The result of the discussion was delete. Were it not for the previous discussion at WT:SPACEFLIGHT this discussion would be right at a "no consensus", but there's not enough here to change that previous consensus. With no current transclusions and a previous deprecation there's nothing left to do but delete. Primefac ( talk) 01:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The template documentation says it is being phased out, but I don't see the deletion discussion. If it's being deleted, it should be actually replaced (as per the template doc) with either {{ Infobox spaceflight}} for articles about single spacecraft or {{ Infobox spacecraft class}} for articles about multiple spacecraft and then deleted. Gonnym ( talk) 09:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
"it's not as if it disrupts Wikipedia in any way"is an argument of a kind expressly deprecated in WP:HARMLESS. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 1. Primefac ( talk) 04:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. Appears to be an abandoned draft. No actual link content. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. WP:NAVBOXCREEP Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 1. Primefac ( talk) 04:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused table, already placed on the parent article directly. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 3. Primefac ( talk) 01:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with mostly redlinks. WP:EXISTING & WP:NENAN both apply. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
WP: NENAN, too soon, not enough links. StaticVapor message me! 19:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 ( talk) 05:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 ( talk) 05:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 ( talk) 05:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 ( talk) 05:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. I withdraw this nomination given its use now, closing as speedy keep per
criterion #1.
(non-admin closure)
DannyS712 (
talk)
11:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Nippon Professional Baseball draft doesn't exist; neither should the navbox. DannyS712 ( talk) 05:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 05:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 13:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 05:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Atlantic Coast Line Railroad. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 13:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Now in use. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:35, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused timeline template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
unused template that just produces a plainlink. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused template with no parent article. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
This is WP:NAVBOXCREEP at its finest. There is an article about the winning teams, we don't need a navbox linking all the managers... Plus this template isn't even used. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 05:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navboxes that all list the playes that were on a certain team in a certain year. Not EVERYTHING needs a navbox. The current team is one thing, but linking every player that was on the team in the same year is just overkill. -- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2019 March 28. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Jerome K. Jerome. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Three Men in a Boat with
Template:Jerome K. Jerome.
Massive overlap between the two templates. The total set of article involved is 9 or ten, and
Template:Three Men in a Boat is basically a reformatted version of
Template:Jerome K. Jerome, with 3 extra links. This duplication is a hindrance to navigation.
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs)
04:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
one of my templates??? Really??? See WP:OWN. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 05:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
attempted to serve as both the nominator and the closer.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Only used on a single page, the parent article CT Corp. Almost entirely WP:REDLINKS which violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 03:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused election results template. Per precedent at
this tfd... To paraphrase an editor at that TFD: The results of the <insert election year> election are there. That information isn't going to change. There is no reason to have a template (even if used on multiple pages) to convey information that is completely static
. Same logic applies here, particularly since the template is UNUSED!
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
00:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. The TFD crew are in the process of creating a list of "common outcomes" at TFD. These single- or two-use templates have mixed outcomes, with some being kept, some being subst/deleted, and some (with 2+ transclusions) being shared via WP:LST. If it becomes clear(er) that one of these outcomes is the preferred outcome of such templates, there is no prejudice against renomination. Primefac ( talk) 01:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused Single-use election results template. Per precedent at
this tfd... To paraphrase an editor at that TFD: The results of the <insert election year> election are there. That information isn't going to change. There is no reason to have a template (even if used on multiple pages) to convey information that is completely static
. Same logic applies here. The tables should be subst directly onto the page and the template deleted.
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
00:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
only one edit would be required to update both locationsWhat about this template could possibly need updating, given that the results of past elections can't change. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 03:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused election template. Per precedent at
this tfd. To paraphrase an editor at that TFD: The results of the <insert election year> election are there. That information isn't going to change. There is no reason to have a template (even if used on multiple pages) to convey information that is completely static
. Same logic applies here, particularly since the template is UNUSED!
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
00:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Were it not for the previous discussion at WT:SPACEFLIGHT this discussion would be right at a "no consensus", but there's not enough here to change that previous consensus. With no current transclusions and a previous deprecation there's nothing left to do but delete. Primefac ( talk) 01:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The template documentation says it is being phased out, but I don't see the deletion discussion. If it's being deleted, it should be actually replaced (as per the template doc) with either {{ Infobox spaceflight}} for articles about single spacecraft or {{ Infobox spacecraft class}} for articles about multiple spacecraft and then deleted. Gonnym ( talk) 09:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
"it's not as if it disrupts Wikipedia in any way"is an argument of a kind expressly deprecated in WP:HARMLESS. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 1. Primefac ( talk) 04:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. Appears to be an abandoned draft. No actual link content. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. WP:NAVBOXCREEP Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 21:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 1. Primefac ( talk) 04:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused table, already placed on the parent article directly. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 3. Primefac ( talk) 01:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox with mostly redlinks. WP:EXISTING & WP:NENAN both apply. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
WP: NENAN, too soon, not enough links. StaticVapor message me! 19:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 ( talk) 05:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 ( talk) 05:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 ( talk) 05:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 ( talk) 05:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. I withdraw this nomination given its use now, closing as speedy keep per
criterion #1.
(non-admin closure)
DannyS712 (
talk)
11:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Nippon Professional Baseball draft doesn't exist; neither should the navbox. DannyS712 ( talk) 05:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 05:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 13:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 05:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Atlantic Coast Line Railroad. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 13:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Now in use. (non-admin closure) Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 17:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:35, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused timeline template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navbox. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
unused template that just produces a plainlink. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused template with no parent article. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
This is WP:NAVBOXCREEP at its finest. There is an article about the winning teams, we don't need a navbox linking all the managers... Plus this template isn't even used. WP:NENAN Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete - FASTILY 05:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused navboxes that all list the playes that were on a certain team in a certain year. Not EVERYTHING needs a navbox. The current team is one thing, but linking every player that was on the team in the same year is just overkill. -- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 05:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2019 March 28. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Jerome K. Jerome. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Three Men in a Boat with
Template:Jerome K. Jerome.
Massive overlap between the two templates. The total set of article involved is 9 or ten, and
Template:Three Men in a Boat is basically a reformatted version of
Template:Jerome K. Jerome, with 3 extra links. This duplication is a hindrance to navigation.
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs)
04:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
one of my templates??? Really??? See WP:OWN. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 05:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
attempted to serve as both the nominator and the closer.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Only used on a single page, the parent article CT Corp. Almost entirely WP:REDLINKS which violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 03:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused election results template. Per precedent at
this tfd... To paraphrase an editor at that TFD: The results of the <insert election year> election are there. That information isn't going to change. There is no reason to have a template (even if used on multiple pages) to convey information that is completely static
. Same logic applies here, particularly since the template is UNUSED!
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
00:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. The TFD crew are in the process of creating a list of "common outcomes" at TFD. These single- or two-use templates have mixed outcomes, with some being kept, some being subst/deleted, and some (with 2+ transclusions) being shared via WP:LST. If it becomes clear(er) that one of these outcomes is the preferred outcome of such templates, there is no prejudice against renomination. Primefac ( talk) 01:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Unused Single-use election results template. Per precedent at
this tfd... To paraphrase an editor at that TFD: The results of the <insert election year> election are there. That information isn't going to change. There is no reason to have a template (even if used on multiple pages) to convey information that is completely static
. Same logic applies here. The tables should be subst directly onto the page and the template deleted.
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
00:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
only one edit would be required to update both locationsWhat about this template could possibly need updating, given that the results of past elections can't change. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 03:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused election template. Per precedent at
this tfd. To paraphrase an editor at that TFD: The results of the <insert election year> election are there. That information isn't going to change. There is no reason to have a template (even if used on multiple pages) to convey information that is completely static
. Same logic applies here, particularly since the template is UNUSED!
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
00:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)