![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 100 | ← | Archive 105 | Archive 106 | Archive 107 | Archive 108 | Archive 109 | Archive 110 |
I, Destynova, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Destynova ( talk) 19:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment: I created this article stub in good faith and it was rejected for lack of notability. This is a rather subjective guideline in general, and since there was nothing wrong with the article itself, it seems needlessly wasteful (and discouraging) to delete it. It's not like the article takes up a significant amount of storage. Destynova ( talk) 19:08, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Marilyn Nix, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Thanks. Marilyn Nix ( talk) 03:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - Lib56 ( talk) 01:07, 22 November 2013 (UTC) Hi there,
I thought my article was in a draft form and had not infact, been uploaded as finished. May I please access the original piece, so that I may attach the appropriate references and links.
Kind regards,
Elizabeth Fairleigh
I would like to request undelete since the sources were reliable being used as reference for the second artcile by Rozhadinii which makes it secondary source not primary source since the second study by Rozhadinii endorse it and speaks about the same sunject of klyosov. study. both studies are master studies according to ISOGG website and others which make the whole study (researcher, study, and journal) reliable. both articles are published in Proceedings of the russian academy of dna genealogy, which has issn and oclc but I forgot to put them thinking doi number suffice. also many articles studies referenced both articles klyosov 2009, and rozhadinii as immediately shown with googling where the study show cited by number articles. I also had a list of articles that referenced and cited the klyosov studies and also mentioned the abraham mh in their studies. Viibird ( talk) 11:17, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Talk page of sockpuppet account of notorious sockpuppeteer. Deleted as "too old", which frankly doesn't apply when dealing with a person who has sockpuppeted for years and still continues to do so, and who continues to try multiple ways to cover his tracks as best possible (e.g. trying to "abandon" former sockpuppet accounts by making the password public, requesting deletion of user talk pages of blocked sockpuppet accounts etc etc.) - 85.197.45.232 ( talk) 14:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Same situation, same sockpuppeteer, different sockpuppet account. This deletion was actually requested by the banned user per right to vanish, which should be disregarded as a pure attempt at gaming the system – one of many over the last 6+ years. This sockpuppeteer should not be allowed to cover any of his tracks abusing Wikipedia processes, especially considering that the latest of his incessant ban evasions dates only to September 2013. - 85.197.45.232 ( talk) 14:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Same reasoning as above. - 85.197.45.232 ( talk) 14:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Marilyn Nix, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Marilyn Nix ( talk) 19:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Marilyn Nix (
talk)
19:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Bloonstdfan360, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. -- Bloonstdfan360 ( talk • contribs) 03:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning -satyanarayana samatham 17:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC) https://www.facebook.com/GrandhiSrinivasFansbhimavaram — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satya3231 ( talk • contribs) 17:23, 23 November 2013
I, Ekjaa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Ekjaa ( talk) 06:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - 99.197.151.31 ( talk) 06:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Maggielanoue ( talk) 21:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Rybec, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. — rybec 00:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Russki33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Article was deleted due to inactivity for 6 months. I now have more materials and sources for the article and wish to improve it to a standard where it will be accepted and published. Russki33 ( talk) 09:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Andrew J Barker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Andrew J Barker ( talk) 20:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Girlies mum, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Girlies mum ( talk) 22:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I, 92.23.77.133, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 92.23.77.133 ( talk) 09:24, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I am not sure why this has been deleted. This is an actual game developer with a highly anticipated game coming out - Chaosngn ( talk) 04:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
This requests concerns talk and subpages of this old 2006 arbcom case. As noted at Wikipedia_talk:ARBCOM#Courtesy_deletion.3F, the deletion, not supported by our policies, was done due to technical reasons, no longer valid. Those pages should be undeleted (and than immediately courtesy blanked). - Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
it is an impotant article. - Nautankifilms ( talk) 08:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - 134.53.112.70 ( talk) 01:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Fushion83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Fushion83 ( talk) 16:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Content should not have been deleted but added but merged to the relevant parent page, Super Powers Collection - 181.50.27.166 ( talk) 16:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
This image is out-of-copyright, so revisions must be recovered. - George Ho ( talk) 08:52, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Please restore edit history for this recently recreated article - Dolovis ( talk) 20:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I have no idea why it doesn't fit the rules. I have seen other pages similarly short about 1 specific person who has no real historic significance, but is an active participant in current events in a local area. I am a teacher, and an artist, I have seen other artists posted on wikipedia. I also can not contact the guy who deleted it (MrX) and ask him for why he deleted it, and how I can improve it so it won't happen again. - MathGeek83 ( talk) 17:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
So basically, the others got there first, you won't take them down because they were there first, and no one else can do it, because you've changed the rules after they got posted. When I see these similar sites, should I send you messages about them for them to be deleted too? I didn't realize that wikipedia considers a description about an artist and educator to be the same thing that would be on that persons social networking site. I certainly kept it extremely professional. How many citations would be required? I have been published, my work exhibited, and interviewed. What exactly is required? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MathGeek83 ( talk • contribs) 13:53, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Eastmain, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Not a controversial or unnotable topic. - Riggabbert ( talk) 22:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Mhsprecher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mhsprecher ( talk) 17:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Lisanab, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Lisanab ( talk) 18:23, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
I do apologize for submitting and incomplete article but I was in the process of adding the information (such as charts, references and other data) to create the article and was unaware that the article would be contested so quickly. The group is a legitimate and well established band and will probably get an article even if I cease to edit it. If you choose to not restore it, could I at least be given the source code so I can continue to edit the article and provide a better article. Thanks again. Ratizi Angelou contribs 16:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC) - Ratizi Angelou contribs 16:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - Hystanford ( talk) 09:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I just got an email in that my Wikipedia page was submitted for deletion by your editor Mr X. Reason: A7. I thought I still would have time to discuss this matter (as done with a previous editor, who put it in the sandbox and later approved the revisited article) in good consent! When I tried to open my page directly after I received the email it was already delated by Mr. Secret.
This is curious. Wonder if these two editors are the same person hiding under the named Mr. X and Mr. Secret.
Although I think it's unbelievable but I recently had a similar 'attack' on my blog (trial and error pictures) and FB-page that could be traced back to a jealous person.
The wikipedia article was BTW rewritten by another one of your editors Ulla Kelly from East London in South Africa who has an extensive experience in both Wikipedia articles and Social Media.
All content in the article is verifiable and the general importance is certainly there. Read for yourself.
Can you please review the original article and restore it.
Thank you.
Herman van Bon
reasoning - Alihaimson ( talk) 05:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
A user deleted this page because she had not heard of Boxcar Books after living in Bloomington for several months and because she claimed that the article was written by one of the founders. However, Boxcar Books has been an important community institution since 2002. It is also referenced by name in this document:
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ivar_matlaus
which has not reached consensus. As that discussion states, many bookstores like Boxcar that are also community centers and have more significance than just a retail space remain active on Wikipedia.
It doesn't seem right to delete a page just because a person who lived in a town for a few months had not heard of it, despite its vibrant community involvement for almost 12 years. Regarding the claim that a founder wrote the page, I honestly can't remember if I wrote it or not. I did contribute to it, but I'm sure many other people have also.
Thank you for your consideration.
I, Humanperformance, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Humanperformance ( talk) 22:31, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - 98.77.91.154 ( talk) 17:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC) Chuck Harder was one of the top 10 talk show radio hosts in the USA during the 1980's and is very well known by tens (hundreds?) of millions of listeners. Multiple Wikipedia pages reference him. Deletion of his page is unwarranted and the page should be reinstated. Thank you.
I, 79.183.171.183, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 79.183.171.183 ( talk) 07:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
{Could we please have the article back without the revision containing the pdf. The pdf article was published in terms of the Creative Commons license by CIPA and we assumed that, since Wikipedia and SAHRIS are also CC that it was possible to link this resource. We will rewrite the article without the link to the pdf in the meantime and will simply reference it from CIPA. Knocknacree ( talk) 04:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - Lukelagis ( talk) 16:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning is deletion information is incorrect ((PROD - Main claim to notability was he is in a movie which hasn't started production yet. The movie listed finished production and has been shown at festivals in Europe, America as well as having completed cinema release in Australia. Other information listed was correct regarding work in professional and international sports. - Redbox43 ( talk) 19:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Marian at Childers, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Marian at Childers ( talk) 19:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Kenbunichi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Kenbunichi ( talk) 19:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
References are okay, Please re-check and give me more time to contribute -Khocon 03:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Article was deleted under CSD G11, but it's as much "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" as /info/en/?search=Arduino or /info/en/?search=RaspberryPi - Hugoslv ( talk) 21:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I, 75.67.49.68, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 75.67.49.68 ( talk) 06:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
I am making this request here per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_administrators_willing_to_provide_copies_of_deleted_articles
"Requests can also be made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion."
The deleted pages were not appropriate for Wikipedia, but are appropriate for other wikis. These pages were deleted for non-controversial reasons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Steam_games_(2nd_nomination) Requesting these articles be "userfied" so I can transfer them to an appropriate wiki. BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
The article was a written explanation and you can't patent a word so the argument was awful. Also, there was no gibberish in the article -- The reviewer could not even spell 'gibberish' correctly, and you put that spelling in the official note. Get a grip wikipedia. - TwoLessOutcast ( talk) 19:54, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
"If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."
This has nothing to do with patentable work. It is a mathematical equation. There was no gibberish and legitimate. Please make sure the reviewers can actually competently do what they're doing before you take their word for deleting things. Their grammar was fucking terrible, and they couldn't even spell right. In mathematics there is only right and wrong. The editor was clearly never correct. - TwoLessOutcast ( talk) 19:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Was moved to commons, who have since deleted it because it contains an image of a copyrighted work; no fair-use rationale is available on commons - Josh Parris 09:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - Flaounas 5 ( talk) 08:22, 29 November 2013 (UTC) So people can find it
reasoning - Itrnsfr ( talk) 15:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC) This article meets general criteria doesn't violate any copyrights. It's been created to help readers get the maximum benefits of the website
Albeu ( talk) 19:45, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
I, 76.178.209.48, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 76.178.209.48 ( talk) 20:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
This file should have better revisions, does it? - George Ho ( talk) 07:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
I would like to see what was there and possibly merge some of the content. If it's short maybe it can be copied or if it's significant I would like it moved to my userspace. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 01:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I would like to see what was there and possibly merge some of the content. Can it be moved to my userspace? Also Long Beach bike path, but I think that was just a redirect? thanks. - Candleabracadabra ( talk) 01:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
The Long Beach Bike Path in Los Angeles County meanders about 4.5 miles (7.2 km) along the sand from Shoreline Village in downtown Long Beach, California to Bayshore Avenue in Belmont Shore. [1] The path is shared with walkers, joggers, and skaters, so its attraction is more for scenery than for travel speed.
The Long Beach Bike path was originally proposed in the late 1970s but local residents resisted the bike path as it was felt it would be an eyesore. [2] That opposition faded away with time. Final plans for the path were ordered by the Long Beach City Council in 1986 with a budget of $1.4 million. [2]
I, Legoines, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Legoines ( talk) 01:45, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
i need the contents because i need to know y it was deleted. - Newbewiki ( talk) 12:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
in the article it is mentioned in a clear way for a business, that they should have these kind of weapons to succeed in marketing their company. As i went through some other company pages. they had too mentioned about the work of their company, so i also mentioned it, if it is not allowed then i shall delete it by myself. :) - 180.188.237.47 ( talk) 10:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - Theloltroll ( talk) 13:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC) wait what whaeres the info gone
Danielmax32 ( talk) 22:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Shyam Sunder Premi ( talk) 12:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC) User:Shyam Sunder Premi
{{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 100 | ← | Archive 105 | Archive 106 | Archive 107 | Archive 108 | Archive 109 | Archive 110 |
I, Destynova, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Destynova ( talk) 19:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment: I created this article stub in good faith and it was rejected for lack of notability. This is a rather subjective guideline in general, and since there was nothing wrong with the article itself, it seems needlessly wasteful (and discouraging) to delete it. It's not like the article takes up a significant amount of storage. Destynova ( talk) 19:08, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Marilyn Nix, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Thanks. Marilyn Nix ( talk) 03:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - Lib56 ( talk) 01:07, 22 November 2013 (UTC) Hi there,
I thought my article was in a draft form and had not infact, been uploaded as finished. May I please access the original piece, so that I may attach the appropriate references and links.
