Juliancolton Alternative (
talk·contribs) – i'm a wikipedia user. i have only been blocked 7 times. i also have over a thousand edits. oh and btw, i am not a 'sock puppet'.
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: blocking people
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: my userpage is nice
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: i told somebody to "*beep* off" yesterday, but i was hoping nobody would notice
Support. I was going to oppose per the seven blocks and the false claim of having over 1000 edits (in actuality it's only 841), but having rollback obviously overrides both.
Useight (
talk)
01:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Go away for six months, bring that block count up to 15 or so, then I will be happy to support. We need someone to block Jimbo.--
Wehwalt (
talk)
01:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose. This user's efforts to bushwhack bubble wrap the encyclopedia on the down lowup and up QT must be nipped from the bottle nipped in the bud, as per episode 133 of NCIS. —
Athaenara ✉ 04:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Strong Support - Seven is just the right number of times to have been blocked. Enough to understand the plight of the common man, but not so much that you're a Super-Villain.
Nutiketaiel (
talk)
14:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
the above user has been banned for not remembering how to wiki links, which implied that the candidate was merely Legit to Quit and not Too Legit to Quit. Fixed.
Syrthiss (
talk)
15:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Juliancolton Alternative (
talk·contribs) – i'm a wikipedia user. i have only been blocked 7 times. i also have over a thousand edits. oh and btw, i am not a 'sock puppet'.
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: blocking people
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: my userpage is nice
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: i told somebody to "*beep* off" yesterday, but i was hoping nobody would notice
Support. I was going to oppose per the seven blocks and the false claim of having over 1000 edits (in actuality it's only 841), but having rollback obviously overrides both.
Useight (
talk)
01:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Go away for six months, bring that block count up to 15 or so, then I will be happy to support. We need someone to block Jimbo.--
Wehwalt (
talk)
01:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose. This user's efforts to bushwhack bubble wrap the encyclopedia on the down lowup and up QT must be nipped from the bottle nipped in the bud, as per episode 133 of NCIS. —
Athaenara ✉ 04:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Strong Support - Seven is just the right number of times to have been blocked. Enough to understand the plight of the common man, but not so much that you're a Super-Villain.
Nutiketaiel (
talk)
14:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply
the above user has been banned for not remembering how to wiki links, which implied that the candidate was merely Legit to Quit and not Too Legit to Quit. Fixed.
Syrthiss (
talk)
15:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)reply