Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Giubbotto non ortodosso

Giubbotto non ortodosso ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

16 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Italian IP range Special:Contributions/62.18.232.0/22 was blocked four days ago. Today, a drawer full of socks was blocked by checkuser. But Chris breezy namibia was not discovered during the checkuser process. Chris breezy namibia re-appeared after all the other socks had been blocked. Chris breezy namibia re-instated the edits made by Italian sock IPs. [1] [2]

Checkuser not needed; behavior is enough. Binksternet ( talk) 15:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Yep, but CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk regardless since this is a sleeper from April that wasn't caught in the last check, so we might uncover others. -- Blablubbs| talk 16:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed. Bagging and tagging sock account. no No comment with respect to IP address(es). This SPI can be closed... ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 16:14, 16 June 2021 (UTC) reply

18 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Two neighboring Italian IP ranges are involved in block evasion: Special:Contributions/109.52.200.0/21 and Special:Contributions/109.52.192.0/21.

The interaction between 109.52.199.77 and blocked sock Like i done it befoh shows the connection. 109.52.199.54 is connected to 109.52.199.77. [3]

Ridinzolooo's only edit was to add the song "Did You?" which is a deleted and salted song article: Did You?.

A thousand words's Eddie Murphy's only edit was to tweak an article of great interest to former socks, [4] closely followed by two Italian IPs. [5]

Mulla boyzsk followed Italian IPs three minutes later. [6] [7]

Checkuser requested to hunt for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 16:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. i'm absolutely not him. i swear. but i wanna help you edits like this need to be stopped. SHAME ON GIUBBOTTO

Thank you for saving wikipedia by the way. i really appreciate your work-- A thousand words's Eddie Murphy ( talk) 16:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely):
Ridinzolooo ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
The confirmed accounts are  Likely to the master based off geolocation and ranges. Ridinzolooo is also in the same geolocation, but on a different range and had a different user agent than the others. no No comment with respect to IP address(es). ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 16:33, 18 June 2021 (UTC) reply

03 July 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

I got timesz performed ten edits to get autoconfirmed, then restored a previous sock edit and then built on it. [8] [9]

Bady man bossa gun performed the signature reversion seen by a great many previous socks. [10] Burn my nameus followed suit. [11] R&Biatch followed behind and restored the same text, claiming in the edit summary to be reverting Giubbotto non ortodosso when the edit was actually restoring. [12]

Checkuser requested to rouse out sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 03:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

25 August 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

This account was created a days ago and already making the same edits as before [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 20:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Va fora is already blocked. They repeated the actions of previous socks, adding "tropical pop" [18] just like Italian IP sock 2.197.90.14. [19]

Blocked sock Shoe and socks added redirects to song articles in the Chris Brown template [20] and blocked sock I luve jak harlow added a redlink to a deleted song article. New sock Mixdlov arrived and added redlinks to deleted song articles and links to redirects. [21]

A long series of socks and Italian IPs have been edit warring over the same 5kb of text at Before the Trap: Nights in Tarzana. New sock Ocean sure neyo performed the same edit. [22] [23] [24]

As always with this case, checkuser requested to root out any new socks. Binksternet ( talk) 01:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Was it alright if I requested global locks on these recent socks? DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 17:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Here's a list of socks found:

Please check the behaviour of this one, and if it fits do block it:

-- zzuuzz (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Indeffed Melmish; probably them, and even if they're not GNO they're clearly disruptive. No tags. Closing. GeneralNotability ( talk) 03:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply

15 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

I have a strong feeling that this account is likely Giubbotto non ortodosso, mainly due to them constantly reverting themselves and re-adding the article Tropical, pretty much picking up where the previous sock, Va fora left off on. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 12:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Now they're just vandalizing by replacing my signature with theirs. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 13:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Pinging either GeneralNotability or TheresNoTime here, or I could just wait for another admin to check in here. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 13:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

For the record, Special:Contributions/Cee_lo_sins and Special:Contributions/Mays Lotus are also recent socks that were blocked without tags. Binksternet ( talk) 14:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Binksternet Why thanks for pointing that out. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 23:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

When I went through this user's edits, I've noticed a few things in their edit summaries: Morce Library's edit summaries are similar to Giubbotto non ortodosso's edit summaries. They also seem to overlap with each other and they appear to be frequenting on albums relating to Chris Brown. Not sure if it's 100% the same user behind a sock account, but one thing that did catch my eye was this particular revert, not to mention a few others. * Giubbotto non ortodosso vs. Morce Library. Not sure what you guys have to say about it, but I'm just adding this in case if I'm ever wrong. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 14:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

To the admins, if I am wrong, please correct me on that. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 14:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I'm not seeing enough here to seriously suspect socking. I see two users who share an interest in some artists and genre classification, and sometimes mention sources in their edit comments. That's not enough to suspect socking; genre warring is very common. Also, we ask (beg, plead, implore) people to be sticklers over sources, so how can we suspect socking when they do so? Morce often uses mobile, Giubbotto almost never does. Morce is only on enwiki, Giubbotto was on many different wikis. Timecards look quite different. Looking at their user talk comments, their mastery of English is different. Closing with no action. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply
    RoySmith I had a feeling I would be wrong anyway. But I did tell Morce that he could defend himself here. But thanks anyway for your response. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 15:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

04 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Note that new user Bjrorn Ølnek performed the same edit as previous socks, the same as Morce Library. [25] [26]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

18 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Snile2017 changed a referenced quote here: "hot yearning" to "profound yearning". Sockpuppet Morce Library was persistently doing the same thing [27] on Chris Brown songs.

Checkuser requested to search for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 13:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

18 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

These two accounts appeared directly following the previous blocks, to edit the same articles as previous socks.

Checkuser requested to look for further socks or any sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 20:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Adding User:Fanx JIZZ, because of the interest in Chris Brown, and the addition of false quotes The actual source says "almost pornographically unnecessary" but Fanx JIZZ got rid of that and instead fabricated the quotes "profusion of sex appeal" and "unusual electro-R&B sound". [28] Binksternet ( talk) 23:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

23 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Tarallibus made a few edits to establish autoconfirmed status, then moved directly to one of his favored Chris Brown–related articles, Heartbreak on a Full Moon, to re-insert disputed text. [29] [30] After that, Tarallibus made a lot of empty edits with the same edit summary, "putting back some material", to try and distract other editors from the Chris Brown–related change. Tarallibus followed the same pattern as blocked sock Happy feat breezy by inserting spaces in the same article, [31] [32] all part of building up an edit history in hopes of achieving autoconfirmed status.

Checkuser requested to hunt for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 16:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed The CU data didn't lend itself to an effective sleeper check. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Is it too late to throw Instantwatym ( talk · contribs) in a search as well? They are edit warring in all the same places and keep trying to do this bizarre "Good Cop Bad Cop" type routine interacting with IPs who admit they are the sock master. I'm pretty close to just DUCK blocking but thought I'd mention it here while this was still active. RoySmith, let me know. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 13:05, 25 February 2022 (UTC) reply

23 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK. Sock's only edit is to recreate same vandalism by sockpuppeteer. This appears to be related to a now blocked IP, so a CheckUser may unearth some more socks. Singularity42 ( talk) 17:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Update: ScottishFinnishRadish ID'd another that is blocked by El C (who has also blocked the master):

So yeah, there's probably more. Singularity42 ( talk) 18:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

They had just created that one, but the other sat around for a while, then gamed autoconfirmed. Looks like the user page moving vandalism was likely the goal. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 18:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Its been my understanding that this disruption has been coming from the user who went by the name Morce Library. He was actively involved and disruptive in the same dispute that Aard was involved in related to Chris Brown. Anyways, whoever it is, I hope we can potentially get a range block or something because they're IP hopping like crazy. Sergecross73 msg me 18:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed: Vrocchio Brocco = Bandpishpole = GreatTime20202 Girth Summit (blether) 18:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  • I've blocked without tags. I can't make a confident technical connection any stronger than  Possible to Morce Library - it looks like they're in the same country, and using identical (albeit very common) user agents, so some behavioural evaluation might be helpful. Girth Summit (blether) 18:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

27 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

More IP hopping harassment of Aardwolf68. [33] LM2000 ( talk) 12:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Can an admin just go ahead and archive this? He has already jumped IPs, there's nothing more to do here. LM2000 ( talk) 09:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC) reply
@ Girth Summit:Yes, there was an ongoing ANI thread about this and another SPI investigation was recently closed, so I didn't give as much detail as I usually would have. Immediately after I brought this here, another IP gave me grief for reporting this here (as opposed to ANV, I guess). [34] My talk page was protected, as was Aardwolf68's. The harassment has gone cold since, as far as I can tell. A global lock was requested at the end of the last investigation, I don't think there's much else that can be accomplished right now. There's too much IP hopping and not enough known current activity. LM2000 ( talk) 00:02, 5 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • LM2000 Hi - I just looked at this. I'm happy to close it, but you're saying that the harassment is ongoing on different IPs? I may be able to look into the ranges and take action if you'd be willing to provide details. Can I add that, in terms of actionability, the report you made above is very scant. A random admin or SPI clerk who comes across this has no way of knowing what the connection between this IP and the proposed master is, and a deep dive into the archives can be time-consuming. A few sentences of explanation for the uninitiated is likely to result in a case being handled more efficiently. Best Girth Summit (blether) 18:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Thanks for the explanation, LM2000 - I haven't been keeping up with ANI lately, missed this stuff. Closing. Girth Summit (blether) 09:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC) reply

22 March 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Jack harlow king of rap has followed in the footsteps of sockpuppet User:Morce Library multiple times, [35] making the same edits. [36] [37] Another example shows the same text added, about "choosing Lucci", referenced to YouTube. [38] [39]

Checkuser requested to find sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 20:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

All of these were involved in edit-warring at Royalty (Chris Brown album), an article of highest interest to the sockmaster. After the article was protected, Cagnamaia gamed the system by making ten edits over three days, then immediately jumped in to restore his preferred version.

Chambalain daykey made this edit including a pagesix.com reference. Italian IP 109.52.244.252 made the same edit. [40] Cagnamaia made the same edit. [41]

Checkuser requested to root out other sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 16:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Chambalain daykey  Likely to the archive. Cagnamaia is  Possible. -- Amanda (she/her) 19:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Pink clock Awaiting administrative action - please indef Cagnamaia and Chambalain daykey per the CU and behavioural evidence. I doubt there are many other Italian editors who are interested in this Chris Brown album. I'll note that the IP range is currently blocked for block evasion. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 12:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  •  Blocked but awaiting tags. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 12:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Tagged, Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested, closing. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 13:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC) reply

22 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

I don't know anything about this person. It caught my attention that a new user was performing all these technical changes on their very first edit. It didn't take me too much to find the problem. (CC)  Tbhotch ™ 17:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Adding Young Product 248319434 who made the same edit as a blocked sock. [42] [43] I added a related IP. Binksternet ( talk) 20:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - for comparison and sleeper check; I'm pretty sure about KittyRight2Sleep but not as sure about Young Product, as the edit they restored seems minor and they weren't picked up in previous checks. I don't think the IP is related; it geolocates to the wrong continent and doesn't appear to be a proxy. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 21:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  •  In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 22:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • KittyRight2Sleep is  Confirmed. Young Product 248319434 is Red X Unrelated. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • It looks like the IP (about which I have no comment) has already been looked at, so closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply

09 May 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Epitomyofjealousy performed the same edit as blocked sock Jack harlow king of rap. [44] [45]

Checkuser requested as this person often creates sleeper accounts. Binksternet ( talk) 15:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Technically indistinguishable from previous Giubbotto socks. He's the only one on his IP but it's a dynamic, busy range; I don't see any obvious sleepers but can't rule it out completely. Blocked, tagged, closing. Katie talk 21:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

13 May 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Another block evasion by Giubbotto non ortodosso [46] [47] [48]. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 09:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I don't think this is Giubbotto non ortodosso. It's well documented in the SPI archives that the sockmaster is in Italy - this IP geolocates to Iran, and does not appear to be a proxy. The same editor appears to have been editing for a while on various Irancell IPs, e.g. [49] [50]. There may well be problems with their edits (I'm seeing a lot of unsourced genre additions) but I do not believe this is sockpuppetry. In any case, the IP hasn't edited in a while. Closing. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 19:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC) reply

07 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Tinder ginger's second edit was to revert me, a typical action. [51] Tinder ginger's focus is on Chris Brown topics. These other users are all single-purpose accounts created to edit Chris Brown topics.

