- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. —ScottyWong— 17:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
User:Jerome501/Funny
Same reason as all other Jerome501 creations that have been nominated: inflammatory content bordering on racist. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 06:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Sundostund ( talk) 06:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 06:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete — pointless; does not seem to be a test or any satire that actually belongs here. Inflammatory and possibly a violation of
WP:NOTWEBHOST.
Duonaut (
talk |
contribs) 07:17, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- To substantiate NOTWEBHOST, can you point to pageviews or other evidence? --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 07:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- More relevant to my argument is criterion 1, in particular: "The focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration. Humorous pages that refer to Wikipedia in some way may be created in an appropriate namespace." I don't think it's a page for others to view, but is used for the host's personal amusement Duonaut ( talk | contribs) 07:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- To substantiate NOTWEBHOST, can you point to pageviews or other evidence? --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 07:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Blank, with {{ Userpage blanked}}. Do not delete. This user has too many mainspace contributions, and his WP:NOTHERE block is too recent, for his dubious userpages to be deleted. If he were always NOTHERE, then this page would be deleteable per WP:CSD#U5. Among other things, if he requests an unblock next month, and you've deleted the worst of his subpages, he will look better than he is. Another big reason is WP:DENY, do not create an MfD discussion for every stupid userpage. {{ Userpage blanked}} was created, with the appropriate nuance, for dealing with dubious userpages of once-productive users. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 07:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete nonsense/trolling page. If this was a sandbox I’d maybe say blank. Dronebogus ( talk) 08:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Blank and template as suggested by SmokeyJoe. I'd prefer to keep attribution history than delete userspace, where practical. BusterD ( talk) 12:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. —ScottyWong— 17:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
User:Jerome501/Funny
Same reason as all other Jerome501 creations that have been nominated: inflammatory content bordering on racist. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 06:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Sundostund ( talk) 06:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 06:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete — pointless; does not seem to be a test or any satire that actually belongs here. Inflammatory and possibly a violation of
WP:NOTWEBHOST.
Duonaut (
talk |
contribs) 07:17, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- To substantiate NOTWEBHOST, can you point to pageviews or other evidence? --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 07:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- More relevant to my argument is criterion 1, in particular: "The focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration. Humorous pages that refer to Wikipedia in some way may be created in an appropriate namespace." I don't think it's a page for others to view, but is used for the host's personal amusement Duonaut ( talk | contribs) 07:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- To substantiate NOTWEBHOST, can you point to pageviews or other evidence? --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 07:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Blank, with {{ Userpage blanked}}. Do not delete. This user has too many mainspace contributions, and his WP:NOTHERE block is too recent, for his dubious userpages to be deleted. If he were always NOTHERE, then this page would be deleteable per WP:CSD#U5. Among other things, if he requests an unblock next month, and you've deleted the worst of his subpages, he will look better than he is. Another big reason is WP:DENY, do not create an MfD discussion for every stupid userpage. {{ Userpage blanked}} was created, with the appropriate nuance, for dealing with dubious userpages of once-productive users. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 07:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete nonsense/trolling page. If this was a sandbox I’d maybe say blank. Dronebogus ( talk) 08:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Blank and template as suggested by SmokeyJoe. I'd prefer to keep attribution history than delete userspace, where practical. BusterD ( talk) 12:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.