Multiple unconstructive edits to Template:Cartoon Network and The Cleveland Show A few specific examples:
I don't know if this represents the totality of the user's different accounts. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
It's a duck. User seems to have re-started vandalism campaign with unsourced edits and ridiculous submissions for example, claiming that The Replacements had 10100 episodes. And gibberish here and here. User may be setting up for a larger campaign, as they have created a number of article pages within their user space, perhaps to make copy/paste vandalism easier, or to direct unsuspecting viewers to his bogus articles. Here are a few examples:
Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 02:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
UPDATE: Found out that some of the other socks appear to be tied to Brightify. Is there any way to merge all of these FanforClarl puppet reports under that sockmaster? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
(Note, not spelled "Original", but "Orginal")
There is another account that might deserve a look from the community: HoshiNoKaabii2000 (Is there a way to link to this user without triggering the user notification?) This editor claims to be 13, has made a series of "good-faith edits" which have been mostly original research and edit warring. In spite of numerous attempts to guide the user, the user persists in adding questionable, unsourced info, and acts huffy when confronted with rules. User has called me out on their User Page as a thorn in their side, and has acknowledged on their user page, as well as on their talk page that they have met Unorginal in real life, and that Unorginal has vandalized from Hoshi's home. In fact, the first Unorginal's first edit was to this user's talk page. "r u british?" I suspect either a good hand/bad hand campaign, or meatpuppetry. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Username is similar, plus creation of the same article Fudget (UK and Ireland. A previous case has already been closed from this user: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoshiNoKaabii2000/Archive [[ axg // ✉ ]] 11:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. The user has been blocked already, so this is just an informational thing, but user David Jetix claims to be a sock of Unorginal. He fits the profile, so I'm inclined to believe it. Benboy00 ( talk) 18:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
User admits to it. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
He admitted it WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 17:21, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
We have another one: /info/en/?search=User:Uno_the_First Benboy00 ( talk) 19:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Thewikiguru1 ( talk) 16:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This sock continues to abuse a relatively small number of articles, with a particular focus on Cartoonito, Discovery Kids (UK) and similar children's television articles. Most recent activity is from the 90.216.10 IP address, again showing the same pattern of edits, undoing undos of previous cleanup of their vandalism under other names and IP addresses. No real attempt to hide their behaviour - significant 'tells' include abusive edits and edit summaries - e.g. [ [3]] and [ [4]] - and interactions with the talk pages of previously used sock names - e.g. [ [5]] and [ [6]]. Bonusballs ( talk) 12:17, 5 October 2013 (UTC) Bonusballs ( talk) 12:17, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Added IP 90.200.232.155, abuse has moved to this address following blocks on other IPs. Bonusballs ( talk) 12:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Added IP 90.196.92.131 as editor has moved again. (All same ISP) Bonusballs ( talk) 17:31, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
The articles Discovery Wings (UK), Discovery Kids (UK), Cartoonito and Disney XD (United Kingdom and Ireland) continue to be a particular focus for this editor currently. Possibly article protection would be appropriate, although they seem to change focus to other similar and related articles from time to time. Bonusballs ( talk) 17:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Added 78.146.191.228. Bonusballs ( talk) 19:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Vandalism resumed with same pattern of behaviour as previous socks. Created own user page User:THEUNOSHlT admitting to be a sockpuppet of Unorginal, itself another sock name used by this vandal. Bonusballs ( talk) 17:50, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Repeated insertion of errors into articles followed by immediate reversions of own edits - same behaviour and focus articles as previously targeted by this sock. Bonusballs ( talk) 09:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC) Bonusballs ( talk) 09:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar pattern of edits to Hoshi/Unorginal sock puppets, including common pattern of adding errors to an article then immediately reverting it - e.g.[ [7]] and [ [8]] and [ [9]], plus creation of hoax articles Sky Highlights and repeated vandalism of sock's previously targeted articles including Toonami (UK & Ireland) - [ [10]] and same ongoing edits to talk pages of other socks - e.g. [ [11]]. Bonusballs ( talk) 21:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC) Bonusballs ( talk) 21:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Hey, that only happened once, I have looked at both of their contribs and I have edited SOME different articles from them. GMTV World ( talk) 08:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
