The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: It's been suggested that the files may be PD in their country of origin, but it seems folks are not 100% certain about this. There is also weak consensus that 14 images is excessive, but it's not clear from the discussion which images should be removed. Given that this has been open for several months and no new comments have added since October, I'm closing this as no consensus/not actionable as-is, with no prejudice to individual renomination of the files below - FASTILY 05:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
References
Martin Gerlach Jr. (1879-1944)
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Consensus is clear, use of this image is not compliant with WP:NFCC, specifically WP:NFCC#1/ WP:NFCC#8. However, no prejudice to restoration if the article in question is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth - FASTILY 05:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
she was the most successful US athlete in the 1996 games. A visual representation of that is borderline decorative non-free use to begin with, but this isn't even a picture showing Miller with or wearing all of the medals she won. There have been quite a number of multiple gold medal winners over years at various Olympic games and such achievements can be more than sufficiently understood by readers of such articles without actually seeing images of the medals they won. So, the reader doesn't need to see a non-free picture of a gold medal to understand that Miller won any gold medals in 1996; moreover, there's nothing special about the design of this medal that's really contextually tied to Miller, at least nothing currently in Shannon Miller#1996 or anywhere else in the article, that would be hard for the reader to understand if they didn't see this particular image. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:06, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep. If anyone has an official photo/screenshot, feel free to overwrite this image - FASTILY 04:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
The file is a LucasFilm image of Star Wars Stormtrooper. As actors/cosplayers playing Stormtroopers wear the same indistinguishable costume/armour (apart from obvious derivative cosplays), it seems that cosplay images can perfectly replace the fair-use file. Given that we have ample cosplay images of Stormtroopers on Commons, it is doubted that whether WP:NFCC#1 is violated. The file is therefore nominated to be deleted. 廣九直通車 ( talk) 05:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. MBisanz talk 19:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Almost certain these would all fall under the license of non-free symbol as copyrighted designs of the Pakistan Army and that they have just been mis-licensed. I however came across this file on Commons which threw some doubt into my mind. If the decision is that they are non-free then they should be removed from the List of serving generals of the Pakistan Army and Pakistan Army articles. The few symbols that are used in the infobox of the specific military unit should be re-licensed and kept (namely File:Regiment of Artillery logo.png, File:Punjab Regiment logo.png, File:Pakistan Armoured Corps logo.png, File:Corps of AAD logo.png, File:Corps of Engineers logo.png, File:Army Ordinance Core logo.png and File:EME Core logo.png). Salavat ( talk) 14:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Coolperson177 ( t| c) 03:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
The US release lacks a picture sleeve, yet the US market share was larger than the rest of the world at the time. Yeah well, I'm summarizing what the uploader (the same who uploaded this image and the other image I previously nominated) said at the other FFD discussion. To put it another way, the American music industry has been very important. Out of huge single releases at the time, Americans received the single release using just a generic sleeve. The US release hasn't been distributed with a picture on the front cover.
I don't think a picture sleeve of an overseas release of " Love Train" by the O'Jays is necessary. The free image exists ( File:Love train by o'jays US vinyl.png) and is concurrently used there. Furthermore, the song can be already well understood without a picture sleeve identifying singers (or band) who recorded the song or a song title. The (overseas, or German/Dutch) picture sleeve may fail WP:NFCC#8 and/or WP:NFCC#1. Moreover, the picture sleeve wasn't well identified without a caption. Whether enjoyment of the article or the song may be affected by deletion of the sleeve isn't part of NFCC. Understanding the song (or the single release) with or without the image is part of the NFCC.
Well, it's not like " I Need You (Eric Carmen song)", whose non-free lead image was kept by default. Rather I hope to compare this with " Ain't Nothing Like the Real Thing". This isn't the case of whether the song has more than one version. Instead, this is more about identifiable releases (of the same version of the song). George Ho ( talk) 18:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#1 Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. MBisanz talk 19:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Non-free music sample claimed to be used for the purpose: "specifically discusses the themes Gojira evokes in its album From Mars to Sirius" but no such discussion about this song exists in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. At 33 seconds, also fails WP:NFCC#3b. Whpq ( talk) 01:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 November 28. MBisanz talk 19:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep per Commons discussion. ✗ plicit 14:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Etudes-Tableaux, Op. 39, No. 5.ogg. Stefan2 ( talk) 11:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 November 28. MBisanz talk 19:01, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned, low quality, superseded by File:BrazosValleyMap.jpg. ✗ plicit 11:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP India, freedom of panorama does not extend to 2D works. Photos of this plaque cannot be released under a free license. ✗ plicit 12:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, the source link is dead and the file is not used anywhere onwiki, no obvious use with current WPTC image standards. Sennecaster ( Chat) 13:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to {{
PD-US-1923-abroad}}
-
FASTILY
22:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Why is this tagged as non-free instead of {{ PD-US-1923-abroad|2030}}? This was previously listed at FFD by Marchjuly ( talk · contribs) in February this year, but the discussion was only about the copyright status in the source country whereas Wikipedia looks at the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure this qualifies for fair use. As far as I'm aware, the plaque still exists, so someone could still go there and create a free replacement of this photo. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
The image is not on the linked web page. [3] No other source provided by the uploader. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Lacks explanation of what the colours mean. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
See c:COM:TOYS. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
See c:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Seems unrelated to the image listed as source. Unclear where the photo of the euro coin comes from. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
It says that the Image creator has given permission to use on the Wikipedia website.
This sounds more like {{
db-f3}} than public domain.
Stefan2 (
talk)
19:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:38, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused crop. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
See c:COM:TOYS. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused textlogo. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Sourced to he:קובץ:Katzsh.jpg which is listed as non-free. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Overwritten file: two in one. Both are missing evidence of permission. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
The source claims to be cc-by-nc-sa, not cc-by-sa. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Although it says author donates
, it doesn't say who the author is.
Stefan2 (
talk)
20:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused crop of File:Donald Trump official portrait.jpg. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Replaced by File:Administrative map of Romania, 1950-1952.svg. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Overwritten file: two in one.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Garavito-1999.png. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Possibly related to Draft:Salt Network which was deleted. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Source ru:Файл:Егошин, Тихон Фёдорович.jpg is listed as non-free. The file information page references obsolete law. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
The watermark suggests it comes from a TV programme or something. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, unsourced. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete, unverifiable source. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Converted to non-free - FASTILY 22:24, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
See c:COM:FOP United States. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, all data is citation needed. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:50, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete source. Impossible to verify public domain claim. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
potential copyright infringement, non-free image for non-encyclopedic purpose HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 22:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Music by Ra Kuk (라국/羅菊), no evidence of permission. Sound recording and performance of unknown provenance. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
1968年、リ・ボムス(리범수)が作詞し、ラ・グク(라국)が作曲した。). I can't find any information about the composer other than his name. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No prejudice to restoration if someone is able to create a valid fair use claim for it. - FASTILY 22:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Conflicting copyright information. Both cc-by and cc-by-nc-nd are mentioned on the file information page. No evidence of permission for either licence. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Overwritten file: two in one. Unused userphotos, no foreeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: It's been suggested that the files may be PD in their country of origin, but it seems folks are not 100% certain about this. There is also weak consensus that 14 images is excessive, but it's not clear from the discussion which images should be removed. Given that this has been open for several months and no new comments have added since October, I'm closing this as no consensus/not actionable as-is, with no prejudice to individual renomination of the files below - FASTILY 05:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
References
Martin Gerlach Jr. (1879-1944)
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Consensus is clear, use of this image is not compliant with WP:NFCC, specifically WP:NFCC#1/ WP:NFCC#8. However, no prejudice to restoration if the article in question is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth - FASTILY 05:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
she was the most successful US athlete in the 1996 games. A visual representation of that is borderline decorative non-free use to begin with, but this isn't even a picture showing Miller with or wearing all of the medals she won. There have been quite a number of multiple gold medal winners over years at various Olympic games and such achievements can be more than sufficiently understood by readers of such articles without actually seeing images of the medals they won. So, the reader doesn't need to see a non-free picture of a gold medal to understand that Miller won any gold medals in 1996; moreover, there's nothing special about the design of this medal that's really contextually tied to Miller, at least nothing currently in Shannon Miller#1996 or anywhere else in the article, that would be hard for the reader to understand if they didn't see this particular image. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:06, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Keep. If anyone has an official photo/screenshot, feel free to overwrite this image - FASTILY 04:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
The file is a LucasFilm image of Star Wars Stormtrooper. As actors/cosplayers playing Stormtroopers wear the same indistinguishable costume/armour (apart from obvious derivative cosplays), it seems that cosplay images can perfectly replace the fair-use file. Given that we have ample cosplay images of Stormtroopers on Commons, it is doubted that whether WP:NFCC#1 is violated. The file is therefore nominated to be deleted. 廣九直通車 ( talk) 05:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. MBisanz talk 19:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Almost certain these would all fall under the license of non-free symbol as copyrighted designs of the Pakistan Army and that they have just been mis-licensed. I however came across this file on Commons which threw some doubt into my mind. If the decision is that they are non-free then they should be removed from the List of serving generals of the Pakistan Army and Pakistan Army articles. The few symbols that are used in the infobox of the specific military unit should be re-licensed and kept (namely File:Regiment of Artillery logo.png, File:Punjab Regiment logo.png, File:Pakistan Armoured Corps logo.png, File:Corps of AAD logo.png, File:Corps of Engineers logo.png, File:Army Ordinance Core logo.png and File:EME Core logo.png). Salavat ( talk) 14:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Coolperson177 ( t| c) 03:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
The US release lacks a picture sleeve, yet the US market share was larger than the rest of the world at the time. Yeah well, I'm summarizing what the uploader (the same who uploaded this image and the other image I previously nominated) said at the other FFD discussion. To put it another way, the American music industry has been very important. Out of huge single releases at the time, Americans received the single release using just a generic sleeve. The US release hasn't been distributed with a picture on the front cover.
I don't think a picture sleeve of an overseas release of " Love Train" by the O'Jays is necessary. The free image exists ( File:Love train by o'jays US vinyl.png) and is concurrently used there. Furthermore, the song can be already well understood without a picture sleeve identifying singers (or band) who recorded the song or a song title. The (overseas, or German/Dutch) picture sleeve may fail WP:NFCC#8 and/or WP:NFCC#1. Moreover, the picture sleeve wasn't well identified without a caption. Whether enjoyment of the article or the song may be affected by deletion of the sleeve isn't part of NFCC. Understanding the song (or the single release) with or without the image is part of the NFCC.
Well, it's not like " I Need You (Eric Carmen song)", whose non-free lead image was kept by default. Rather I hope to compare this with " Ain't Nothing Like the Real Thing". This isn't the case of whether the song has more than one version. Instead, this is more about identifiable releases (of the same version of the song). George Ho ( talk) 18:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#1 Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. MBisanz talk 19:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Non-free music sample claimed to be used for the purpose: "specifically discusses the themes Gojira evokes in its album From Mars to Sirius" but no such discussion about this song exists in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. At 33 seconds, also fails WP:NFCC#3b. Whpq ( talk) 01:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 November 28. MBisanz talk 19:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep per Commons discussion. ✗ plicit 14:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Etudes-Tableaux, Op. 39, No. 5.ogg. Stefan2 ( talk) 11:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 November 28. MBisanz talk 19:01, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned, low quality, superseded by File:BrazosValleyMap.jpg. ✗ plicit 11:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP India, freedom of panorama does not extend to 2D works. Photos of this plaque cannot be released under a free license. ✗ plicit 12:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, the source link is dead and the file is not used anywhere onwiki, no obvious use with current WPTC image standards. Sennecaster ( Chat) 13:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Convert to {{
PD-US-1923-abroad}}
-
FASTILY
22:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Why is this tagged as non-free instead of {{ PD-US-1923-abroad|2030}}? This was previously listed at FFD by Marchjuly ( talk · contribs) in February this year, but the discussion was only about the copyright status in the source country whereas Wikipedia looks at the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure this qualifies for fair use. As far as I'm aware, the plaque still exists, so someone could still go there and create a free replacement of this photo. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
The image is not on the linked web page. [3] No other source provided by the uploader. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Lacks explanation of what the colours mean. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
See c:COM:TOYS. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
See c:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Seems unrelated to the image listed as source. Unclear where the photo of the euro coin comes from. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
It says that the Image creator has given permission to use on the Wikipedia website.
This sounds more like {{
db-f3}} than public domain.
Stefan2 (
talk)
19:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:38, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused crop. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
See c:COM:TOYS. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused textlogo. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Sourced to he:קובץ:Katzsh.jpg which is listed as non-free. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Overwritten file: two in one. Both are missing evidence of permission. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
The source claims to be cc-by-nc-sa, not cc-by-sa. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Although it says author donates
, it doesn't say who the author is.
Stefan2 (
talk)
20:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused crop of File:Donald Trump official portrait.jpg. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Replaced by File:Administrative map of Romania, 1950-1952.svg. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Overwritten file: two in one.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Garavito-1999.png. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable use. Possibly related to Draft:Salt Network which was deleted. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Source ru:Файл:Егошин, Тихон Фёдорович.jpg is listed as non-free. The file information page references obsolete law. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
The watermark suggests it comes from a TV programme or something. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, unsourced. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete, unverifiable source. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Converted to non-free - FASTILY 22:24, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
See c:COM:FOP United States. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused, all data is citation needed. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:50, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete source. Impossible to verify public domain claim. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
potential copyright infringement, non-free image for non-encyclopedic purpose HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 22:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Music by Ra Kuk (라국/羅菊), no evidence of permission. Sound recording and performance of unknown provenance. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:20, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
1968年、リ・ボムス(리범수)が作詞し、ラ・グク(라국)が作曲した。). I can't find any information about the composer other than his name. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete. No prejudice to restoration if someone is able to create a valid fair use claim for it. - FASTILY 22:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Conflicting copyright information. Both cc-by and cc-by-nc-nd are mentioned on the file information page. No evidence of permission for either licence. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Overwritten file: two in one. Unused userphotos, no foreeable use. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)