From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 29

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 29, 2020.

Redirects to Deathline International

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

These all redirect to a target in which the subject of the redirect isn't even mentioned. The only thing I can find is that these individuals are listed as additional performers in the personnel section of an album by the band but no further info is provided. Are such redirects going to be useful to readers? Some of the names (Gander, Hansen, Harrison) are mentioned in other articles referencing a different person by the same name but who also don't have articles. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 23:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bia Angkor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

An internet search suggests that this is the Vietnamese name for this brand, which may fall afoul of WP:RLOTE and thus should be deleted. signed, Rosguill talk 14:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Weak keep as not just Vietnamese but apparently a plausible spelling of the Khmer name បៀរ អង្គរ. The first word is "Beer" and the second is "Angkor". In បៀរ (the first word):
    • the first letter gets romanised either as <b> or <p> depending on the romanisation system
    • The vowel cluster has a schwa at the end (i.e. the same sound at the start of the word about)
    • the final (r) is silent in most dialects, says Khmer script#Variation in pronunciation
(Warning: I speak zero Khmer.) 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 00:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 ( talk) 05:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as while it's a reasonable romanization of the Khmer name, it basically requires someone to transliterate the Khmer name, rather than using the English spelling that is also on the bottle. This strikes me as basically hitting all the reasoning at WP:RLOTE except with an extra unlikely step to actually be useful. ~ mazca talk 20:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as an apparently plausible rendering of the target's native name. I don't think we can assume that all varieties of the beer will be like the one pictured in the article in having the English name printed, and we can't also assume that all readers will be searching based on what they see on a bottle (rather than, say, hear spoken in conversation). – Uanfala (talk) 15:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. A reasonable transliteration of the product's native name. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hörfunk

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete per WP:FORRED. The target article's subject does not have affinity to any specific language. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment tending to weak keep for as long as its not in the way of some other entry. Is this perhaps used as a loanword in some German-language-rooted locales in the US (like f.e. the Pittsburgh area)? I'm asking, because, from a German perspective, the entry makes a lot of sense, as in the German language the term "Radio" refers exclusively to a "broadcast radio receiver" device (not to wireless communication and wireless communication devices in general), and the correct term for the wireless transmission of audio in one-to-many (public) broadcasting is "Hörfunk". (There is also "Sprechfunk" for wireless transmisson of speech-only audio in one-to-one radiophony.) Might be worth some further research... -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 10:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Network (2018 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Implausible redirect. The article says that the "Network film" was released in June 2019. Seventyfiveyears ( Seventyfiveyears) 20:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

 Question: Was it originally scheduled for release in 2018? —  Tartan357  ( Talk) 20:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Yes, but it was pushed back to 2019, so this redirect should be deleted. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 20:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Well, if it was heavily advertised as "coming 2018" then it is a plausible redirect. If someone sees an old poster or promotion with the 2018 date, then that would be a reasonable search term. The plausibility depends on how heavily it was advertised as being scheduled for a 2018 release. If there were no posters/ads made with that date, then I'd say that it should be deleted. —  Tartan357  ( Talk) 20:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, its pageview stats do not suggest much usage. Someone typing it in anyway would receive search results offering the 2019 film first, so I don't think this is particularly necessary. ~ mazca talk 21:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Upon a quick search I didn't find any posters/promotional content prominently advertising a 2018 release, so unless someone can find otherwise, I'd say this redirect is implausible and should be deleted. —  Tartan357  ( Talk) 21:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rage killing

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Crime of passion. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Umm ... I'm not sure what subject on Wikipedia would be the proper subject to arrive at if the redirect is searched, but I didn't expect to arrive at the current target. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:44, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Comment provocation (legal), maybe? The exact phrase "rage killing" doesn't appear there, but it discusses homicide extensively and has the word "rage" in there at one point (In common law, "passion usually means rage ..."). Though it's always a bit difficult trying to figure out the best legal concept that corresponds to a colloquial phrase. Anyway clearly the current target is no good, so this should be deleted if people don't think provocation (legal) is a good target either. 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 07:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Retarget to crime of passion - "a violent crime, especially homicide, in which the perpetrator commits the act against someone because of sudden strong impulse such as sudden rage". Narky Blert ( talk) 12:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as ambiguous. This redirect may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ mazca talk 20:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kim Ruff (politician)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 16:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Subject is the vice chair of a national party caucus, and likely meets WP:GNG. This redirect points to an entry in a table with no substantial biographical information on the subject. It should be deleted to allow for the existence of red links to encourage article creation.  —  Tartan357  ( Talk) 19:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

I withdraw the nomination. —  Tartan357  ( Talk) 02:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super Mario Wii

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Super Mario (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

This is too vague to be for just one game. There were 16 Mario games for the Wii, 6 of which have Super in the title. Captain Galaxy 19:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mark Graue

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

From what I researched, he is a prominent video game and TV show voice actor. I don't think his name should be linked to just this one game when, at the very least, he has worked on more notable games. Captain Galaxy 19:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Well if that's the case, that knocks this redirect even more because they didn't spell his name correctly. Captain Galaxy 20:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ajania pacifica

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 5#Ajania pacifica

Vexation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. XfDcloser bugged out on me, meant to close this without relisting. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Seems as though this redirect could also refer to subjects such as Annoyance, Frustration, and Worry. Due to its ambiguity, it's probably best to either delete the redirect so the search function on Wikipedia can do its job, or retarget to Wiktionary:vexation. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Percentage (film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

This redirect causes confusion because "Netflix programming" has no content about this subject. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 16:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rebecca Freyja O'Rourke

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 15:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 16:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Parfum

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Aroma compound. signed, Rosguill talk 19:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

French WP:FORRED. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

...Or retarget to Aroma compound since Fragrance redirects there, and the subject of "fragrance" seems to be the common use/synonym for "parfum" as used in the English language. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blast hole & Bomb holes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Research into these two redirects' topics makes it seem as though they are synonyms for the same subject. However, it's also unclear where they should both target if they are to be synced. (Also, note that Bomb hole, the singular for "Bomb holes" does not exist.) Steel1943 ( talk) 23:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete, failing that I'd probably leave them at the current targets - a bomb hole is a kind of blast hole, but a blast hole isn't necessarily a bomb hole. But that aside, neither topic is really discussed in either article, and I don't think our readers really need a redirect to inform them that a bomb hole is caused by a bomb, or indeed a blast hole is caused by blasting. They're the kind of redirects that are neither harmful nor particularly useful. ~ mazca talk 20:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Saxony Wool

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Merino. signed, Rosguill talk 18:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target article's subject unclear. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Retarget' to Merino, as it does seem to be the closest useful target we have. Most references to Saxony Wool on the web seem to be various suit manufacturers talking self-promotingly about it, but some of them are reasonably informative. It does not seem to be used frequently to refer to wool literally from Saxony, but rather a historical style of wool now from sheep generally farmed elsewhere. This is potentially the kind of topic that could have its own article if there's been actual coverage of it outside of websites selling suits, but the significant mentions at Merino seem to be the best we can offer. ~ mazca talk 20:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vakıflar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Waqf. (non-admin closure) Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Vakıflar just means "foundations" in Turkish, and points to their article for Foundation on trWiki ( [1]). Even on English Wikipedia, we have VakıfBank and Vakıflar (İzmir Metro). Searching online, I don't see evidence that "Vakıflar" on its own generally refers to the Directorate General. I would lean towards deletion, although disambiguation may also be an appropriate option. signed, Rosguill talk 18:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 ( talk) 05:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 15:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Флаг

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 6#Template:Флаг

Super Mario 64 Glitches

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 5#Super Mario 64 Glitches

Mutated Cap

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

This is something that doesn't exist in the game, so who is this helping? Looking at the visits, barely anybody has used it. Captain Galaxy 14:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Move Yugoslavia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1970