Checkuser requested to make certain of Tinder ginger. Binksternet ( talk) 19:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC) reply

With Tinder ginger now blocked, the CU request is for connecting other accounts; finding sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 03:32, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I've done nothing wrong. What is wrong with my edits? Your "pruning" on Breezy consisted on unreasonably removing the album's confirmed release date, then you're accusing me because i corrected you. During these last months you are deleting songs from Template:Chris Brown songs. You did it to User:Young Product 248319434 using the same accusations that you are using against me, then you said sorry to his talk page because you got caught bullshitting. I have no idea who is User:DerekAlcantar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinder ginger ( talk • contribs) 19:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

13 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Recent activity from this sockmaster has included many throwaway accounts. Here are four more, all active at the same article of interest last time. Here are two new socks insisting that the song "Iffy" was released as the lead single of the album. [52] [53]

Checkuser requested to find sleepers. A hefty haul of them was found last time. Binksternet ( talk) 00:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Fun fact: a sock of Giubotto non ortodosso was the one who the fact that the song "Iffy" was released as the lead single of the album, and now you are accusing of being a sockpuppet everyone that is removing a false information required by a sock?? What a bald head you are.-- Justin Peliper ( talk) 07:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

24 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Warm advice, Betterduuude and Big slime 2000 showed up in response to new songs by Chris Brown, the favorite topic of this sockmaster. Betterduuude restored the unusual word "comcomitantly" which had been added by a previous sock. [54] [55] Warm advice restored the same edit as a previous sock. [56] [57] Big slime 2000 made the same edit as previous socks. [58] [59]

Checkuser requested to roust sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 15:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

You restored a version of the page dating back to when the album wasn't even released. Nowadays the album has been released. There is no evading, the album is out, if someone points out on this article that the album is out is not evading, he's just doing what he's supposed to-- Big slime 2000 ( talk) 15:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC) reply

UPDATE: Binksternet keeps on reverting my response here, going against my right to Defend myself against claims-- Big slime 2000 ( talk) 16:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC) reply

You also keep adding false stuff to that article, like the fact that Bruno Mars is a featured artist on the album, when he's nowhere to be found on it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Big slime 2000 ( talk • contribs) 16:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Kyoto boyx made just enough edits to gain access to the semi-protected Breezy (album) at which point he restored the edit of blocked sock Greatville56. [60] [61]

Checkuser requested because sleepers are often found with this account. Binksternet ( talk) 19:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 July 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

I Bangkok in Bangkok made substantially the same edit as previous blocked socks. [62] [63] [64] Note the removal of negative material such as the word "idiotic", and the addition of positive material.

Checkuser is requested to check for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 00:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Binksternet Need not to worry they have been reported at AIV now. Soon they will be blocked. Dove's talk ( talk) 10:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 August 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Possible lock evasion by Giubbotto non ortodosso, see also 1, 2, 3, 4. Mtarch11 ( talk) 16:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CheckUser requested - because I believe we normally run checks on this master. Bbb23 ( talk) 17:02, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  •  In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Both accounts  Confirmed Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested -- RoySmith (talk) 18:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply

22 August 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

All of these single-purpose accounts edited Chris Brown music topics. Better me.sh edited Template:Chris Brown to add the song articles created by new sock Maria Cherpantéz and blocked sock Usher King of R&B. [65] The very first edit by C through love was to update the song article created by Maria Cherpantéz. [66] Italian IP 176.246.103.45 updated the song article created by BlueTwingo. [67]

Checkuser requested to make certain and to check for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 18:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Adding BlueTwingo which I somehow missed listing. Binksternet ( talk) 21:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 August 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Continuing past sockpuppets' pattern of disruptive editing on articles related to Chris Brown. In Special:Diff/1105264669, Jesten Ruler defended the inclusion of fabricated reviews on the Heartbreak on a Full Moon article that were originally added by a sockpuppet of Giubbotto non ortodosso, e.g. Morce Library ( talk · contribs) in Special:Diff/1050537848. 176.246.89.143 ( talk · contribs) and 176.246.18.132 ( talk · contribs) have engaged in disruptive editing on the F.A.M.E. (Chris Brown album) article, and 176.246.89.143 is part of the IP range 176.246.64.0/19 that had previously been used by Giubbotto non ortodosso. Requesting CheckUser to scan for sleeper accounts. —  Newslinger  talk 12:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Adding BithdayGirl ( talk · contribs), which added fabricated reviews on the Indigo (Chris Brown album) article in Special:Diff/1065792204, e.g. a "8/10" review by "Barry Walters" that cites the home page of Spin and a "4/5" review by "Mike Juliano" that cites the home page of Exclaim!, both of which are nowhere to be found on any page of their respective websites. —  Newslinger  talk 12:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply
Added 176.246.64.0/19 to the list. —  Newslinger  talk 13:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply
Expanded to 176.246.0.0/17. —  Newslinger  talk 13:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

12 September 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Pigsternet and his deadwife is following me to several articles where I previously reverted socks of Giubbotto non ortodosso. In one case, Usher King of R&B started an article from a redirect, [68] and I deleted much of it per EVADE. Pigsternet and his deadwife reverted the reversion. [69] In another case, Italian IP 109.52.35.3 vandalized a song article, [70] followed by Pigsternet vandalizing again. [71] There's also the username taunt aspect of this case.

Adding Blatant bleah who restored the same text added by sockpuppet Maria Cherpantéz [72] [73] after I had deleted much of this stuff per EVADE. [74]

Requesting checkuser to prove the connection and check for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 13:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Confirmed to each other:

20 October 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Lil treeEe showed up to restore a version made by previous socks. [75] [76]

Xyzs 098 restored edits by previous socks. [77] [78]

Checkuser requested to hunt down sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 02:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Group 1  Confirmed to each other:
  • Group 2  Confirmed to each other:

27 October 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Same editing pattern as previously, per this revert of one of their edits. Will also request a global block. They're a prolific sockmaster so I thought it'd be worth asking a checkuser to find any of their other new accounts. Graham 87 14:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

05 November 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Following recent sockpuppetry at X (Chris Brown album), which was reverted by Aardwolf68, Aardwolf68's talk page was attacked by 158.148.84.253, saying the USA Today source was too negative. After this, Taylor Classyer appeared to attack Aardwolf68 on the talk page of Sergecross73, [79] talking about months of previous effort (so obviously not a new user.)

