K1Bond007 (
talk·contribs) - K1Bond007 is a familiar name on the
WikiProject Computer and video games, where he and
Mrwojo created the template that we use on most CVG articles. He also actively edits and patrols
James Bond-related articles, and lately he's been helping out a lot on CFD. He has a whopping 12029 edits as of just now.
[1] He occasionally asks me to merge page histories, which I don't mind doing, but I think he can be trusted with the tools and responsibility of adminship.
Andre (
talk) 19:50, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
Thank you Andre, I accept.
K1Bond007 20:22, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
Support
As the nominator, full support.
Andre (
talk) 19:51, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
Strong Support I have nothing bad to say about K1Bond007. Definately deserves adminship.
Thunderbrand 21:46, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
Support It's really high time that James gets promoted to administrator. He's gained a lot of experience and has done very much for Wikipedia.
NightBeAsT22:49, 12 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I briefly interacted with K1Bond007 several months ago when I was working on some of the James Bond articles. Was knowlegable and courteous then as he is now.
Zzyzx11(Talk)22:59, 12 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I've also interacted with K1Bond007 over James Bond articles, very fair and accommodating. Contribution to this subject immense.
Mark8323:05, 12 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Looking at his contributions, he already seems to act like a good administrator. But since he isn't officially an admin at this time, I think we should change that. So, I will support.Denelson8306:02, 13 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I'm not basing this vote purely on edit count, of course... but.... wow. Just wow.
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 06:07, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
Support - I've had good interactions with this editor, and have seen him pounce on problems quickly, efficiently, and effectively. --
BD2412talk 20:49, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
Boothy has been identified as
using multiple vandal sockpuppets and has been temporarily blocked. It's safe to say his votes no longer count. —
BRIAN0918 • 2005-08-15 15:51
A. RC vandalism patrol from time to time. Lately I've been doing a lot of work for CFD. Wouldn't mind helping out there either.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Most of the articles dealing with James Bond, specifically Thunderball and For Your Eyes Only which I aided in greatly expanding. Bond aside, I work on a lot of computer and video game articles.
Sega and
Sony Computer Entertainment off the top of my head are two articles that I've made great contributions to in the past.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I got involved in a conflict with
User:Boothy443 the other day over changing a category to one that had a consensus per
WP:CFD (e.g.
Burlington-Bristol Bridge). For this specific one, I essentially backed out and notified
User:Kbdank71 after having my edit reverted twice even after notifying Boothy of the reasoning. I'm not really sure what I could have done better in this situation and given Boothy443's track record I decided it wasn't worth it for my part.
K1Bond007 (
talk·contribs) - K1Bond007 is a familiar name on the
WikiProject Computer and video games, where he and
Mrwojo created the template that we use on most CVG articles. He also actively edits and patrols
James Bond-related articles, and lately he's been helping out a lot on CFD. He has a whopping 12029 edits as of just now.
[1] He occasionally asks me to merge page histories, which I don't mind doing, but I think he can be trusted with the tools and responsibility of adminship.
Andre (
talk) 19:50, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
Thank you Andre, I accept.
K1Bond007 20:22, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
Support
As the nominator, full support.
Andre (
talk) 19:51, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
Strong Support I have nothing bad to say about K1Bond007. Definately deserves adminship.
Thunderbrand 21:46, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
Support It's really high time that James gets promoted to administrator. He's gained a lot of experience and has done very much for Wikipedia.
NightBeAsT22:49, 12 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I briefly interacted with K1Bond007 several months ago when I was working on some of the James Bond articles. Was knowlegable and courteous then as he is now.
Zzyzx11(Talk)22:59, 12 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I've also interacted with K1Bond007 over James Bond articles, very fair and accommodating. Contribution to this subject immense.
Mark8323:05, 12 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Looking at his contributions, he already seems to act like a good administrator. But since he isn't officially an admin at this time, I think we should change that. So, I will support.Denelson8306:02, 13 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I'm not basing this vote purely on edit count, of course... but.... wow. Just wow.
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 06:07, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
Support - I've had good interactions with this editor, and have seen him pounce on problems quickly, efficiently, and effectively. --
BD2412talk 20:49, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
Boothy has been identified as
using multiple vandal sockpuppets and has been temporarily blocked. It's safe to say his votes no longer count. —
BRIAN0918 • 2005-08-15 15:51
A. RC vandalism patrol from time to time. Lately I've been doing a lot of work for CFD. Wouldn't mind helping out there either.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Most of the articles dealing with James Bond, specifically Thunderball and For Your Eyes Only which I aided in greatly expanding. Bond aside, I work on a lot of computer and video game articles.
Sega and
Sony Computer Entertainment off the top of my head are two articles that I've made great contributions to in the past.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I got involved in a conflict with
User:Boothy443 the other day over changing a category to one that had a consensus per
WP:CFD (e.g.
Burlington-Bristol Bridge). For this specific one, I essentially backed out and notified
User:Kbdank71 after having my edit reverted twice even after notifying Boothy of the reasoning. I'm not really sure what I could have done better in this situation and given Boothy443's track record I decided it wasn't worth it for my part.