I believe there was previously a strong link suggesting that the Brightify socks were related to FanforClarl and his socks, although I don't know that the two reports were ever merged. This new one is similar in name, and behavior. User page appears to be set up for vandalism with the usual interests: television animation, mostly. Bob's Burgers, Cleveland Show, etc. Currently engaged in disruption, like this gibberish addition, or this one that suggests a Korean footballer is playing for various television shows. Or the submission of more unrelated information in various articles. The information seems centered on The Replacements television program, Wayside, Dave the Barbarian, etc. Can we please also check for sleepers? This user seems to be inserting random words and phrases, and I know I've seen that recently in a few TV articles. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I saw his edit on Cartoonito and clicked his name. The user claims to be a sockpuppet of Unorginal, who is said of being a sock of Hoshi. Toon Disney HD ( talk) 19:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I added a second duck to the list. Same style, same subjects. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 12:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I've noticed a few users adding gibberish and making bizarre changes to articles in what seems to be a calculated way. Tends to involve children's television programs. For example, WangsDaringFun adds gibberish here, and SedrentDJ13 makes similar gibberish edits here, here, and to a lesser extent here. Similar edits have also been generated by KaptanFlamingo here and here. Most of the edits from all three users were tagged as mobile edits. Possible app-assisted vandalism? WangsDaringFun also added a redirect to his talk page here, perhaps to discourage users from leaving warning messages. User SedrentDJ13 was using his talk page as a resource for future vandalism here. Might also be related to Gabucho22 (but I haven't looked too closely at his edits yet.) Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 00:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar behavior to other accounts. Addition of random words/gibberish sentences to articles, with some interest in children's television, for example, here and with mentions of kids' shows in this edit and here. This looks like a coordinated plan to disrupt across various accounts. Should we consider checking for sleepers? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:42, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same stuff as before, and vandalism to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoshiNoKaabii2000. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 15:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. YOU GAVE NO REASON WHY I AM A SOCK YOU ARE MEANT TO! Klubklassik ( talk) 15:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Vandalism to same articles, vandalism of user pages, continued routine/same activity ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
aka HoshiNoKaabii2000, similar edits to same articles ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 15:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Umm... Given this mess, could we please get a Checkuser to determine whether or not User:Brightify is the actual sockmaster or not? The following accounts have been confirmed to each other in a different SPI:
I'm not sure about User:Brightify. He has been suspected of being the true sockmaster, and the SPI archives of the other 3 accounts strongly suggests that Brightify is the true sockmaster. A Checkuser should run a check on all 4 accounts, and if Brightify is the sockmaster, all of these pages should be redirected to his SPI case pages. If not, then someone should really clean up the mess and merge the SPIs of all 3 accounts listed above. Either way, we really need to get a handle on which account is socking through which, and that gives us a lot of work to do. LightandDark2000 ( talk) 01:20, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Caught this duck in the edit filter log trying to create an account. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 06:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Not even an attempt to conceal his username, matches with several previous usernames. I won't request checkuser as this one seems fairly obviousl. Safiel ( talk) 04:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Already blocked. Also Banclark57 ( talk · contribs) was another recent account. I'm monitoring further activity. Elockid ( Talk) 01:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Came up in the edit filter log. No contribs yet, but a duck nonetheless. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 23:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
@ Cyphoidbomb:: Please do know that the CheckUser team is diligently working on this matter and has been working diligently for the past few months. Also, ISPs don't tend to really care the abuse that occurs at Wikipedia. You can try, but you'll just end up wasting your time. Elockid ( Talk) 22:34, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Passengerpigeon (
talk)
08:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Already indef blocked, adding for documentation ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 13:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
quack quack. Same naming pattern EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 06:53, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Completed Banclark75 tagged, already blocked by
NrDg. Closing —
MusikAnimal
talk
05:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a duck to me
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
22:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 04:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Near identical edits on Lontara alphabet by confirmed socks [12] & [13] and new socksuspect [14]
I realize this is stale, but would like this evaluated on behavior to shore up a possible LTA case.
Note this involves accounts from two existing sockfarms. More behavioral evidence relating these sockfarms is at User:Brianhe/CompUSA vandal#Other notes.
End of comments. Brianhe ( talk) 08:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
[15] matches chemical elements twiddling of LTA Brightify/Vodkapoise. Compare [16] Vodkapoise CU-confirmed editing. ☆ Bri ( talk) 03:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vodkapoise. @ Bri: In the future, please file any new reports at Vodkapoise. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Multiple unconstructive edits to Template:Cartoon Network and The Cleveland Show A few specific examples:
I don't know if this represents the totality of the user's different accounts. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
It's a duck. User seems to have re-started vandalism campaign with unsourced edits and ridiculous submissions for example, claiming that The Replacements had 10100 episodes. And gibberish here and here. User may be setting up for a larger campaign, as they have created a number of article pages within their user space, perhaps to make copy/paste vandalism easier, or to direct unsuspecting viewers to his bogus articles. Here are a few examples:
Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 02:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
UPDATE: Found out that some of the other socks appear to be tied to Brightify. Is there any way to merge all of these FanforClarl puppet reports under that sockmaster? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
(Note, not spelled "Original", but "Orginal")
There is another account that might deserve a look from the community: HoshiNoKaabii2000 (Is there a way to link to this user without triggering the user notification?) This editor claims to be 13, has made a series of "good-faith edits" which have been mostly original research and edit warring. In spite of numerous attempts to guide the user, the user persists in adding questionable, unsourced info, and acts huffy when confronted with rules. User has called me out on their User Page as a thorn in their side, and has acknowledged on their user page, as well as on their talk page that they have met Unorginal in real life, and that Unorginal has vandalized from Hoshi's home. In fact, the first Unorginal's first edit was to this user's talk page. "r u british?" I suspect either a good hand/bad hand campaign, or meatpuppetry. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Username is similar, plus creation of the same article Fudget (UK and Ireland. A previous case has already been closed from this user: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoshiNoKaabii2000/Archive [[ axg // ✉ ]] 11:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. The user has been blocked already, so this is just an informational thing, but user David Jetix claims to be a sock of Unorginal. He fits the profile, so I'm inclined to believe it. Benboy00 ( talk) 18:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
User admits to it. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
He admitted it WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 17:21, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
We have another one: /info/en/?search=User:Uno_the_First Benboy00 ( talk) 19:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Thewikiguru1 ( talk) 16:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This sock continues to abuse a relatively small number of articles, with a particular focus on Cartoonito, Discovery Kids (UK) and similar children's television articles. Most recent activity is from the 90.216.10 IP address, again showing the same pattern of edits, undoing undos of previous cleanup of their vandalism under other names and IP addresses. No real attempt to hide their behaviour - significant 'tells' include abusive edits and edit summaries - e.g. [ [3]] and [ [4]] - and interactions with the talk pages of previously used sock names - e.g. [ [5]] and [ [6]]. Bonusballs ( talk) 12:17, 5 October 2013 (UTC) Bonusballs ( talk) 12:17, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Added IP 90.200.232.155, abuse has moved to this address following blocks on other IPs. Bonusballs ( talk) 12:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Added IP 90.196.92.131 as editor has moved again. (All same ISP) Bonusballs ( talk) 17:31, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
The articles Discovery Wings (UK), Discovery Kids (UK), Cartoonito and Disney XD (United Kingdom and Ireland) continue to be a particular focus for this editor currently. Possibly article protection would be appropriate, although they seem to change focus to other similar and related articles from time to time. Bonusballs ( talk) 17:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Added 78.146.191.228. Bonusballs ( talk) 19:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Vandalism resumed with same pattern of behaviour as previous socks. Created own user page User:THEUNOSHlT admitting to be a sockpuppet of Unorginal, itself another sock name used by this vandal. Bonusballs ( talk) 17:50, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Repeated insertion of errors into articles followed by immediate reversions of own edits - same behaviour and focus articles as previously targeted by this sock. Bonusballs ( talk) 09:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC) Bonusballs ( talk) 09:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar pattern of edits to Hoshi/Unorginal sock puppets, including common pattern of adding errors to an article then immediately reverting it - e.g.[ [7]] and [ [8]] and [ [9]], plus creation of hoax articles Sky Highlights and repeated vandalism of sock's previously targeted articles including Toonami (UK & Ireland) - [ [10]] and same ongoing edits to talk pages of other socks - e.g. [ [11]]. Bonusballs ( talk) 21:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC) Bonusballs ( talk) 21:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Hey, that only happened once, I have looked at both of their contribs and I have edited SOME different articles from them. GMTV World ( talk) 08:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
I believe there was previously a strong link suggesting that the Brightify socks were related to FanforClarl and his socks, although I don't know that the two reports were ever merged. This new one is similar in name, and behavior. User page appears to be set up for vandalism with the usual interests: television animation, mostly. Bob's Burgers, Cleveland Show, etc. Currently engaged in disruption, like this gibberish addition, or this one that suggests a Korean footballer is playing for various television shows. Or the submission of more unrelated information in various articles. The information seems centered on The Replacements television program, Wayside, Dave the Barbarian, etc. Can we please also check for sleepers? This user seems to be inserting random words and phrases, and I know I've seen that recently in a few TV articles. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I saw his edit on Cartoonito and clicked his name. The user claims to be a sockpuppet of Unorginal, who is said of being a sock of Hoshi. Toon Disney HD ( talk) 19:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I added a second duck to the list. Same style, same subjects. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 12:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I've noticed a few users adding gibberish and making bizarre changes to articles in what seems to be a calculated way. Tends to involve children's television programs. For example, WangsDaringFun adds gibberish here, and SedrentDJ13 makes similar gibberish edits here, here, and to a lesser extent here. Similar edits have also been generated by KaptanFlamingo here and here. Most of the edits from all three users were tagged as mobile edits. Possible app-assisted vandalism? WangsDaringFun also added a redirect to his talk page here, perhaps to discourage users from leaving warning messages. User SedrentDJ13 was using his talk page as a resource for future vandalism here. Might also be related to Gabucho22 (but I haven't looked too closely at his edits yet.) Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 00:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar behavior to other accounts. Addition of random words/gibberish sentences to articles, with some interest in children's television, for example, here and with mentions of kids' shows in this edit and here. This looks like a coordinated plan to disrupt across various accounts. Should we consider checking for sleepers? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:42, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same stuff as before, and vandalism to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoshiNoKaabii2000. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 15:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. YOU GAVE NO REASON WHY I AM A SOCK YOU ARE MEANT TO! Klubklassik ( talk) 15:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Vandalism to same articles, vandalism of user pages, continued routine/same activity ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
aka HoshiNoKaabii2000, similar edits to same articles ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 15:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Umm... Given this mess, could we please get a Checkuser to determine whether or not User:Brightify is the actual sockmaster or not? The following accounts have been confirmed to each other in a different SPI:
I'm not sure about User:Brightify. He has been suspected of being the true sockmaster, and the SPI archives of the other 3 accounts strongly suggests that Brightify is the true sockmaster. A Checkuser should run a check on all 4 accounts, and if Brightify is the sockmaster, all of these pages should be redirected to his SPI case pages. If not, then someone should really clean up the mess and merge the SPIs of all 3 accounts listed above. Either way, we really need to get a handle on which account is socking through which, and that gives us a lot of work to do. LightandDark2000 ( talk) 01:20, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Caught this duck in the edit filter log trying to create an account. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 06:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Not even an attempt to conceal his username, matches with several previous usernames. I won't request checkuser as this one seems fairly obviousl. Safiel ( talk) 04:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Already blocked. Also Banclark57 ( talk · contribs) was another recent account. I'm monitoring further activity. Elockid ( Talk) 01:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Came up in the edit filter log. No contribs yet, but a duck nonetheless. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 23:44, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
@ Cyphoidbomb:: Please do know that the CheckUser team is diligently working on this matter and has been working diligently for the past few months. Also, ISPs don't tend to really care the abuse that occurs at Wikipedia. You can try, but you'll just end up wasting your time. Elockid ( Talk) 22:34, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Passengerpigeon (
talk)
08:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Already indef blocked, adding for documentation ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 13:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
quack quack. Same naming pattern EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 06:53, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Completed Banclark75 tagged, already blocked by
NrDg. Closing —
MusikAnimal
talk
05:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a duck to me
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
22:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
See below. Bbb23 ( talk) 04:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Near identical edits on Lontara alphabet by confirmed socks [12] & [13] and new socksuspect [14]
I realize this is stale, but would like this evaluated on behavior to shore up a possible LTA case.
Note this involves accounts from two existing sockfarms. More behavioral evidence relating these sockfarms is at User:Brianhe/CompUSA vandal#Other notes.
End of comments. Brianhe ( talk) 08:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
[15] matches chemical elements twiddling of LTA Brightify/Vodkapoise. Compare [16] Vodkapoise CU-confirmed editing. ☆ Bri ( talk) 03:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vodkapoise. @ Bri: In the future, please file any new reports at Vodkapoise. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)