Checkuser requested to check for more socks. Binksternet ( talk) 13:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Taylor Classyer is  Likely based on the CU data, blocking and tagging as suspected. no No comment with respect to IP address(es) -- RoySmith (talk) 13:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested -- RoySmith (talk) 13:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • I don't imagine it will achieve much, but blocking to IP for a week. They're obviously related, and even if they weren't they'd have earned a block for the personal attack. Closing. Girth Summit (blether) 17:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply

04 December 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Previous socks repeatedly removed the phrase "who praised the production but generally panned the lyrical content and Brown’s performances". [80] [81] New sock Dee Cosey performed some minor edits to build up for autoconfirmed status, then radically changed the target phrase by blaming any negative criticism of the music on those who also criticize Brown's domestic violence streak. The same edit re-added the bit about blackballing which was first inserted by another sock more than a year ago. [82]

Checkuser requested to root out sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 22:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 June 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Some new editor names have changed Chris Brown articles to be too positive, reducing negative reviews and overemphasizing positive ones. Two of these editors overemphasized the Afrobeats genre [83] [84] which the source says the album "touches". Binksternet ( talk) 14:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC) reply

CU requested to make certain, and check for more accounts. Binksternet ( talk) 14:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you to the team for blocking the socks in group 1 and group 2. I submit that the remaining two usernames are also sockpuppets, geolocating to the same country, and interested in the same topics. All weekend on the weeknd has the same style and uses the same sources and text as previous socks. He restored some complicated changes including text that had previously been inserted by sockpuppets. Example: A "Musically, Indigo is an R&B record, that contains genres such as dancehall, afropop and bounce music as well." B "Musically, Indigo is an R&B record, that contains genres such as dancehall, Afrobeats and bounce music as well." Suspicious minds elvis hasn't repeated previous sock edits, but is highly suspicious because of the same geolocation and topic interests. Binksternet ( talk) 17:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
I'd like to point out the surprising familiarity with Wikipedia that is displayed by All weekend on the weeknd, and his insistence on edit-warring to restore disputed content. Note that All weekend on the weeknd cuts down existing citations in the same manner as unblocked sock Lovely boy oneder, removing the title and author of the citation. This edit by All weekend on the weeknd removed a negative paragraph previously removed by blocked sock Dee Cosey. [85] Binksternet ( talk) 14:29, 1 July 2023 (UTC) reply
Apparently the checkuser information that All weekend on the weeknd is from the same country as the sockmaster and other socks isn't seen as sufficient to block him. Which means that we are back to examining behavior, which I've highlighted above. I think the behavior and the geolocation are quite enough evidence. Binksternet ( talk) 05:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Hi everybody. I'm user All weekend on the weeknd. I don't wanna make this more confusing than it already is, but the "sockpuppet" that had previously inserted the same text as me was never blocked or even investigated for being a sockpuppet. The fact that we made the same edit probably comes from the fact that we both looked at this discussion => Talk:Indigo (Chris Brown album)#Opening discussion on vandalism, cherrypicking and editorial bias on this article. The same restoring that me and that other user did, has been made by other users as well like User:Instantwatym. These restorings keep on happening because Binksternet revertings are sometimes considered to be disruptive to articles by various other users.

I'm pretty sure that this won't help me from getting blocked, because I've stumbled across a Korean user that has been blocked in the past for being Giubbotto non ortodosso solely because he was accused by Binksternet.... But i wanna thank you for being careful so far-- All weekend on the weeknd ( talk) 10:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Group 1  Confirmed to each other:

10 July 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

New user Talk 2 3 girls has repeated the edits of blocked sock Morce Library, as seen in the interaction tool, specifically these two edits adding COVID. [86] [87] ClueBot reverted an edit, [88] which indicates suspicious behavior. Typical sock activity includes adding positive and removing negative stuff about Chris Brown: toward that end, Talk 2 3 girls could not resist removing a negative description of Chris Brown which is part of a direct quote. [89] This exact same removal was performed by Italian IP Special:Contributions/109.52.244.9 two years ago. [90] The IP was rangeblocked for a year as Special:Contributions/109.52.240.0/21.

Checkuser requested to check for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 17:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

22 August 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

The username Instantwhatdoyoumean is a parody of Instantwatym who has been targeted by Giubbotto non ortodosso socks and Italian IPs. [91] [92] [93] [94] [95]

New user Rober Glasper made just one Chris Brown–related edit in February 2023, [96] then picked up editing heavily today. This behavior is aimed at earning autoconfirmed status. The account's tenth edit today was made to the biography the Weeknd which requires autoconfirmed status. [97]

Checkuser requested to make certain the connection, and to search for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 16:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es). Courcelles ( talk) 16:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
    Blocked the following: Rober Glasper, Instantwhatdoyoumean, Na na delay and Make I say uh. Courcelles ( talk) 16:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
    No comment on IPs, and I’ll leave them for someone else to evaluate and deal with. Courcelles ( talk) 16:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
  • 5.90.48.120 is obviously the master [98]. Edits are fairly infrequent, so I am closing the case. But if someone considers a block, 5.90.48.0/21 is a reasonably sized range that covers the most recent IPs. MarioGom ( talk) 21:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC) reply

02 September 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Dave Peast made the same edits as previous socks trying to add the Afrobeats genre to the album Indigo. [99] [100] An Italian IP did it, too. [101] This was followed by Aardwolf60 doing the same thing. [102] Aardwolf60 was blocked for creating a username which attacked Aardwolf68, and Aardwolf62 should have the same treatment.

Do eT like that tried to add "Come Together" to the Chris Brown template, [103] just like a previous sock. [104]

4lipmode 4 reverted a redirect to "Come Together", restoring text that had been repeatedly placed by socks and an Italian IP. [105] [106] [107] [108]

Blooey writes the same way as current and previous socks, adding a summary sentence of critical reviews saying "was met" rather than simply "met". [109] [110]

The only edit by Clavicle guy was to restore text added by previous socks. [111] [112]

Checkuser requested to sweep for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 23:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es). The following users are:

RickinBaltimore ( talk) 15:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Also, adding Seen&fixed ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), as I blocked them prior reviewing the SPI. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 15:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Templates added to the above listing for the script. MarioGom ( talk) 20:05, 27 September 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Tagged. Closing. I'll request locks. MarioGom ( talk) 20:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC) reply

15 June 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Proforma for the scripts, already blocked. Also Jake Miosge OFFICIAL. Girth Summit (blether) 11:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 June 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Another one. Girth Summit (blether) 12:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Giubbotto_non_ortodosso/Archive&oldid=1229227166"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Giubbotto non ortodosso

Giubbotto non ortodosso ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

16 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Italian IP range Special:Contributions/62.18.232.0/22 was blocked four days ago. Today, a drawer full of socks was blocked by checkuser. But Chris breezy namibia was not discovered during the checkuser process. Chris breezy namibia re-appeared after all the other socks had been blocked. Chris breezy namibia re-instated the edits made by Italian sock IPs. [1] [2]

Checkuser not needed; behavior is enough. Binksternet ( talk) 15:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Yep, but CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk regardless since this is a sleeper from April that wasn't caught in the last check, so we might uncover others. -- Blablubbs| talk 16:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed. Bagging and tagging sock account. no No comment with respect to IP address(es). This SPI can be closed... ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 16:14, 16 June 2021 (UTC) reply

18 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Two neighboring Italian IP ranges are involved in block evasion: Special:Contributions/109.52.200.0/21 and Special:Contributions/109.52.192.0/21.

The interaction between 109.52.199.77 and blocked sock Like i done it befoh shows the connection. 109.52.199.54 is connected to 109.52.199.77. [3]

Ridinzolooo's only edit was to add the song "Did You?" which is a deleted and salted song article: Did You?.

A thousand words's Eddie Murphy's only edit was to tweak an article of great interest to former socks, [4] closely followed by two Italian IPs. [5]

Mulla boyzsk followed Italian IPs three minutes later. [6] [7]

Checkuser requested to hunt for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 16:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. i'm absolutely not him. i swear. but i wanna help you edits like this need to be stopped. SHAME ON GIUBBOTTO

Thank you for saving wikipedia by the way. i really appreciate your work-- A thousand words's Eddie Murphy ( talk) 16:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely):
Ridinzolooo ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
The confirmed accounts are  Likely to the master based off geolocation and ranges. Ridinzolooo is also in the same geolocation, but on a different range and had a different user agent than the others. no No comment with respect to IP address(es). ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 16:33, 18 June 2021 (UTC) reply

03 July 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

I got timesz performed ten edits to get autoconfirmed, then restored a previous sock edit and then built on it. [8] [9]

Bady man bossa gun performed the signature reversion seen by a great many previous socks. [10] Burn my nameus followed suit. [11] R&Biatch followed behind and restored the same text, claiming in the edit summary to be reverting Giubbotto non ortodosso when the edit was actually restoring. [12]

Checkuser requested to rouse out sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 03:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

25 August 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

This account was created a days ago and already making the same edits as before [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 20:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Va fora is already blocked. They repeated the actions of previous socks, adding "tropical pop" [18] just like Italian IP sock 2.197.90.14. [19]

Blocked sock Shoe and socks added redirects to song articles in the Chris Brown template [20] and blocked sock I luve jak harlow added a redlink to a deleted song article. New sock Mixdlov arrived and added redlinks to deleted song articles and links to redirects. [21]

A long series of socks and Italian IPs have been edit warring over the same 5kb of text at Before the Trap: Nights in Tarzana. New sock Ocean sure neyo performed the same edit. [22] [23] [24]

As always with this case, checkuser requested to root out any new socks. Binksternet ( talk) 01:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Was it alright if I requested global locks on these recent socks? DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 17:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Here's a list of socks found:

Please check the behaviour of this one, and if it fits do block it:

-- zzuuzz (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Indeffed Melmish; probably them, and even if they're not GNO they're clearly disruptive. No tags. Closing. GeneralNotability ( talk) 03:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply

15 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

I have a strong feeling that this account is likely Giubbotto non ortodosso, mainly due to them constantly reverting themselves and re-adding the article Tropical, pretty much picking up where the previous sock, Va fora left off on. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 12:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Now they're just vandalizing by replacing my signature with theirs. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 13:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Pinging either GeneralNotability or TheresNoTime here, or I could just wait for another admin to check in here. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 13:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

For the record, Special:Contributions/Cee_lo_sins and Special:Contributions/Mays Lotus are also recent socks that were blocked without tags. Binksternet ( talk) 14:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Binksternet Why thanks for pointing that out. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 23:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

When I went through this user's edits, I've noticed a few things in their edit summaries: Morce Library's edit summaries are similar to Giubbotto non ortodosso's edit summaries. They also seem to overlap with each other and they appear to be frequenting on albums relating to Chris Brown. Not sure if it's 100% the same user behind a sock account, but one thing that did catch my eye was this particular revert, not to mention a few others. * Giubbotto non ortodosso vs. Morce Library. Not sure what you guys have to say about it, but I'm just adding this in case if I'm ever wrong. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 14:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

To the admins, if I am wrong, please correct me on that. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 14:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I'm not seeing enough here to seriously suspect socking. I see two users who share an interest in some artists and genre classification, and sometimes mention sources in their edit comments. That's not enough to suspect socking; genre warring is very common. Also, we ask (beg, plead, implore) people to be sticklers over sources, so how can we suspect socking when they do so? Morce often uses mobile, Giubbotto almost never does. Morce is only on enwiki, Giubbotto was on many different wikis. Timecards look quite different. Looking at their user talk comments, their mastery of English is different. Closing with no action. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply
    RoySmith I had a feeling I would be wrong anyway. But I did tell Morce that he could defend himself here. But thanks anyway for your response. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 15:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

04 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Note that new user Bjrorn Ølnek performed the same edit as previous socks, the same as Morce Library. [25] [26]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

18 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Snile2017 changed a referenced quote here: "hot yearning" to "profound yearning". Sockpuppet Morce Library was persistently doing the same thing [27] on Chris Brown songs.

Checkuser requested to search for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 13:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

18 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

These two accounts appeared directly following the previous blocks, to edit the same articles as previous socks.

Checkuser requested to look for further socks or any sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 20:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Adding User:Fanx JIZZ, because of the interest in Chris Brown, and the addition of false quotes The actual source says "almost pornographically unnecessary" but Fanx JIZZ got rid of that and instead fabricated the quotes "profusion of sex appeal" and "unusual electro-R&B sound". [28] Binksternet ( talk) 23:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

23 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Tarallibus made a few edits to establish autoconfirmed status, then moved directly to one of his favored Chris Brown–related articles, Heartbreak on a Full Moon, to re-insert disputed text. [29] [30] After that, Tarallibus made a lot of empty edits with the same edit summary, "putting back some material", to try and distract other editors from the Chris Brown–related change. Tarallibus followed the same pattern as blocked sock Happy feat breezy by inserting spaces in the same article, [31] [32] all part of building up an edit history in hopes of achieving autoconfirmed status.

Checkuser requested to hunt for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 16:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed The CU data didn't lend itself to an effective sleeper check. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Is it too late to throw Instantwatym ( talk · contribs) in a search as well? They are edit warring in all the same places and keep trying to do this bizarre "Good Cop Bad Cop" type routine interacting with IPs who admit they are the sock master. I'm pretty close to just DUCK blocking but thought I'd mention it here while this was still active. RoySmith, let me know. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 13:05, 25 February 2022 (UTC) reply

23 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK. Sock's only edit is to recreate same vandalism by sockpuppeteer. This appears to be related to a now blocked IP, so a CheckUser may unearth some more socks. Singularity42 ( talk) 17:50, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Update: ScottishFinnishRadish ID'd another that is blocked by El C (who has also blocked the master):

So yeah, there's probably more. Singularity42 ( talk) 18:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

They had just created that one, but the other sat around for a while, then gamed autoconfirmed. Looks like the user page moving vandalism was likely the goal. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 18:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Its been my understanding that this disruption has been coming from the user who went by the name Morce Library. He was actively involved and disruptive in the same dispute that Aard was involved in related to Chris Brown. Anyways, whoever it is, I hope we can potentially get a range block or something because they're IP hopping like crazy. Sergecross73 msg me 18:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed: Vrocchio Brocco = Bandpishpole = GreatTime20202 Girth Summit (blether) 18:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  • I've blocked without tags. I can't make a confident technical connection any stronger than  Possible to Morce Library - it looks like they're in the same country, and using identical (albeit very common) user agents, so some behavioural evaluation might be helpful. Girth Summit (blether) 18:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC) reply

27 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

More IP hopping harassment of Aardwolf68. [33] LM2000 ( talk) 12:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Can an admin just go ahead and archive this? He has already jumped IPs, there's nothing more to do here. LM2000 ( talk) 09:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC) reply
@ Girth Summit:Yes, there was an ongoing ANI thread about this and another SPI investigation was recently closed, so I didn't give as much detail as I usually would have. Immediately after I brought this here, another IP gave me grief for reporting this here (as opposed to ANV, I guess). [34] My talk page was protected, as was Aardwolf68's. The harassment has gone cold since, as far as I can tell. A global lock was requested at the end of the last investigation, I don't think there's much else that can be accomplished right now. There's too much IP hopping and not enough known current activity. LM2000 ( talk) 00:02, 5 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • LM2000 Hi - I just looked at this. I'm happy to close it, but you're saying that the harassment is ongoing on different IPs? I may be able to look into the ranges and take action if you'd be willing to provide details. Can I add that, in terms of actionability, the report you made above is very scant. A random admin or SPI clerk who comes across this has no way of knowing what the connection between this IP and the proposed master is, and a deep dive into the archives can be time-consuming. A few sentences of explanation for the uninitiated is likely to result in a case being handled more efficiently. Best Girth Summit (blether) 18:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Thanks for the explanation, LM2000 - I haven't been keeping up with ANI lately, missed this stuff. Closing. Girth Summit (blether) 09:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC) reply

22 March 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Jack harlow king of rap has followed in the footsteps of sockpuppet User:Morce Library multiple times, [35] making the same edits. [36] [37] Another example shows the same text added, about "choosing Lucci", referenced to YouTube. [38] [39]

Checkuser requested to find sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 20:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

All of these were involved in edit-warring at Royalty (Chris Brown album), an article of highest interest to the sockmaster. After the article was protected, Cagnamaia gamed the system by making ten edits over three days, then immediately jumped in to restore his preferred version.

Chambalain daykey made this edit including a pagesix.com reference. Italian IP 109.52.244.252 made the same edit. [40] Cagnamaia made the same edit. [41]

Checkuser requested to root out other sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 16:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Chambalain daykey  Likely to the archive. Cagnamaia is  Possible. -- Amanda (she/her) 19:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Pink clock Awaiting administrative action - please indef Cagnamaia and Chambalain daykey per the CU and behavioural evidence. I doubt there are many other Italian editors who are interested in this Chris Brown album. I'll note that the IP range is currently blocked for block evasion. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 12:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  •  Blocked but awaiting tags. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 12:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Tagged, Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested, closing. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 13:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC) reply

22 April 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

I don't know anything about this person. It caught my attention that a new user was performing all these technical changes on their very first edit. It didn't take me too much to find the problem. (CC)  Tbhotch ™ 17:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Adding Young Product 248319434 who made the same edit as a blocked sock. [42] [43] I added a related IP. Binksternet ( talk) 20:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - for comparison and sleeper check; I'm pretty sure about KittyRight2Sleep but not as sure about Young Product, as the edit they restored seems minor and they weren't picked up in previous checks. I don't think the IP is related; it geolocates to the wrong continent and doesn't appear to be a proxy. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 21:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  •  In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 22:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • KittyRight2Sleep is  Confirmed. Young Product 248319434 is Red X Unrelated. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply
  • It looks like the IP (about which I have no comment) has already been looked at, so closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply

09 May 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Epitomyofjealousy performed the same edit as blocked sock Jack harlow king of rap. [44] [45]

Checkuser requested as this person often creates sleeper accounts. Binksternet ( talk) 15:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Technically indistinguishable from previous Giubbotto socks. He's the only one on his IP but it's a dynamic, busy range; I don't see any obvious sleepers but can't rule it out completely. Blocked, tagged, closing. Katie talk 21:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

13 May 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Another block evasion by Giubbotto non ortodosso [46] [47] [48]. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 09:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I don't think this is Giubbotto non ortodosso. It's well documented in the SPI archives that the sockmaster is in Italy - this IP geolocates to Iran, and does not appear to be a proxy. The same editor appears to have been editing for a while on various Irancell IPs, e.g. [49] [50]. There may well be problems with their edits (I'm seeing a lot of unsourced genre additions) but I do not believe this is sockpuppetry. In any case, the IP hasn't edited in a while. Closing. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 19:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC) reply

07 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Tinder ginger's second edit was to revert me, a typical action. [51] Tinder ginger's focus is on Chris Brown topics. These other users are all single-purpose accounts created to edit Chris Brown topics.