Kind regards,
Elizabeth Fairleigh
I would like to request undelete since the sources were reliable being used as reference for the second artcile by Rozhadinii which makes it secondary source not primary source since the second study by Rozhadinii endorse it and speaks about the same sunject of klyosov. study. both studies are master studies according to ISOGG website and others which make the whole study (researcher, study, and journal) reliable. both articles are published in Proceedings of the russian academy of dna genealogy, which has issn and oclc but I forgot to put them thinking doi number suffice. also many articles studies referenced both articles klyosov 2009, and rozhadinii as immediately shown with googling where the study show cited by number articles. I also had a list of articles that referenced and cited the klyosov studies and also mentioned the abraham mh in their studies. Viibird ( talk) 11:17, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Talk page of sockpuppet account of notorious sockpuppeteer. Deleted as "too old", which frankly doesn't apply when dealing with a person who has sockpuppeted for years and still continues to do so, and who continues to try multiple ways to cover his tracks as best possible (e.g. trying to "abandon" former sockpuppet accounts by making the password public, requesting deletion of user talk pages of blocked sockpuppet accounts etc etc.) - 85.197.45.232 ( talk) 14:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Same situation, same sockpuppeteer, different sockpuppet account. This deletion was actually requested by the banned user per right to vanish, which should be disregarded as a pure attempt at gaming the system – one of many over the last 6+ years. This sockpuppeteer should not be allowed to cover any of his tracks abusing Wikipedia processes, especially considering that the latest of his incessant ban evasions dates only to September 2013. - 85.197.45.232 ( talk) 14:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Same reasoning as above. - 85.197.45.232 ( talk) 14:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Marilyn Nix, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Marilyn Nix ( talk) 19:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Marilyn Nix (
talk)
19:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Bloonstdfan360, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. -- Bloonstdfan360 ( talk • contribs) 03:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning -satyanarayana samatham 17:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC) https://www.facebook.com/GrandhiSrinivasFansbhimavaram — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satya3231 ( talk • contribs) 17:23, 23 November 2013
I, Ekjaa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Ekjaa ( talk) 06:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - 99.197.151.31 ( talk) 06:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Maggielanoue ( talk) 21:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Rybec, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. — rybec 00:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Russki33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Article was deleted due to inactivity for 6 months. I now have more materials and sources for the article and wish to improve it to a standard where it will be accepted and published. Russki33 ( talk) 09:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Andrew J Barker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Andrew J Barker ( talk) 20:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Girlies mum, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Girlies mum ( talk) 22:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I, 92.23.77.133, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 92.23.77.133 ( talk) 09:24, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I am not sure why this has been deleted. This is an actual game developer with a highly anticipated game coming out - Chaosngn ( talk) 04:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
This requests concerns talk and subpages of this old 2006 arbcom case. As noted at Wikipedia_talk:ARBCOM#Courtesy_deletion.3F, the deletion, not supported by our policies, was done due to technical reasons, no longer valid. Those pages should be undeleted (and than immediately courtesy blanked). - Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
it is an impotant article. - Nautankifilms ( talk) 08:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - 134.53.112.70 ( talk) 01:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Fushion83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Fushion83 ( talk) 16:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Content should not have been deleted but added but merged to the relevant parent page, Super Powers Collection - 181.50.27.166 ( talk) 16:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
This image is out-of-copyright, so revisions must be recovered. - George Ho ( talk) 08:52, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Please restore edit history for this recently recreated article - Dolovis ( talk) 20:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I have no idea why it doesn't fit the rules. I have seen other pages similarly short about 1 specific person who has no real historic significance, but is an active participant in current events in a local area. I am a teacher, and an artist, I have seen other artists posted on wikipedia. I also can not contact the guy who deleted it (MrX) and ask him for why he deleted it, and how I can improve it so it won't happen again. - MathGeek83 ( talk) 17:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
So basically, the others got there first, you won't take them down because they were there first, and no one else can do it, because you've changed the rules after they got posted. When I see these similar sites, should I send you messages about them for them to be deleted too? I didn't realize that wikipedia considers a description about an artist and educator to be the same thing that would be on that persons social networking site. I certainly kept it extremely professional. How many citations would be required? I have been published, my work exhibited, and interviewed. What exactly is required? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MathGeek83 ( talk • contribs) 13:53, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Eastmain, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Not a controversial or unnotable topic. - Riggabbert ( talk) 22:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Mhsprecher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mhsprecher ( talk) 17:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Lisanab, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Lisanab ( talk) 18:23, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
I do apologize for submitting and incomplete article but I was in the process of adding the information (such as charts, references and other data) to create the article and was unaware that the article would be contested so quickly. The group is a legitimate and well established band and will probably get an article even if I cease to edit it. If you choose to not restore it, could I at least be given the source code so I can continue to edit the article and provide a better article. Thanks again. Ratizi Angelou contribs 16:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC) - Ratizi Angelou contribs 16:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - Hystanford ( talk) 09:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I just got an email in that my Wikipedia page was submitted for deletion by your editor Mr X. Reason: A7. I thought I still would have time to discuss this matter (as done with a previous editor, who put it in the sandbox and later approved the revisited article) in good consent! When I tried to open my page directly after I received the email it was already delated by Mr. Secret.
This is curious. Wonder if these two editors are the same person hiding under the named Mr. X and Mr. Secret.
Although I think it's unbelievable but I recently had a similar 'attack' on my blog (trial and error pictures) and FB-page that could be traced back to a jealous person.
The wikipedia article was BTW rewritten by another one of your editors Ulla Kelly from East London in South Africa who has an extensive experience in both Wikipedia articles and Social Media.
All content in the article is verifiable and the general importance is certainly there. Read for yourself.
Can you please review the original article and restore it.
Thank you.
Herman van Bon
reasoning - Alihaimson ( talk) 05:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
A user deleted this page because she had not heard of Boxcar Books after living in Bloomington for several months and because she claimed that the article was written by one of the founders. However, Boxcar Books has been an important community institution since 2002. It is also referenced by name in this document:
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ivar_matlaus
which has not reached consensus. As that discussion states, many bookstores like Boxcar that are also community centers and have more significance than just a retail space remain active on Wikipedia.
It doesn't seem right to delete a page just because a person who lived in a town for a few months had not heard of it, despite its vibrant community involvement for almost 12 years. Regarding the claim that a founder wrote the page, I honestly can't remember if I wrote it or not. I did contribute to it, but I'm sure many other people have also.
Thank you for your consideration.
I, Humanperformance, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Humanperformance ( talk) 22:31, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - 98.77.91.154 ( talk) 17:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC) Chuck Harder was one of the top 10 talk show radio hosts in the USA during the 1980's and is very well known by tens (hundreds?) of millions of listeners. Multiple Wikipedia pages reference him. Deletion of his page is unwarranted and the page should be reinstated. Thank you.
I, 79.183.171.183, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 79.183.171.183 ( talk) 07:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
{Could we please have the article back without the revision containing the pdf. The pdf article was published in terms of the Creative Commons license by CIPA and we assumed that, since Wikipedia and SAHRIS are also CC that it was possible to link this resource. We will rewrite the article without the link to the pdf in the meantime and will simply reference it from CIPA. Knocknacree ( talk) 04:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - Lukelagis ( talk) 16:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning is deletion information is incorrect ((PROD - Main claim to notability was he is in a movie which hasn't started production yet. The movie listed finished production and has been shown at festivals in Europe, America as well as having completed cinema release in Australia. Other information listed was correct regarding work in professional and international sports. - Redbox43 ( talk) 19:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Marian at Childers, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Marian at Childers ( talk) 19:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I, Kenbunichi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Kenbunichi ( talk) 19:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
References are okay, Please re-check and give me more time to contribute -Khocon 03:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Article was deleted under CSD G11, but it's as much "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" as /info/en/?search=Arduino or /info/en/?search=RaspberryPi - Hugoslv ( talk) 21:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I, 75.67.49.68, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 75.67.49.68 ( talk) 06:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Requesting userfied copy for transfer to another wiki - BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
I am making this request here per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_administrators_willing_to_provide_copies_of_deleted_articles
"Requests can also be made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion."
The deleted pages were not appropriate for Wikipedia, but are appropriate for other wikis. These pages were deleted for non-controversial reasons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Steam_games_(2nd_nomination) Requesting these articles be "userfied" so I can transfer them to an appropriate wiki. BrentNewland ( talk) 12:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
The article was a written explanation and you can't patent a word so the argument was awful. Also, there was no gibberish in the article -- The reviewer could not even spell 'gibberish' correctly, and you put that spelling in the official note. Get a grip wikipedia. - TwoLessOutcast ( talk) 19:54, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
"If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."
This has nothing to do with patentable work. It is a mathematical equation. There was no gibberish and legitimate. Please make sure the reviewers can actually competently do what they're doing before you take their word for deleting things. Their grammar was fucking terrible, and they couldn't even spell right. In mathematics there is only right and wrong. The editor was clearly never correct. - TwoLessOutcast ( talk) 19:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Was moved to commons, who have since deleted it because it contains an image of a copyrighted work; no fair-use rationale is available on commons - Josh Parris 09:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - Flaounas 5 ( talk) 08:22, 29 November 2013 (UTC) So people can find it
reasoning - Itrnsfr ( talk) 15:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC) This article meets general criteria doesn't violate any copyrights. It's been created to help readers get the maximum benefits of the website
Albeu ( talk) 19:45, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
I, 76.178.209.48, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 76.178.209.48 ( talk) 20:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
This file should have better revisions, does it? - George Ho ( talk) 07:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
I would like to see what was there and possibly merge some of the content. If it's short maybe it can be copied or if it's significant I would like it moved to my userspace. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 01:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I would like to see what was there and possibly merge some of the content. Can it be moved to my userspace? Also Long Beach bike path, but I think that was just a redirect? thanks. - Candleabracadabra ( talk) 01:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
The Long Beach Bike Path in Los Angeles County meanders about 4.5 miles (7.2 km) along the sand from Shoreline Village in downtown Long Beach, California to Bayshore Avenue in Belmont Shore. [1] The path is shared with walkers, joggers, and skaters, so its attraction is more for scenery than for travel speed.
The Long Beach Bike path was originally proposed in the late 1970s but local residents resisted the bike path as it was felt it would be an eyesore. [2] That opposition faded away with time. Final plans for the path were ordered by the Long Beach City Council in 1986 with a budget of $1.4 million. [2]
I, Legoines, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Legoines ( talk) 01:45, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
i need the contents because i need to know y it was deleted. - Newbewiki ( talk) 12:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
in the article it is mentioned in a clear way for a business, that they should have these kind of weapons to succeed in marketing their company. As i went through some other company pages. they had too mentioned about the work of their company, so i also mentioned it, if it is not allowed then i shall delete it by myself. :) - 180.188.237.47 ( talk) 10:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
reasoning - Theloltroll ( talk) 13:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC) wait what whaeres the info gone
Danielmax32 ( talk) 22:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Shyam Sunder Premi ( talk) 12:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC) User:Shyam Sunder Premi
{{
cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help)