The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep -
WP:NOCONFED is not a policy. It's not a guideline. It's an essay that does not enjoy the widespread support of other commonly cited essays such as
WP:CIR or
WP:NONAZIS. I would hope a more valid rationale is presented for deletion. --🌈WaltCip-(
talk)13:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Exactly –
WP:NOCONFED is not a policy, and it's not a guideline. It's an essay that is about a month old, and already endorsed by several users; currently, more users support it than
WP:NORACISTS. I hope that it will enjoy far greater support over time, and that it will be implemented with the same strictness as related essays, like
WP:NONAZIS and WP:NORACISTS. I would say that
WP:NOTWEBHOST is quite a valid rationale for deletion; I am sorry that I forgot to mention
WP:SOAPBOX and
WP:UPNOT, cited by Thebiguglyalien, that certainly apply in this case. —
Sundostundmppria(
talk /
contribs)14:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep -
WP:NOCONFED is not a policy. It's not a guideline. It's an essay that does not enjoy the widespread support of other commonly cited essays such as
WP:CIR or
WP:NONAZIS. I would hope a more valid rationale is presented for deletion. --🌈WaltCip-(
talk)13:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Exactly –
WP:NOCONFED is not a policy, and it's not a guideline. It's an essay that is about a month old, and already endorsed by several users; currently, more users support it than
WP:NORACISTS. I hope that it will enjoy far greater support over time, and that it will be implemented with the same strictness as related essays, like
WP:NONAZIS and WP:NORACISTS. I would say that
WP:NOTWEBHOST is quite a valid rationale for deletion; I am sorry that I forgot to mention
WP:SOAPBOX and
WP:UPNOT, cited by Thebiguglyalien, that certainly apply in this case. —
Sundostundmppria(
talk /
contribs)14:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.