This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 16, 2020.
A Subaltern
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 25#A Subaltern
HoganStand.ie
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 26#HoganStand.ie
Bionicle stuff
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Implausible search term.
Dominicmgm (
talk)
22:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bionicle contests
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target article.
Dominicmgm (
talk)
22:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bionicle products (not building sets)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Implausible search term.
Dominicmgm (
talk)
22:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
China occupied Kashmir redirects
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Kashmir#Current status and political divisions. While the current target is certainly justifiable, there is undoubtedly a level of ambiguity around other areas administered by China. The overall page
Kashmir has been a popular choice in previous RfDs when resolving some of these genuinely ambiguous terms, and the suggestion of
Kashmir#Current_status_and_political_divisions seems to be the section that has the most comprehensive mention of this particular subset, and which most participants seem to prefer. ~
mazca
talk
20:07, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Retarget to
Kashmir since
Trans-Karakoram Tract is also administered by China.
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages
17:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Also,
China-occupied Kashmir targets to
Kashmir. --
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages
09:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- And Gilgit-Baltistan is still internationally (including under current enwiki consensus) considered part of
Pakistan-administered Kashmir, so I don't see your point.
M Imtiaz (
talk ·
contribs)
04:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Er, sorry, my apologies: it's late night here, so I didn't realise that you were pointing out that there is more to China-administered Kashmir than just Aksai Chin. Self-trout :-)
M Imtiaz (
talk ·
contribs)
04:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Fraternity ring
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Fraternity ring
Fraternity paddle
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Fraternity paddle
Jesus Cristo
Gesù
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was move
Gesu (disambiguation) over redirect due to the ambiguity and lack of primary topic. --
Tavix (
talk)
01:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
WP:FORRED?
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages
10:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment this was created as a redirect to
Gesù Nuovo by
Charles Matthews. It was retargetted, without comment, to
Church of the Gesù by
Neelix. In 2016 it was retargetted to the present target, this time by
Lucas citing "common use".
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Weak retarget to
Gesu (disambiguation) or
Church of Gesù to match
Gesu. It does get use in English but not really as far as I can tell with the plain meaning "Jesus" as much as for churches.
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, this should be used for disambiguation.
Charles Matthews (
talk)
12:40, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Gesu (disambiguation) and tag as {{
R from diacritics}} and {{
R ambig}}.
Narky Blert (
talk)
19:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Church of the Gesù (not the disambiguation page) since that's where
Gesu targets. It's illogical to have
Gesu targeting an article with "Gesù" in the title, but
Gesù targeting an article with "Gesu".
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
09:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- This really depends on whether Gesù on its own is synonymous with
Church of the Gesù as primary topic. But probably not if it's anything like
Jesu which is a disambiguation.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff)
22:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Alternatively, move
Gesu (disambiguation) to
Gesu and retarget
Gesù there, but they must be consistent.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
09:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
No personal attacks
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Unlike in the last discussion, there does not exist consensus to delete and some appetite for an
XNR to the appropriate project page. --
Tavix (
talk)
22:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
This redirect was speedily deleted, but
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 October 29 decided to refer it to RfD instead. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral.
Sandstein
08:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Hard redirect to
WP:No personal attacks. Although I know it's cross-namespace, there doesn't seem to be any other reasonable destination or a real-world subject. I also feel as though the fact that it's so fundamental and central to Wikipedia, that it's worth being cross-namespace. Also having a look at
the inwards links, it seems pretty obvious that it's a simple error for talk pages trying to link to
WP:NPA.
ItsPugle (please
ping on reply)
07:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Wikipedia:No personal attacks, as this project page seems to be a better target. Seventyfiveyears (
talk)
01:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment as
Shhhnotsoloud said, I'd like to confirm that this page is not a redirect to Wiktionary;
the template used to redirect to project space is a fork of
the one used to redirect to Wiktionary, which may have caused confusion.
JJP...MASTER!...MASTER!!! master of puppets, i'm pulling your strings (0-3-5)
[talk about or to] JJP... master? master? where's the dreams that i've been after (0-3-6-5)
14:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment. Further to my !vote for a soft redirect above, and the following !votes by other editors for a retarget, I should say that I do object to a straightforward retarget, which would be an unnecessary and undesirable cross-namespace redirect.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
17:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- We should probably decide what to do with policy/guideline XNRs. I think that they are in general useful but they might be
WP:COSTLY. A compromise would be to redirect them to an article about Wikipedia such as
Articles for deletion should probably redirect to
Deletionism and inclusionism in Wikipedia (since its discussed there) and on a related note we do have the likes of
Biographies of living persons redirecting to
Biography and
Village pump redirecting to
Well. "No personal attacks" only returns 3 other articles (other than the current redirect) one of which being
Common Knowledge?#Wikipedia in Short where it is a reference to Wikipedia so this could redirect there until/if something is added to a more specific Wikipedia related article.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
17:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
White car
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was disambiguate --
JHunterJ (
talk)
19:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Hmm, don't these just refer to cars that are white?
TheAwesome
Hwyh
21:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Would it make sense to redirect to
car colour popularity? Though it would seem that many other pages of the form "color car" or "colorcar" are either films (blue, grey) or other transit (red, yellow, green) articles. Definitely seems odd to have point to ambulance especially since the lead image is
chartreuse colored.
Chris857 (
talk)
01:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
El viaje de Chihiro
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
This appears to be the Spanish language name for this film. I don't really see the connection between this film and the Spanish language. I believe this redirect should be deleted per
WP:RFFL.
TheAwesome
Hwyh
21:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Musa Cliffortiana
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete
Thryduulf (
talk)
00:16, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Mentioned as See also at the target, which has a link to a deWiki article. Delete per
WP:R#DELETE #10. signed,
Rosguill
talk
18:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
LOL JK
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 24#LOL JK
Halaman Utama
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy delete as a repost.
Hut 8.5
18:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not sure what was being attempted here. Not mentioned on Main Page.
Onel5969
TT me
16:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
TiJe
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 25#TiJe
Tkp.me
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 24#Tkp.me
User:Stevage/rdtest
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn. Not sure why I thought deleting this would accomplish anything.
(non-admin closure)
Hog Farm
Bacon
19:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Appears to be an old userspace test, discouraged per
WP:XNR.
Hog Farm
Bacon
16:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep harmless, and old. Can't see the rationale for deleting this at XNR. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough
14:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC).
reply
- Keep redirects out of userspace a harmless and not mentioned at all at
WP:XNR (which is about redirects from article space to userspace). As with all userpages we should not be deleting them unless there is a specific problem with them or the owner of the userspace requests it, and neither are true here.
Thryduulf (
talk)
16:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Temple of Victoria
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 24#Temple of Victoria
Dr. Excel
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Orphan redirect with no apparent connection to the target article. —
O Still Small
Voice of Clam
13:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
IPhone (sixth generation)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was procedural close because it was opened by a sock. I'm reverting some vandalism which changed it from its correct target. The
iPhone 5 is the only sixth generation iPhone, so it is not ambiguous. It seems Thryduulf and Rich picked up on that bit of incorrect information from the nominator which influenced their !votes. If this still needs to be discussed, any editor in good standing may renominate. --
Tavix (
talk)
14:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Ambiguous as the
iPhone 5 is the sixth-generation iPhone, and there is no
iPhone (fifth generation),
iPhone (seventh generation), etc. Although redirect has gained quite significant pageviews, so maybe retarget/disambiguate instead of deleting.
The Incognito Guy (
Browsing privately)
06:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
IPhone X Edition
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was procedural close. Nom is a blocked sock. (Block reason includes spurious RfD.)
(non-admin closure) —
HELLKNOWZ ▎
TALK
12:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
This apparently refers to a custom iPhone X by Caviar (which itself doesn't have its own article), and a Google search brings up only one result of the actual phone. Plus the target doesn't mention it, and it has only 3 pageviews in its history (one by me).
The Incognito Guy (
Browsing privately)
06:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
IPhone Five
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator.
(non-admin closure) —
J947 ‡
message ⁓
edits
03:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
No source refers to the device as the iPhone Five, and there isn't an
iPhone Six,
iPhone Four, etc. It also only has
1 page view in its history, which was from it's creator.
The Incognito Guy (
Browsing privately)
06:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep It's logical, unambiguous, harmless, and not misleading.
Hog Farm
Bacon
12:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per Hog Farm. Though it may seem like search bar clutter, it isn't really in the way of anything (as is pretty much the case with a lot of other redirects like this, such as
Toy Story Two). Regards,
SONIC
678
22:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep Huh? I count 85 views.
Schierbecker (
talk)
04:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per everyone above. While it only got 1 hit in the month preceding this nomination it got 51 hits last year so it's clearly being used.
Thryduulf (
talk)
14:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Withdraw nomination per above.
The Incognito Guy (
Browsing privately)
03:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
越南社會主義共和國
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete although I agree with Rich Farmbrough that bringing this to RfD was probably unnecessary. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
越南社會主義共和國 is Chinese instead of Vietnamese (Cộng hòa Xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam, 共和社會主義越南).
Konno
Yumeto
09:11, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nominator and
WP:RLOTE. I don't feel that the two countries having a long relationship is the right thing to focus on; rather, the main concern here is whether it's a likely search term for English Wikipedia users (debatable at best), and whether there's anything encyclopedic as opposed to
WP:DICDEF to say about the full name of the country in Chinese that we could expand some article like
Names of Vietnam to discuss this term (there really isn't; its just the proper name
越南 followed by the two standard dictionary words "socialist" and "republic").
61.239.39.90 (
talk)
16:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per
WP:RDELETE point 8, we shouldn't generally have redirects in foreign language terms which don't exist in English unless the subject relates to that language or some culture which speaks that language. Although there are minority groups in Vietnam who speak Chinese it's not a major language within the country or any part of the country.
Hut 8.5
18:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- RDELETE says " should generally not be created" rather than "should be deleted". This is for a reason, the cost of deletion is many times the cost of not deleting. The benefit of deleting is so slight as to be a phantasm. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough
14:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC).
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Saturday Night Live parodies of Joe Biden
Walche Cut, Kentucky
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed,
Rosguill
talk
21:10, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at target. The redirect is about a
railroad cut in
Kentucky, while the target claims to be a geological formation in
Indiana. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
11:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Meh I put it up as an editorial decision so the outcome of the afd has no weight here.
Spartaz
Humbug!
18:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- If more people at the AfD had read Paul H.'s Comment it would be clear why this has been made into a redirect, and the implementer of the close would have included the relevant information in the target. So:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.