Withdrawn at candidate's request at (13/43/9) by Kingturtle at 14:12, 29 June 2008
EricV89 ( talk · contribs) - I've become devoted to fighting vandalism on Wikipedia and removing unsourced, biased material from article space and tagging new pages created following Wikipedia's guidline for speedy deletion. I've become use to reverting pages more than once becuase of blatant vandals who repost the same useless stuff over and over again. I recall becoming frustrated once when the same article was being vandalised over and over again and even when I reported the I.P. there was quite a substantial time between the time I reported the I.P. and the when the user actually got blocked.(maybe it was becuase it was 3:30 A.M. EST and basically no administrator was online) Anyways, I've thought it would be time to change that :-). I don't mind working the night shift. I've used Wikipedia since I was in High School, 4 years ago, and fianlly decieded to register with Wikipedia in November of 2006. I became fully active a few months ago oppose to my edits here and there over the years I was registered. I AM and WILLING to fight to protect Wikipedia from vandals and idiotic ideology. While I may of only contributed a few times to articles, I certainly know how to edit and follow the rules and procedures, not to mention guidelines of Wikipedia and serving as a SYSOPS would make it easier for me to stop vandals before they corrupt Wikipedia anymore. I am a student, still learning from the world but I do find myself sometimes clicking the RANDOM ARTICLE link to just learn about something new. I love it. I'm very proficient with Huggle and I got a keene eye for detail and bad edits. I strive to maintain a 0 tolerance policy against vandalism(blatant).
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Additional question from Frank:
Optional Question from Bigvinu
Question from User:JeanLatore
For the edit count, see the talk page.
I take offense to those who call me a mindless reverter using Huggle. Take a look at my earlier reverts from early April... even early May. I did not use ANY tools what-so-ever. Absolutely none. I did everything by hand by using the Recent Changes link on the Wikipedia web site for a while. Rollbacking and copy and pasting the templates using nothing by my browser. I did not even bother to download and use Huggle until just recently, within the past month and half. I both undid the revisions and reversions by using the interaction's link on the Wikipedia web site. Even today, I do not just use Huggle all the time, I actually take the time to read the new sections and flag them appropriately. Huggle is just a tool I use to help me do this faster. These votes seem to be on a biased vote of me using a anti-vandalism tool that Wikipedia offers. It's not like I don't know what belongs in articles and doesn't. Just becuase I press a red button doesn't mean I am not learning about this process has I go. I know and get the idea already. The reason I mention this is becuase I like fighting vandalism and am best at this, not nessacarily meaning I am inept from other contributive activities on Wikipedia. Therefor, I can't not understand why you base your vote on this fact. -- ♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ ( talk) 06:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/EricV89 before commenting.
Withdrawn at candidate's request at (13/43/9) by Kingturtle at 14:12, 29 June 2008
EricV89 ( talk · contribs) - I've become devoted to fighting vandalism on Wikipedia and removing unsourced, biased material from article space and tagging new pages created following Wikipedia's guidline for speedy deletion. I've become use to reverting pages more than once becuase of blatant vandals who repost the same useless stuff over and over again. I recall becoming frustrated once when the same article was being vandalised over and over again and even when I reported the I.P. there was quite a substantial time between the time I reported the I.P. and the when the user actually got blocked.(maybe it was becuase it was 3:30 A.M. EST and basically no administrator was online) Anyways, I've thought it would be time to change that :-). I don't mind working the night shift. I've used Wikipedia since I was in High School, 4 years ago, and fianlly decieded to register with Wikipedia in November of 2006. I became fully active a few months ago oppose to my edits here and there over the years I was registered. I AM and WILLING to fight to protect Wikipedia from vandals and idiotic ideology. While I may of only contributed a few times to articles, I certainly know how to edit and follow the rules and procedures, not to mention guidelines of Wikipedia and serving as a SYSOPS would make it easier for me to stop vandals before they corrupt Wikipedia anymore. I am a student, still learning from the world but I do find myself sometimes clicking the RANDOM ARTICLE link to just learn about something new. I love it. I'm very proficient with Huggle and I got a keene eye for detail and bad edits. I strive to maintain a 0 tolerance policy against vandalism(blatant).
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Additional question from Frank:
Optional Question from Bigvinu
Question from User:JeanLatore
For the edit count, see the talk page.
I take offense to those who call me a mindless reverter using Huggle. Take a look at my earlier reverts from early April... even early May. I did not use ANY tools what-so-ever. Absolutely none. I did everything by hand by using the Recent Changes link on the Wikipedia web site for a while. Rollbacking and copy and pasting the templates using nothing by my browser. I did not even bother to download and use Huggle until just recently, within the past month and half. I both undid the revisions and reversions by using the interaction's link on the Wikipedia web site. Even today, I do not just use Huggle all the time, I actually take the time to read the new sections and flag them appropriately. Huggle is just a tool I use to help me do this faster. These votes seem to be on a biased vote of me using a anti-vandalism tool that Wikipedia offers. It's not like I don't know what belongs in articles and doesn't. Just becuase I press a red button doesn't mean I am not learning about this process has I go. I know and get the idea already. The reason I mention this is becuase I like fighting vandalism and am best at this, not nessacarily meaning I am inept from other contributive activities on Wikipedia. Therefor, I can't not understand why you base your vote on this fact. -- ♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ ( talk) 06:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/EricV89 before commenting.