The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with
wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.
He certainly is an expert, but he's not going to do it just for some random person on the internet. Your best bet is to join a Facebook group about Baltimore and post your query there. The unusual looking building on the right looks like a church tower. I tried reverse image searching for the tower but it didn't come up. A google image search for churches in Baltimore didn't bring anything up either. --
Viennese Waltz09:17, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you for your answers! I had already searched the category and found nothing. The picture is from the film Step Up 2 and in both films all the locations are in Baltimore. Therefore I suspect that this street can also be found there. --
Chris06 (
talk)
15:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you very much, Amble! The cityscape in the background has changed since then. This church is not on commons I think. --
Chris06 (
talk)
06:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)reply
See
archetype, but note that care has to be taken in order to distinguish between Plato's view vs Jung's interpretation. This will not be giving a direct explanation but illustrate Jung's description of the phenomenon. The king analogy is built by a collective
schema. That of schema most often does not need or better, deserve an explanation as any individual will have and own his particular share of the explanation. That's according to his specticific position in the collective. --
Askedonty (
talk)
21:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)reply
See also
Cultural depictions of lions for the characterization as "king of beasts". The lion hunts mainly on open woodlands and is not found in dense woodlands such as are called "
jungles", so "king of the jungle" is a bit of a misnomer. (In Indian English, though, the term "jungle" may refer to any uncultivated tract of forest or scrub habitat.) Other animals have also been called "king of the jungle", such as the
tiger,[2][3] the
peafowl,[4] the
Asian elephant[5] and the
gorilla.[6] Â --
Lambiam08:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply
HI. During the manual recount of ballots in Florida, in 2000, how did election officials record vote totals and communicate the results of the recount both to the elections office, the Secretary of State, and ultimately to the networks? Thank you.
2.32.203.63 (
talk)
19:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I just want to point out that given the dispute over ballots and lawsuits, the process was extensively detailed in the literature. If you can be more specific with your question, I may be able to answer it, although it is quite esoteric.
Viriditas (
talk)
18:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
June 29 Information
Which US city is closest to the Equator?
I can't find an answer to the question above. When Googling I get answers only to questions I didnât ask, such as "Which city in the 50 states is closest to the Equator?" (which excludes territories and dependencies, which I don't want), "Which state capital is closest?" (not my question), and "Which state is closest?" (cut it out with the states already) but not just plain "Which city is closest?".
Hmm, I think I'm not too surprised that you would get those Google results. I would intuitively interpret "US city" to mean "city in the fifty states plus the District". If you mean to broaden it beyond that you probably need to use different phrasing. --
Trovatore (
talk)
05:50, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
HagÄtña, the capital of
Guam, is closer than Pago Pago, but can hardly be called a city. However, it is labelled as such ("the City of HagÄtña") by the government of Guam.
Dededo is also closer and considerably more populous than both HagÄtña and
Charlotte Amalie. Â --
Lambiam00:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
That might depend on the definition of city. "The U.S. territory of Guam is comprised of 19 villages."[7] However, the Virgin Islands are farther south than the Hawaiian Islands, so
Charlotte Amalie, U.S. Virgin Islands could be correct. Still, according to our article, it is recognized as a town by the U.S. Census Bureau.
American Samoa and
Palmyra Atoll are even farther south, but might not have any "cities" (
Pago Pago has the largest population at 3,656). Also note that "The Greater Pago Pago Metropolitan Area comprises several villages along Pago Pago Harbor",[8] yet I haven't found any official source noting it as a "city". --
136.54.106.120 (
talk)
02:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC) . . . Edit:03:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I like how in American Samoa, Pago Pago correctly comprises several villages; whilst in Guam, HagÄtña incorrectly "comprises
of villages".
Folly Mox (
talk)
11:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The U.S. Census Bureau might not have a rigorous definition of city.
They do seem to haveindependent city and consolidated city, but mostly appear to employ the technical terms
metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas â which can contain a principal city.I suspect the term city might be one of the things that varies by state, but one can only assume that at least for their unemancipated colonial toeholdsminor outlying territories territories the federal government would have a single definition.
Folly Mox (
talk)
11:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)edited 14:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
"I suspect the term city might be one of the things that varies by state" Yep. In my own state of North Carolina, a city is any municipality that chose to use that word when incorporating. In Massachussetts it is based on the form of government, with cities having a mayor-council or council-manager type of government. In Louisiana it is based on population, with a minimum of 5000 people needed. In North Dakota any incorporated community is a city. I could probably find many other definitions in the other states, but that should get the point across. --
User:Khajidha (
talk) (
contributions)
12:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Is the government of Guam official enough?[9] Reportedly,
"En la isla de Guam sĂłlocabrĂa hablar de ciudad en un caso: el deAgaña, que obtuvo tal tĂtulo en 1686, trashaber ostentado el de villa con anterioridad."[10], p.433 â "On the island of Guam it is only possible to speak of a city in one case: that of Agaña, which obtained such title in 1686, after having previously held the title of town."
Being a Spanish possession at the time, the title would have been bestowed by a decree of the Spanish crown. In Europe, the traditional view is: once a city, forever a city. Â --
Lambiam13:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I think it's state-by-state. In California, as far as I understand, there is no official distinction between "city" and "town"; incorporated municipalities may refer to themselves by either name. There is a distinction between a
charter city and a
general law city, which may bear some vague analogy to the notion of "city status" that MinorProphet references, but I think it's not a very close one. --
Trovatore (
talk)
06:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
What is the highest rated type of plant milk for use as a creamer in coffee, in terms of taste tests? I'm not talking about brands, but rather the type of plant milk, such as soy, almond, oat, pea, etc. I've been wondering about this for a while, but I've never been able to find an answer. The other strange thing is that the answer appears to change over time, as if taste is a function of trends and market preference, maybe even culture? But surely, someone can point to a specific type of plant milk and say, "our overall taste tests show that people prefer this type in coffee over others". But what if this kind of result is the function of specific populations, where taste is determined by other factors? On the other hand, food science is fairly mature at this point, so it should be quite easy to say "x type of plant milk is preferred by most people in coffee", but not just as a function of sales (because people will often buy what is cheaper, not simply what tastes the best). Is this doable? Can one say which is both preferred and tastes the best?
Viriditas (
talk)
21:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Advances in
food science will hardly be of help. One can imagine a study in which a panel of tasters, say regular cappuccino users, are asked to rank various
plant milks. But designing such a study is not easy. There are many confounding issues, including personal preferences, cultural preferences, and significant differences in taste (e.g. sweetness) between brands for the same type of milk substitute. I have a hard time imagining a research council funding an independent study on ranking the suitability of
milk substitutes for use as a creamer in coffee. If any such studies have been conducted, they were most likely of the type informally conducted by newspapers or magazines. Â --
Lambiam07:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
My own original researchoriginal research involving witnessing non-vegan friends opting for plantmilk upgrades at coffee shops would indicate that oatmilk is the preferred creamer for this purpose. I acknowledge the sample may not be representative and few coffee shops stock more than three or four species of non-dairy creamers.
Folly Mox (
talk)
10:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Milk does, but
plant milk does not. I'm sure you're aware that this is far from the only case in the English language where modifying a term does not make the referent an instance of the unmodified term. --
Trovatore (
talk)
01:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Samuel Johnson called it "milk" in 1755, so this is not exactly a novelty, as much as it may irritate the National Milk Producers sic for the missing apostrophe Federation and similar industry mouthpieces. --
Trovatore (
talk)
01:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
That's an image the dairy industry put in your head.
Look, I like milk and cheese. I have no particular animus against dairy farmers. But their behavior as an industry on this particular issue has been utterly loathsome and reprehensible. You shouldn't be doing their work for them. --
Trovatore (
talk)
16:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
No, that is the obvious first thought when you come across the term "plant milk" ( or any of the various types thereof). No matter how long the terms have been used, they are inherently silly. --
User:Khajidha (
talk) (
contributions)
16:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Meh, doesn't seem silly to me, calling a culinary substitute the same term as the product it substitutes. *Plant mammary gland secretions or *Teat-expressed baby plant nutrient colloid would be significantly sillier.
Folly Mox (
talk)
11:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
There's plenty of precedent for naming things after other things that are similar in appearance or purpose, whether it be chicory coffee, herbal tea, laverbread, milk of magnesia, filter cake...
AlmostReadytoFly (
talk)
12:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
In that case the plural would not be needed; it would be the "National Milk Producer Federation". I know our British friends sometimes use plural noun adjuncts, but it sounds bad on this side of the Pond. --
Trovatore (
talk)
05:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Oh, and by the way the English genitive does not necessarily imply possession. That's the clamorous error, completely indefensible and I hope you won't try, made by the US Bureau of Geographic Names, when they imposed ridiculous forms like *Pikes Peak, luckily ignored by sensible people. --
Trovatore (
talk)
05:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm trying to find historical population levels for this city. Searching has turned up sources like
this, which is great, but only goes back ~20 years. The city was formed in 1973 from the amalgamation of nearby towns/villages; I'd like to know what the population was then (or thereabouts) and a decade later, say 1980-1985 or so. In an ideal situation, I'd like to see the historical population trend, but I'll take what I can get. :-)
Matt Deres (
talk)
13:27, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Looking back at past Canadian censuses, I find the following figures 101,429 for 1996; 92,772 for 1991; 79,920 for 1986; 76,300 for 1981; 64,794 for 1976 (needed to go through the PDF version of a poorly printed document for that one). All of these can be found online if you look for Canadian census and the year. More recent figures are in a table in the French version of the article, which I'm sure you have looked at already
Xuxl (
talk)
15:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Cambridge was formed by the merger of the city of Galt with two significantly smaller places. Historical populations for Galt may be the appropriate thing to use, depending on your purpose. --
142.112.148.225 (
talk)
21:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I can't imagine any reason why you shouldn't do that, unless it reveals any personal information? You're simply supplying information about the appliance.
Shantavira|
feed me18:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)reply
July 6 Information
Winston Churchill cigars
Can you tell me which was the actual specific cigar that was named in tribute to Winston Churchill? I got a good friend's birthday coming up. Googling turns up with loads of spam.
Iloveparrots (
talk)
05:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)reply
If you're driving along Santa Teresa Boulevard, you'll see
this along the way. It seems to be a memorial in memory of Nicole Sosa, who, if I'm not mistaken, died in a car crash. Who was she, and is there any more information on what happened?
TWOrantulaTM (
enter the web)
23:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm not finding anything in Newspapers.com. If you can find a nearby library, it's possible someone there will know. But these kinds of things will occasionally turn up for people who are otherwise not well known. â
Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrotsâ
01:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Headline: "Woman killed when her SUV crashes into building in San Jose". Other than "a woman", the article does not provide further information about the victim. Â --
Lambiam07:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with
wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.
He certainly is an expert, but he's not going to do it just for some random person on the internet. Your best bet is to join a Facebook group about Baltimore and post your query there. The unusual looking building on the right looks like a church tower. I tried reverse image searching for the tower but it didn't come up. A google image search for churches in Baltimore didn't bring anything up either. --
Viennese Waltz09:17, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you for your answers! I had already searched the category and found nothing. The picture is from the film Step Up 2 and in both films all the locations are in Baltimore. Therefore I suspect that this street can also be found there. --
Chris06 (
talk)
15:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you very much, Amble! The cityscape in the background has changed since then. This church is not on commons I think. --
Chris06 (
talk)
06:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)reply
See
archetype, but note that care has to be taken in order to distinguish between Plato's view vs Jung's interpretation. This will not be giving a direct explanation but illustrate Jung's description of the phenomenon. The king analogy is built by a collective
schema. That of schema most often does not need or better, deserve an explanation as any individual will have and own his particular share of the explanation. That's according to his specticific position in the collective. --
Askedonty (
talk)
21:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)reply
See also
Cultural depictions of lions for the characterization as "king of beasts". The lion hunts mainly on open woodlands and is not found in dense woodlands such as are called "
jungles", so "king of the jungle" is a bit of a misnomer. (In Indian English, though, the term "jungle" may refer to any uncultivated tract of forest or scrub habitat.) Other animals have also been called "king of the jungle", such as the
tiger,[2][3] the
peafowl,[4] the
Asian elephant[5] and the
gorilla.[6] Â --
Lambiam08:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply
HI. During the manual recount of ballots in Florida, in 2000, how did election officials record vote totals and communicate the results of the recount both to the elections office, the Secretary of State, and ultimately to the networks? Thank you.
2.32.203.63 (
talk)
19:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I just want to point out that given the dispute over ballots and lawsuits, the process was extensively detailed in the literature. If you can be more specific with your question, I may be able to answer it, although it is quite esoteric.
Viriditas (
talk)
18:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
June 29 Information
Which US city is closest to the Equator?
