From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 24

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 24, 2010

Wikipedia:INDECISION2010

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 15:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

This redirect appears to be a form of commentary on the nature or outcome of the elections. Tijfo098 ( talk) 21:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Veil of ignorance (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 17:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Delete. The target is not a dab page. Jafeluv ( talk) 17:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Bajrang Lal Takhar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy closed as wrong forum. The procedure in WP:RM should be followed; perhaps simply tagging {{db-move}}. NAC. Bridgeplayer ( talk) 18:32, 25 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Deletion. The name of the sportsperson is "Bajrang Lal Takhar" and not "Bajranglal Takhar" (185000+ google hits for the former and 3000 hits for the latter). So, the current article should be moved from "Bajranglal Takhar" to "Bajrang Lal Takhar." However, this cannot be done till such time that the existing redirect at "Bajrang Lal Takhar" is deleted. Hence, I propose deletion. Gurubrahma ( talk) 14:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Brendan Gallagher

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. There are at least 3 other Brendan Gallagher's mentioned in Wikipedia articles. None of which currently seem notable enough for articles so a dab page is not appropriate. Redirecting to this target is also not appropriate as our users may not be looking for the hockey player. This is a case where the search function is better than a redirect. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 16:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I'd like to see Gallagher's article deleted at this point as I don't see it as useful at this point. The author of the article want it to remain, citing point 2, 3, 4 and 5 at WP:REDIRECT#KEEP. I don't see enough information about Gallagher to warrant an article or redirect. There are more than one hundred players selected in the 2010 NHL Entry Draft currently playing in North American junior leagues, should they all get a page which simply redirects to their current team? Or is there something noteworthy about Gallagher which warrants an article at this point? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ho-ju-96 ( talkcontribs)

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Portal:Game

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Mixed. First three deleted, next two kept, and last one re-targeted to Portal:Sports and games. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 20:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Africa as there have previously been no discussion on the subject of these cross-namespace redirects. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Portal:United States of America

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep three, but delete Portal:Palestinian National Authority.. Courcelles 08:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Africa as there have previously been no discussion on the subject of these low-traffic redirects. They are also implausible because of their length, the autocomplete should be able to locate the portals without the need of these. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

User:Pkukiss

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Lenticel ( talk) 00:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this cross-namespace redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

FUck

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Taelus ( talk) 10:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

You miss the point - the U is capitalised deliberately - it means "you". Rich  Farmbrough, 19:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC). reply

Ppmm

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 17:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Old Bush

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 17:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect (search term could refer to just about any other bush). :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Idclip

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Re-targeted to John Romero#Doom II and Final Doom where idclip is described. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 15:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Vivat

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 17:18, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Given the second sentence of Vive, Viva, this is clearly not implausible in the least, and is a perfectly fine redirect. The traffic that it garners is quite irrelevant. It's a good redirect that does an appropriate job. Uncle G ( talk) 19:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC) reply
  • I concur with Uncle G. The redirect's title is mentioned multiple times in the lead of the target article, and the redirect itself receives c. 100 pageviews per month, which is (in my opinion) well above the threshold of "low-traffic". -- Black Falcon ( talk) 20:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Kapkinoe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 14:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Convicted politicians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Re-targeted per Black Falcon. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 15:13, 18 December 2010 (UTC) reply

All of these are low-traffic redirects from mainspace to category-space. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 07:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

1988 election

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No consensus. There is no consensus for deletion. Of the 5 or so that have main space alternatives, they have been redirected. As for suggestion to restore articles or create new lists, any editor that wishes may be bold and do that. If there are issues, they should be worked out at the applicable articles' talk pages. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 20:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

All of these are low-traffic redirects from mainspace to category-space. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 07:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Links should exist (or not) to help the readers, not to "incentivize" or cajole or annoy into action the tiny fraction of Wikipedia readers who are also editors. If you're concerned that there should be an article there, put it there. Croctotheface ( talk) 04:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC) reply
I would rather keep a redlink without information than an article with incorrect information, or even more so than a non-article page. No information > bad information. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 04:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

ANE Resources

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep all. Courcelles 08:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Low-traffic, cross-namespace redirects to the portal namespace. Please also take this previous rfd into account when !voting. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Delete all. If I lookup Geography portal, I would expect to see an article on some sort of portal wormhole between the regions of the world, not anything else. But I really would like to keep the List of lists antique; perhaps retarget to a mainspace article? Reh man
  • Keep-There's simply too many diverse redirects being nominated here to give them a fair evaluation. Many are likely deletion-worthy, but I doubt they all are. No objection to a more piecemeal relisting.-- Fyre2387 ( talkcontribs) 18:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Strong Keep - What -possible- justification is there for removing these redirects? They're simply aliases to another (often harder to remember, often with more typing involved) page. I -greatly- prefer to type 'list of portals' than whatever the ugly alternative is. If there's a lot of programming/memory overhead for these aliases ... and there shouldn't be ... that's a programming problem. I consider the aliases to be a -big- plus. Twang ( talk) 02:12, 4 December 2010 (UTC) reply
    The primary justification usually is that they're cross-namespace, see WP:CNR for an explanation. -- œ 23:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Change title of a Wikipedia page

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was RESULT was delete. -- Orlady ( talk) 16:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Low-traffic, cross-namespace redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Christian topics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Mixed results in accordance with Black Falcon's recommendations. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 03:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

All of these are low-traffic redirects from mainspace to category-space. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Changing Username

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was RESULT was retarget to User (computing), along with other redirects mentioned by Black Falcon. Orlady ( talk) 15:58, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Low-traffic, cross-namespace redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 24

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 24, 2010

Wikipedia:INDECISION2010

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 15:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

This redirect appears to be a form of commentary on the nature or outcome of the elections. Tijfo098 ( talk) 21:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Veil of ignorance (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 17:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Delete. The target is not a dab page. Jafeluv ( talk) 17:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Bajrang Lal Takhar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy closed as wrong forum. The procedure in WP:RM should be followed; perhaps simply tagging {{db-move}}. NAC. Bridgeplayer ( talk) 18:32, 25 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Deletion. The name of the sportsperson is "Bajrang Lal Takhar" and not "Bajranglal Takhar" (185000+ google hits for the former and 3000 hits for the latter). So, the current article should be moved from "Bajranglal Takhar" to "Bajrang Lal Takhar." However, this cannot be done till such time that the existing redirect at "Bajrang Lal Takhar" is deleted. Hence, I propose deletion. Gurubrahma ( talk) 14:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Brendan Gallagher

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. There are at least 3 other Brendan Gallagher's mentioned in Wikipedia articles. None of which currently seem notable enough for articles so a dab page is not appropriate. Redirecting to this target is also not appropriate as our users may not be looking for the hockey player. This is a case where the search function is better than a redirect. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 16:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I'd like to see Gallagher's article deleted at this point as I don't see it as useful at this point. The author of the article want it to remain, citing point 2, 3, 4 and 5 at WP:REDIRECT#KEEP. I don't see enough information about Gallagher to warrant an article or redirect. There are more than one hundred players selected in the 2010 NHL Entry Draft currently playing in North American junior leagues, should they all get a page which simply redirects to their current team? Or is there something noteworthy about Gallagher which warrants an article at this point? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ho-ju-96 ( talkcontribs)

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Portal:Game

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Mixed. First three deleted, next two kept, and last one re-targeted to Portal:Sports and games. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 20:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Africa as there have previously been no discussion on the subject of these cross-namespace redirects. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Portal:United States of America

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep three, but delete Portal:Palestinian National Authority.. Courcelles 08:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Africa as there have previously been no discussion on the subject of these low-traffic redirects. They are also implausible because of their length, the autocomplete should be able to locate the portals without the need of these. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

User:Pkukiss

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Lenticel ( talk) 00:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this cross-namespace redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

FUck

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Taelus ( talk) 10:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

You miss the point - the U is capitalised deliberately - it means "you". Rich  Farmbrough, 19:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC). reply

Ppmm

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 17:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Old Bush

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 17:20, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect (search term could refer to just about any other bush). :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Idclip

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Re-targeted to John Romero#Doom II and Final Doom where idclip is described. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 15:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Vivat

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 17:18, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Given the second sentence of Vive, Viva, this is clearly not implausible in the least, and is a perfectly fine redirect. The traffic that it garners is quite irrelevant. It's a good redirect that does an appropriate job. Uncle G ( talk) 19:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC) reply
  • I concur with Uncle G. The redirect's title is mentioned multiple times in the lead of the target article, and the redirect itself receives c. 100 pageviews per month, which is (in my opinion) well above the threshold of "low-traffic". -- Black Falcon ( talk) 20:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Kapkinoe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 14:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC) reply

 Relisted from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 17#User:Pkukiss to discuss this low-traffic, implausible redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Convicted politicians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Re-targeted per Black Falcon. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 15:13, 18 December 2010 (UTC) reply

All of these are low-traffic redirects from mainspace to category-space. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 07:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

1988 election

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No consensus. There is no consensus for deletion. Of the 5 or so that have main space alternatives, they have been redirected. As for suggestion to restore articles or create new lists, any editor that wishes may be bold and do that. If there are issues, they should be worked out at the applicable articles' talk pages. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 20:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

All of these are low-traffic redirects from mainspace to category-space. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 07:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Links should exist (or not) to help the readers, not to "incentivize" or cajole or annoy into action the tiny fraction of Wikipedia readers who are also editors. If you're concerned that there should be an article there, put it there. Croctotheface ( talk) 04:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC) reply
I would rather keep a redlink without information than an article with incorrect information, or even more so than a non-article page. No information > bad information. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 04:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

ANE Resources

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep all. Courcelles 08:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Low-traffic, cross-namespace redirects to the portal namespace. Please also take this previous rfd into account when !voting. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Delete all. If I lookup Geography portal, I would expect to see an article on some sort of portal wormhole between the regions of the world, not anything else. But I really would like to keep the List of lists antique; perhaps retarget to a mainspace article? Reh man
  • Keep-There's simply too many diverse redirects being nominated here to give them a fair evaluation. Many are likely deletion-worthy, but I doubt they all are. No objection to a more piecemeal relisting.-- Fyre2387 ( talkcontribs) 18:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Strong Keep - What -possible- justification is there for removing these redirects? They're simply aliases to another (often harder to remember, often with more typing involved) page. I -greatly- prefer to type 'list of portals' than whatever the ugly alternative is. If there's a lot of programming/memory overhead for these aliases ... and there shouldn't be ... that's a programming problem. I consider the aliases to be a -big- plus. Twang ( talk) 02:12, 4 December 2010 (UTC) reply
    The primary justification usually is that they're cross-namespace, see WP:CNR for an explanation. -- œ 23:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Change title of a Wikipedia page

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was RESULT was delete. -- Orlady ( talk) 16:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Low-traffic, cross-namespace redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Christian topics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Mixed results in accordance with Black Falcon's recommendations. -- JLaTondre ( talk) 03:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

All of these are low-traffic redirects from mainspace to category-space. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Changing Username

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was RESULT was retarget to User (computing), along with other redirects mentioned by Black Falcon. Orlady ( talk) 15:58, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Low-traffic, cross-namespace redirect. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook