From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 20, 2020.

Toll booth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Tollbooth. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:49, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

This term does not seem super ambiguous. We can disambiguate but a toll booth is almost certainly this. Aasim ( talk) 23:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Scottish English Wikipedia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There is unanimous agreement that the current target is explicitly inaccurate - Scottish English and the Scots language are not synonymous. Beyond that, there are broadly equal numbers of participants advocating retargeting it to Scottish Wikipedia or deleting it - but none of the proponents of retargeting have made any real arguments as to why that disambiguation is useful for this term, as "Scottish English" is not currently on that page, and is not really ambiguous in the way that "Scottish" as a language is. Taking particular note of BDD's point regarding how circuitous any mention of Scottish English would have to be on that disambiguation page, and the other contributions that emphasise how it's also misleading, I think the best informed consensus here seems to be to delete. ~ mazca talk 13:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Scots language and Scottish English aren't the same thing, see the respective articles. I suggest retargeting this redirect to English Wikipedia. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 17:38, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Couldn't you just change the redirect to point to English Wikipedia? I don't see why deletion is necessary. Edge3 ( talk) 20:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Edge3: retargetting is what Soumya-8974 is proposing. Thryduulf ( talk) 20:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply
I'm just wondering why we're discussing this here at RfD if the proposal is to retarget. In any case, I agree with you and recommend that we delete, for the same reason that we don't have redirects for other variations of the English language (e.g. "American English Wikipedia"). Edge3 ( talk) 21:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply
RfD is redirects for discussion, not deletion. Nominations for retargetting are common. Thryduulf ( talk) 22:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Oh I see. Thanks for the additional context. I don't comment in discussions that often so I was unaware. Edge3 ( talk) 22:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 16:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per Thryduulf. The only way a retarget to the disambiguation makes any sense is if we could add a link to the English Wikipedia, but I think that would have to be very tortured ("English Wikipedia, the Wikipedia of the most widely spoken language in Scotland"). -- BDD ( talk) 17:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Knighthood Village, Indiana

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 17:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knighthood Village, Indiana established this is a non-notable subdivision. Township articles do not seem to be a good place to dump mentions for every non-notable locality in the township. Hog Farm Bacon 06:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

delete Township articles are not good targets for NN towns, as they aren't going to say anything significant about them. Mangoe ( talk) 17:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

  • comment none of the rationales for deletion apply to the the suggested alternative target and no other arguments against retargetting in general or against the suggested target have been made. Thryduulf ( talk) 03:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:51, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Upon further reflection, I really don't think it would be worthwhile to redirect to the county page where it is merely listed as an unincorporated community, as this provides no meaningful information. A red link would be appropriate there, and we should let the 2019 AfD stand until someone believes there is sufficient sourcing to establish notability for a stub. Mdewman6 ( talk) 03:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bulidings

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Because we don't have the redirect " Buliding" and that those are the only mentions of "buliding" in enwiki, I don't know how plausible those redirects are. Similar discussions like Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 1#Ablums and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Kase (disambigation) show consensus against those kind of redirects. Therefore, delete unless justification can be provided. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 22:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Duolingo tree

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 29#Duolingo tree

Treading On Thin Ice

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to On Thin Ice. There's broad agreement that the current target is unhelpful, but no consensus as to exactly where the best target is. The best compromise seems to split the difference per Rosguill's suggestion and target the disambiguation page that mentions all of the possibilities. ~ mazca talk 14:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target page, nor what one would expect this to lead to as it's much more commonly known as an English phrase than associated with some Chinese drama from 2011. I propose simply deleting the redirect since there isn't an appropriate target (nor a Wiktionary entry for a soft redirect). Opencooper ( talk) 01:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Interwiki soft redir to wikt:on thin ice, which already has a section for derivatives, including skate on thin ice, which is where tread on thin ice and walk on thin ice and so on will eventually show up. Even without a specific one for tread[ing] on thin ice, the page already makes it entirely clear what this phrase means. I agree with nom that most people looking for this will be interested in the idiom and do not have Scarlet Heart in mind.  —  SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  05:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 18:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: All the comments choose to retarget. However, one of them decides wikt:on thin ice, the second one decides Treddin' on Thin Ice, and the third one decides On Thin Ice.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 22:12, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stakeholders' Revolt

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at the target, Google Scholar search returns results for this term to refer to a few different contexts. Deletion seems appropriate unless a sourced, due mention can be added. signed, Rosguill talk 22:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Araz Junction, California

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 28#Araz Junction, California

Lake harriet (hennepin county, minnesota)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:47, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Unused redirect with incorrect capitalization Leschnei ( talk) 19:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 22:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Strage degli Innocenti

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 27#Strage degli Innocenti

Revolving drum

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 27#Revolving drum

Türk Sanat Müzi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The name is apparently malformed and duplicate, the original one is in here. Ahmetlii ( talk) 16:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Comment See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 15#Türk Sanat Müzgi. Thryduulf ( talk) 18:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete this appears to be a misspelling (the final word should be "Müziği"), and it doesn't strike me as an especially plausible one (omission of the last two letters). Thryduulf ( talk) 18:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete This is a misspelling as Thryduulf states but it is not entirely implausible, if this was in Turkish Wikipedia. See, in Turkish the letter ğ represents the elongation of the previous vowel (actually,it comes from the sound g in old turkic,that is why the letter choice is ğ), so for example dağ (mountain) is /da:/ So it is likely for some uneducated people to spell Türk Sanat Müziği (pronounced roughly as /tyrk sanat myzi:i/ or /tyrk sanat myziɰi/ ) as "Türk Sanat Müzi" (Pronounced /tyrc sanat myzi(:)/. However, since this is the English Wikipedia where Turks who are uneducated would rarely be here I think there would be no problem removing this redirect. KaptaşHero ( talk) 18:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mario Castillo (TACA Flight 390)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Redirect to an article without any mention of the person. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

İngilizce insuyu mağarası

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The name is apparently malformed, it only says "English insuyu cave" Ahmetlii ( talk) 16:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete someone searching for information in English about a given topic is unlikely to do so using the Turkish word for the English language. And if they do, it's the sort of thing that they would almost certainly use an external search engine for. Thryduulf ( talk) 19:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hope canal

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Hope Canal. I'm closing this discussion since "Hope canal" is more of a plausible term of "Hope Canal". (non-admin closure) Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 15:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete. It's a lower-case dupe to a different article. The redirect was probably made before the actual Hope Canal article but never caught because the lower-case 'c' means it's a unique page. Estheim ( talk) 15:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Caucasian Albanian architecture

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 27#Caucasian Albanian architecture

History of the Kashmir conflict

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 20:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Retarget to timeline of the Kashmir conflict. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 08:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose History is more than the list of events. History means understanding the who, what, where, why, how, and of course when of the past. This is described best by the main article for the conflict, which is the current target. ― NK1406 talkcontribs 16:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nekki

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

It is a WP:XY case, as Vector (video game) exists by the same team, so redirecting it to just Shadow Fight doesn't make much sense. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 19:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 20, 2020.

Toll booth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Tollbooth. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:49, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

This term does not seem super ambiguous. We can disambiguate but a toll booth is almost certainly this. Aasim ( talk) 23:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Scottish English Wikipedia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There is unanimous agreement that the current target is explicitly inaccurate - Scottish English and the Scots language are not synonymous. Beyond that, there are broadly equal numbers of participants advocating retargeting it to Scottish Wikipedia or deleting it - but none of the proponents of retargeting have made any real arguments as to why that disambiguation is useful for this term, as "Scottish English" is not currently on that page, and is not really ambiguous in the way that "Scottish" as a language is. Taking particular note of BDD's point regarding how circuitous any mention of Scottish English would have to be on that disambiguation page, and the other contributions that emphasise how it's also misleading, I think the best informed consensus here seems to be to delete. ~ mazca talk 13:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Scots language and Scottish English aren't the same thing, see the respective articles. I suggest retargeting this redirect to English Wikipedia. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 17:38, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Couldn't you just change the redirect to point to English Wikipedia? I don't see why deletion is necessary. Edge3 ( talk) 20:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Edge3: retargetting is what Soumya-8974 is proposing. Thryduulf ( talk) 20:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply
I'm just wondering why we're discussing this here at RfD if the proposal is to retarget. In any case, I agree with you and recommend that we delete, for the same reason that we don't have redirects for other variations of the English language (e.g. "American English Wikipedia"). Edge3 ( talk) 21:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply
RfD is redirects for discussion, not deletion. Nominations for retargetting are common. Thryduulf ( talk) 22:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Oh I see. Thanks for the additional context. I don't comment in discussions that often so I was unaware. Edge3 ( talk) 22:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 16:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per Thryduulf. The only way a retarget to the disambiguation makes any sense is if we could add a link to the English Wikipedia, but I think that would have to be very tortured ("English Wikipedia, the Wikipedia of the most widely spoken language in Scotland"). -- BDD ( talk) 17:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Knighthood Village, Indiana

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 17:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knighthood Village, Indiana established this is a non-notable subdivision. Township articles do not seem to be a good place to dump mentions for every non-notable locality in the township. Hog Farm Bacon 06:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

delete Township articles are not good targets for NN towns, as they aren't going to say anything significant about them. Mangoe ( talk) 17:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

  • comment none of the rationales for deletion apply to the the suggested alternative target and no other arguments against retargetting in general or against the suggested target have been made. Thryduulf ( talk) 03:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:51, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Upon further reflection, I really don't think it would be worthwhile to redirect to the county page where it is merely listed as an unincorporated community, as this provides no meaningful information. A red link would be appropriate there, and we should let the 2019 AfD stand until someone believes there is sufficient sourcing to establish notability for a stub. Mdewman6 ( talk) 03:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bulidings

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Because we don't have the redirect " Buliding" and that those are the only mentions of "buliding" in enwiki, I don't know how plausible those redirects are. Similar discussions like Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 1#Ablums and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Kase (disambigation) show consensus against those kind of redirects. Therefore, delete unless justification can be provided. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 22:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Duolingo tree

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 29#Duolingo tree

Treading On Thin Ice

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to On Thin Ice. There's broad agreement that the current target is unhelpful, but no consensus as to exactly where the best target is. The best compromise seems to split the difference per Rosguill's suggestion and target the disambiguation page that mentions all of the possibilities. ~ mazca talk 14:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target page, nor what one would expect this to lead to as it's much more commonly known as an English phrase than associated with some Chinese drama from 2011. I propose simply deleting the redirect since there isn't an appropriate target (nor a Wiktionary entry for a soft redirect). Opencooper ( talk) 01:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Interwiki soft redir to wikt:on thin ice, which already has a section for derivatives, including skate on thin ice, which is where tread on thin ice and walk on thin ice and so on will eventually show up. Even without a specific one for tread[ing] on thin ice, the page already makes it entirely clear what this phrase means. I agree with nom that most people looking for this will be interested in the idiom and do not have Scarlet Heart in mind.  —  SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  05:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 18:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: All the comments choose to retarget. However, one of them decides wikt:on thin ice, the second one decides Treddin' on Thin Ice, and the third one decides On Thin Ice.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 22:12, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stakeholders' Revolt

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at the target, Google Scholar search returns results for this term to refer to a few different contexts. Deletion seems appropriate unless a sourced, due mention can be added. signed, Rosguill talk 22:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Araz Junction, California

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 28#Araz Junction, California

Lake harriet (hennepin county, minnesota)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:47, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Unused redirect with incorrect capitalization Leschnei ( talk) 19:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 22:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Strage degli Innocenti

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 27#Strage degli Innocenti

Revolving drum

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 27#Revolving drum

Türk Sanat Müzi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The name is apparently malformed and duplicate, the original one is in here. Ahmetlii ( talk) 16:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Comment See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 15#Türk Sanat Müzgi. Thryduulf ( talk) 18:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete this appears to be a misspelling (the final word should be "Müziği"), and it doesn't strike me as an especially plausible one (omission of the last two letters). Thryduulf ( talk) 18:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete This is a misspelling as Thryduulf states but it is not entirely implausible, if this was in Turkish Wikipedia. See, in Turkish the letter ğ represents the elongation of the previous vowel (actually,it comes from the sound g in old turkic,that is why the letter choice is ğ), so for example dağ (mountain) is /da:/ So it is likely for some uneducated people to spell Türk Sanat Müziği (pronounced roughly as /tyrk sanat myzi:i/ or /tyrk sanat myziɰi/ ) as "Türk Sanat Müzi" (Pronounced /tyrc sanat myzi(:)/. However, since this is the English Wikipedia where Turks who are uneducated would rarely be here I think there would be no problem removing this redirect. KaptaşHero ( talk) 18:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mario Castillo (TACA Flight 390)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Redirect to an article without any mention of the person. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

İngilizce insuyu mağarası

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The name is apparently malformed, it only says "English insuyu cave" Ahmetlii ( talk) 16:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete someone searching for information in English about a given topic is unlikely to do so using the Turkish word for the English language. And if they do, it's the sort of thing that they would almost certainly use an external search engine for. Thryduulf ( talk) 19:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hope canal

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Hope Canal. I'm closing this discussion since "Hope canal" is more of a plausible term of "Hope Canal". (non-admin closure) Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 15:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete. It's a lower-case dupe to a different article. The redirect was probably made before the actual Hope Canal article but never caught because the lower-case 'c' means it's a unique page. Estheim ( talk) 15:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Caucasian Albanian architecture

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 27#Caucasian Albanian architecture

History of the Kashmir conflict

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 20:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Retarget to timeline of the Kashmir conflict. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 08:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose History is more than the list of events. History means understanding the who, what, where, why, how, and of course when of the past. This is described best by the main article for the conflict, which is the current target. ― NK1406 talkcontribs 16:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nekki

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

It is a WP:XY case, as Vector (video game) exists by the same team, so redirecting it to just Shadow Fight doesn't make much sense. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 19:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook