IP is causing disruption similar to how NisarKand does. NisarKand uses that IP range, see suspected socks and past CU request. See an example from sock User:Banigul, he always touches topics of Pashtun ascentry [1], and removes facts about Pashto having borrowings and origins from other languages [2]
I notice recent activity from that IP range in Silvia Lancome, a typical target of Misarkand. See this from 119.73.4.123 in 11th July, which is similar to this from 119.30.69.117 in October 2008, and that IP was tagged as a suspect sock of NisarKand.
This could also be a sock of User:Khampalak, who wrote another section about Bactrian descent.
I have tagged the IP. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/NisarKand for how a few socks were many times found when checkusering, so please run checkuser.
Ugh, and the other side, 94.219.218.20 ( talk · contribs), could be User:Beh-nam, he always accuses people of being socks of NisarKand.
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
User:Ahmed shahi was blocked indefinitely but since then has used several sockpuppet accounts (check Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ahmed_shahi/Archive) to edit Afghanistan related articles. I suspect he is now using the IP 119.73.7.124. Both accounts try to push the same set of POVs; and in addition their style of writing are quite similar. In all cases, 119.73.7.124 has good knowledge of how things are carried on in wikipedia, and is surely a sockpuppet of another user account. Ariana ( talk) 13:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
It seems he has changed again the IP address, and is now using Special:Contributions/210.2.177.244. He made edits with this IP over the same subject ( Afghanistan's Foreign relations and military). I made a WHOIS for this IP, and it comes exactly for the same server in Islamabad, Pakistan. Although he has received warning for disruptive behaviour in the past (see User_talk:210.2.177.244), his latest edits in Afghanistan article were constructive. But what is annoying is that he reported me for "vandalism" and 3RR in WK:AVI ( here) just as he did with his older IP address. I thought to mention it here which might help the administrator in his/her decision. Ariana ( talk) 16:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Have you considered the fact that Pakistan has about 177 million people and that "Nisar" and "Ahmad" are one of the most common names in Pakistan? It's like John and Michael in America. My internet provider has millions of customers and many of them use Wikipedia editing mainly Pakistan related articles, including neighboring countries sometimes. Not to mention that 1.7 million Afghan refugees live here and I guess they also edit Afghanistan pages.-- 119.73.8.27 ( talk) 01:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Clerk declined CU should generally not be used to tie links between IPs and accounts, per Wikipedia:CheckUser#IP information disclosure, the case has therefore been declined for checkuser attention. That aside, we seem to be onto something interesting here. The IPs listed are from the range 119.73.0.0/20 ( block range · block log ( global) · WHOIS (partial)), that range has just recently come out of a 3 month block which resulted from it's abusive use by sockpuppeteer NisarKand ( talk · contribs) (who also focuses on Afghanistan related articles). Given that that range block was set with account creation disabled it seems unlikely that the IP range was/is being used by Ahmed shahi ( talk · contribs), as he has been creating accounts while the range block was in place. However, the range should probably be re-blocked, as it seems that NisarKand is still using it (now that the block has expired). Hopefully that all makes sense, although I'd recommend that an admin check over this with due care before taking action, since I'm not familiar with NisarKand. Regards, Spitfire Tally-ho! 23:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: please note that this case was originally opened at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ahmed shahi. Spitfire Tally-ho! 17:40, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Taken from lost October request
Added from comments below
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/NisarKand; it appears there was a lost case a few months ago, for which checkuser evidence would be enlightening. Please note I am not necessarily accusing Lagoo sab of anything, simply processing the diligence required of an admin when he is asked to mediate an edit war. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 19:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Regarding users Lagoo Sab, Jrsko, Kaddoo:
Chartinael ( talk) 13:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Regarding Kaki joe. I am not sure, why no intersect edits come up with Lagoo Sab, although both have edited the same articles, namely Afghanistan and Pashto are shared articles for sure. [15] nor here [16]. His data is not included in the xls-file provided above. Chartinael ( talk) 13:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
User:Lagoo Sab is a sockpuppet of User:Ketabtoon. I contacted him through a just created account and his email and introduced myself as one of his allies and talked with him about the Pashtun-Tajik-Hazara editwars here on Wikipedia and told him I would support him against infidel Hazaras and sellout Tajiks. In return he told me creating at least two accounts and use them alternating. Further, he said between both account´s usage should be at least 3month break for not beeing identified as sockpuppet. He himself told me Ketabtoon is another account of him which is used on his cousins computer. Now it´s your duty as admin and guard of Wikipedia´s policy to do something against him. I can pass on his message to you if you wish.-- 94.219.98.69 ( talk) 07:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Before it leads to a wrong assumptation I am neither a Hazara or Uzbek nor a Tajik or Arab, Kashmiri or whatever. I know that Wikipedia became a play-ground for all kind of nationalistic bias and I do not welcome such tendencies, be they from my own people, Hazaras, Turks or Tajiks, Arabs, Americans, Dutchs or Indians. It´s a shame for everyone of us to show ourself as sociel illiterate individuals on the world stage of information acquisition to all kind of poeple, particular to the western world you claim beeing and got your educate from. Maybe you should go and live for 2 weeks in Kongo or India where you don´t have money to food or water to wash yourself or a safe place. Where will this war on Wikipedia, media, politics, X, Y, Z lead us? What do you await from it? If you have some complexes than go to psychiatry and get some help. I do not say to stand for the correct policy of Wikipedia but I can´t stand it when people, obviously even from the same country and the same race, tear themself to pieces just because they do not want to accept other opinions. Who cares what XYZ did in the past and to whom XYZ belong. What do you hope for? That your situation turns better or that your countries getting more attention from the world? If that´s so than you seems beeing very pathetic. Not the history of a nation make him special but his DAILY contributions and DAILY outputs (Turkey, India, South-Korea, Japan, China, Indonesia, South Africa) for a better TOMORROW. Those who dropped off their sick visions and started to live in TODAY and not still in YESTERDAY, they just gained good (Turkey, India, South-Korea, Japan, China, Indonesia, South Africa) from all part of the world. You people suffered to much because of your lost identities (IDless>Identity Crysis) and thus you turned your own country to hell with millions of innocent deaths, millions of replaced people, the highest death rate, the before-last country on earth. Get a bit civilised. Wikipedia´s reader are not only some 14 years old boys and girls. It became in the last 5 years the most important reference to all government institution for all countries along the globe. What do you guess those politicians and diplomats think about you when they read your all kind of crap here, a tool of the western world, actually made for the civilised western world and the Air Force, that you rubbish it here now and today and you will keep on in tomorrow as well. That´s sick and smells! I appreciate you to excuse my crudeness to some Wikipedians here.
@Tajik You are not better than the rest of the many clowns here. I don´t want to share my time with you or you-alike guys. You are a shame for civility and Wikipedia. Your way to talk with them and providing sources is not wrong, but pick holes on someone and come up with your well-known that´s POV and that´s not, this is PPP and this is DDD. What is wrong with you. You are not better than them and not all your sources can be correct. References from others are wrong, except yours who are God-gaven from God to you. Grow up, boy. I also do not care if the admin ban those (including you) guys or not, but my parent´s did not teached me to blame others (this option a ultima ratio). When I contacted the person I just wanted to know if he is one of some known and already banned Users and a sockpuppet of Ketabtoon, who further, indeed, is of banned User:NisarKand and his thousand other socks. Your request telling my Account is not acceptable. Maybe I ant use it one day and it´s very easy to personate me as a sock of IP XYZ 10-5 which possibly would be a reason to block me, while the real vandalists are occuring here days and nights. But I am ready to present my email (shabirdurani@rocketmail.com). If anyone have any questions they are free to ask and contact me through my mail but don´t expect from me letting someone go into the knife which would be only my last action if there´s no view taling place.
@Admin Sometimes I do edit some articles, only minor faults or nationalistic POVs, but since Afghanistan-related articles have no own guards or at the best at least two Admins, those Users reedite those articles again. A sign that Wikipedia failed. Please take also a look on this, where Lagoo Sab is already linked to NisarKand and Bani Gul. Isn´t strange one get blocked and banned on Wikipedia and not one day later, another User registers do the same POVs and changes without any reactions of the admins?
Good morning-- 94.219.98.69 ( talk) 12:30, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The editor Inuit18 ( talk · contribs) who added my name in the October 2010 CU request is a banned editor [17]. CheckUser is not for fishing, listing me here is considered fishing because I didn't violate anything. Instead, what I did was provide a valid argument in the talk pages of 2 articles ( Talk:Languages of Afghanistan#Problem with CIA estimates for languages of Afghanistan and Talk:Afghanistan#Problem with CIA estimates for languages of Afghanistan) so that the info is corrected. To thank me for this, User:Magog the Ogre decided to report me here. Seems to me that nobody follow rules, each person makes up own rules as they go along, and I feel this is a revenge to give me a bad name even though I'm improving articles in Wikipedia. I am against incorrect information presented as a fact in Wikipedia. As a result of too many mistakes and errors accepted by the west (America and NATO countries), they are now suffering and slowly going down the drain while countries in Asia are rising to the top.-- Lagoo sab ( talk) 20:40, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Okay, everyone stop. This is not the right venue to have your battles; we're here to discuss the plausibility of running a checkuser to compare Lagoo sab to other people. First, someone needs to update the Suspected sockpuppets section above to list the potential sockpuppets. After that, all I want is a concise explanation (preferably using diffs) to explain why we should look into those editors as being potential socks. And then I (or another clerk) will determine whether or not a CU is needed. Until then, take your bickering elsewhere. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 00:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed as each other:
Confirmed as each other:
Unrelated to each other or to any of the above:
As far as I see on the technical end, there is no relation between the two groups of confirmed users. No comment with regards to any suspected IP addresses. – MuZemike 00:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Procedural request for tracking purposes. User is already blocked. Nakon 02:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
In the future, it's not necessary to report every confirmed sock here ( WP:NOTBURO), especially since it was already tagged and blocked as such. – MuZemike 02:42, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Again. Among two issues, we have someone pushing the certain POV on Pashtun peoples and misuse of the term vandalism. There is one other issue that has me concerned, which I will not note out loud per WP:BEANS (but can do for another admin/CU upon request).
If this was a new user I'd be sure of the connection, but Xinjao has been around a while, unlike LS. However, who knows who the sockmaster is? Magog the Ogre ( talk) 03:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Hi Magog, I doubt the association. This user does not try to UP the figures for Pashtuns, declaring everyone Pathan Pashtun. His edits appear founded and he uses the talk page to address others whose edits he/she views as problematic. Regards. छातीऀनाएल - chartinael ( talk) 12:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
I probably didn't need to check, but since my assumption was wrong the last time in this case (There was indeed socking when I didn't expect it), I went ahead; Xinjao is Unrelated. – MuZemike 15:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Yet another user popping up out of the ether to edit war in LS's style. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 01:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. What is this? Me chase girl she chase me ( talk) 19:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Ranges may have too much traffic for a rangeblock. Another CU may wish to weigh in. -- Avi ( talk) 05:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
User:She has a bird brain came to edit war in Lagoo sab's style. In the Hamid Karzai's article history he indirectly showed that he is no other than Lagoo sab by stating and making his typical (false) accusations: "JCAla you are showing your typical shia pov by being a sympathizer to them ..." ( see here) There was no prior contact to the user so it is unlikely for any other person to state such things. You will also find that User:She has a bird brain edits exactly the same articles as did Lagoo sab with his countless socks. ( see here) The other users named are very likely less-used sock accounts of Lagoo sab. See their contribution history. JCAla ( talk) 08:38, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The following are Confirmed as Lagoo sab:
The other accounts mentioned above are either Unlikely or outright Unrelated. – MuZemike 08:58, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
I suspect [25] that Cabolitae is using JCAla as a single-purpose account to edit for promotion, advocacy or other unsuitable agendas. Cabolitae stated on his page that he is from Afghanistan who is in France and edits Afghanistan articles [26] and has added his name to the WikiProject Afghanistan members list as did JCAla, a user who is also Afghan and very familiar with France [27], both accounts edit the same Afghanistan articles. [28] [29] [30]
JCAla and Cabolitae edit very similarly using the same level of English in talk pages from a location in France I believe, and they leave behind very similar comments in their edit summaries, immediately get into edit-war with anyone who changes their watched pages. [31] Although they don't edit much, they sure appear to be watching the pages everyday, this elevates the level of my suspicion.
I believe that Cabolitae is using the JCAla account for personal political propaganda and to express his anger by bashing the U.S. and NATO-allied state of Pakistan [32] [33] and in the meantime to promote Ahmad Shah Massoud and the Northern Alliance, which is regarded in the mainstream media as a group of Category:Afghan warlords accused of ethnic cleansing and mass human rights violations, including killings, rapes and robberies. The official RAWA website is full of reports on that.
JCAla is very disruptive, he is turning Afghanistan related Wikipedia articles to his personal blog pages by copy pasting the same large portion of propaganda work that he prepared on all of them [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40], which is cherry-picked to reflect his anti-Pakistan pro-Ahmad Shah Massoud/Northern Alliance POVs. It's against Wikipedia's policy to host JCAla who wants to spread his politically motivated propaganda messages, especially if he is used by someone as a sockpuppet. Both users have been blocked before for edit-warring on Afghanistan. [41] [42] I listed the IP to help with the investigation, it is from France and I'm very sure it was used by Cabolitae. She has a bird brain ( talk) 06:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Go ahead, check it. Got nothing to hide. Other than that, be aware that User: She has a bird brain is more than likely just another sock of banned User: Lagoo sab. See his dozens of socks and the investigation here. Lagoo sab has systematically used dozens of accounts to further his political pro-Taliban stance and has engaged a variety of respected users in edit wars by simply restoring false information again and again. You will find that my two blocks for edit wars were when I was relatively new to wikipedia and both were in connection to countering political propaganda by his now-blocked sock account User: Jrkso (a fact then unknown to the blocking administrator). JCAla ( talk) 15 April 2011 (UTC)
I was already in the process of checking the reporter. Confirmed She has a bird brain is User: Lagoo sab. Plus there are several more Confirmed accounts on the IP:
The IP was already blocked for the anonymous editing from it. Dominic· t 08:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Possibly another sock of User:Lagoo sab. Same editing pattern on the same issues, with the same pov and same tendency towards edit warring. See i. e. [43], [44], [45] or [46] JCAla ( talk) 09:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The reporter of this request is the banned User:Beh-nam, who has used 100s of sockpuppets. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Beh-nam His location is Toronto, Canada. [47] Please do a check on the report as well. He is the same racist ethnic Tajik and editing the same articles as Beh-nam used to edit. He calls everyone who oppose his view as Taliban. It is not right to see a banned editor report other people.-- Hkrclu ( talk) 14:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed that
are the same and very likely She has a bird brain ( talk · contribs), a previously blocked sock. Amalthea 10:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Based on their edits, they're clearly not a new account. Similar domain of editing. Endorsing for confirmation and sleepers. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 08:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed as being the same as Hkrclu ( talk · contribs). TN X Man 14:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
V7 was blocked on August 5 for edit warring. Two days later, on August 7, Mirwais' first mainspace edit was on Faisal Shahzad, a place where V7 had edited. The first edit was to go back to V7's version of the article, and they used the edit history "Rvv". No new editor does that. Endorsing for confirmation. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:00, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Could I also get a check towards the account AlimNaz ( talk · contribs) please? Elockid ( Talk) 02:29, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Courcelles 08:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Another Strider filing. Requesting CU to check for sleepers. Elockid ( Talk) 03:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
No apparent sleepers. TN X Man 15:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Administrator note Already blocked by Elockid, tagged now. — Spaceman Spiff 16:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Same philosophy on the same issues. Resistance to relevant arguments and normal dispute solution. Starts edit wars. Vandalizes user page instead of using the talk page just like one of Lagoo sab's socks once did. [48] I am not sure, but the contributions' history suggests that this could be another sock account of Lagoo sab. [49] Considering Lagoo sab's history this should be checked before engaging in long disputes with this user which could become irrelevant when this is just another of Lagoo sab's hundreds of socks. Thank you. JCAla ( talk) 08:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Lagoo sab ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) seems to be very strategic and manipulative "editor". As soon as Jorge Koli ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) got blocked, this "editor" quickly resurrected NorthernPashtun ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and continued "editing" the very same pages with similar "vigor", bias, prejudices and aggressiveness. 68.27.248.223 ( talk) 14:18, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
1 2007 edit, 1 2008 edit, the edit after that clearly not new, makes about 500 contribs, and now is calling everyone they see a sock, with these accusations being baseless and like pulling some name out of a hat. Also Similar editing topics, and similar changes have lead me to request a CU, adding a relatively positive CU crosses the line for this type of disruption. -- DQ (t) (e) 18:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Afzalkhan123 is a SPA (one edit only) coming straight to a deletion review with same pov, same bias as Lagoo sab's sock farm. [55] TAzimi also edits exactly the same articles as Lagoo sab with exactly the same pov. (Pashtuns 60 % of Afghan population: [56] [57] ,edit warring: [58]) I have called him by the name of LS several times, after which, at least in the form of TAzimi, he was not to be seen again at the article I had called on him. JCAla ( talk) 11:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
why are you accusing me of wrong names??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afzalkhan123 ( talk • contribs) 14:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Note: The discussion below was initiated after the unblock by
Future Perfect at Sunrise as noted in the section below.
I don't have time to check all the 40 or more of Lagoo sab's socks for comparison, but there are fairly easy things to point out that make the connection obvious:
Ethnicity and Linguistics of Afghanistan
Dislike for Shia Islam
Fondness of Hamid Karzai
Same sources and pov
BTW, it is quite interesting and funny that besides Cabolitae, me and several others, both, Future Perfect at Sunrise [75] and Magog [76], have also been accused of sockpuppetry and POV propaganda by Lagoo sab in the past. ;)
Further indications:
JCAla ( talk) 16:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
The following are Likely matches to each other -all of the accounts in the archive are Stale:
Blocked all three. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Was dropped on my talk page by another edit a few days ago, where some discussion has taken place. There is crossover in the proper topics [81], and behavioral linkage. Nasir seems to not be as new as he is, and there are other behaviors, including an interest in socks, and others that I would rather not disclose publicly. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 11:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC) (per request of Lysozym)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Hi, I noticed you added my name to this page but I'm not either of the two persons which Lysozym ( talk · contribs) accused me to be. I have opposed the edits of Nasir Ghobar in one of the article and reverted him several times (please see my talk page). My account is not even new, because I have created articles, mainly about Pashto (its dialects), and expanded/moved to correct titles the already existing articles about Afghan calendar, about several Pashtun tribes and about some of the other topics about my country (Afghanistan). So because of my edits, I can't be any of those two persons, thanks. Khestwol ( talk) 14:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC) (copied from the talk page of Dennis Brown)
(cur | prev) 05:59, August 16, 2012 Khestwol (t | c | block) . . (+1,170) . . (Undid revision 507642814 by Nasir Ghobar (talk) unexplained removal of content (China shouldn't be removed from the country list, as Tarim Basin was conquered), reverted unexplained changes) (×)
Following a suggestion and a quite obnoxious comment at User talk:Chilum aw charrs, I took a quick glance; either I'm misunderstanding the usage of IPs in Pakistan, or this is a whole pile of socking going on -- which is exactly the pattern from Lagoo sab. Someone with more experience with this serial socker should take a look and see if it seems to match. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 17:07, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I got an email which said this editor was likely a sock of LS. Contribution history of the suspect sock shows nothing but overlap [82] Both use similar edit summarys LS suspect sock And both seem to have issues about the Pashto language LS suspect sock Darkness Shines ( talk) 00:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Fareed30 edits in the same topic area as LS and his other socks used to do with a similar Afghan/Pashtun POV. Though Fareed30 registered late last year but strangely enough knows the history of editing/socking in this topic area very well.( [83], [84]). And this is a reference to an established editor against whom LS sock(s) have previously filed SPIs (here and at commons) and had a number of editing disputes. A new editor can not figure out this much details as given in the edit summaries.
Matching edits
Partial match
There may be many more intersecting edits I assume but I guess this much are sufficient to establish a case. SMS Talk 22:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same Afghan POV, taking content disputes to administrator noticeboards for getting editors blocked with baseless allegations. Calling every one a sock puppet. Looks to be a behavior and pattern match to me. Asking for a CU, and also pinging Magog the Ogre, he has much experience in dealing with this guy in previous SPI (archives). Fai zan 15:26, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Nice try but I'm not a sockpuppet of anyone, a totally new editor who happens to be interested in some Afghan topics, according to Faizan, everyone who edits an Afghan page is a sockpuppet. I repeatedly told admins in the past at ANI board that my first edits were nominating an unfree image of Mullah Omar which got deleted along with my first edits. You can accuse me all you want but it will show that I'm not abusing multiple accounts or using IPs disruptively. While admin does a CU on me, I request that a CU be done on Faizan and on User:TheSawTooth just to clear things up. These guys are not here to build Wikipedia but to fight with anyone who they believe is Afghan or Indian.-- Krzyhorse22 ( talk) 20:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Krazy horse you are confirming your behavior. One more point:
It is the same style of writing of Krazy and Kiftaan. Hence left hand side is equal to right hand side. Thus proved Lagoo sab is puppetmaster of Krazy horse and Kiftaan. --- TheSawTooth ( talk) 20:55, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Pretty much like last time, he created this account in August 2014 but knows too much for being a new editor. His earlier sock requested a CU check on User:Saladin1987 with same reason/suspicions as did Krzyhorse this time. Lagoo (and his socks) have a history of getting in disputes with User:Mar4d and accusing him of socking, here and at commons. Some matching edits:
Besides I have been following Lagoo's often edited articles and have seen many a time IP editors making same or similar edits as Lagoo's non-IP socks did. According to my understanding the last CU run on Krzyhorse22 matched his IP to Lagoo sab's IP (but the CUs didn't know). I can reveal here or via email this IP range. -- SMS Talk 18:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Think its been kinda enough now, having let this sock of him go on for months. I thought someone else would make a CU, but to no avail, as no CU has been run yet. Like Lagoo sab and his other socks, he's literally obsessed with labelling everyone as sock, [107]- [108]- [109]- [110]- [111], with demanding everyone he has triffles with to be blocked, [112]- [113]- If I'm going to be indef blocked then User:Smsarmad (SMS), the guy who filed SPI without notifying me, should also be indef blocked. - [114] - [115] - "I also feel that Faizan be blocked for P.O.V pushing"- [116] - [117] - I think it's about time that Tajik is permanently blocked from en:Wiki, he was given so many chances but he arrogantly continues with his attacking people of different ethnicity while many admins have turned a blind eye to this- I requested he be blocked because he's not properly rehabilitated. That decision is in your hand.
Also, a perfect example, look here at this edit of Krzyhorse22, just like CU blocked socks of Lagoo sab before him, where he reinstates the exact same edit including edit summary, of a CU blocked sock of Lagoo Sab, namely Fareed30, on the same article;
Equally important, his very first edit on Wikipedia was to ask another user to be blocked. [118]. Ever seen a completely legit new user doing this?
Similar, structural ways of making edit summaries like previously CU blocked socks (this includes edit summaries by Krzyhorse as well as CU blocked socks as well as of the master);
more;
As well as very often passively agressive, some very racist/fascist, inflammatory, and ad-hominem edit summaries and responses of a remarkebly similar fashion (incl. WP:NOTTHEM); [119] - [120] - [121] - [122] - Krzyhorse22; "I don't give a shit who or what you are" I'm getting sick of this Iranian POV pushers - "If you look at the edits from the date this article was first created until right now, only Persians and Punjabis (neighbors of Pashtuns) came along with sneaky ideas to defame Pashtuns. These Persian and Punjabi sockpuppets all act like Yosemite Sam, obviously they're the same hate-filled sock abusers" - [123]- [124]- [125]- "It's a historical fact Afghans taught your ancestors how to read. Ghaznavids from Afghanistan brought to your ancestors in Hindustan the Persian language with instructions how to live like humans" - [126]- [127]- [128]- [129]- [130]- [131].
Another important one; Here Krzyhorse backs up the exact same stance, [132] as socks of Lagoo sab had done on the same article. [133] Regarding that same edit, he says that Pashtuns come from different origins, [134] a crucial and definite give-away thats typical of already CU blocked socks of Lagoo sab. [135]- [136]- [137].
Here Krzyhorse filed a page manually that had extensive material written by CU confirmed socks of Lagoo sab, especially Fareed03, on a page both he and already CU confirmed socks of Lagoo sab have edited. [138]
Furthermore, he and Lagoo sab sign their comments literally always the same way as well, namely with a "--" [139] - [140] - [141] - [142] - [143] - [144] - [145], up to including the last CU blocked sock.
As you can see its all structural and typical, with a focus solely on Afghanistan, Pakistan and sometimes India, and also rarely, like already CU blocked socks, on articles about American stars and foreign celebs. [146]- [147]- [148]- [149], exactly like already CU blocked socks of Lagoo sab. [150]- [151]. He also has edited with numerous known socks on Afghans in Iran (check its history, it includes NorthernPashtun, Lagoo sab) and Military of Afghanistan (it includes CU confirmed socks Jorge Koli, and Kaddoo), including as well with his current sock Krzyhorse22. [152]- [153]. This is all typical of Lagoo sab and his socks.
With little more than 2,000 edits, this new Lagoo sab sock called "Krzyhorse" has filed multiple SPI's, [154]- knows his way around a little bit too well, tagged numerous people, [155]- [156], made numerous ANI reports with the exact same demand, has the exact same behaviour as Lagoo sab & co (incl. being mostly in argues and filing people, often with people he had issues with priorly too), and literally his very first edits on this Krzyhorse22 account of his, was to try and get others blocked in an ANI request, including users with whom he apparently had alot of issues on previous CU blocked socks.
And yes, definetely a CU endorsment as I dare to bet there are sleepers. Pinging @ Smsarmad: and @ Magog the Ogre: as well as they have experience with the sockmaster. This is as clear as what. - LouisAragon ( talk) 02:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Do a complete CU on me. I have absolutely no reason to use more than this one (1) account (Krzyhorse22), I don't know why someone would even waste its time filing SPI against me. Most of my comments posted above prove nothing but majority's views/opinions. It's like how majority of Americans feel about certain issues, e.g., like Muslims or people from the Middle East (particularly Pakistanis and Iranians). Almost every American you encounter will make a very similar statement.-- Krzyhorse22 ( talk) 22:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Lagoo sab created exactly 100 accounts (just counted them) since 2009 to 2013. It's impossible to believe that after creating 100 accounts just to push his POV, he just stopped editing Wikipedia altogether and did not edit for last 3 years. 100 accounts over the period of 4 years mean 25 accounts per year which if we keep his track record in mind, he should have 75 more socks over the period of 2013 to 2016. Its just not possible that he stopped editing altogether and did not try for a WP:STANDARD and did not create any sock. Krzyhorse22's first edit was a filing of report against another user at ANI, this never kind of sunk in with me that a new user would do that. After my last poor report under a different SPI which i filed in haste, the only report in which i failed. After failing in my initial report, i went through the SPI archives, noticed this SPI and this sockpuppet having been reported so many times. I got intrigued in this case and wanted to dig deeper. While comparing these three users, i am convinced as well that Lagoo sab, Fareed30 and Krzyhorse22 are same people. It cannot be a coincidence that Krzyhorse22 edits the same Afghanistan articles that Lagoo, Fareed and all other confirmed socks of Lagoo did, and has the same POV with so many similarities in behavior. I would also like to assert that since so many people suspect this user being Lagoo sab, it warrants that we should run a CU on this user and put our suspicions behind. Apart from the fact that these three users display the same interest and have edited same pages, following behavioral evidences should be good enough to establish him a WP:DUCK and we might not even need to run a CU, its hard to imagine that few user accounts would have so many similarities and be different people, one or two similarities are understandable but so many of them as shown below and in the archives by other editors are questionable:
I will like to commend LouisAragon as well and will like admins to evaluate evidences presented by him one more time along with evidences presented by me. Also, there are quite good evidences by Smsarmad in that same report, have a look at them one more time. I think we are letting a sock off the hook for no understandable reason. Thank you! Let's take care of this, once and for all! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sheriff, both templates are public. See the bottom. Wikipedia:WikiProject Afghanistan/Templates -- 2A01:B840:111:D8:6C70:F38:9ED5:9C88 ( talk) 01:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Another so-called "grand return" of Lagoo sab. We're almost 10 years further since the first SPI, as well as some 100+ recorded sockpuppets. He just can't help returning over and over. Its been almost exactly 1 year since his last majorly disruptive sock was blocked; Kryzhorse22. Now, roughly a year later, both listed accounts ("Tummywinks" and "Kojakkrags") instantly threw themselves on Krzyhorse22's topic area (Afghanistan-Pakistan), employed the exact same editorial pattern, and both quickly got into edit wars with two users whom Lagoo sab has issues with for years. In "textbook Lagoo sab behavior", Kojakkrags ~ 50th edit was to ask an admin whether he could block user Saadkhan12345, an user with whom Lagoo sab & co. had an extensive number of argues with. He then continued quickly afterwards with more textbook admin shopping in order to get him blocked. [158] [159]. Likewise, in textbook Lagoo sab behaviour, "Tummywink" appeared on the stage, and instantly started inserting WP:OR material by the means of edit-warring against his long time enemy, Mar4d. Notice that Lagoo sab and Krzyhorse22 started fights with Mar4d on numerous occassions, and that Krzyhorse22's very first edits were to get other users of this topic area blocked as well. [160]
The amount of behavioral overlap is insane, as usual, but really "never a smoking gun", as Magog the Ogre correctly stated after the previous SPI. Coincidence however? Hell no! Never. I have dealt extensively with this sockmaster, so I'm pretty aware of how he writes, the way he writes, and what is petty " purpose" here is on Wiki. Even though both accounts have few edits on their record, they have the exact same POV as Lagoo sab.
More evidence;
There's no friggin' way that these two accounts, created within three months of each other,
[167]
[168] are legit accounts used by legit, new editors. Looking at the evidence, in combination with our long-standing experience with the sockmaster, everything seems to be pointing to another Lagoo sab charade.
Pinging
SheriffIsInTown,
Mar4d, and
RegentsPark. -
LouisAragon (
talk) 02:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- LouisAragon ( talk) 18:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
"Drayqueen" was created very recently (23 February 2019 [181]), has only made 176 edits, but already displays extensive knowledge of Wikipedia, and has considerable editorial overlap with Lagoo sab & Co. The utter vast majority of "Drayqueens" edits are made on the Afghanistan/Pakistan topic area, and Pashtuns/Afghans in particular. This is fully in line with Lagoo sab & Co. Though "Drayqueen" is a very new "account", he knew how to move an article within three edits, [182] and also displays perfect knowlege of the WP:RM process. [183]- [184] He has moved numerous other pages as well, e.g. [185]
These are all trademark habits/characteristics of Lagoo sab. For example, compare with blocked socks Krzyhorse22 [186] and Minervials [187] who also moved articles within very few edits on the very same topic area. Please refer to the Editor Interaction Analyzer [188]- [189] and the LTA case [190] for more information. - LouisAragon ( talk) 22:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The IP was blocked in February 2021 for a month after they filed this SPI. Looking at their contribution history and talk page, it looks like the same person on a static IP, with very specific idiosyncrasies (see the large scale changes, language use and formatting in articles, as well as on their own talk page) since February 2020 till the present. Tayi Arajakate Talk 21:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Part of the exact same IP ranges which Lagoo sab & co. has used extensively for years, as well as the same editorial pattern (focused on Afghanistan, knows his way around well straight off the bat, POV pushing, ad hominems, etc.). Some diffs:
Adding this material for the record as per this convo with Drmies. You guys could probably check whether a rangeblock would be feasible. - LouisAragon ( talk) 22:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of her training as a clerk. Please allow her to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on her talk page or on this page.
IP is causing disruption similar to how NisarKand does. NisarKand uses that IP range, see suspected socks and past CU request. See an example from sock User:Banigul, he always touches topics of Pashtun ascentry [1], and removes facts about Pashto having borrowings and origins from other languages [2]
I notice recent activity from that IP range in Silvia Lancome, a typical target of Misarkand. See this from 119.73.4.123 in 11th July, which is similar to this from 119.30.69.117 in October 2008, and that IP was tagged as a suspect sock of NisarKand.
This could also be a sock of User:Khampalak, who wrote another section about Bactrian descent.
I have tagged the IP. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/NisarKand for how a few socks were many times found when checkusering, so please run checkuser.
Ugh, and the other side, 94.219.218.20 ( talk · contribs), could be User:Beh-nam, he always accuses people of being socks of NisarKand.
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
User:Ahmed shahi was blocked indefinitely but since then has used several sockpuppet accounts (check Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ahmed_shahi/Archive) to edit Afghanistan related articles. I suspect he is now using the IP 119.73.7.124. Both accounts try to push the same set of POVs; and in addition their style of writing are quite similar. In all cases, 119.73.7.124 has good knowledge of how things are carried on in wikipedia, and is surely a sockpuppet of another user account. Ariana ( talk) 13:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
It seems he has changed again the IP address, and is now using Special:Contributions/210.2.177.244. He made edits with this IP over the same subject ( Afghanistan's Foreign relations and military). I made a WHOIS for this IP, and it comes exactly for the same server in Islamabad, Pakistan. Although he has received warning for disruptive behaviour in the past (see User_talk:210.2.177.244), his latest edits in Afghanistan article were constructive. But what is annoying is that he reported me for "vandalism" and 3RR in WK:AVI ( here) just as he did with his older IP address. I thought to mention it here which might help the administrator in his/her decision. Ariana ( talk) 16:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Have you considered the fact that Pakistan has about 177 million people and that "Nisar" and "Ahmad" are one of the most common names in Pakistan? It's like John and Michael in America. My internet provider has millions of customers and many of them use Wikipedia editing mainly Pakistan related articles, including neighboring countries sometimes. Not to mention that 1.7 million Afghan refugees live here and I guess they also edit Afghanistan pages.-- 119.73.8.27 ( talk) 01:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Clerk declined CU should generally not be used to tie links between IPs and accounts, per Wikipedia:CheckUser#IP information disclosure, the case has therefore been declined for checkuser attention. That aside, we seem to be onto something interesting here. The IPs listed are from the range 119.73.0.0/20 ( block range · block log ( global) · WHOIS (partial)), that range has just recently come out of a 3 month block which resulted from it's abusive use by sockpuppeteer NisarKand ( talk · contribs) (who also focuses on Afghanistan related articles). Given that that range block was set with account creation disabled it seems unlikely that the IP range was/is being used by Ahmed shahi ( talk · contribs), as he has been creating accounts while the range block was in place. However, the range should probably be re-blocked, as it seems that NisarKand is still using it (now that the block has expired). Hopefully that all makes sense, although I'd recommend that an admin check over this with due care before taking action, since I'm not familiar with NisarKand. Regards, Spitfire Tally-ho! 23:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: please note that this case was originally opened at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ahmed shahi. Spitfire Tally-ho! 17:40, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Taken from lost October request
Added from comments below
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/NisarKand; it appears there was a lost case a few months ago, for which checkuser evidence would be enlightening. Please note I am not necessarily accusing Lagoo sab of anything, simply processing the diligence required of an admin when he is asked to mediate an edit war. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 19:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Regarding users Lagoo Sab, Jrsko, Kaddoo:
Chartinael ( talk) 13:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Regarding Kaki joe. I am not sure, why no intersect edits come up with Lagoo Sab, although both have edited the same articles, namely Afghanistan and Pashto are shared articles for sure. [15] nor here [16]. His data is not included in the xls-file provided above. Chartinael ( talk) 13:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
User:Lagoo Sab is a sockpuppet of User:Ketabtoon. I contacted him through a just created account and his email and introduced myself as one of his allies and talked with him about the Pashtun-Tajik-Hazara editwars here on Wikipedia and told him I would support him against infidel Hazaras and sellout Tajiks. In return he told me creating at least two accounts and use them alternating. Further, he said between both account´s usage should be at least 3month break for not beeing identified as sockpuppet. He himself told me Ketabtoon is another account of him which is used on his cousins computer. Now it´s your duty as admin and guard of Wikipedia´s policy to do something against him. I can pass on his message to you if you wish.-- 94.219.98.69 ( talk) 07:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Before it leads to a wrong assumptation I am neither a Hazara or Uzbek nor a Tajik or Arab, Kashmiri or whatever. I know that Wikipedia became a play-ground for all kind of nationalistic bias and I do not welcome such tendencies, be they from my own people, Hazaras, Turks or Tajiks, Arabs, Americans, Dutchs or Indians. It´s a shame for everyone of us to show ourself as sociel illiterate individuals on the world stage of information acquisition to all kind of poeple, particular to the western world you claim beeing and got your educate from. Maybe you should go and live for 2 weeks in Kongo or India where you don´t have money to food or water to wash yourself or a safe place. Where will this war on Wikipedia, media, politics, X, Y, Z lead us? What do you await from it? If you have some complexes than go to psychiatry and get some help. I do not say to stand for the correct policy of Wikipedia but I can´t stand it when people, obviously even from the same country and the same race, tear themself to pieces just because they do not want to accept other opinions. Who cares what XYZ did in the past and to whom XYZ belong. What do you hope for? That your situation turns better or that your countries getting more attention from the world? If that´s so than you seems beeing very pathetic. Not the history of a nation make him special but his DAILY contributions and DAILY outputs (Turkey, India, South-Korea, Japan, China, Indonesia, South Africa) for a better TOMORROW. Those who dropped off their sick visions and started to live in TODAY and not still in YESTERDAY, they just gained good (Turkey, India, South-Korea, Japan, China, Indonesia, South Africa) from all part of the world. You people suffered to much because of your lost identities (IDless>Identity Crysis) and thus you turned your own country to hell with millions of innocent deaths, millions of replaced people, the highest death rate, the before-last country on earth. Get a bit civilised. Wikipedia´s reader are not only some 14 years old boys and girls. It became in the last 5 years the most important reference to all government institution for all countries along the globe. What do you guess those politicians and diplomats think about you when they read your all kind of crap here, a tool of the western world, actually made for the civilised western world and the Air Force, that you rubbish it here now and today and you will keep on in tomorrow as well. That´s sick and smells! I appreciate you to excuse my crudeness to some Wikipedians here.
@Tajik You are not better than the rest of the many clowns here. I don´t want to share my time with you or you-alike guys. You are a shame for civility and Wikipedia. Your way to talk with them and providing sources is not wrong, but pick holes on someone and come up with your well-known that´s POV and that´s not, this is PPP and this is DDD. What is wrong with you. You are not better than them and not all your sources can be correct. References from others are wrong, except yours who are God-gaven from God to you. Grow up, boy. I also do not care if the admin ban those (including you) guys or not, but my parent´s did not teached me to blame others (this option a ultima ratio). When I contacted the person I just wanted to know if he is one of some known and already banned Users and a sockpuppet of Ketabtoon, who further, indeed, is of banned User:NisarKand and his thousand other socks. Your request telling my Account is not acceptable. Maybe I ant use it one day and it´s very easy to personate me as a sock of IP XYZ 10-5 which possibly would be a reason to block me, while the real vandalists are occuring here days and nights. But I am ready to present my email (shabirdurani@rocketmail.com). If anyone have any questions they are free to ask and contact me through my mail but don´t expect from me letting someone go into the knife which would be only my last action if there´s no view taling place.
@Admin Sometimes I do edit some articles, only minor faults or nationalistic POVs, but since Afghanistan-related articles have no own guards or at the best at least two Admins, those Users reedite those articles again. A sign that Wikipedia failed. Please take also a look on this, where Lagoo Sab is already linked to NisarKand and Bani Gul. Isn´t strange one get blocked and banned on Wikipedia and not one day later, another User registers do the same POVs and changes without any reactions of the admins?
Good morning-- 94.219.98.69 ( talk) 12:30, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The editor Inuit18 ( talk · contribs) who added my name in the October 2010 CU request is a banned editor [17]. CheckUser is not for fishing, listing me here is considered fishing because I didn't violate anything. Instead, what I did was provide a valid argument in the talk pages of 2 articles ( Talk:Languages of Afghanistan#Problem with CIA estimates for languages of Afghanistan and Talk:Afghanistan#Problem with CIA estimates for languages of Afghanistan) so that the info is corrected. To thank me for this, User:Magog the Ogre decided to report me here. Seems to me that nobody follow rules, each person makes up own rules as they go along, and I feel this is a revenge to give me a bad name even though I'm improving articles in Wikipedia. I am against incorrect information presented as a fact in Wikipedia. As a result of too many mistakes and errors accepted by the west (America and NATO countries), they are now suffering and slowly going down the drain while countries in Asia are rising to the top.-- Lagoo sab ( talk) 20:40, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Okay, everyone stop. This is not the right venue to have your battles; we're here to discuss the plausibility of running a checkuser to compare Lagoo sab to other people. First, someone needs to update the Suspected sockpuppets section above to list the potential sockpuppets. After that, all I want is a concise explanation (preferably using diffs) to explain why we should look into those editors as being potential socks. And then I (or another clerk) will determine whether or not a CU is needed. Until then, take your bickering elsewhere. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 00:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed as each other:
Confirmed as each other:
Unrelated to each other or to any of the above:
As far as I see on the technical end, there is no relation between the two groups of confirmed users. No comment with regards to any suspected IP addresses. – MuZemike 00:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Procedural request for tracking purposes. User is already blocked. Nakon 02:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
In the future, it's not necessary to report every confirmed sock here ( WP:NOTBURO), especially since it was already tagged and blocked as such. – MuZemike 02:42, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Again. Among two issues, we have someone pushing the certain POV on Pashtun peoples and misuse of the term vandalism. There is one other issue that has me concerned, which I will not note out loud per WP:BEANS (but can do for another admin/CU upon request).
If this was a new user I'd be sure of the connection, but Xinjao has been around a while, unlike LS. However, who knows who the sockmaster is? Magog the Ogre ( talk) 03:07, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Hi Magog, I doubt the association. This user does not try to UP the figures for Pashtuns, declaring everyone Pathan Pashtun. His edits appear founded and he uses the talk page to address others whose edits he/she views as problematic. Regards. छातीऀनाएल - chartinael ( talk) 12:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
I probably didn't need to check, but since my assumption was wrong the last time in this case (There was indeed socking when I didn't expect it), I went ahead; Xinjao is Unrelated. – MuZemike 15:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Yet another user popping up out of the ether to edit war in LS's style. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 01:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. What is this? Me chase girl she chase me ( talk) 19:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Ranges may have too much traffic for a rangeblock. Another CU may wish to weigh in. -- Avi ( talk) 05:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
User:She has a bird brain came to edit war in Lagoo sab's style. In the Hamid Karzai's article history he indirectly showed that he is no other than Lagoo sab by stating and making his typical (false) accusations: "JCAla you are showing your typical shia pov by being a sympathizer to them ..." ( see here) There was no prior contact to the user so it is unlikely for any other person to state such things. You will also find that User:She has a bird brain edits exactly the same articles as did Lagoo sab with his countless socks. ( see here) The other users named are very likely less-used sock accounts of Lagoo sab. See their contribution history. JCAla ( talk) 08:38, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The following are Confirmed as Lagoo sab:
The other accounts mentioned above are either Unlikely or outright Unrelated. – MuZemike 08:58, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
I suspect [25] that Cabolitae is using JCAla as a single-purpose account to edit for promotion, advocacy or other unsuitable agendas. Cabolitae stated on his page that he is from Afghanistan who is in France and edits Afghanistan articles [26] and has added his name to the WikiProject Afghanistan members list as did JCAla, a user who is also Afghan and very familiar with France [27], both accounts edit the same Afghanistan articles. [28] [29] [30]
JCAla and Cabolitae edit very similarly using the same level of English in talk pages from a location in France I believe, and they leave behind very similar comments in their edit summaries, immediately get into edit-war with anyone who changes their watched pages. [31] Although they don't edit much, they sure appear to be watching the pages everyday, this elevates the level of my suspicion.
I believe that Cabolitae is using the JCAla account for personal political propaganda and to express his anger by bashing the U.S. and NATO-allied state of Pakistan [32] [33] and in the meantime to promote Ahmad Shah Massoud and the Northern Alliance, which is regarded in the mainstream media as a group of Category:Afghan warlords accused of ethnic cleansing and mass human rights violations, including killings, rapes and robberies. The official RAWA website is full of reports on that.
JCAla is very disruptive, he is turning Afghanistan related Wikipedia articles to his personal blog pages by copy pasting the same large portion of propaganda work that he prepared on all of them [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40], which is cherry-picked to reflect his anti-Pakistan pro-Ahmad Shah Massoud/Northern Alliance POVs. It's against Wikipedia's policy to host JCAla who wants to spread his politically motivated propaganda messages, especially if he is used by someone as a sockpuppet. Both users have been blocked before for edit-warring on Afghanistan. [41] [42] I listed the IP to help with the investigation, it is from France and I'm very sure it was used by Cabolitae. She has a bird brain ( talk) 06:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Go ahead, check it. Got nothing to hide. Other than that, be aware that User: She has a bird brain is more than likely just another sock of banned User: Lagoo sab. See his dozens of socks and the investigation here. Lagoo sab has systematically used dozens of accounts to further his political pro-Taliban stance and has engaged a variety of respected users in edit wars by simply restoring false information again and again. You will find that my two blocks for edit wars were when I was relatively new to wikipedia and both were in connection to countering political propaganda by his now-blocked sock account User: Jrkso (a fact then unknown to the blocking administrator). JCAla ( talk) 15 April 2011 (UTC)
I was already in the process of checking the reporter. Confirmed She has a bird brain is User: Lagoo sab. Plus there are several more Confirmed accounts on the IP:
The IP was already blocked for the anonymous editing from it. Dominic· t 08:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Possibly another sock of User:Lagoo sab. Same editing pattern on the same issues, with the same pov and same tendency towards edit warring. See i. e. [43], [44], [45] or [46] JCAla ( talk) 09:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The reporter of this request is the banned User:Beh-nam, who has used 100s of sockpuppets. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Beh-nam His location is Toronto, Canada. [47] Please do a check on the report as well. He is the same racist ethnic Tajik and editing the same articles as Beh-nam used to edit. He calls everyone who oppose his view as Taliban. It is not right to see a banned editor report other people.-- Hkrclu ( talk) 14:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed that
are the same and very likely She has a bird brain ( talk · contribs), a previously blocked sock. Amalthea 10:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Based on their edits, they're clearly not a new account. Similar domain of editing. Endorsing for confirmation and sleepers. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 08:24, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed as being the same as Hkrclu ( talk · contribs). TN X Man 14:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
V7 was blocked on August 5 for edit warring. Two days later, on August 7, Mirwais' first mainspace edit was on Faisal Shahzad, a place where V7 had edited. The first edit was to go back to V7's version of the article, and they used the edit history "Rvv". No new editor does that. Endorsing for confirmation. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:00, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Could I also get a check towards the account AlimNaz ( talk · contribs) please? Elockid ( Talk) 02:29, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Courcelles 08:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Another Strider filing. Requesting CU to check for sleepers. Elockid ( Talk) 03:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
No apparent sleepers. TN X Man 15:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Administrator note Already blocked by Elockid, tagged now. — Spaceman Spiff 16:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Same philosophy on the same issues. Resistance to relevant arguments and normal dispute solution. Starts edit wars. Vandalizes user page instead of using the talk page just like one of Lagoo sab's socks once did. [48] I am not sure, but the contributions' history suggests that this could be another sock account of Lagoo sab. [49] Considering Lagoo sab's history this should be checked before engaging in long disputes with this user which could become irrelevant when this is just another of Lagoo sab's hundreds of socks. Thank you. JCAla ( talk) 08:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Lagoo sab ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) seems to be very strategic and manipulative "editor". As soon as Jorge Koli ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) got blocked, this "editor" quickly resurrected NorthernPashtun ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and continued "editing" the very same pages with similar "vigor", bias, prejudices and aggressiveness. 68.27.248.223 ( talk) 14:18, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
1 2007 edit, 1 2008 edit, the edit after that clearly not new, makes about 500 contribs, and now is calling everyone they see a sock, with these accusations being baseless and like pulling some name out of a hat. Also Similar editing topics, and similar changes have lead me to request a CU, adding a relatively positive CU crosses the line for this type of disruption. -- DQ (t) (e) 18:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Afzalkhan123 is a SPA (one edit only) coming straight to a deletion review with same pov, same bias as Lagoo sab's sock farm. [55] TAzimi also edits exactly the same articles as Lagoo sab with exactly the same pov. (Pashtuns 60 % of Afghan population: [56] [57] ,edit warring: [58]) I have called him by the name of LS several times, after which, at least in the form of TAzimi, he was not to be seen again at the article I had called on him. JCAla ( talk) 11:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
why are you accusing me of wrong names??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afzalkhan123 ( talk • contribs) 14:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Note: The discussion below was initiated after the unblock by
Future Perfect at Sunrise as noted in the section below.
I don't have time to check all the 40 or more of Lagoo sab's socks for comparison, but there are fairly easy things to point out that make the connection obvious:
Ethnicity and Linguistics of Afghanistan
Dislike for Shia Islam
Fondness of Hamid Karzai
Same sources and pov
BTW, it is quite interesting and funny that besides Cabolitae, me and several others, both, Future Perfect at Sunrise [75] and Magog [76], have also been accused of sockpuppetry and POV propaganda by Lagoo sab in the past. ;)
Further indications:
JCAla ( talk) 16:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
The following are Likely matches to each other -all of the accounts in the archive are Stale:
Blocked all three. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:48, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Was dropped on my talk page by another edit a few days ago, where some discussion has taken place. There is crossover in the proper topics [81], and behavioral linkage. Nasir seems to not be as new as he is, and there are other behaviors, including an interest in socks, and others that I would rather not disclose publicly. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 11:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC) (per request of Lysozym)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Hi, I noticed you added my name to this page but I'm not either of the two persons which Lysozym ( talk · contribs) accused me to be. I have opposed the edits of Nasir Ghobar in one of the article and reverted him several times (please see my talk page). My account is not even new, because I have created articles, mainly about Pashto (its dialects), and expanded/moved to correct titles the already existing articles about Afghan calendar, about several Pashtun tribes and about some of the other topics about my country (Afghanistan). So because of my edits, I can't be any of those two persons, thanks. Khestwol ( talk) 14:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC) (copied from the talk page of Dennis Brown)
(cur | prev) 05:59, August 16, 2012 Khestwol (t | c | block) . . (+1,170) . . (Undid revision 507642814 by Nasir Ghobar (talk) unexplained removal of content (China shouldn't be removed from the country list, as Tarim Basin was conquered), reverted unexplained changes) (×)
Following a suggestion and a quite obnoxious comment at User talk:Chilum aw charrs, I took a quick glance; either I'm misunderstanding the usage of IPs in Pakistan, or this is a whole pile of socking going on -- which is exactly the pattern from Lagoo sab. Someone with more experience with this serial socker should take a look and see if it seems to match. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 17:07, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I got an email which said this editor was likely a sock of LS. Contribution history of the suspect sock shows nothing but overlap [82] Both use similar edit summarys LS suspect sock And both seem to have issues about the Pashto language LS suspect sock Darkness Shines ( talk) 00:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Fareed30 edits in the same topic area as LS and his other socks used to do with a similar Afghan/Pashtun POV. Though Fareed30 registered late last year but strangely enough knows the history of editing/socking in this topic area very well.( [83], [84]). And this is a reference to an established editor against whom LS sock(s) have previously filed SPIs (here and at commons) and had a number of editing disputes. A new editor can not figure out this much details as given in the edit summaries.
Matching edits
Partial match
There may be many more intersecting edits I assume but I guess this much are sufficient to establish a case. SMS Talk 22:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same Afghan POV, taking content disputes to administrator noticeboards for getting editors blocked with baseless allegations. Calling every one a sock puppet. Looks to be a behavior and pattern match to me. Asking for a CU, and also pinging Magog the Ogre, he has much experience in dealing with this guy in previous SPI (archives). Fai zan 15:26, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Nice try but I'm not a sockpuppet of anyone, a totally new editor who happens to be interested in some Afghan topics, according to Faizan, everyone who edits an Afghan page is a sockpuppet. I repeatedly told admins in the past at ANI board that my first edits were nominating an unfree image of Mullah Omar which got deleted along with my first edits. You can accuse me all you want but it will show that I'm not abusing multiple accounts or using IPs disruptively. While admin does a CU on me, I request that a CU be done on Faizan and on User:TheSawTooth just to clear things up. These guys are not here to build Wikipedia but to fight with anyone who they believe is Afghan or Indian.-- Krzyhorse22 ( talk) 20:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Krazy horse you are confirming your behavior. One more point:
It is the same style of writing of Krazy and Kiftaan. Hence left hand side is equal to right hand side. Thus proved Lagoo sab is puppetmaster of Krazy horse and Kiftaan. --- TheSawTooth ( talk) 20:55, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Pretty much like last time, he created this account in August 2014 but knows too much for being a new editor. His earlier sock requested a CU check on User:Saladin1987 with same reason/suspicions as did Krzyhorse this time. Lagoo (and his socks) have a history of getting in disputes with User:Mar4d and accusing him of socking, here and at commons. Some matching edits:
Besides I have been following Lagoo's often edited articles and have seen many a time IP editors making same or similar edits as Lagoo's non-IP socks did. According to my understanding the last CU run on Krzyhorse22 matched his IP to Lagoo sab's IP (but the CUs didn't know). I can reveal here or via email this IP range. -- SMS Talk 18:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Think its been kinda enough now, having let this sock of him go on for months. I thought someone else would make a CU, but to no avail, as no CU has been run yet. Like Lagoo sab and his other socks, he's literally obsessed with labelling everyone as sock, [107]- [108]- [109]- [110]- [111], with demanding everyone he has triffles with to be blocked, [112]- [113]- If I'm going to be indef blocked then User:Smsarmad (SMS), the guy who filed SPI without notifying me, should also be indef blocked. - [114] - [115] - "I also feel that Faizan be blocked for P.O.V pushing"- [116] - [117] - I think it's about time that Tajik is permanently blocked from en:Wiki, he was given so many chances but he arrogantly continues with his attacking people of different ethnicity while many admins have turned a blind eye to this- I requested he be blocked because he's not properly rehabilitated. That decision is in your hand.
Also, a perfect example, look here at this edit of Krzyhorse22, just like CU blocked socks of Lagoo sab before him, where he reinstates the exact same edit including edit summary, of a CU blocked sock of Lagoo Sab, namely Fareed30, on the same article;
Equally important, his very first edit on Wikipedia was to ask another user to be blocked. [118]. Ever seen a completely legit new user doing this?
Similar, structural ways of making edit summaries like previously CU blocked socks (this includes edit summaries by Krzyhorse as well as CU blocked socks as well as of the master);
more;
As well as very often passively agressive, some very racist/fascist, inflammatory, and ad-hominem edit summaries and responses of a remarkebly similar fashion (incl. WP:NOTTHEM); [119] - [120] - [121] - [122] - Krzyhorse22; "I don't give a shit who or what you are" I'm getting sick of this Iranian POV pushers - "If you look at the edits from the date this article was first created until right now, only Persians and Punjabis (neighbors of Pashtuns) came along with sneaky ideas to defame Pashtuns. These Persian and Punjabi sockpuppets all act like Yosemite Sam, obviously they're the same hate-filled sock abusers" - [123]- [124]- [125]- "It's a historical fact Afghans taught your ancestors how to read. Ghaznavids from Afghanistan brought to your ancestors in Hindustan the Persian language with instructions how to live like humans" - [126]- [127]- [128]- [129]- [130]- [131].
Another important one; Here Krzyhorse backs up the exact same stance, [132] as socks of Lagoo sab had done on the same article. [133] Regarding that same edit, he says that Pashtuns come from different origins, [134] a crucial and definite give-away thats typical of already CU blocked socks of Lagoo sab. [135]- [136]- [137].
Here Krzyhorse filed a page manually that had extensive material written by CU confirmed socks of Lagoo sab, especially Fareed03, on a page both he and already CU confirmed socks of Lagoo sab have edited. [138]
Furthermore, he and Lagoo sab sign their comments literally always the same way as well, namely with a "--" [139] - [140] - [141] - [142] - [143] - [144] - [145], up to including the last CU blocked sock.
As you can see its all structural and typical, with a focus solely on Afghanistan, Pakistan and sometimes India, and also rarely, like already CU blocked socks, on articles about American stars and foreign celebs. [146]- [147]- [148]- [149], exactly like already CU blocked socks of Lagoo sab. [150]- [151]. He also has edited with numerous known socks on Afghans in Iran (check its history, it includes NorthernPashtun, Lagoo sab) and Military of Afghanistan (it includes CU confirmed socks Jorge Koli, and Kaddoo), including as well with his current sock Krzyhorse22. [152]- [153]. This is all typical of Lagoo sab and his socks.
With little more than 2,000 edits, this new Lagoo sab sock called "Krzyhorse" has filed multiple SPI's, [154]- knows his way around a little bit too well, tagged numerous people, [155]- [156], made numerous ANI reports with the exact same demand, has the exact same behaviour as Lagoo sab & co (incl. being mostly in argues and filing people, often with people he had issues with priorly too), and literally his very first edits on this Krzyhorse22 account of his, was to try and get others blocked in an ANI request, including users with whom he apparently had alot of issues on previous CU blocked socks.
And yes, definetely a CU endorsment as I dare to bet there are sleepers. Pinging @ Smsarmad: and @ Magog the Ogre: as well as they have experience with the sockmaster. This is as clear as what. - LouisAragon ( talk) 02:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Do a complete CU on me. I have absolutely no reason to use more than this one (1) account (Krzyhorse22), I don't know why someone would even waste its time filing SPI against me. Most of my comments posted above prove nothing but majority's views/opinions. It's like how majority of Americans feel about certain issues, e.g., like Muslims or people from the Middle East (particularly Pakistanis and Iranians). Almost every American you encounter will make a very similar statement.-- Krzyhorse22 ( talk) 22:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Lagoo sab created exactly 100 accounts (just counted them) since 2009 to 2013. It's impossible to believe that after creating 100 accounts just to push his POV, he just stopped editing Wikipedia altogether and did not edit for last 3 years. 100 accounts over the period of 4 years mean 25 accounts per year which if we keep his track record in mind, he should have 75 more socks over the period of 2013 to 2016. Its just not possible that he stopped editing altogether and did not try for a WP:STANDARD and did not create any sock. Krzyhorse22's first edit was a filing of report against another user at ANI, this never kind of sunk in with me that a new user would do that. After my last poor report under a different SPI which i filed in haste, the only report in which i failed. After failing in my initial report, i went through the SPI archives, noticed this SPI and this sockpuppet having been reported so many times. I got intrigued in this case and wanted to dig deeper. While comparing these three users, i am convinced as well that Lagoo sab, Fareed30 and Krzyhorse22 are same people. It cannot be a coincidence that Krzyhorse22 edits the same Afghanistan articles that Lagoo, Fareed and all other confirmed socks of Lagoo did, and has the same POV with so many similarities in behavior. I would also like to assert that since so many people suspect this user being Lagoo sab, it warrants that we should run a CU on this user and put our suspicions behind. Apart from the fact that these three users display the same interest and have edited same pages, following behavioral evidences should be good enough to establish him a WP:DUCK and we might not even need to run a CU, its hard to imagine that few user accounts would have so many similarities and be different people, one or two similarities are understandable but so many of them as shown below and in the archives by other editors are questionable:
I will like to commend LouisAragon as well and will like admins to evaluate evidences presented by him one more time along with evidences presented by me. Also, there are quite good evidences by Smsarmad in that same report, have a look at them one more time. I think we are letting a sock off the hook for no understandable reason. Thank you! Let's take care of this, once and for all! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sheriff, both templates are public. See the bottom. Wikipedia:WikiProject Afghanistan/Templates -- 2A01:B840:111:D8:6C70:F38:9ED5:9C88 ( talk) 01:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Another so-called "grand return" of Lagoo sab. We're almost 10 years further since the first SPI, as well as some 100+ recorded sockpuppets. He just can't help returning over and over. Its been almost exactly 1 year since his last majorly disruptive sock was blocked; Kryzhorse22. Now, roughly a year later, both listed accounts ("Tummywinks" and "Kojakkrags") instantly threw themselves on Krzyhorse22's topic area (Afghanistan-Pakistan), employed the exact same editorial pattern, and both quickly got into edit wars with two users whom Lagoo sab has issues with for years. In "textbook Lagoo sab behavior", Kojakkrags ~ 50th edit was to ask an admin whether he could block user Saadkhan12345, an user with whom Lagoo sab & co. had an extensive number of argues with. He then continued quickly afterwards with more textbook admin shopping in order to get him blocked. [158] [159]. Likewise, in textbook Lagoo sab behaviour, "Tummywink" appeared on the stage, and instantly started inserting WP:OR material by the means of edit-warring against his long time enemy, Mar4d. Notice that Lagoo sab and Krzyhorse22 started fights with Mar4d on numerous occassions, and that Krzyhorse22's very first edits were to get other users of this topic area blocked as well. [160]
The amount of behavioral overlap is insane, as usual, but really "never a smoking gun", as Magog the Ogre correctly stated after the previous SPI. Coincidence however? Hell no! Never. I have dealt extensively with this sockmaster, so I'm pretty aware of how he writes, the way he writes, and what is petty " purpose" here is on Wiki. Even though both accounts have few edits on their record, they have the exact same POV as Lagoo sab.
More evidence;
There's no friggin' way that these two accounts, created within three months of each other,
[167]
[168] are legit accounts used by legit, new editors. Looking at the evidence, in combination with our long-standing experience with the sockmaster, everything seems to be pointing to another Lagoo sab charade.
Pinging
SheriffIsInTown,
Mar4d, and
RegentsPark. -
LouisAragon (
talk) 02:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- LouisAragon ( talk) 18:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
"Drayqueen" was created very recently (23 February 2019 [181]), has only made 176 edits, but already displays extensive knowledge of Wikipedia, and has considerable editorial overlap with Lagoo sab & Co. The utter vast majority of "Drayqueens" edits are made on the Afghanistan/Pakistan topic area, and Pashtuns/Afghans in particular. This is fully in line with Lagoo sab & Co. Though "Drayqueen" is a very new "account", he knew how to move an article within three edits, [182] and also displays perfect knowlege of the WP:RM process. [183]- [184] He has moved numerous other pages as well, e.g. [185]
These are all trademark habits/characteristics of Lagoo sab. For example, compare with blocked socks Krzyhorse22 [186] and Minervials [187] who also moved articles within very few edits on the very same topic area. Please refer to the Editor Interaction Analyzer [188]- [189] and the LTA case [190] for more information. - LouisAragon ( talk) 22:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The IP was blocked in February 2021 for a month after they filed this SPI. Looking at their contribution history and talk page, it looks like the same person on a static IP, with very specific idiosyncrasies (see the large scale changes, language use and formatting in articles, as well as on their own talk page) since February 2020 till the present. Tayi Arajakate Talk 21:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Part of the exact same IP ranges which Lagoo sab & co. has used extensively for years, as well as the same editorial pattern (focused on Afghanistan, knows his way around well straight off the bat, POV pushing, ad hominems, etc.). Some diffs:
Adding this material for the record as per this convo with Drmies. You guys could probably check whether a rangeblock would be feasible. - LouisAragon ( talk) 22:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of her training as a clerk. Please allow her to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on her talk page or on this page.