The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Nominated on behalf of 118.149.76.35 (
talk), who posted this on
the MfD talk page: "Reason: Does not meet GNG, no RS or secondary coverage. Multiple declined submissions. It should be noted that the series is directly related to "
Battle For Dream Island", another YouTube series of the same genre that has been repeatedly submitted and declined multiple times and now page-created, for the exact same reasons.
118.149.76.35 (
talk) 00:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)"
Zerbu💬00:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment One thing to take note here in MfD is that drafts are not subject to notability guidelines (see
WP:NDRAFT); however, I noticed there are more than 10 "declined submissions" since this draft was created (7 February 2019).
AlphaBeta135talk00:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Note that the mainspace spot has been salted since 2016, and no new articles have come up to show that it is now notable.
There's 2 declined submissions in 2019, 3 in 2020, 3 in 2021, 3 in 2022, and 1 in 2023 (pre-MfD). I honestly have no idea if this is considered "tendentious" looking at the declines per year. It also appears that the draft is being edited somewhat consistently and not every 5-6 months.
AlphaBeta135talk01:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: I don’t see its resubmissions as tendenditious. The Declines imply that it could be improved to be suitable. Has not been rejected. Please read
WP:NDRAFT. These things belong in draftspace. Bringing them to MfD defeats the purpose of draftspace.
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
01:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: I was unable to find any sources which evidence this subject to be notable, but that is not a reason to delete this draft. The draft has only been declined twice, and the two declines were separated by a period of many months, so I do not see any evidence that it has been disruptive and do not believe that it poses any sort of problem.
silvia(BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)(
inquire within)06:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Not enough evidence of tendentious resubmission in the relevant time frame (there were tendentious resubmissions in the past). —
Alalch E.20:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Nominated on behalf of 118.149.76.35 (
talk), who posted this on
the MfD talk page: "Reason: Does not meet GNG, no RS or secondary coverage. Multiple declined submissions. It should be noted that the series is directly related to "
Battle For Dream Island", another YouTube series of the same genre that has been repeatedly submitted and declined multiple times and now page-created, for the exact same reasons.
118.149.76.35 (
talk) 00:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)"
Zerbu💬00:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment One thing to take note here in MfD is that drafts are not subject to notability guidelines (see
WP:NDRAFT); however, I noticed there are more than 10 "declined submissions" since this draft was created (7 February 2019).
AlphaBeta135talk00:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Note that the mainspace spot has been salted since 2016, and no new articles have come up to show that it is now notable.
There's 2 declined submissions in 2019, 3 in 2020, 3 in 2021, 3 in 2022, and 1 in 2023 (pre-MfD). I honestly have no idea if this is considered "tendentious" looking at the declines per year. It also appears that the draft is being edited somewhat consistently and not every 5-6 months.
AlphaBeta135talk01:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: I don’t see its resubmissions as tendenditious. The Declines imply that it could be improved to be suitable. Has not been rejected. Please read
WP:NDRAFT. These things belong in draftspace. Bringing them to MfD defeats the purpose of draftspace.
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
01:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: I was unable to find any sources which evidence this subject to be notable, but that is not a reason to delete this draft. The draft has only been declined twice, and the two declines were separated by a period of many months, so I do not see any evidence that it has been disruptive and do not believe that it poses any sort of problem.
silvia(BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)(
inquire within)06:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Not enough evidence of tendentious resubmission in the relevant time frame (there were tendentious resubmissions in the past). —
Alalch E.20:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.