This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 25, 2019.
I'm not sure it's appropriate to redirect from this phrase to a single theory on the psychology of terror (really just fear in this context), especially considering that this theory is given only one sentence in the article Fear. Concerns that come to mind to me are whether this is giving too much prominence to a single theory, and whether there is a possibility for confusion due to the use of the word terror, as readers could potentially be looking for an article on the effects of terrorism or Terror (politics). signed, Rosguill talk 23:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, this is an independent company and may even meet notability guidelines. I would recommend deletion, or the creation of a stub for the company if enough sources can be found to meet WP:NORG. signed, Rosguill talk 23:26, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Created alongside several other redirects from similar terms to this target, this one is a bridge too far IMO, as the redirect title doesn't mention floods, and an internet search suggests that this term is more commonly used to refer to fire hazards (even dictionary [2]). I would suggest either deletion, or conversion to a DAB. signed, Rosguill talk 23:15, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
These terms do not appear to refer to the same type of yoga position––"Uttitha bandhasana" is not mentioned in the target, and searching online returned results suggesting that Uttitha bandhasana is a different position. I would suggest deleting unless someone is aware of a more appropriate target. signed, Rosguill talk 22:54, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 7#Ospreys
I propose to retarget this to the overview article Orthodoxy in Korea to match the retargetting to that title of Orthodoxy in South Korea proposed at #Orthodoxy in South Korea below. Thryduulf ( talk) 17:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
WP:XY. The two songs were released as a double a-side, so this is a plausible search term, but neither target is preferable to the other. In Utero (album) is a possibility as this is quite an old redirect (perhaps specifically In Utero (album)#Singles), but I don't really see any harm in deleting this. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 16:57, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a misleading redirect, as it leads to only those by-elections from 2010 onwards. I have been unable to identify a proper target for it, so it should be deleted and incoming links removed. DuncanHill ( talk) 16:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
There is an Russian Orthodox Church in South Korea. See Orthodoxy in Korea. 223.62.169.15 ( talk) 15:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
slang, WP:NEO . Wiktionary also deleted. Widefox; talk 14:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This started out as a shortm unsourced article, which was turned into a redirect shortly after creation. The target, however, makes no mention of "hipster art" (and neither did the version at the time of the redirecting). No likely target in sight, and the term is too vague and also possibly ambiguous (which meaning of Hipster is involved?). – Uanfala (talk) 12:41, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 5#SnarXiv
I don't see any evidence that this is a term used for or associated with the target, whether in the article or on internet and Google Scholar searches. I would recommend deletion unless someone can provide a reasonable alternative. signed, Rosguill talk 22:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 2#Dr. Salvador
Not a valid search term, because this “2019 border closure” doesn’t exist. Never happened. This was originally a short article which was AfD’ed as “delete”. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 United States Border closure After it was deleted, the original author recreated it as a redirect to National Emergency Concerning the Southern Border of the United States. (He had suggested that redirect at the AfD, but nobody seconded it). The reason the article was deleted is that there was no such thing. A border closure was something Trump mentioned as a possibility, but he quickly dropped the idea and never took any steps to implement it. This is not even fake news; it’s no news at all. A search for the term finds no sources, only Wikipedia and mirrors. It isn’t even mentioned at our target article. It is a completely invalid redirect. MelanieN ( talk) 05:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
deletePages()
~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
19:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Leftovers from a bizarre method of renaming articles (e.g. if the intent was the move A -> B, but B was not overwriteable, then the editor would move instead to B () and leave it for somebody with the tools to spot and correct to B). The articles have been at these titles for the duration of minutes to days (the largest time spent was two weeks by the last redirect in the list). There are no incoming links from articles and the redirects have no conceivable use. I haven't tagged any of them with {{ rfd1}}. – Uanfala (talk) 00:06, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 25, 2019.
I'm not sure it's appropriate to redirect from this phrase to a single theory on the psychology of terror (really just fear in this context), especially considering that this theory is given only one sentence in the article Fear. Concerns that come to mind to me are whether this is giving too much prominence to a single theory, and whether there is a possibility for confusion due to the use of the word terror, as readers could potentially be looking for an article on the effects of terrorism or Terror (politics). signed, Rosguill talk 23:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, this is an independent company and may even meet notability guidelines. I would recommend deletion, or the creation of a stub for the company if enough sources can be found to meet WP:NORG. signed, Rosguill talk 23:26, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Created alongside several other redirects from similar terms to this target, this one is a bridge too far IMO, as the redirect title doesn't mention floods, and an internet search suggests that this term is more commonly used to refer to fire hazards (even dictionary [2]). I would suggest either deletion, or conversion to a DAB. signed, Rosguill talk 23:15, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
These terms do not appear to refer to the same type of yoga position––"Uttitha bandhasana" is not mentioned in the target, and searching online returned results suggesting that Uttitha bandhasana is a different position. I would suggest deleting unless someone is aware of a more appropriate target. signed, Rosguill talk 22:54, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 7#Ospreys
I propose to retarget this to the overview article Orthodoxy in Korea to match the retargetting to that title of Orthodoxy in South Korea proposed at #Orthodoxy in South Korea below. Thryduulf ( talk) 17:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
WP:XY. The two songs were released as a double a-side, so this is a plausible search term, but neither target is preferable to the other. In Utero (album) is a possibility as this is quite an old redirect (perhaps specifically In Utero (album)#Singles), but I don't really see any harm in deleting this. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 16:57, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a misleading redirect, as it leads to only those by-elections from 2010 onwards. I have been unable to identify a proper target for it, so it should be deleted and incoming links removed. DuncanHill ( talk) 16:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
There is an Russian Orthodox Church in South Korea. See Orthodoxy in Korea. 223.62.169.15 ( talk) 15:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
slang, WP:NEO . Wiktionary also deleted. Widefox; talk 14:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This started out as a shortm unsourced article, which was turned into a redirect shortly after creation. The target, however, makes no mention of "hipster art" (and neither did the version at the time of the redirecting). No likely target in sight, and the term is too vague and also possibly ambiguous (which meaning of Hipster is involved?). – Uanfala (talk) 12:41, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 5#SnarXiv
I don't see any evidence that this is a term used for or associated with the target, whether in the article or on internet and Google Scholar searches. I would recommend deletion unless someone can provide a reasonable alternative. signed, Rosguill talk 22:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 2#Dr. Salvador
Not a valid search term, because this “2019 border closure” doesn’t exist. Never happened. This was originally a short article which was AfD’ed as “delete”. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 United States Border closure After it was deleted, the original author recreated it as a redirect to National Emergency Concerning the Southern Border of the United States. (He had suggested that redirect at the AfD, but nobody seconded it). The reason the article was deleted is that there was no such thing. A border closure was something Trump mentioned as a possibility, but he quickly dropped the idea and never took any steps to implement it. This is not even fake news; it’s no news at all. A search for the term finds no sources, only Wikipedia and mirrors. It isn’t even mentioned at our target article. It is a completely invalid redirect. MelanieN ( talk) 05:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
deletePages()
~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
19:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Leftovers from a bizarre method of renaming articles (e.g. if the intent was the move A -> B, but B was not overwriteable, then the editor would move instead to B () and leave it for somebody with the tools to spot and correct to B). The articles have been at these titles for the duration of minutes to days (the largest time spent was two weeks by the last redirect in the list). There are no incoming links from articles and the redirects have no conceivable use. I haven't tagged any of them with {{ rfd1}}. – Uanfala (talk) 00:06, 25 May 2019 (UTC)