This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 16, 2022.
I think this makes sense to delete. A cursory web search doesn't turn up much about "Snoop Dawg" connected to The Dandy, and I think it's much more likely to be a typo for the rapper Snoop Dogg. I think a deletion would be an improvement, but a retarget to Snoop Dogg would probably also be an improvement. 92anonymous92 ( talk) 23:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Weird target. This redirect currently points to Senua (Hellblade) when Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice seems to be a better target. A user changed the target to Senua, saying that Hellblade is now a series and Senua is the titular "Hellblade" of the series, but (A) I think the character isn't primarily known by that name and (B) the series is primarily discussed on the page for the first game (sequel isn't out yet). When people search "Hellblade", they will be looking for the game or the series, which is discussed at Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice primarily. TarkusAB talk/ contrib 23:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This redirect is an E number-related redirect. I've been researching to find the validity of this redirect for a while, and seemed to be stumped on finding any third party resources that confirm this the E number "E918" is defined at all. Another issue is that most redirects in the Category:Redirects from E numbers target an article, not a set index (or disambiguation page) that lists possible articles which the term could refer; in other words, most, if not all, other E number redirects target the specific subject which the E number defines. With all that being said, without a source defining this E number or its existence in general, this redirect is erroneous for the aforementioned reasons. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Ladies' singles has been renamed women's singles. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Why Wikipedia Sucks
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Aftonomi Monastiki Politia Agiou Orous
Delete due to the unnatural and implausible formatting. -- Tavix ( talk) 18:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Ottoman Turkestan
Essentially unused redirect that is not linked to from the page it is redirect to as a shortcut and the redirect was used 8 times total last year. Tartar Torte 17:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this is a plausible redirect. It is related by being the YouTube ID in the URL of Never Gonna Give You Up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ . But should Wikipedia replicate YouTube URL IDs? Mvqr ( talk) 16:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#George Wallace (New Zealand)
Those redirects are misleading, as the article is only about Catholic canon law and not canon law in general. I highly doubt the Catholic Church is the only denomination to have those.
I recommend deletion to encourage creation. A redirect to
Canon law would be unwise, as those subjects are not present there.
Veverve (
talk) 01:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
unless it can be shown that corresponding articles exist for non-Catholic religious groups on the English Wikipedia: Canon law of the Eastern Orthodox Church also has theological and philosophical aspects. All I can find searching for "Fundamental theory of canon law" is a book by Carlos José Errázuriz, Justice in the Church: A Fundamental Theory of Canon Law, so it does not seem like it is a Catholic term, rather it is a the title of a book by one author using a vague expression. Veverve ( talk) 19:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 05:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk) 13:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#Voluntary agency
The target of this transliteration redirect seems to be an error. Yoshiyahu and Yoshiahu correctly link there already, but our redirect needs to point to Isaiah, as does Yeshayahu currently. (*Adding: As does Yeshaya and Yeshayah. Yishaya seems to be a short form of Yeshayahu used by some people.) While our redirect is more of a mistaken transliteration for Isaiah, since the first syllable of the latter bears the shva (eh) and not the hiriq (ee) of our redirect, still they are close; but our redirect is a far cry from the holam (oh) of the current target. Moreover, in the second syllable of the target there is no "ah" vowel (Hebrew patah or letter ayin), only a hiriq (ee). Since the redirect opens with a hiriq as well, this might explain the confusion on the part of the article creator. Note: Adding that Yishayahu Goldstein-Ophir redirects to someone with the Hebrew name Isaiah, while Yishayahu Yosef Pinto redirects to someone with the Hebrew name Josiah. The latter example apparently was done to help people who think that his Hebrew name is really Isaiah. Havradim leaf a message 12:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Havradim leaf a message 09:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
This is a redirect of a deleted article per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akash DTH, but it isn't even mentioned in the target leaving the reader to wonder why they were redirected. There is also a declined Draft:Akash DTH that hasn't been edited in months. MB 00:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Also listing two other variations. This appears to be another version of the article that once existed. Real VU is not mentioned at BEXIMCO either. MB 00:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 08:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This previously targeted
Suez (company), which was moved first to
Suez (company, 1858-2008) by
RT59RC, and then to
Suez (company, 1858–2008) by me for
MOS:DASH reasons, and then (more importantly) to
Suez (company, 1997–2008) by me when I noticed that the article drew a dividing line in 1997, with the company's/companies' history before that being at
Suez Canal Company. (I assume that RT59RC was mirroring frwiki's naming scheme; however, they cover both entities in one article). It only points to the current target due to a double-redirect cleanup mixup; the 1997–2008 title should be considered the status quo. Since this name seems to be associated with the pre-1997 company (see
:fr:Suez (entreprise, 1858-2008) § La Compagnie universelle du canal maritime de Suez: Rebaptisée Compagnie financière de Suez en 1958
→ Renamed the Compagnie financière de Suez in 1958
), I move to retarget to Suez Canal Company. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they) 07:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Long name of Banque de Suez, which is redlinked from two articles. fr:Banque de Suez redirects to fr:Suez (entreprise, 1858-2008), but our corresponding articles ( Suez_(company, 1997–2008) and Suez Canal Company) do not mention such a bank once. Mentioned briefly at Banque de l'Indochine, which notes that the two banks merged to form Banque Indosuez, a term which redirects to Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, which does not mention Banque de Suez. Delete to encourage article creation or until discussed in depth at one of the articles on its successor entities.
(Note: This originally targeted the article now at Suez (company, 1997–2008), and only points to the target due to a mixup with double-redirect correction. Thus the status quo here would be to retarget to Suez (company, 1997–2008), although Suez Canal Company might actually be the better target... There's been some confusion over the years based on the fact that frwiki treats this as one company that existed from 1858 to 2008, while enwiki treats it as two with a dividing line in 1997.) -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 07:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 23#Civil Administrator
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 16, 2022.
I think this makes sense to delete. A cursory web search doesn't turn up much about "Snoop Dawg" connected to The Dandy, and I think it's much more likely to be a typo for the rapper Snoop Dogg. I think a deletion would be an improvement, but a retarget to Snoop Dogg would probably also be an improvement. 92anonymous92 ( talk) 23:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Weird target. This redirect currently points to Senua (Hellblade) when Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice seems to be a better target. A user changed the target to Senua, saying that Hellblade is now a series and Senua is the titular "Hellblade" of the series, but (A) I think the character isn't primarily known by that name and (B) the series is primarily discussed on the page for the first game (sequel isn't out yet). When people search "Hellblade", they will be looking for the game or the series, which is discussed at Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice primarily. TarkusAB talk/ contrib 23:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This redirect is an E number-related redirect. I've been researching to find the validity of this redirect for a while, and seemed to be stumped on finding any third party resources that confirm this the E number "E918" is defined at all. Another issue is that most redirects in the Category:Redirects from E numbers target an article, not a set index (or disambiguation page) that lists possible articles which the term could refer; in other words, most, if not all, other E number redirects target the specific subject which the E number defines. With all that being said, without a source defining this E number or its existence in general, this redirect is erroneous for the aforementioned reasons. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Ladies' singles has been renamed women's singles. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Why Wikipedia Sucks
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Aftonomi Monastiki Politia Agiou Orous
Delete due to the unnatural and implausible formatting. -- Tavix ( talk) 18:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Ottoman Turkestan
Essentially unused redirect that is not linked to from the page it is redirect to as a shortcut and the redirect was used 8 times total last year. Tartar Torte 17:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this is a plausible redirect. It is related by being the YouTube ID in the URL of Never Gonna Give You Up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ . But should Wikipedia replicate YouTube URL IDs? Mvqr ( talk) 16:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#George Wallace (New Zealand)
Those redirects are misleading, as the article is only about Catholic canon law and not canon law in general. I highly doubt the Catholic Church is the only denomination to have those.
I recommend deletion to encourage creation. A redirect to
Canon law would be unwise, as those subjects are not present there.
Veverve (
talk) 01:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
unless it can be shown that corresponding articles exist for non-Catholic religious groups on the English Wikipedia: Canon law of the Eastern Orthodox Church also has theological and philosophical aspects. All I can find searching for "Fundamental theory of canon law" is a book by Carlos José Errázuriz, Justice in the Church: A Fundamental Theory of Canon Law, so it does not seem like it is a Catholic term, rather it is a the title of a book by one author using a vague expression. Veverve ( talk) 19:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 05:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
(talk) 13:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#Voluntary agency
The target of this transliteration redirect seems to be an error. Yoshiyahu and Yoshiahu correctly link there already, but our redirect needs to point to Isaiah, as does Yeshayahu currently. (*Adding: As does Yeshaya and Yeshayah. Yishaya seems to be a short form of Yeshayahu used by some people.) While our redirect is more of a mistaken transliteration for Isaiah, since the first syllable of the latter bears the shva (eh) and not the hiriq (ee) of our redirect, still they are close; but our redirect is a far cry from the holam (oh) of the current target. Moreover, in the second syllable of the target there is no "ah" vowel (Hebrew patah or letter ayin), only a hiriq (ee). Since the redirect opens with a hiriq as well, this might explain the confusion on the part of the article creator. Note: Adding that Yishayahu Goldstein-Ophir redirects to someone with the Hebrew name Isaiah, while Yishayahu Yosef Pinto redirects to someone with the Hebrew name Josiah. The latter example apparently was done to help people who think that his Hebrew name is really Isaiah. Havradim leaf a message 12:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Havradim leaf a message 09:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
This is a redirect of a deleted article per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akash DTH, but it isn't even mentioned in the target leaving the reader to wonder why they were redirected. There is also a declined Draft:Akash DTH that hasn't been edited in months. MB 00:39, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Also listing two other variations. This appears to be another version of the article that once existed. Real VU is not mentioned at BEXIMCO either. MB 00:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkl
talk 08:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This previously targeted
Suez (company), which was moved first to
Suez (company, 1858-2008) by
RT59RC, and then to
Suez (company, 1858–2008) by me for
MOS:DASH reasons, and then (more importantly) to
Suez (company, 1997–2008) by me when I noticed that the article drew a dividing line in 1997, with the company's/companies' history before that being at
Suez Canal Company. (I assume that RT59RC was mirroring frwiki's naming scheme; however, they cover both entities in one article). It only points to the current target due to a double-redirect cleanup mixup; the 1997–2008 title should be considered the status quo. Since this name seems to be associated with the pre-1997 company (see
:fr:Suez (entreprise, 1858-2008) § La Compagnie universelle du canal maritime de Suez: Rebaptisée Compagnie financière de Suez en 1958
→ Renamed the Compagnie financière de Suez in 1958
), I move to retarget to Suez Canal Company. --
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they) 07:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Long name of Banque de Suez, which is redlinked from two articles. fr:Banque de Suez redirects to fr:Suez (entreprise, 1858-2008), but our corresponding articles ( Suez_(company, 1997–2008) and Suez Canal Company) do not mention such a bank once. Mentioned briefly at Banque de l'Indochine, which notes that the two banks merged to form Banque Indosuez, a term which redirects to Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, which does not mention Banque de Suez. Delete to encourage article creation or until discussed in depth at one of the articles on its successor entities.
(Note: This originally targeted the article now at Suez (company, 1997–2008), and only points to the target due to a mixup with double-redirect correction. Thus the status quo here would be to retarget to Suez (company, 1997–2008), although Suez Canal Company might actually be the better target... There's been some confusion over the years based on the fact that frwiki treats this as one company that existed from 1858 to 2008, while enwiki treats it as two with a dividing line in 1997.) -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 07:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 23#Civil Administrator