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete Pretty obvious erroneous legacy of a botched pagemove (I checked: no Move Yugoslavia participated in that year's contest), with no substantive history, but housekeeping speedy was declined. Note, the correctly titled redirect Draft:Yugoslavia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1970 exists. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heroes (band)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Héroes del Silencio. If any content about Darren Costin's Heroes is added to Wikipedia in the future, then the redirect can be revisited. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Unless there is a reason (not currently mentioned in the article) for this to target Wang Chung, it should be retargeted to Héroes del Silencio, aka Héroes, as {{ R to diacritic}}. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heros (tv)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete. Possibly a misspelling; a badly capitalised disambiguator; definitely ambiguous with many other entries at Hero (disambiguation), Heroes (disambiguation) but not at Heros. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. If there were any TV-related entries at the dab page Heros, then retargeting there would have worked. But there aren't, so it won't. The term is much more plausible as a misspelling for "Heroes" than for "Hero", but I don't see a need for retargeting to Heroes (disambiguation) because of the combination of a misspelling with an unusual and miscapitalised disambiguator. – Uanfala (talk) 13:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete for the qualifier alone: non-standard capitalisation, and ambiguous - TV channel or TV series? A google exact-spelling search for "heros tv" yielded several hits, including Heros TV Senegal, but no obvious target. Narky Blert ( talk) 14:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

'Heroes'

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete. Unnecessary and confusing use of single quotes. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ClueBot NG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep per either SK#1 or #3. An assertion that a redirect shouldn't be an article is not valid grounding for an RfD at any stretch. (non-admin closure) J947 messageedits 03:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia does not need an article about ClueBot NG. Sysages ( talk | contribs) 02:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Indeed it doesn't, which is why this is a redirect instead of an article. Keep as {{ R from merge}} given that no one at the 2017 AfD besides the nominator supported outright deletion, the topic is covered at the target article, and there has been no suggestion about removing the content from there. 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 02:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep. This nomination is clearly erroneous. ClueBot NG is mentioned at target article and that is why this redirect exists, aiding readers who want to find information about this bot. Similarly titled ClueBot is another redirect that also targets this article. Deletion should be out of the question here. CycloneYoris talk! 02:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Marnie Champ

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Unclear why this redirect targets the target page. It's not mentioned in the target article. and I'm not able to verify if this is an alternative name for the target subject. Steel1943 ( talk) 00:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 29

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 29, 2020.

Redirects to Deathline International

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

These all redirect to a target in which the subject of the redirect isn't even mentioned. The only thing I can find is that these individuals are listed as additional performers in the personnel section of an album by the band but no further info is provided. Are such redirects going to be useful to readers? Some of the names (Gander, Hansen, Harrison) are mentioned in other articles referencing a different person by the same name but who also don't have articles. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 23:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bia Angkor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

An internet search suggests that this is the Vietnamese name for this brand, which may fall afoul of WP:RLOTE and thus should be deleted. signed, Rosguill talk 14:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Weak keep as not just Vietnamese but apparently a plausible spelling of the Khmer name បៀរ អង្គរ. The first word is "Beer" and the second is "Angkor". In បៀរ (the first word):
    • the first letter gets romanised either as <b> or <p> depending on the romanisation system
    • The vowel cluster has a schwa at the end (i.e. the same sound at the start of the word about)
    • the final (r) is silent in most dialects, says Khmer script#Variation in pronunciation
(Warning: I speak zero Khmer.) 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 00:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 ( talk) 05:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as while it's a reasonable romanization of the Khmer name, it basically requires someone to transliterate the Khmer name, rather than using the English spelling that is also on the bottle. This strikes me as basically hitting all the reasoning at WP:RLOTE except with an extra unlikely step to actually be useful. ~ mazca talk 20:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as an apparently plausible rendering of the target's native name. I don't think we can assume that all varieties of the beer will be like the one pictured in the article in having the English name printed, and we can't also assume that all readers will be searching based on what they see on a bottle (rather than, say, hear spoken in conversation). – Uanfala (talk) 15:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. A reasonable transliteration of the product's native name. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hörfunk

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete per WP:FORRED. The target article's subject does not have affinity to any specific language. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment tending to weak keep for as long as its not in the way of some other entry. Is this perhaps used as a loanword in some German-language-rooted locales in the US (like f.e. the Pittsburgh area)? I'm asking, because, from a German perspective, the entry makes a lot of sense, as in the German language the term "Radio" refers exclusively to a "broadcast radio receiver" device (not to wireless communication and wireless communication devices in general), and the correct term for the wireless transmission of audio in one-to-many (public) broadcasting is "Hörfunk". (There is also "Sprechfunk" for wireless transmisson of speech-only audio in one-to-one radiophony.) Might be worth some further research... -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 10:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Network (2018 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Implausible redirect. The article says that the "Network film" was released in June 2019. Seventyfiveyears ( Seventyfiveyears) 20:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

 Question: Was it originally scheduled for release in 2018? —  Tartan357  ( Talk) 20:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Yes, but it was pushed back to 2019, so this redirect should be deleted. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 20:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Well, if it was heavily advertised as "coming 2018" then it is a plausible redirect. If someone sees an old poster or promotion with the 2018 date, then that would be a reasonable search term. The plausibility depends on how heavily it was advertised as being scheduled for a 2018 release. If there were no posters/ads made with that date, then I'd say that it should be deleted. —  Tartan357  ( Talk) 20:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, its pageview stats do not suggest much usage. Someone typing it in anyway would receive search results offering the 2019 film first, so I don't think this is particularly necessary. ~ mazca talk 21:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Upon a quick search I didn't find any posters/promotional content prominently advertising a 2018 release, so unless someone can find otherwise, I'd say this redirect is implausible and should be deleted. —  Tartan357  ( Talk) 21:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rage killing

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Crime of passion. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Umm ... I'm not sure what subject on Wikipedia would be the proper subject to arrive at if the redirect is searched, but I didn't expect to arrive at the current target. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:44, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Comment provocation (legal), maybe? The exact phrase "rage killing" doesn't appear there, but it discusses homicide extensively and has the word "rage" in there at one point (In common law, "passion usually means rage ..."). Though it's always a bit difficult trying to figure out the best legal concept that corresponds to a colloquial phrase. Anyway clearly the current target is no good, so this should be deleted if people don't think provocation (legal) is a good target either. 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 07:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Retarget to crime of passion - "a violent crime, especially homicide, in which the perpetrator commits the act against someone because of sudden strong impulse such as sudden rage". Narky Blert ( talk) 12:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as ambiguous. This redirect may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ mazca talk 20:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kim Ruff (politician)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 16:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Subject is the vice chair of a national party caucus, and likely meets WP:GNG. This redirect points to an entry in a table with no substantial biographical information on the subject. It should be deleted to allow for the existence of red links to encourage article creation.  —  Tartan357  ( Talk) 19:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

I withdraw the nomination. —  Tartan357  ( Talk) 02:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super Mario Wii

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Super Mario (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

This is too vague to be for just one game. There were 16 Mario games for the Wii, 6 of which have Super in the title. Captain Galaxy 19:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mark Graue

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

From what I researched, he is a prominent video game and TV show voice actor. I don't think his name should be linked to just this one game when, at the very least, he has worked on more notable games. Captain Galaxy 19:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Well if that's the case, that knocks this redirect even more because they didn't spell his name correctly. Captain Galaxy 20:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ajania pacifica

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 5#Ajania pacifica

Vexation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. XfDcloser bugged out on me, meant to close this without relisting. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Seems as though this redirect could also refer to subjects such as Annoyance, Frustration, and Worry. Due to its ambiguity, it's probably best to either delete the redirect so the search function on Wikipedia can do its job, or retarget to Wiktionary:vexation. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Percentage (film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

This redirect causes confusion because "Netflix programming" has no content about this subject. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 16:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rebecca Freyja O'Rourke

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 15:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 16:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Parfum

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Aroma compound. signed, Rosguill talk 19:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

French WP:FORRED. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

...Or retarget to Aroma compound since Fragrance redirects there, and the subject of "fragrance" seems to be the common use/synonym for "parfum" as used in the English language. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blast hole & Bomb holes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Research into these two redirects' topics makes it seem as though they are synonyms for the same subject. However, it's also unclear where they should both target if they are to be synced. (Also, note that Bomb hole, the singular for "Bomb holes" does not exist.) Steel1943 ( talk) 23:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete, failing that I'd probably leave them at the current targets - a bomb hole is a kind of blast hole, but a blast hole isn't necessarily a bomb hole. But that aside, neither topic is really discussed in either article, and I don't think our readers really need a redirect to inform them that a bomb hole is caused by a bomb, or indeed a blast hole is caused by blasting. They're the kind of redirects that are neither harmful nor particularly useful. ~ mazca talk 20:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Saxony Wool