I can't find an answer to the question above. When Googling I get answers only to questions I didnât ask, such as "Which city in the 50 states is closest to the Equator?" (which excludes territories and dependencies, which I don't want), "Which state capital is closest?" (not my question), and "Which state is closest?" (cut it out with the states already) but not just plain "Which city is closest?".
Hmm, I think I'm not too surprised that you would get those Google results. I would intuitively interpret "US city" to mean "city in the fifty states plus the District". If you mean to broaden it beyond that you probably need to use different phrasing. --
Trovatore (
talk)
05:50, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
HagÄtña, the capital of
Guam, is closer than Pago Pago, but can hardly be called a city. However, it is labelled as such ("the City of HagÄtña") by the government of Guam.
Dededo is also closer and considerably more populous than both HagÄtña and
Charlotte Amalie. Â --
Lambiam00:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
That might depend on the definition of city. "The U.S. territory of Guam is comprised of 19 villages."[7] However, the Virgin Islands are farther south than the Hawaiian Islands, so
Charlotte Amalie, U.S. Virgin Islands could be correct. Still, according to our article, it is recognized as a town by the U.S. Census Bureau.
American Samoa and
Palmyra Atoll are even farther south, but might not have any "cities" (
Pago Pago has the largest population at 3,656). Also note that "The Greater Pago Pago Metropolitan Area comprises several villages along Pago Pago Harbor",[8] yet I haven't found any official source noting it as a "city". --
136.54.106.120 (
talk)
02:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC) . . . Edit:03:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I like how in American Samoa, Pago Pago correctly comprises several villages; whilst in Guam, HagÄtña incorrectly "comprises
of villages".
Folly Mox (
talk)
11:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The U.S. Census Bureau might not have a rigorous definition of city.
They do seem to haveindependent city and consolidated city, but mostly appear to employ the technical terms
metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas â which can contain a principal city.I suspect the term city might be one of the things that varies by state, but one can only assume that at least for their unemancipated colonial toeholdsminor outlying territories territories the federal government would have a single definition.
Folly Mox (
talk)
11:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)edited 14:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
"I suspect the term city might be one of the things that varies by state" Yep. In my own state of North Carolina, a city is any municipality that chose to use that word when incorporating. In Massachussetts it is based on the form of government, with cities having a mayor-council or council-manager type of government. In Louisiana it is based on population, with a minimum of 5000 people needed. In North Dakota any incorporated community is a city. I could probably find many other definitions in the other states, but that should get the point across. --
User:Khajidha (
talk) (
contributions)
12:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Is the government of Guam official enough?[9] Reportedly,
"En la isla de Guam sĂłlocabrĂa hablar de ciudad en un caso: el deAgaña, que obtuvo tal tĂtulo en 1686, trashaber ostentado el de villa con anterioridad."[10], p.433 â "On the island of Guam it is only possible to speak of a city in one case: that of Agaña, which obtained such title in 1686, after having previously held the title of town."
Being a Spanish possession at the time, the title would have been bestowed by a decree of the Spanish crown. In Europe, the traditional view is: once a city, forever a city. Â --
Lambiam13:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I think it's state-by-state. In California, as far as I understand, there is no official distinction between "city" and "town"; incorporated municipalities may refer to themselves by either name. There is a distinction between a
charter city and a
general law city, which may bear some vague analogy to the notion of "city status" that MinorProphet references, but I think it's not a very close one. --
Trovatore (
talk)
06:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
What is the highest rated type of plant milk for use as a creamer in coffee, in terms of taste tests? I'm not talking about brands, but rather the type of plant milk, such as soy, almond, oat, pea, etc. I've been wondering about this for a while, but I've never been able to find an answer. The other strange thing is that the answer appears to change over time, as if taste is a function of trends and market preference, maybe even culture? But surely, someone can point to a specific type of plant milk and say, "our overall taste tests show that people prefer this type in coffee over others". But what if this kind of result is the function of specific populations, where taste is determined by other factors? On the other hand, food science is fairly mature at this point, so it should be quite easy to say "x type of plant milk is preferred by most people in coffee", but not just as a function of sales (because people will often buy what is cheaper, not simply what tastes the best). Is this doable? Can one say which is both preferred and tastes the best?
Viriditas (
talk)
21:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Advances in
food science will hardly be of help. One can imagine a study in which a panel of tasters, say regular cappuccino users, are asked to rank various
plant milks. But designing such a study is not easy. There are many confounding issues, including personal preferences, cultural preferences, and significant differences in taste (e.g. sweetness) between brands for the same type of milk substitute. I have a hard time imagining a research council funding an independent study on ranking the suitability of
milk substitutes for use as a creamer in coffee. If any such studies have been conducted, they were most likely of the type informally conducted by newspapers or magazines. Â --
Lambiam07:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
My own original researchoriginal research involving witnessing non-vegan friends opting for plantmilk upgrades at coffee shops would indicate that oatmilk is the preferred creamer for this purpose. I acknowledge the sample may not be representative and few coffee shops stock more than three or four species of non-dairy creamers.
Folly Mox (
talk)
10:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Milk does, but
plant milk does not. I'm sure you're aware that this is far from the only case in the English language where modifying a term does not make the referent an instance of the unmodified term. --
Trovatore (
talk)
01:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Samuel Johnson called it "milk" in 1755, so this is not exactly a novelty, as much as it may irritate the National Milk Producers sic for the missing apostrophe Federation and similar industry mouthpieces. --
Trovatore (
talk)
01:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
That's an image the dairy industry put in your head.
Look, I like milk and cheese. I have no particular animus against dairy farmers. But their behavior as an industry on this particular issue has been utterly loathsome and reprehensible. You shouldn't be doing their work for them. --
Trovatore (
talk)
16:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
No, that is the obvious first thought when you come across the term "plant milk" ( or any of the various types thereof). No matter how long the terms have been used, they are inherently silly. --
User:Khajidha (
talk) (
contributions)
16:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Meh, doesn't seem silly to me, calling a culinary substitute the same term as the product it substitutes. *Plant mammary gland secretions or *Teat-expressed baby plant nutrient colloid would be significantly sillier.
Folly Mox (
talk)
11:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
There's plenty of precedent for naming things after other things that are similar in appearance or purpose, whether it be chicory coffee, herbal tea, laverbread, milk of magnesia, filter cake...
AlmostReadytoFly (
talk)
12:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
In that case the plural would not be needed; it would be the "National Milk Producer Federation". I know our British friends sometimes use plural noun adjuncts, but it sounds bad on this side of the Pond. --
Trovatore (
talk)
05:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Oh, and by the way the English genitive does not necessarily imply possession. That's the clamorous error, completely indefensible and I hope you won't try, made by the US Bureau of Geographic Names, when they imposed ridiculous forms like *Pikes Peak, luckily ignored by sensible people. --
Trovatore (
talk)
05:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm trying to find historical population levels for this city. Searching has turned up sources like
this, which is great, but only goes back ~20 years. The city was formed in 1973 from the amalgamation of nearby towns/villages; I'd like to know what the population was then (or thereabouts) and a decade later, say 1980-1985 or so. In an ideal situation, I'd like to see the historical population trend, but I'll take what I can get. :-)
Matt Deres (
talk)
13:27, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Looking back at past Canadian censuses, I find the following figures 101,429 for 1996; 92,772 for 1991; 79,920 for 1986; 76,300 for 1981; 64,794 for 1976 (needed to go through the PDF version of a poorly printed document for that one). All of these can be found online if you look for Canadian census and the year. More recent figures are in a table in the French version of the article, which I'm sure you have looked at already
Xuxl (
talk)
15:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Cambridge was formed by the merger of the city of Galt with two significantly smaller places. Historical populations for Galt may be the appropriate thing to use, depending on your purpose. --
142.112.148.225 (
talk)
21:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I can't imagine any reason why you shouldn't do that, unless it reveals any personal information? You're simply supplying information about the appliance.
Shantavira|
feed me18:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)reply
July 6 Information
Winston Churchill cigars
Can you tell me which was the actual specific cigar that was named in tribute to Winston Churchill? I got a good friend's birthday coming up. Googling turns up with loads of spam.
Iloveparrots (
talk)
05:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)reply
If you're driving along Santa Teresa Boulevard, you'll see
this along the way. It seems to be a memorial in memory of Nicole Sosa, who, if I'm not mistaken, died in a car crash. Who was she, and is there any more information on what happened?
TWOrantulaTM (
enter the web)
23:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm not finding anything in Newspapers.com. If you can find a nearby library, it's possible someone there will know. But these kinds of things will occasionally turn up for people who are otherwise not well known. â
Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrotsâ
01:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Headline: "Woman killed when her SUV crashes into building in San Jose". Other than "a woman", the article does not provide further information about the victim. Â --
Lambiam07:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply