the opinion of people related to an article and whether it meets basic WP:GNG without WP:CANVASSING? (This is in related to an actual article I am currently working on) DiplomatTesterMan ( talk) 13:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
I see all these people with customized talk page tags. How do I change it from just the standard "Walkyo"? Walkyo ( talk) 16:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
|[[User:Walkyo|<link text>]]
) and/or user talk page (|[[User talk:Walkyo|<link text>]]
). Also, see
Wikipedia:Signatures for what is and isn't allowed. Regards
So
Why
16:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Why do we make Certain Wikipedia Article Names have the first word have capitalization and the other word not capitalized, It Doesn't Make any sense? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwc435 ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Everyone, I have been looking for an entry on the poet and healthcare worker, Laura Crafton Gilpin. A dead link exists for her at [ [1]] (she won the award in 1976). There also appears to be an original entry at http://www.thefullwiki.org/Laura_Crafton_Gilpin I would happy to re-create the article, but the presence of entry in fullwiki.org suggests an accidental deletion.
I would be grateful for any advice about what I should do.
Many Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KingOfCabbage ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Thankyou everyone! - your advice is much appreciated, and thank you Lectonar for resurrecting the entry - Now it is in draft, is it just a matter of waiting for approval? - sorry for my ignorance... Re. The original deletion, the reason seems to be that the entry in the list of Walt Whitman prize winners was for “Laura Gilpin” and not “Laura Crafton Gilpin” - Laura Gilpin being the photographer - the hatnote for each person seems a must. Please could you also advise - there is a (paid for) obituary in the NY Times for her, and an award in her name, given by the organisation she worked for - would these be valid references or just external links?
I welcome your advice... Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KingOfCabbage ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Are you guys looking at what is actually being published or NO. Damien Linson was a member or the Baltimore Ravens(NFL) and 2010 (GFL Champions) Kiel Baltic Hurricanes. Select a search engine and do your research, facts are facts. However to consistently delete facts when there are notable people who have done less, seems a little off. To the editors its 2019, based off of the criteria it should actually be a few more names on the list. As long as you guys delete, the information will be resubmitted because they are facts. National Football League and German Football League are both professional leagues. Editors please put your personal issues aside, just do your research and thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitecityplymouth ( talk • contribs) 18:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The documentation in Template:Cite web#Using author-link has six example citations. Only the first one uses the author-link parameter. I don't feel competent to edit this, but somebody should. -- Thnidu ( talk) 03:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 915 | ← | Archive 920 | Archive 921 | Archive 922 | Archive 923 | Archive 924 | Archive 925 |
Hi,
I submitted a page for review in late January and I wanted to ask if there's anything else I need to do in order for the page to be published and searchable via Google, etc.
If a link to the page is needed: /info/en/?search=User:TenTonKodiak/sandbox
Please let me know what I need to do in order to contribute and finalize the page for publication.
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TenTonKodiak ( talk • contribs) 17:50, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Why has vandalism been so high for the past few months. I'm pretty new here so I am wondering if this is normal. Doublethink1954 ( talk) 20:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Why is there not an article for the n-word pass. The least we could do is mention it. It is the most culturally significant thing to date.— Preceding unsigned comment added by NinetyNinja34 ( talk • contribs)
Hello,
I am looking to insert a table of contents into a article I am creating, as the article has around 6 or 7 seperate headings. Is there a specific piece of code required to write this, or does Wikipedia do this automatically.
Thank you for your help,
( Greentree21 ( talk) 18:13, 13 March 2019 (UTC))
Approved via AfC as article Constantine Plan. Not bad (very good!) as a student assignment. Congratulations. David notMD ( talk) 20:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Creating an article for The T34 Tank but certain lines on the infobox will not display/update such as Main Gun, Armor, and Engine. Ive had this problem before and cannot solve it can i please get some help???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaunWhick01 ( talk • contribs) 19:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
My page Wikipedia:Outreach_Dashboard/University_of_Derby/5PU506_Content_Development_(January_2019) has been flagged for speedy deletion, under criteria G8 - and I'm not sure why, or what I've done wrong here, or how to fix it. Can anyone help?
Thanks!
Cbderbylib ( talk) 18:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Tea house,
I feel we have a biased wikipedia editor in the house and I really need your help to curtail his actions. There is an apparent lack of neutrality and destructive actions on his part. His name is Matthew hk ( talk)
History: 1) I first bumped into Matthew HK when I added Raiffeisen news related to the Holocaust and Mafia to this page /info/en/?search=Raiffeisen_Bank_International The same news was already on /info/en/?search=Raiffeisen_Zentralbank (the parent company of Raiffeisen Bank Intl). I determined that the content should be on both pages since they are IN FACT the same company / owner. I pointed out that many companies in Germany who had Holocaust news e,g, Bayer, Hoechst, BASF and other subsidiaries of IG Farben /info/en/?search=IG_Farben followed the same treatment. Matthew HK deleted my edits and brought this issue to the dispute board and /info/en/?search=User:Robert_McClenon User:Robert_McClenon presided. Matthew HK never responded to my point about IG Farben and now I cannot find the original dispute on the board. It seems to have disappeared mysteriously.
2) Now Matthew HK is trying to change the name of Raiffeiisen Zentralbank to disassociate itself from Raiffeisen Bank International. Please see /info/en/?search=Talk:Raiffeisen_Zentralbank He is trying to use 2 sources do do this never mind there are thousands of tier one sources and wikipedia article sources that refer to Raiffeisen Zentralbank as the parent company of Raiffeisen Bank International. We have to question Matthew HK independence on this Raiffeisen issue.
3) To further censure my work Matthew HK is now trying to bring Sock Puppetry violations against me. I have had the same IP and same account, nothing has changed. If he can prove that I used another account while I was using my current Josephintechnicolor account I would like to see the proof. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mohamed_Ouda [[Sockpuppet_investigations/Mohamed_Ouda ]]
4) A smaller issue came up when I created the RZB Securities LLC page which was a subsidiary of Raiffeisen Group of Companies (Raiffeisen Zentral Bank and Raiffeisen Bank International) and Matthew HK placed a deletion tag on the page. I accepted his deletion and offered a solution to add RZB Securities to the Raiffeisen Bank International page, this has not been done yet.
Conclusion: Matthew hk does not seem like an independent person on the topic of Raiffeisen wikipedia articles and he needs to declare himself as such. He is trying to change the Raiffeisen name and corporate structure with 2 ambiguous sources where there are thousands that say the opposite. He is not following normal wikipedia protocol with regards to the parent companies / subsidiaries and their shared news. He has aggressively been harassing my attempts to put properly sourced news on Raiffeisen's wikipedia articles. Matthew HK does not follow up on statements I made to defend my actions on the dispute board when it was HE Himself who made the disputed page on Raiffeisen in the first place. Matthew HK is overtly defending and removing Raiffeisen wikipedia pages of content/news sources. My news sources represent millions of people and many reporters who have been affected by Raiffeisen past actions and the truth should be upheld as it is for IG Farben and many others like them. I feel matthew HK is disruptive to wikipedia and should be banned.
All of these entities are related and their news is related. Matthew HK has a HIDDEN agenda to clean up Raiffeisen's past. /info/en/?search=Raiffeisenbank /info/en/?search=Friedrich_Wilhelm_Raiffeisen /info/en/?search=Raiffeisen_Zentralbank /info/en/?search=Raiffeisen_Bank_International
02:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC) Josephintechnicolor ( talk)
Please help!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loc - Xinchao ( talk • contribs) 13:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
If you look at the revision history of Enclosure, you will see edits by 3 users since 11 March. These edits take the article in a direction that I regard as off-subject (yes, I might be wrong!!). The 3 users have not edited any other articles. Does this look suspicious? If so, is there any recommended course of action? ThoughtIdRetired ( talk) 22:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am Veronicah
I am really looking for the day I will get an article accepted and approved by Wikipedia. I have submitted several and every time I get a decline message. So disapointing. but I am so much into this and I need to get the skills to get an article approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vkangethe ( talk • contribs) 01:26, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
This video shows an inside look of the production of the film Despicable Me 2, and I was asking if it can be used as a source to the corresponding article - Gouleg ( Talk • Contribs) 23:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
I had been compensated to write several Wikipedia articles by a particular client without knowing that I had to disclose this fact on Wikipedia. Two editors recently pointed this out to me and I now have inserted the Connected Contributor tag on the appropriate Talk pages. However, in this case, the problem is not about adding new edits to these articles, since I have finished my work on them. Rather, the question is what will happen to these articles and all the edits that have already been made to them?
One of the editors who had questioned me in the first place about the paid edits suggested on the articles' Talk pages that a neutral editor volunteer to review these articles I had worked on... and actually, I agree with that.
So I have two questions: a) what is the procedure for having a neutral editor review these articles?; and b) since the first editor's comments on the articles' Talk pages were so sneeringly (and in my view totally unfairly) insulting about the articles in question, how can I prevent the reviewing editor from being biased by those comments?
Thank you for your feedback. Dylanexpert ( talk) 02:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Is there a way to collapse only a portion of a table? We are trying to make a box in a table that could then be expanded to show more details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walkyo ( talk • contribs) 13:55, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
I am really dumb when it comes to editing a Wicki page and would appreciate it if someone could make an edit for me. The page listing the oldest Americans is incorrect, my mother turned 111 January 28 and I would like to see her listed. Her name is Doris Jablonsky Sperber. She was born in NYC on 1/28/1908 and now lives in San Francisco. I have any number of references, including an article that ran in the San Francisco Chronicle on 1.22.2018 (sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/SF-woman-is-well-into-her-2nd-century-12512397.php). The page that needs editing is
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_American_supercentenarians&action=edit§ion=1
Thanks very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brooklyn39 ( talk • contribs) 06:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
In between 2011 and 2015, American pornstar Riley Reid published posts on twitter and her personal website detailing her self-described raping of her highschool boyfriend. As she is a pornstar and was relatively new at the time, no major news outlet reported this, as far as I can tell. Nevertheless, there exist images of her now-deleted tweets. For your reference, she said the following things in her tweets and on her website:
I beleive a section in Riley Reid's page should mention this, and I edited the page to include a paraphrased version of what she said in her own tweets, as well as including direct quotes. I also included as sources: 1) images of the self-published writings; and 2) a website called naughtynews which I can't link in this question because it keeps getting flagged by Wikipedia's algorithm. The entire section was eventually deleted by another user, who stated that the website is not reliable and the self-published sources are not sufficient.
My questions are: 1) Are the self-publiushed sources allowed?; 2) Are the self-published sources sufficient as the sole sources?; 3) Is the website allowed to be an additional source (if not, why)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cynwniloc ( talk • contribs)
My father, 92 years old this month, is writing a memoir in which he wants to use an image where we can't read the media description page; it’s in Russian ( https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Махлуп,_Фриц#/media/File:Махлуп,_Фриц.jpg). Must we find someone who can read it, or is there an easier way to find out what’s needed in order to use this image in my father's book? -- KWW52 ( talk) 04:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Tea house, Greetings Kindly requesting help editing a previously rejected article/page. I am new here and have no idea how to go about writing an article that will be approved by Wikipedia. Thanks and looking forward to any kind of assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athienorachel2 ( talk • contribs) 09:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I am digital marketer. I write content and market them on digital platform for various client. But, wikipedia doesnt allow me to publish the content for my clients business. I although its genuine content and client want it to publish on their behalf.
Regards Aduber.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aduber Digital ( talk • contribs) 11:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Im finishing up an article but the main info box will not show Armament and Armor data underneath even after removing and re adding. And yes I added the information to it twice but it refuses to show any new data. JaunWhick01 ( talk) 00:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)JaunWhick01
|primary_weapon=
in the infobox, but use |primary_armament=
instead. One mistaken parameter can sometimes cause others to not work properly. --
Marchjuly (
talk)
01:12, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, i created an account with Wikipedia and i even confirm my email,i also have edited some contributions about myself but when some my boss and some acquaintance search for my name on Wikipedia they couldn't find me(am i not visible to the public) what am to do because i want to be visible to the general public, i will be glad to get a reply soon, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foretv ( talk • contribs) 08:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Suddenly everything changes size and color. I must have done something, but I can't figure out what. I need help; its really annoying. Creuzbourg ( talk) 10:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there,
Could you point me to where I can update my email to the account pls? Thank you! -- Redzebras ( talk) 07:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! Redzebras ( talk) 14:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi
I am preparing a final version to re-submit a page for Traka, which was previously removed. There are a couple of points that I can't find a reference online other than a press release, which I know isn't accepted. Should i leave the reference off?
Currently, I have in place: 4. ASSA ABLOY acquires Traka Plc in the United Kingdom https://www.professionalsecurity.co.uk/news/press-releases/assa-abloy-acquires-traka-plc-in-the-united-kingdom/
11. Justin Sasse appointed as Managing Director for Traka https://www.psimagazine.co.uk/justin-sasse-appointed-as-managing-director-for-traka/
Please let me know and any advice welcome.
Thanks Lydia LydiaFionaLewis ( talk) 10:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The listing for The Bull diverts to the Susi Earnshaw Theatre School. Whilst both businesses are based in the same building they are in fact separate businesses. Is it possible to have these split out on Wikipedia please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clpcreativemanagement ( talk • contribs) 13:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
How do I ask for the opinion of people related to an article and whether it meets basic WP:GNG without WP:CANVASSING? (This is in related to an actual article I am currently working on) DiplomatTesterMan ( talk) 13:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
I see all these people with customized talk page tags. How do I change it from just the standard "Walkyo"? Walkyo ( talk) 16:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
|[[User:Walkyo|<link text>]]
) and/or user talk page (|[[User talk:Walkyo|<link text>]]
). Also, see
Wikipedia:Signatures for what is and isn't allowed. Regards
So
Why
16:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Why do we make Certain Wikipedia Article Names have the first word have capitalization and the other word not capitalized, It Doesn't Make any sense? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwc435 ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Everyone, I have been looking for an entry on the poet and healthcare worker, Laura Crafton Gilpin. A dead link exists for her at [ [1]] (she won the award in 1976). There also appears to be an original entry at http://www.thefullwiki.org/Laura_Crafton_Gilpin I would happy to re-create the article, but the presence of entry in fullwiki.org suggests an accidental deletion.
I would be grateful for any advice about what I should do.
Many Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KingOfCabbage ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Thankyou everyone! - your advice is much appreciated, and thank you Lectonar for resurrecting the entry - Now it is in draft, is it just a matter of waiting for approval? - sorry for my ignorance... Re. The original deletion, the reason seems to be that the entry in the list of Walt Whitman prize winners was for “Laura Gilpin” and not “Laura Crafton Gilpin” - Laura Gilpin being the photographer - the hatnote for each person seems a must. Please could you also advise - there is a (paid for) obituary in the NY Times for her, and an award in her name, given by the organisation she worked for - would these be valid references or just external links?
I welcome your advice... Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KingOfCabbage ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Are you guys looking at what is actually being published or NO. Damien Linson was a member or the Baltimore Ravens(NFL) and 2010 (GFL Champions) Kiel Baltic Hurricanes. Select a search engine and do your research, facts are facts. However to consistently delete facts when there are notable people who have done less, seems a little off. To the editors its 2019, based off of the criteria it should actually be a few more names on the list. As long as you guys delete, the information will be resubmitted because they are facts. National Football League and German Football League are both professional leagues. Editors please put your personal issues aside, just do your research and thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitecityplymouth ( talk • contribs) 18:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The documentation in Template:Cite web#Using author-link has six example citations. Only the first one uses the author-link parameter. I don't feel competent to edit this, but somebody should. -- Thnidu ( talk) 03:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)