This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 2, 2020.
Unused redirects to disambiguation templates
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep most, delete the misspellings. --
JHunterJ (
talk) 12:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Unused redirects. I am developing
Module:Disambiguation, which will automatically detect disambiguation pages. In order to simplify the code, it is necessary to reduce the number of redirects, so I am starting by nominating the unused redirects for deletion. — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 22:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep, generally. Redirects are cheap, and you would expect these to be currently unused because the template is removed once the tagged page is, in fact, cleaned up.
BD2412
T 22:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep in princple: most look perfectly plausible, and as BD2412 points out, we don't know whether they get used or not. On a side note, is there really a need for a module to detect if a page is a disambiguation page? I don't know the inns and outs of the dab machinery, but all the dab templates add categorie, so I would imagine that a page is a dab page if it's a member of
Category:All disambiguation pages or
Category:All article disambiguation pages. You don't need to parse the text and look for templates. –
Uanfala (talk) 23:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep just do a regular AWB run to replace them, if it's a problem for you. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough 00:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC).
reply
- Keep per above but delete
Template:Disambig-clenup and
Template:Disambig-cleanip and
Template:Disambig-cleaup which are clearly misspellings and not required.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 08:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep the redirects that are not misspelled, but the misspellings can be deleted (include
Template:Diaambig-cleanup with SNSL's list). --
Tavix (
talk) 15:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete
Template:Disambig-clenup,
Template:Diaambig-cleanup,
Template:Disambig-cleanip, and
Template:Disambig-cleaup as obvious misspellings, but keep the rest per
WP:CHEAP and everyone above. They still might be used to some degree. Regards,
SONIC
678 19:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete the mispelled ones, but keep the correctly spelled ones. Stuff like cleanip and cleaup aren't going to be particularly useful as templates, but the others ones all have potential for correct use.
Hog Farm
Bacon 02:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as a batch without prejudice to considering individual nominations. Reasonable shortcuts. —
Godsy (
TALK
CONT) 07:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Arnaldo Hernandez
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk 22:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
non notable minor leaguer - player no longer with the Royals so no need for redirect
Spanneraol (
talk) 20:19, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Without a mention, this redirect is confusing because the name may be ambiguous. This is tricky, because this page and those like it seem doomed to generate such redirects over the course of time, unless there is a "Former players" section.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 08:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Matt Lipka (baseball)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Matt Lipka.
(non-admin closure) feminist
(talk) | Americans, unite 07:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not with this organization so no need of redirect
Spanneraol (
talk) 18:33, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Southeast Coast
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. "Hopelessly ambiguous" is the consensus, current target is clearly non-exclusive and there are far too many southeast coasts to disambiguate. ~
mazca
talk 20:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Doesn't unambiguously refer to the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. Could maybe be converted to a dab but the term is so broad that it may not be worth the effort. signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
China occupied Kashmir redirects
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 10#China occupied Kashmir redirects
Azad Kashmiris
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy withdrawn.
(non-admin closure)
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 17:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Retarget to
Kashmiri.
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 17:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pakistani-held Kashmir
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Kashmir#Current status and political divisions. While editors agree on retargeting to
Kashmir, there's some disagreement on which section to pick. I'm closing for now in favor of the majority perspective, but there's room for further discussion there, which will likely affect related redirects as well. signed,
Rosguill
talk 22:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Retarget to
Kashmir where its synonym
Pakistan-occupied Kashmir redirects to.
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 17:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Haque (disambiguation)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was refine per Hog Farm.
(non-admin closure) feminist
(talk) | Americans, unite 07:50, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Target is not a dab page.
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 17:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Seikh
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was disambiguate. signed,
Rosguill
talk 22:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Could also be a misspelling of
Sheikh.
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 17:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- "Seikh" is not a misspelling, but a historic variant, commonly found in 19th-century English texts. –
Uanfala (talk) 22:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- True; I've changed the redirect template to reflect that. So it certainly shouldn't be redirected to
Sheikh in preference, though there could be a disambig note added to
Sikhs. ··
gracefool
💬 00:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Oh wait, this is also attested as a spelling of
Shaikh. Probably best to disambiguate – the spelling is obscure for either topic, so I wouldn't like to see prominent articles adorned with hatnotes for it. –
Uanfala (talk) 03:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
"Liturgical Christian"
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk 22:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
"Implausible redirect with quotations."
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 17:14, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Template:Dalli–Rajhara–Jagdalpur line
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk 22:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Redundant redirect. Template name changed leaving redirect, but sole incoming link has been changed to use new name, so redirect now has no links and presence of endash makes it unlikely search term, so no reason to keep.
Colonies Chris (
talk) 17:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bengaltsy
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy withdrawn. Its a dab page.
(non-admin closure)
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 17:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
WP:FORRED?
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 17:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tapete
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was procedurally closed, with the article restored, as RfD isn't the place for discussing articles. There are sources out there, but if anybody (
Lithopsian,
Onel5969?) has concerns about
notability, then the place to discuss that would be
WP:AfD. If the issue has to do with
primary topic status, then feel free to move/disambiguate, but bear in mind that the previous target may be seen as a
partial title match, and is apparently pretty obscure itself.
(non-admin closure) –
Uanfala (talk) 23:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
An attempt to write a stub about the Tapete audio format was reverted twice despite being in use for almost 40 years by the RNIB
213.205.198.132 (
talk) 16:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hekate event
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 14#Hekate event
Abums
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk 22:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Implausible redirects. We don't have the pages "
abum" or "
(abum)", so these are the only mentions of "abum" in enwiki. The only page "abum" is plausibly used on is
Sumu-abum. Also see
WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 1#Ablums. Seventyfiveyears (
talk) 13:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Agreed. It's obvious someone just misspelled "album."
Katniss
May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 16:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete all. Implausible search terms, useless clutter.
Narky Blert (
talk) 17:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete all per nom. Not a likely alternative spelling for such current albums.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 20:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete all per nom and the consensus of that discussion I opened. These aren't stylized in the titles like this, nor should we use this questionably plausible misspelling in the disambiguators. Regards,
SONIC
678 23:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete these unambiguous errors.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 08:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mr. Boening
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk 22:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Delete. I am unable to determine why this redirects here, other than that it might be a misspelling of
Mr. Boeing.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 08:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. We have three articles about people called
Boening (or Böning, the equivalent with diacritics), and "Mr." is too generic to distinguish between them.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as "Mr. Boeing" is not even mentioned on Jackson's page of that nickname so it fails
MOS:DABMENTION.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 20:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Cut crotch
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk 22:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Doesn't seem to be exclusively connected to the current target, although it could result from that.
Hog Farm
Bacon 03:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. We have nothing on
split crotch, a better-known term for certain items of clothing (and also a likely consequence of riding a rail).
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Road Head
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Soft Sounds from Another Planet.
(non-admin closure)
Asmodea Oaktree (
talk) 16:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not really explained anywhere on enwiki, another obscure slang term.
Hog Farm
Bacon 02:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Urban Dictionary stuff. Roadhead is also a
dictionary word and a
village near Carlise.
Narky Blert (
talk) 08:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete A obscure urban dictionary slang. Road head never refers to oral sex.
ֆօʍɛɮօɖʏǟռʏɮօɖʏ05 (
talk) 12:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, then redirect ot
Bewcastle unless there is a better target. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄) 13:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- I found no evidence that the place in Cumbria is ever spelt as two words.
Narky Blert (
talk) 17:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Soft Sounds from Another Planet - second track on the album. –
Deacon Vorbis (
carbon •
videos) 02:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget (changing !vote) per Deacon Vorbis as {{
R from song}}.
Narky Blert (
talk) 09:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget per Deacon Vorbis.
CycloneYoris
talk! 06:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget per above, and add a hatnote to the village as it's a plausible misspelling of that, especially for anyone hearing rather than reading it.
Thryduulf (
talk) 17:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
South Carolina Highway 93 (1937)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk 22:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
The original SC 93 existed from the 1920s to the 1950s. It did not begin in 1937.
Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (
talk) 01:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom, I can't find anything about this highway that would give it a connection to that year specifically.
Hog Farm
Bacon 02:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. I don't know why I created that. It should be replaced with South Carolina Highway 93 (1920s).
Alexlatham96 (
talk) 22:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.