Checkuser requested to make certain of Tinder ginger. Binksternet ( talk) 19:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC) reply

With Tinder ginger now blocked, the CU request is for connecting other accounts; finding sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 03:32, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I've done nothing wrong. What is wrong with my edits? Your "pruning" on Breezy consisted on unreasonably removing the album's confirmed release date, then you're accusing me because i corrected you. During these last months you are deleting songs from Template:Chris Brown songs. You did it to User:Young Product 248319434 using the same accusations that you are using against me, then you said sorry to his talk page because you got caught bullshitting. I have no idea who is User:DerekAlcantar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinder ginger ( talk • contribs) 19:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

13 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Recent activity from this sockmaster has included many throwaway accounts. Here are four more, all active at the same article of interest last time. Here are two new socks insisting that the song "Iffy" was released as the lead single of the album. [52] [53]

Checkuser requested to find sleepers. A hefty haul of them was found last time. Binksternet ( talk) 00:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Fun fact: a sock of Giubotto non ortodosso was the one who the fact that the song "Iffy" was released as the lead single of the album, and now you are accusing of being a sockpuppet everyone that is removing a false information required by a sock?? What a bald head you are.-- Justin Peliper ( talk) 07:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

24 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Warm advice, Betterduuude and Big slime 2000 showed up in response to new songs by Chris Brown, the favorite topic of this sockmaster. Betterduuude restored the unusual word "comcomitantly" which had been added by a previous sock. [54] [55] Warm advice restored the same edit as a previous sock. [56] [57] Big slime 2000 made the same edit as previous socks. [58] [59]

Checkuser requested to roust sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 15:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

You restored a version of the page dating back to when the album wasn't even released. Nowadays the album has been released. There is no evading, the album is out, if someone points out on this article that the album is out is not evading, he's just doing what he's supposed to-- Big slime 2000 ( talk) 15:53, 24 June 2022 (UTC) reply

UPDATE: Binksternet keeps on reverting my response here, going against my right to Defend myself against claims-- Big slime 2000 ( talk) 16:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC) reply

You also keep adding false stuff to that article, like the fact that Bruno Mars is a featured artist on the album, when he's nowhere to be found on it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Big slime 2000 ( talk • contribs) 16:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 June 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Kyoto boyx made just enough edits to gain access to the semi-protected Breezy (album) at which point he restored the edit of blocked sock Greatville56. [60] [61]

Checkuser requested because sleepers are often found with this account. Binksternet ( talk) 19:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 July 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

I Bangkok in Bangkok made substantially the same edit as previous blocked socks. [62] [63] [64] Note the removal of negative material such as the word "idiotic", and the addition of positive material.

Checkuser is requested to check for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 00:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Binksternet Need not to worry they have been reported at AIV now. Soon they will be blocked. Dove's talk ( talk) 10:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

17 August 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Possible lock evasion by Giubbotto non ortodosso, see also 1, 2, 3, 4. Mtarch11 ( talk) 16:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CheckUser requested - because I believe we normally run checks on this master. Bbb23 ( talk) 17:02, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  •  In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Both accounts  Confirmed Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested -- RoySmith (talk) 18:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply

22 August 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

All of these single-purpose accounts edited Chris Brown music topics. Better me.sh edited Template:Chris Brown to add the song articles created by new sock Maria Cherpantéz and blocked sock Usher King of R&B. [65] The very first edit by C through love was to update the song article created by Maria Cherpantéz. [66] Italian IP 176.246.103.45 updated the song article created by BlueTwingo. [67]

Checkuser requested to make certain and to check for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 18:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Adding BlueTwingo which I somehow missed listing. Binksternet ( talk) 21:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 August 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Continuing past sockpuppets' pattern of disruptive editing on articles related to Chris Brown. In Special:Diff/1105264669, Jesten Ruler defended the inclusion of fabricated reviews on the Heartbreak on a Full Moon article that were originally added by a sockpuppet of Giubbotto non ortodosso, e.g. Morce Library ( talk · contribs) in Special:Diff/1050537848. 176.246.89.143 ( talk · contribs) and 176.246.18.132 ( talk · contribs) have engaged in disruptive editing on the F.A.M.E. (Chris Brown album) article, and 176.246.89.143 is part of the IP range 176.246.64.0/19 that had previously been used by Giubbotto non ortodosso. Requesting CheckUser to scan for sleeper accounts. —  Newslinger  talk 12:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Adding BithdayGirl ( talk · contribs), which added fabricated reviews on the Indigo (Chris Brown album) article in Special:Diff/1065792204, e.g. a "8/10" review by "Barry Walters" that cites the home page of Spin and a "4/5" review by "Mike Juliano" that cites the home page of Exclaim!, both of which are nowhere to be found on any page of their respective websites. —  Newslinger  talk 12:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply
Added 176.246.64.0/19 to the list. —  Newslinger  talk 13:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply
Expanded to 176.246.0.0/17. —  Newslinger  talk 13:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

12 September 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Pigsternet and his deadwife is following me to several articles where I previously reverted socks of Giubbotto non ortodosso. In one case, Usher King of R&B started an article from a redirect, [68] and I deleted much of it per EVADE. Pigsternet and his deadwife reverted the reversion. [69] In another case, Italian IP 109.52.35.3 vandalized a song article, [70] followed by Pigsternet vandalizing again. [71] There's also the username taunt aspect of this case.

Adding Blatant bleah who restored the same text added by sockpuppet Maria Cherpantéz [72] [73] after I had deleted much of this stuff per EVADE. [74]

Requesting checkuser to prove the connection and check for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 13:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Confirmed to each other:

20 October 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Lil treeEe showed up to restore a version made by previous socks. [75] [76]

Xyzs 098 restored edits by previous socks. [77] [78]

Checkuser requested to hunt down sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 02:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Group 1  Confirmed to each other:
  • Group 2  Confirmed to each other:

27 October 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Same editing pattern as previously, per this revert of one of their edits. Will also request a global block. They're a prolific sockmaster so I thought it'd be worth asking a checkuser to find any of their other new accounts. Graham 87 14:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

05 November 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Following recent sockpuppetry at X (Chris Brown album), which was reverted by Aardwolf68, Aardwolf68's talk page was attacked by 158.148.84.253, saying the USA Today source was too negative. After this, Taylor Classyer appeared to attack Aardwolf68 on the talk page of Sergecross73, [79] talking about months of previous effort (so obviously not a new user.)

Checkuser requested to check for more socks. Binksternet ( talk) 13:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Taylor Classyer is  Likely based on the CU data, blocking and tagging as suspected. no No comment with respect to IP address(es) -- RoySmith (talk) 13:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested -- RoySmith (talk) 13:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • I don't imagine it will achieve much, but blocking to IP for a week. They're obviously related, and even if they weren't they'd have earned a block for the personal attack. Closing. Girth Summit (blether) 17:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply

04 December 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Previous socks repeatedly removed the phrase "who praised the production but generally panned the lyrical content and Brown’s performances". [80] [81] New sock Dee Cosey performed some minor edits to build up for autoconfirmed status, then radically changed the target phrase by blaming any negative criticism of the music on those who also criticize Brown's domestic violence streak. The same edit re-added the bit about blackballing which was first inserted by another sock more than a year ago. [82]

Checkuser requested to root out sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 22:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 June 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Some new editor names have changed Chris Brown articles to be too positive, reducing negative reviews and overemphasizing positive ones. Two of these editors overemphasized the Afrobeats genre [83] [84] which the source says the album "touches". Binksternet ( talk) 14:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC) reply

CU requested to make certain, and check for more accounts. Binksternet ( talk) 14:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you to the team for blocking the socks in group 1 and group 2. I submit that the remaining two usernames are also sockpuppets, geolocating to the same country, and interested in the same topics. All weekend on the weeknd has the same style and uses the same sources and text as previous socks. He restored some complicated changes including text that had previously been inserted by sockpuppets. Example: A "Musically, Indigo is an R&B record, that contains genres such as dancehall, afropop and bounce music as well." B "Musically, Indigo is an R&B record, that contains genres such as dancehall, Afrobeats and bounce music as well." Suspicious minds elvis hasn't repeated previous sock edits, but is highly suspicious because of the same geolocation and topic interests. Binksternet ( talk) 17:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply
I'd like to point out the surprising familiarity with Wikipedia that is displayed by All weekend on the weeknd, and his insistence on edit-warring to restore disputed content. Note that All weekend on the weeknd cuts down existing citations in the same manner as unblocked sock Lovely boy oneder, removing the title and author of the citation. This edit by All weekend on the weeknd removed a negative paragraph previously removed by blocked sock Dee Cosey. [85] Binksternet ( talk) 14:29, 1 July 2023 (UTC) reply
Apparently the checkuser information that All weekend on the weeknd is from the same country as the sockmaster and other socks isn't seen as sufficient to block him. Which means that we are back to examining behavior, which I've highlighted above. I think the behavior and the geolocation are quite enough evidence. Binksternet ( talk) 05:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Hi everybody. I'm user All weekend on the weeknd. I don't wanna make this more confusing than it already is, but the "sockpuppet" that had previously inserted the same text as me was never blocked or even investigated for being a sockpuppet. The fact that we made the same edit probably comes from the fact that we both looked at this discussion => Talk:Indigo (Chris Brown album)#Opening discussion on vandalism, cherrypicking and editorial bias on this article. The same restoring that me and that other user did, has been made by other users as well like User:Instantwatym. These restorings keep on happening because Binksternet revertings are sometimes considered to be disruptive to articles by various other users.

I'm pretty sure that this won't help me from getting blocked, because I've stumbled across a Korean user that has been blocked in the past for being Giubbotto non ortodosso solely because he was accused by Binksternet.... But i wanna thank you for being careful so far-- All weekend on the weeknd ( talk) 10:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Group 1  Confirmed to each other:

10 July 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

New user Talk 2 3 girls has repeated the edits of blocked sock Morce Library, as seen in the interaction tool, specifically these two edits adding COVID. [86] [87] ClueBot reverted an edit, [88] which indicates suspicious behavior. Typical sock activity includes adding positive and removing negative stuff about Chris Brown: toward that end, Talk 2 3 girls could not resist removing a negative description of Chris Brown which is part of a direct quote. [89] This exact same removal was performed by Italian IP Special:Contributions/109.52.244.9 two years ago. [90] The IP was rangeblocked for a year as Special:Contributions/109.52.240.0/21.

Checkuser requested to check for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 17:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

22 August 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

The username Instantwhatdoyoumean is a parody of Instantwatym who has been targeted by Giubbotto non ortodosso socks and Italian IPs. [91] [92] [93] [94] [95]

New user Rober Glasper made just one Chris Brown–related edit in February 2023, [96] then picked up editing heavily today. This behavior is aimed at earning autoconfirmed status. The account's tenth edit today was made to the biography the Weeknd which requires autoconfirmed status. [97]

Checkuser requested to make certain the connection, and to search for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 16:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es). Courcelles ( talk) 16:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
    Blocked the following: Rober Glasper, Instantwhatdoyoumean, Na na delay and Make I say uh. Courcelles ( talk) 16:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
    No comment on IPs, and I’ll leave them for someone else to evaluate and deal with. Courcelles ( talk) 16:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply
  • 5.90.48.120 is obviously the master [98]. Edits are fairly infrequent, so I am closing the case. But if someone considers a block, 5.90.48.0/21 is a reasonably sized range that covers the most recent IPs. MarioGom ( talk) 21:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC) reply

02 September 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Dave Peast made the same edits as previous socks trying to add the Afrobeats genre to the album Indigo. [99] [100] An Italian IP did it, too. [101] This was followed by Aardwolf60 doing the same thing. [102] Aardwolf60 was blocked for creating a username which attacked Aardwolf68, and Aardwolf62 should have the same treatment.

Do eT like that tried to add "Come Together" to the Chris Brown template, [103] just like a previous sock. [104]

4lipmode 4 reverted a redirect to "Come Together", restoring text that had been repeatedly placed by socks and an Italian IP. [105] [106] [107] [108]

Blooey writes the same way as current and previous socks, adding a summary sentence of critical reviews saying "was met" rather than simply "met". [109] [110]

The only edit by Clavicle guy was to restore text added by previous socks. [111] [112]

Checkuser requested to sweep for sleepers. Binksternet ( talk) 23:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es). The following users are:

RickinBaltimore ( talk) 15:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Also, adding Seen&fixed ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), as I blocked them prior reviewing the SPI. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 15:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Templates added to the above listing for the script. MarioGom ( talk) 20:05, 27 September 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Tagged. Closing. I'll request locks. MarioGom ( talk) 20:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC) reply

15 June 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Proforma for the scripts, already blocked. Also Jake Miosge OFFICIAL. Girth Summit (blether) 11:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 June 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Another one. Girth Summit (blether) 12:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Giubbotto_non_ortodosso/Archive&oldid=1229227166"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE