The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bonne Nuit les Petits
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. I've speedy deleted this as a
WP:G7. The only purpose in creating this redirect was to inform readers of the existence of the French article. It is already one step away from being useful by taking the reader through an additional page. Creating a stub shoves the interwiki link to the bottom of the sidebar making it even harder to find. Plastering it with templates completely obscures the page's purpose. I've come to the conclusion that this is never going to help anyone, even those who can read the French page.
SpinningSpark08:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I created this redirect because I thought this was the accepted way of linking to other Wikipedias (ie, they shouldn't be linked directly in article). There is no article for this subject on Wikipedia, but there is a French one. It seems quite reasonable to provide a link for readers who want to know more and can read French. The page is also an opportunity to link to the IMdB page, which is in English.
SpinningSpark20:22, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Why do I always feel like I am banging my head against a brick wall every time I come to this board? It's only a redirect because you just restored it (to the wrong place I might add) after I created a stub, as suggested here. Please close this discussion and stop this nonsense. I've withdrawn the attempt to create a stub. You are wasting everyones time continuing to discuss it.
SpinningSpark02:18, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
For Christ's sake, all I'm trying to do is bring to the attention of readers that a French article exists, not write an article here. There's no need to plaster that with templates – that's just over the top.
SpinningSpark02:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Discussion notices should remain on the page being discussed until the respective deletion discussion closes. Drafting may occur beneath it. Secondly, stubs are articles. Thus,
WP:V and
WP:N apply, making
cleanup templates pointing out such issues warranted. —
Godsy (
TALKCONT)04:22, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tom Vague
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Mentioned only very briefly in the target; there doesn't seem to be any particularly close connection between Tom Vague and Martin Kitcher. None of the
other articles that mentions Tom Vague strikes me as a better target. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk)
19:16, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as Tom Vague could possibly have his own article, provided there are news articles about him, and not just random blogs.
[1][2] He wrote a book called Televisionaries, the Red Army Faction Story, 1963 - 1993AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
17:19, 29 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Broken (Memphis May Fire album)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Article I have already discussed with
Walter Görlitz after he decided to remove my article twice. Even if the sources couldn't be the best ones, an album should deserve an article and not just a redirect. A track list is an important missing information if there is the redirect.
One of the source trascribed an interview of Matty Mullins and it brings a lot of informations about writing process, production and mixing.
Ibbus93 (
talk)
00:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I didn't remove the article, I redirected it.
WP:NALBUM and
WP:GNG are the only possible criteria that this album could claim for notability. Neither of those say that all albums should have articles, only notable ones. I'm not sure why you do not understand that.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
00:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I understood your point, but the fact that the discussion came here means that I'm not the only one that is not fully agree with you. Anyway, right now, there are new reviews and articles about the record coming from
Sputnikmusic and
Deadpress. Those seems to me totally reliable sources and independent.
Ibbus93 (
talk)
09:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Restore article and send to AfD which is the proper venue to resolve disputes about whether an article should exist for a given subject.
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Galactus (film)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
An {{R from quote}} and long-dead meme recently come back to life. Not mentioned at the target. One somewhat-reliable source exists
[3], but I am not sure whether or not this is worth adding to the target (maybe it would fit in the
Reception and legacy section.) There don't seem to have been any recent non-vandal attempts to add content about it.
59.149.124.29 (
talk)
16:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Yuhanon Mar Dimithrios
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
There exist a number of primary sources that evidence that
Dr Mathews is also known by this name. It would also appear that for liturgical purposes in
Oriental Orthodoxy clerics with the given name "John" (in English) are referred to as "Yuhanon" (which appears to be a common latin alphabet transliteration of John in the
Syriac language).
Shirt58 (
talk)
09:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Needs knowledgeable attention - this article was found by me written in the name of John Mathews - but in the article space of Yuhanon Mar Dimithrios. However the article appeared to make little or not reference to the odd discrepancy / possible dual name. This either needs rewriting to reflect the dual name issue or the be de-linked entirely. ::
Kevinalewis :
(Talk Page)/
(Desk)
CommentJohn Mathews (theologian) makes no mention of this name. If it is the case that he is also known by this name, that article needs to mention it, preferably with some insight into why he has this alternative name (needless to say, covering the "Mar" and the "Dimithrios" as well as the "Yuhanon"). —
Smjg (
talk)
13:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
According to the news piece on the Malankara Orthodox Diocese of America, he was consecrated with the new name when he became Metropolitan. Yuhanon (variously spelled in English) is just the
Saint Thomas Christian names form of "John", and Mar is a title (but it's unlikely there exists a source explaining that specifically in connection with him, because the people writing news about him assume that's already common knowledge among their readers).
59.149.124.29 (
talk)
13:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bonne Nuit les Petits
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. I've speedy deleted this as a
WP:G7. The only purpose in creating this redirect was to inform readers of the existence of the French article. It is already one step away from being useful by taking the reader through an additional page. Creating a stub shoves the interwiki link to the bottom of the sidebar making it even harder to find. Plastering it with templates completely obscures the page's purpose. I've come to the conclusion that this is never going to help anyone, even those who can read the French page.
SpinningSpark08:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I created this redirect because I thought this was the accepted way of linking to other Wikipedias (ie, they shouldn't be linked directly in article). There is no article for this subject on Wikipedia, but there is a French one. It seems quite reasonable to provide a link for readers who want to know more and can read French. The page is also an opportunity to link to the IMdB page, which is in English.
SpinningSpark20:22, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Why do I always feel like I am banging my head against a brick wall every time I come to this board? It's only a redirect because you just restored it (to the wrong place I might add) after I created a stub, as suggested here. Please close this discussion and stop this nonsense. I've withdrawn the attempt to create a stub. You are wasting everyones time continuing to discuss it.
SpinningSpark02:18, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
For Christ's sake, all I'm trying to do is bring to the attention of readers that a French article exists, not write an article here. There's no need to plaster that with templates – that's just over the top.
SpinningSpark02:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Discussion notices should remain on the page being discussed until the respective deletion discussion closes. Drafting may occur beneath it. Secondly, stubs are articles. Thus,
WP:V and
WP:N apply, making
cleanup templates pointing out such issues warranted. —
Godsy (
TALKCONT)04:22, 25 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Tom Vague
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Mentioned only very briefly in the target; there doesn't seem to be any particularly close connection between Tom Vague and Martin Kitcher. None of the
other articles that mentions Tom Vague strikes me as a better target. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk)
19:16, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as Tom Vague could possibly have his own article, provided there are news articles about him, and not just random blogs.
[1][2] He wrote a book called Televisionaries, the Red Army Faction Story, 1963 - 1993AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
17:19, 29 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Broken (Memphis May Fire album)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Article I have already discussed with
Walter Görlitz after he decided to remove my article twice. Even if the sources couldn't be the best ones, an album should deserve an article and not just a redirect. A track list is an important missing information if there is the redirect.
One of the source trascribed an interview of Matty Mullins and it brings a lot of informations about writing process, production and mixing.
Ibbus93 (
talk)
00:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I didn't remove the article, I redirected it.
WP:NALBUM and
WP:GNG are the only possible criteria that this album could claim for notability. Neither of those say that all albums should have articles, only notable ones. I'm not sure why you do not understand that.
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
00:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I understood your point, but the fact that the discussion came here means that I'm not the only one that is not fully agree with you. Anyway, right now, there are new reviews and articles about the record coming from
Sputnikmusic and
Deadpress. Those seems to me totally reliable sources and independent.
Ibbus93 (
talk)
09:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Restore article and send to AfD which is the proper venue to resolve disputes about whether an article should exist for a given subject.
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Galactus (film)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
An {{R from quote}} and long-dead meme recently come back to life. Not mentioned at the target. One somewhat-reliable source exists
[3], but I am not sure whether or not this is worth adding to the target (maybe it would fit in the
Reception and legacy section.) There don't seem to have been any recent non-vandal attempts to add content about it.
59.149.124.29 (
talk)
16:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Yuhanon Mar Dimithrios
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
There exist a number of primary sources that evidence that
Dr Mathews is also known by this name. It would also appear that for liturgical purposes in
Oriental Orthodoxy clerics with the given name "John" (in English) are referred to as "Yuhanon" (which appears to be a common latin alphabet transliteration of John in the
Syriac language).
Shirt58 (
talk)
09:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Needs knowledgeable attention - this article was found by me written in the name of John Mathews - but in the article space of Yuhanon Mar Dimithrios. However the article appeared to make little or not reference to the odd discrepancy / possible dual name. This either needs rewriting to reflect the dual name issue or the be de-linked entirely. ::
Kevinalewis :
(Talk Page)/
(Desk)
CommentJohn Mathews (theologian) makes no mention of this name. If it is the case that he is also known by this name, that article needs to mention it, preferably with some insight into why he has this alternative name (needless to say, covering the "Mar" and the "Dimithrios" as well as the "Yuhanon"). —
Smjg (
talk)
13:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
According to the news piece on the Malankara Orthodox Diocese of America, he was consecrated with the new name when he became Metropolitan. Yuhanon (variously spelled in English) is just the
Saint Thomas Christian names form of "John", and Mar is a title (but it's unlikely there exists a source explaining that specifically in connection with him, because the people writing news about him assume that's already common knowledge among their readers).
59.149.124.29 (
talk)
13:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.