This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 21, 2020.
None of these are mentioned at the target, delete unless an appropriate sourced mention is added to the target signed, Rosguill talk 21:49, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Unbelievably vague and no indication that the target is ever referred to as such. — Xezbeth ( talk) 18:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Similar to the other redirects nominated by Hog Farm, which were deleted en masse in a WP:SNOW early closure upon readily apparent consensus, this cross-namespace redirect from User: namespace is an implausible search term and redirect, as demonstrated by its 0 pageviews in the preceding twelve month period, to yesterday, prior to its nomination. We already have God hates figs; there's no need for useless exact duplicates of existing redirects that cross namespaces. There is no history to preserve whatsoever in fact, either, as demonstrated by a bot fixing a double redirect in 2011 following the redirect's creation earlier that same year. Doug Mehus T· C 18:08, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
This specific fictional element is not mentioned in any Wikipedia article, so these redirects are of no benefit to a potential reader. — Xezbeth ( talk) 18:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 28#Smirch
I saw a notification that this page was speedy deleted by Tom Morris. I reverted the deletion because no speedy criterion was specified, and presuming Tom Morris meant this to be WP:R3 deletion, it fails the "recently created" stipulation (has existed for 12 years). That bit of bureaucratic nonsense out of the way, the redirect does not seem useful seeing as it has one hit in the past 30 days, but I'd like to hear from some editors familiar with Japanese as to whether it's a plausible error. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 29#Atmospheric research
The word "enthusiast" is ambiguous/vague; in these redirects, it doesn't necessarily refer to a gamer, but could also refer to video game collectors. Also, video game collectors don't necessarily play video games themselves. Since these redirects don't exclusively refer to either subject and are not an official title for either subject ("oppose creating a disambiguation page"), they should be deleted to allow Wikipedia's search function to help readers determine what subject they are looking for. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Another WBC redirect, I missed this one yesterday. Not mentioned in the article, most definitely not a slogan of the organization, and 24 pageviews. The big bundled discussion has already been snow closed, so I can't add it there. Historic redirect (from 2004), so I wouldn't consider CSD to be applicable here. Hog Farm ( talk) 14:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 28#Vagina entry
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 28#Yup yup yup
Disambiguate or delete per WP:XY. This SBC is not the only organization to have directors of missions. I'm leaning disambiguate, but this role does not seem to be discussed at the various denominational pages, including the target one. Hog Farm ( talk) 02:08, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 21, 2020.
None of these are mentioned at the target, delete unless an appropriate sourced mention is added to the target signed, Rosguill talk 21:49, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Unbelievably vague and no indication that the target is ever referred to as such. — Xezbeth ( talk) 18:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Similar to the other redirects nominated by Hog Farm, which were deleted en masse in a WP:SNOW early closure upon readily apparent consensus, this cross-namespace redirect from User: namespace is an implausible search term and redirect, as demonstrated by its 0 pageviews in the preceding twelve month period, to yesterday, prior to its nomination. We already have God hates figs; there's no need for useless exact duplicates of existing redirects that cross namespaces. There is no history to preserve whatsoever in fact, either, as demonstrated by a bot fixing a double redirect in 2011 following the redirect's creation earlier that same year. Doug Mehus T· C 18:08, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
This specific fictional element is not mentioned in any Wikipedia article, so these redirects are of no benefit to a potential reader. — Xezbeth ( talk) 18:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 28#Smirch
I saw a notification that this page was speedy deleted by Tom Morris. I reverted the deletion because no speedy criterion was specified, and presuming Tom Morris meant this to be WP:R3 deletion, it fails the "recently created" stipulation (has existed for 12 years). That bit of bureaucratic nonsense out of the way, the redirect does not seem useful seeing as it has one hit in the past 30 days, but I'd like to hear from some editors familiar with Japanese as to whether it's a plausible error. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 29#Atmospheric research
The word "enthusiast" is ambiguous/vague; in these redirects, it doesn't necessarily refer to a gamer, but could also refer to video game collectors. Also, video game collectors don't necessarily play video games themselves. Since these redirects don't exclusively refer to either subject and are not an official title for either subject ("oppose creating a disambiguation page"), they should be deleted to allow Wikipedia's search function to help readers determine what subject they are looking for. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Another WBC redirect, I missed this one yesterday. Not mentioned in the article, most definitely not a slogan of the organization, and 24 pageviews. The big bundled discussion has already been snow closed, so I can't add it there. Historic redirect (from 2004), so I wouldn't consider CSD to be applicable here. Hog Farm ( talk) 14:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 28#Vagina entry
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February 28#Yup yup yup
Disambiguate or delete per WP:XY. This SBC is not the only organization to have directors of missions. I'm leaning disambiguate, but this role does not seem to be discussed at the various denominational pages, including the target one. Hog Farm ( talk) 02:08, 21 February 2020 (UTC)