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Merino. signed, Rosguill talk 18:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target article's subject unclear. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Retarget' to Merino, as it does seem to be the closest useful target we have. Most references to Saxony Wool on the web seem to be various suit manufacturers talking self-promotingly about it, but some of them are reasonably informative. It does not seem to be used frequently to refer to wool literally from Saxony, but rather a historical style of wool now from sheep generally farmed elsewhere. This is potentially the kind of topic that could have its own article if there's been actual coverage of it outside of websites selling suits, but the significant mentions at Merino seem to be the best we can offer. ~ mazca talk 20:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vakıflar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Waqf. (non-admin closure) Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Vakıflar just means "foundations" in Turkish, and points to their article for Foundation on trWiki ( [1]). Even on English Wikipedia, we have VakıfBank and Vakıflar (İzmir Metro). Searching online, I don't see evidence that "Vakıflar" on its own generally refers to the Directorate General. I would lean towards deletion, although disambiguation may also be an appropriate option. signed, Rosguill talk 18:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 ( talk) 05:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 15:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Флаг

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 6#Template:Флаг

Super Mario 64 Glitches

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 5#Super Mario 64 Glitches

Mutated Cap

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

This is something that doesn't exist in the game, so who is this helping? Looking at the visits, barely anybody has used it. Captain Galaxy 14:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Move Yugoslavia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1970

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete Pretty obvious erroneous legacy of a botched pagemove (I checked: no Move Yugoslavia participated in that year's contest), with no substantive history, but housekeeping speedy was declined. Note, the correctly titled redirect Draft:Yugoslavia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1970 exists. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heroes (band)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Héroes del Silencio. If any content about Darren Costin's Heroes is added to Wikipedia in the future, then the redirect can be revisited. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Unless there is a reason (not currently mentioned in the article) for this to target Wang Chung, it should be retargeted to Héroes del Silencio, aka Héroes, as {{ R to diacritic}}. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heros (tv)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete. Possibly a misspelling; a badly capitalised disambiguator; definitely ambiguous with many other entries at Hero (disambiguation), Heroes (disambiguation) but not at Heros. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. If there were any TV-related entries at the dab page Heros, then retargeting there would have worked. But there aren't, so it won't. The term is much more plausible as a misspelling for "Heroes" than for "Hero", but I don't see a need for retargeting to Heroes (disambiguation) because of the combination of a misspelling with an unusual and miscapitalised disambiguator. – Uanfala (talk) 13:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete for the qualifier alone: non-standard capitalisation, and ambiguous - TV channel or TV series? A google exact-spelling search for "heros tv" yielded several hits, including Heros TV Senegal, but no obvious target. Narky Blert ( talk) 14:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

'Heroes'

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete. Unnecessary and confusing use of single quotes. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ClueBot NG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep per either SK#1 or #3. An assertion that a redirect shouldn't be an article is not valid grounding for an RfD at any stretch. (non-admin closure) J947 messageedits 03:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia does not need an article about ClueBot NG. Sysages ( talk | contribs) 02:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Indeed it doesn't, which is why this is a redirect instead of an article. Keep as {{ R from merge}} given that no one at the 2017 AfD besides the nominator supported outright deletion, the topic is covered at the target article, and there has been no suggestion about removing the content from there. 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 02:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep. This nomination is clearly erroneous. ClueBot NG is mentioned at target article and that is why this redirect exists, aiding readers who want to find information about this bot. Similarly titled ClueBot is another redirect that also targets this article. Deletion should be out of the question here. CycloneYoris talk! 02:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Marnie Champ

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Unclear why this redirect targets the target page. It's not mentioned in the target article. and I'm not able to verify if this is an alternative name for the target subject. Steel1943 ( talk) 00:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook