|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to 28 October 2009 Peshawar bombing, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. yousaf465' 05:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
No, but just because it's the start of winter doesn't mean everybody is doing their winter shopping - avoid making such assumptions if you don't have sources. And not exactly, but you'd have to have a source stating that a majority or so were doing said type of shopping; otherwise it's original research. Master of Puppets 03:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
“ | At Lady Reading Hospital, a student named Ahmed Jan, 25, said a relative of his had been killed in the bombing. He said she was a teacher who had gone to the market to buy winter clothes for her two children. [1] | ” |
People do winter shopping before the cold winter weather begins, usually one month in advance, and in the case of Peshawar the cold season starts now. You probably live in India where you don't see winter, but in many places of the world people know what winter shopping means. Why did you remove the source? Why don't you use the talk page instead of removing information from articles? This isn't good.-- Jrkso ( talk) 14:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Zabiullah Mujahid has been reverted.
Your edit
here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCptFrPZZG0 (matching the
regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
media file (e.g. a
sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's
copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our
upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our
guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk) 23:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
FYI -
I just formally asked for a third opinion on the Afghanisan article.
Thanks,
Danieldis47 ( talk) 16:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Your views on the latest draft for the section Afghanistan#War_in_Afghanistan_2001.E2.80.93present would be valuable. The discussion is at Talk:Afghanistan#Proposal:_Section_War_in_Afghanistan_2001.E2.80.93present-- Work permit ( talk) 03:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
You might like to contribute to this : Talk:Afghanistan#Section_title_-_War.2FNATO_Mission.2FUS_Mission_2001-present
I'm not strongly invested either way, but I do feel it makes some sort of sense to have the section title match the article it links to as Main Article: Begoon talk 00:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
I am stop here as your constant edit warring is disruptive and i will be soon offline so i left a message here IQinn ( talk) 14:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to notify you that you are in fact falsifying sources. 3 sources are given which put the number of Tajiks at 30-40% (one of them is the authoritative Encyclopaedia Iranica which puts the number at 33.7%). The list gives the minimum and the maximum numbers. Please revert your latest change. Thank you.
Your edit is negating and falsifying these 3 sources. Tajik ( talk) 16:40, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Please stop accusing me of using sockpuppets. If you have any problems, please ask admins for a checkuser file. I have no problems with it. And you should not accuse others of POV-pushing while your own edits are highly controversial and seem to be of Pashtun nationalist and ethno-centric nature. Regards. Tajik ( talk) 00:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Because of your unencyclopedic behavior, because of your stubborn POV pushing in regard of Alexanders fake letter, because of your attitude to ignore certain discussions, and because of your POV regarding Afghanistan's ethnic groups and the relevant sources, I have reported you to WP:ANI ( Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#POV_and_propaganda_by_User:Jrkso) after being indirectly advised by User:Paul Barlow to do so. The wrong information regarding Alexander was removed as per discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. But you ignored my message on Talk:Afghanistan and blindly reverted. Tajik ( talk) 13:18, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Because of your politically motivated edit warring, repeated baseless accusations and disruptive use of wikipedia notification/reporting boards (without you notifying the people you are talking about) I have referred the issue here. JCAla ( talk) 26 November 2010 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to 28 October 2009 Peshawar bombing, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. yousaf465' 05:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
No, but just because it's the start of winter doesn't mean everybody is doing their winter shopping - avoid making such assumptions if you don't have sources. And not exactly, but you'd have to have a source stating that a majority or so were doing said type of shopping; otherwise it's original research. Master of Puppets 03:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
“ | At Lady Reading Hospital, a student named Ahmed Jan, 25, said a relative of his had been killed in the bombing. He said she was a teacher who had gone to the market to buy winter clothes for her two children. [1] | ” |
People do winter shopping before the cold winter weather begins, usually one month in advance, and in the case of Peshawar the cold season starts now. You probably live in India where you don't see winter, but in many places of the world people know what winter shopping means. Why did you remove the source? Why don't you use the talk page instead of removing information from articles? This isn't good.-- Jrkso ( talk) 14:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Zabiullah Mujahid has been reverted.
Your edit
here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCptFrPZZG0 (matching the
regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
media file (e.g. a
sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's
copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our
upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our
guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk) 23:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
FYI -
I just formally asked for a third opinion on the Afghanisan article.
Thanks,
Danieldis47 ( talk) 16:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Your views on the latest draft for the section Afghanistan#War_in_Afghanistan_2001.E2.80.93present would be valuable. The discussion is at Talk:Afghanistan#Proposal:_Section_War_in_Afghanistan_2001.E2.80.93present-- Work permit ( talk) 03:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
You might like to contribute to this : Talk:Afghanistan#Section_title_-_War.2FNATO_Mission.2FUS_Mission_2001-present
I'm not strongly invested either way, but I do feel it makes some sort of sense to have the section title match the article it links to as Main Article: Begoon talk 00:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
I am stop here as your constant edit warring is disruptive and i will be soon offline so i left a message here IQinn ( talk) 14:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to notify you that you are in fact falsifying sources. 3 sources are given which put the number of Tajiks at 30-40% (one of them is the authoritative Encyclopaedia Iranica which puts the number at 33.7%). The list gives the minimum and the maximum numbers. Please revert your latest change. Thank you.
Your edit is negating and falsifying these 3 sources. Tajik ( talk) 16:40, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Please stop accusing me of using sockpuppets. If you have any problems, please ask admins for a checkuser file. I have no problems with it. And you should not accuse others of POV-pushing while your own edits are highly controversial and seem to be of Pashtun nationalist and ethno-centric nature. Regards. Tajik ( talk) 00:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Because of your unencyclopedic behavior, because of your stubborn POV pushing in regard of Alexanders fake letter, because of your attitude to ignore certain discussions, and because of your POV regarding Afghanistan's ethnic groups and the relevant sources, I have reported you to WP:ANI ( Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#POV_and_propaganda_by_User:Jrkso) after being indirectly advised by User:Paul Barlow to do so. The wrong information regarding Alexander was removed as per discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. But you ignored my message on Talk:Afghanistan and blindly reverted. Tajik ( talk) 13:18, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Because of your politically motivated edit warring, repeated baseless accusations and disruptive use of wikipedia notification/reporting boards (without you notifying the people you are talking about) I have referred the issue here. JCAla ( talk) 26 November 2010 (UTC)