From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 28

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 28, 2016.

Laystan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete. These redirects are in romanized Hebrew. The first one is a typo for the second. The Hebrew language is not especially relevant to the topic of clowns. Gorobay ( talk) 20:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Donald Trump presidential campaign

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn... per below. But, specifically per BDD's comment which makes this discussion seem like it should be on WP:DRV, and I didn't even realize it. Either way, yes, this will probably have to be revisited if Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2020 is created in the future. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply

So ... should this redirect be converted to a disambiguation page listing its current target ( Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016) and Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2000 ... or should we just keep the current situation, claiming that the 2016 campaign is the WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT target for the term? (For the record, I support disambiguation.) Steel1943 ( talk) 19:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

I would say the 2016 campaign would be the primary target, and we can handle the 2000 campaign with a hatnote, as described at WP:TWODAB, which is the current situation. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 19:46, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Parc Étang

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 10#Parc Étang

Republican debates

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 11#Republican debates

Swiss Powerhouse

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Ranze's statement that they are not this wrestler in question is accepted. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 04:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Misuse for selfpromotion. ZH8000 ( talk) 10:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. This is a widely used term and the wrestler is not in the first three pages of a google search for "Swiss Powerhouse". Searching for Swiss Powerhouse wrestling -Wikipedia finds only one mention of Cesaro and that is in the middle of a long list of wresting nicknames in an unreliable source. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Note user:Ranze, the creator of this redirect, has since been topic banned from redirects related to wresting, including participating at RfD, but wishes to respond to the nomination statement. Specifically, they state that they ( Ranze) are "not the subject of this redirect", have "never been involved in any form of sports entertainment or employed by any of the companies that man has worked for." He thus asserts that the redirect is not self-promotion. [1]. Thryduulf ( talk) 16:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD ( talk) 16:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Unlikely search term, as it's just a nickname used in passing by the announcers; anyone actually looking for this article would use the actual ring name. Plus it's vague; there's numerous other persons or things that can be called the same thing. Should it be mentioned in the article? Sure. But that doesn't make it something we need to keep a redirect around for. While this isn't wholly made up or used once in passing like some of the other redirects created by the same user, it's still part of the same pattern of creating exceedingly unlikely search terms as redirect just to say they created it. That said, I don't understand the nominator's rationale at all; are they claiming that the user who created this is the wrestler in question? Strange. oknazevad ( talk) 11:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Swiss Superman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. ( non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 16:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Misuse for selfpromotion. ZH8000 ( talk) 10:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. The first two pages of a Google search for Swiss Superman -Wikipedia finds only this person, so they are clearly the primary topic for this term. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:58, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Note user:Ranze, the creator of this redirect, has since been topic banned from redirects related to wresting, including participating at RfD, but wishes to respond to the nomination statement. Specifically, they state that they ( Ranze) are "not the subject of this redirect", have "never been involved in any form of sports entertainment or employed by any of the companies that man has worked for." He thus asserts that the redirect is not self-promotion. [2]. Thryduulf ( talk) 16:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD ( talk) 16:55, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Thryduulf. Common nickname for target page. JTP ( talkcontribs) 20:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Unlikely search term, as it's just a nickname used in passing by the announcers; anyone actually looking for this article would use the actual ring name. Should it be mentioned in the article? Sure. But that doesn't make it something we need to keep a redirect around for. While this isn't wholly made up or used once in passing like some of the other redirects created by the same user, it's still part of the same pattern of creating exceedingly unlikely search terms as redirect just to say they created it. That said, I don't understand the nominator's rationale at all; are they claiming that the user who created this is the wrestler in question? Strange. oknazevad ( talk) 11:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Thryduulf. A Google search shows that it isn't just a one-time ring thing, it gets used in the headlines of news articles [3] as well. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 04:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fifa Ultimate team 2013

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep and refine to FIFA 13#Ultimate Team. -- Tavix ( talk) 17:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Seems implausible to me, especially now that the game is four years old. (This wasn't the first edition of Ultimate Team, either, which I might have understood.) — foxj 14:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. -- BDD ( talk) 16:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
AngusWOOF - Sure, but Ultimate Team has existed since FIFA 11, and exists in the most recent edition of the game. It seems totally arbitrary to redirect to 2013's edition of the game, which is now four years old. — foxj 23:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply
That's true. the Ultimate Team one should go to FIFA (video game series) and be explained there. You can use Polygon's review [4] Then comes the question whether it's worth having Ultimate Team redirects for each year and if so which formats should stay: Fifa Ultimate Team XX, Fifa XX Ultimate Team, and so forth. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 23:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply
@ AngusWOOF: Sure, we could do that. (Though honestly I reckon Ultimate Team is probably worthy of a standalone article by this point, that's a different discussion.) The question is, do you think that "Fifa Ultimate team 2013" - bear in mind that it is case-sensitive - is a realistic redirect to keep around? It does receive a (barely) non-zero number of pageviews per day, but I reckon that's mostly because it's linked to from so many random places still. — foxj 13:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:ITC Logo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows Commons, otherwise unused. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Committee.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:LogoRED.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Hands.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Hostels.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Hillary.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect Shadows Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Mehran.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sebastian Cohn

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Nthep per WP:CSD#R3 and salted for three months by me. Thryduulf ( talk) 23:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

No information about a "Sebastian Cohn" on the linked page. HaeB ( talk) 13:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

United Airlines Flight 953

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was SNOW delete. -- BDD ( talk) 15:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Recommend deletion. At the moment we are RDing a non-notable flight to the famous person who had a heart attack on it. The flight will never be notable for this association, and I can see no plausible reason for the redirect - albeit it was created in undoubted good faith - to exist. DBaK ( talk) 13:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trumpisim

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Implausible misspelling. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 05:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Comment This was originally an article, it was nominated for speedy deletion under criteria G3 (vandalism and hoaxes) and A11 (obviously made up), but was redirected here rather than being deleted. Having looked at the content, I don't think it qualifies as G3 and I'm uncertain about A11 but I would delete it under G10 (Pages that disparage, threaten, intimidate, or harass their subject). For this reason I don't think we need to revert to the article and send it to AfD as is the normal practice for content converted to a redirect and then nominated here. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete It certainly needs deleting one way or t'other. In a way it's a pity that the redirect has obscured the original problem. It seems, (thanks Thryduulf), at first to have been a silly neologism coined by someone who was desperate to make up a word, or who thought they were saying Trumpism but can't spell. For that, it should have been deleted as a waste of space and a made-up one at that. Now it's here then it should be deleted as an implausible misspelling. Either way, it should go away. DBaK ( talk) 13:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I agree that this seems useless. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 23:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 22:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. An ugly redirect. scope_creep ( talk) 12:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lue Ju

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

(Eubot) Not a Germanic umlaut, Chinese romanization. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 05:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Douglas Home

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep ( non-admin closure) I've created a surname index article at Douglas-Home (surname), which is now linked from a hatnote at the target. No prejudice against a formal move request to move the surname index over to the base title. – Uanfala (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Should Douglas-Home (disambiguation) be created? All pages with titles containing Douglas-Home renders quite a few people. -- Nevé selbert 00:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Back Button

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 9#Back Button

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 28

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 28, 2016.

Laystan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete. These redirects are in romanized Hebrew. The first one is a typo for the second. The Hebrew language is not especially relevant to the topic of clowns. Gorobay ( talk) 20:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Donald Trump presidential campaign

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn... per below. But, specifically per BDD's comment which makes this discussion seem like it should be on WP:DRV, and I didn't even realize it. Either way, yes, this will probably have to be revisited if Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2020 is created in the future. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply

So ... should this redirect be converted to a disambiguation page listing its current target ( Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016) and Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2000 ... or should we just keep the current situation, claiming that the 2016 campaign is the WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT target for the term? (For the record, I support disambiguation.) Steel1943 ( talk) 19:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

I would say the 2016 campaign would be the primary target, and we can handle the 2000 campaign with a hatnote, as described at WP:TWODAB, which is the current situation. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 19:46, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Parc Étang

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 10#Parc Étang

Republican debates

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 11#Republican debates

Swiss Powerhouse

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Ranze's statement that they are not this wrestler in question is accepted. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 04:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Misuse for selfpromotion. ZH8000 ( talk) 10:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. This is a widely used term and the wrestler is not in the first three pages of a google search for "Swiss Powerhouse". Searching for Swiss Powerhouse wrestling -Wikipedia finds only one mention of Cesaro and that is in the middle of a long list of wresting nicknames in an unreliable source. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Note user:Ranze, the creator of this redirect, has since been topic banned from redirects related to wresting, including participating at RfD, but wishes to respond to the nomination statement. Specifically, they state that they ( Ranze) are "not the subject of this redirect", have "never been involved in any form of sports entertainment or employed by any of the companies that man has worked for." He thus asserts that the redirect is not self-promotion. [1]. Thryduulf ( talk) 16:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD ( talk) 16:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Unlikely search term, as it's just a nickname used in passing by the announcers; anyone actually looking for this article would use the actual ring name. Plus it's vague; there's numerous other persons or things that can be called the same thing. Should it be mentioned in the article? Sure. But that doesn't make it something we need to keep a redirect around for. While this isn't wholly made up or used once in passing like some of the other redirects created by the same user, it's still part of the same pattern of creating exceedingly unlikely search terms as redirect just to say they created it. That said, I don't understand the nominator's rationale at all; are they claiming that the user who created this is the wrestler in question? Strange. oknazevad ( talk) 11:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Swiss Superman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. ( non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 16:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Misuse for selfpromotion. ZH8000 ( talk) 10:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. The first two pages of a Google search for Swiss Superman -Wikipedia finds only this person, so they are clearly the primary topic for this term. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:58, 17 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Note user:Ranze, the creator of this redirect, has since been topic banned from redirects related to wresting, including participating at RfD, but wishes to respond to the nomination statement. Specifically, they state that they ( Ranze) are "not the subject of this redirect", have "never been involved in any form of sports entertainment or employed by any of the companies that man has worked for." He thus asserts that the redirect is not self-promotion. [2]. Thryduulf ( talk) 16:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD ( talk) 16:55, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Thryduulf. Common nickname for target page. JTP ( talkcontribs) 20:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Unlikely search term, as it's just a nickname used in passing by the announcers; anyone actually looking for this article would use the actual ring name. Should it be mentioned in the article? Sure. But that doesn't make it something we need to keep a redirect around for. While this isn't wholly made up or used once in passing like some of the other redirects created by the same user, it's still part of the same pattern of creating exceedingly unlikely search terms as redirect just to say they created it. That said, I don't understand the nominator's rationale at all; are they claiming that the user who created this is the wrestler in question? Strange. oknazevad ( talk) 11:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Thryduulf. A Google search shows that it isn't just a one-time ring thing, it gets used in the headlines of news articles [3] as well. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 04:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fifa Ultimate team 2013

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep and refine to FIFA 13#Ultimate Team. -- Tavix ( talk) 17:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Seems implausible to me, especially now that the game is four years old. (This wasn't the first edition of Ultimate Team, either, which I might have understood.) — foxj 14:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. -- BDD ( talk) 16:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
AngusWOOF - Sure, but Ultimate Team has existed since FIFA 11, and exists in the most recent edition of the game. It seems totally arbitrary to redirect to 2013's edition of the game, which is now four years old. — foxj 23:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply
That's true. the Ultimate Team one should go to FIFA (video game series) and be explained there. You can use Polygon's review [4] Then comes the question whether it's worth having Ultimate Team redirects for each year and if so which formats should stay: Fifa Ultimate Team XX, Fifa XX Ultimate Team, and so forth. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 23:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply
@ AngusWOOF: Sure, we could do that. (Though honestly I reckon Ultimate Team is probably worthy of a standalone article by this point, that's a different discussion.) The question is, do you think that "Fifa Ultimate team 2013" - bear in mind that it is case-sensitive - is a realistic redirect to keep around? It does receive a (barely) non-zero number of pageviews per day, but I reckon that's mostly because it's linked to from so many random places still. — foxj 13:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:ITC Logo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows Commons, otherwise unused. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Committee.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:LogoRED.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Hands.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Hostels.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Hillary.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect Shadows Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Mehran.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Deleted by RHaworth per the rationale in {{ Db-redircom}}. The page on Commons is now visible. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Redirect shadows Commons. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sebastian Cohn

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Nthep per WP:CSD#R3 and salted for three months by me. Thryduulf ( talk) 23:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

No information about a "Sebastian Cohn" on the linked page. HaeB ( talk) 13:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

United Airlines Flight 953

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was SNOW delete. -- BDD ( talk) 15:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Recommend deletion. At the moment we are RDing a non-notable flight to the famous person who had a heart attack on it. The flight will never be notable for this association, and I can see no plausible reason for the redirect - albeit it was created in undoubted good faith - to exist. DBaK ( talk) 13:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trumpisim

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Implausible misspelling. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 05:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Comment This was originally an article, it was nominated for speedy deletion under criteria G3 (vandalism and hoaxes) and A11 (obviously made up), but was redirected here rather than being deleted. Having looked at the content, I don't think it qualifies as G3 and I'm uncertain about A11 but I would delete it under G10 (Pages that disparage, threaten, intimidate, or harass their subject). For this reason I don't think we need to revert to the article and send it to AfD as is the normal practice for content converted to a redirect and then nominated here. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete It certainly needs deleting one way or t'other. In a way it's a pity that the redirect has obscured the original problem. It seems, (thanks Thryduulf), at first to have been a silly neologism coined by someone who was desperate to make up a word, or who thought they were saying Trumpism but can't spell. For that, it should have been deleted as a waste of space and a made-up one at that. Now it's here then it should be deleted as an implausible misspelling. Either way, it should go away. DBaK ( talk) 13:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I agree that this seems useless. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 23:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 22:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. An ugly redirect. scope_creep ( talk) 12:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lue Ju

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

(Eubot) Not a Germanic umlaut, Chinese romanization. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 05:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Douglas Home

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep ( non-admin closure) I've created a surname index article at Douglas-Home (surname), which is now linked from a hatnote at the target. No prejudice against a formal move request to move the surname index over to the base title. – Uanfala (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Should Douglas-Home (disambiguation) be created? All pages with titles containing Douglas-Home renders quite a few people. -- Nevé selbert 00:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Back Button

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 January 9#Back Button


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook