The result of the discussion was: on commons Skier Dude ( talk) 02:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Copied from [1]. No permission and claimed to be self-made. NAH ID 12:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Peripitus (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
According to the other uploads of this user i strongly dispute that this image is his own work and free. -- Martin H. ( talk)
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image clearly shows that it is professionally done and not the work of the uploader. Bvlax2005 ( talk) 13:58, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Unlikely that the uploader has the right to release this image into the public domain Stifle ( talk) 15:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
F8 by
Athaenara (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
— Bellhalla ( talk) 15:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC) replyA “derivative work” is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. (emphasis added)
Kept - Garion96 (talk) 12:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I7 by
PhilKnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
This article, which explains the origin of the Mao photos, seems to suggest that this is a September 1959 photo. And can we get some clarity on the PD-China tag? The one at commons doesn't have this caveat. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Change to a fair use tag. Garion96 (talk) 19:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Derivative work Forrester ( talk) 17:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Uploader claims the photo to be from his private collection, but it is clearly from a source they used in the Choy gar article. Ghostexorcist ( talk) 18:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Uploader claims the photo to be from his private collection, but it is clearly from a source they used in the Choy gar article. Ghostexorcist ( talk) 18:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Uploader claims the photo to be from his private collection, but it is clearly from a source they used in the Choy gar article. -- Ghostexorcist ( talk) 18:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Uploader claims the photo to be from his private collection, but it is clearly from a source they used in the Choy gar article. -- Ghostexorcist ( talk) 18:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Sherool (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image is probably a copyright violation. It is a low-resolution cover of a magazine. The author seems to claim by their username that they are an intern for that magazine and further claims that they've released the image under free licenses, but unless the unlikely claim can be substantiated, the image should be deleted as a copyvio. Nick— Contact/ Contribs 19:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I4 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Editor has a terrible history when it comes to uploading images, if this turns out not to be free it's time for a block. — Realist 2 19:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Uploader states the image is from a website, but does not give the link. Most importantly, it is incorrectly claimed under the GNU Free document license. -- Ghostexorcist ( talk) 20:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Sherool (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
As for permission, you do not need anything special from us. We consider Wikipedia a non-commercial reference site so you do not need written permission to use DSS images, but an acknowledgement is appreciated. http://gsss.stsci.edu/Acknowledgements/DSSCopyrights.htm
That's what can be read following the link to copyright notice. A non-commercial reference may mean that this image can only be available as fair use. Sdrtirs ( talk) 21:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Sherool (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
derivative work Garion96 (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: on commons Skier Dude ( talk) 02:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Copied from [1]. No permission and claimed to be self-made. NAH ID 12:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I9 by
Peripitus (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
According to the other uploads of this user i strongly dispute that this image is his own work and free. -- Martin H. ( talk)
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image clearly shows that it is professionally done and not the work of the uploader. Bvlax2005 ( talk) 13:58, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Unlikely that the uploader has the right to release this image into the public domain Stifle ( talk) 15:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
F8 by
Athaenara (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
— Bellhalla ( talk) 15:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC) replyA “derivative work” is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. (emphasis added)
Kept - Garion96 (talk) 12:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I7 by
PhilKnight (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
This article, which explains the origin of the Mao photos, seems to suggest that this is a September 1959 photo. And can we get some clarity on the PD-China tag? The one at commons doesn't have this caveat. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Change to a fair use tag. Garion96 (talk) 19:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Derivative work Forrester ( talk) 17:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Uploader claims the photo to be from his private collection, but it is clearly from a source they used in the Choy gar article. Ghostexorcist ( talk) 18:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Uploader claims the photo to be from his private collection, but it is clearly from a source they used in the Choy gar article. Ghostexorcist ( talk) 18:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Uploader claims the photo to be from his private collection, but it is clearly from a source they used in the Choy gar article. -- Ghostexorcist ( talk) 18:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Uploader claims the photo to be from his private collection, but it is clearly from a source they used in the Choy gar article. -- Ghostexorcist ( talk) 18:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Sherool (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Image is probably a copyright violation. It is a low-resolution cover of a magazine. The author seems to claim by their username that they are an intern for that magazine and further claims that they've released the image under free licenses, but unless the unlikely claim can be substantiated, the image should be deleted as a copyvio. Nick— Contact/ Contribs 19:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
I4 by
Gwen Gale (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Editor has a terrible history when it comes to uploading images, if this turns out not to be free it's time for a block. — Realist 2 19:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Garion96 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Uploader states the image is from a website, but does not give the link. Most importantly, it is incorrectly claimed under the GNU Free document license. -- Ghostexorcist ( talk) 20:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Sherool (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
As for permission, you do not need anything special from us. We consider Wikipedia a non-commercial reference site so you do not need written permission to use DSS images, but an acknowledgement is appreciated. http://gsss.stsci.edu/Acknowledgements/DSSCopyrights.htm
That's what can be read following the link to copyright notice. A non-commercial reference may mean that this image can only be available as fair use. Sdrtirs ( talk) 21:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Sherool (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
01:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
derivative work Garion96 (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply