< January 15 | January 17 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was:
That's merely your opinion.-- 71.232.156.181 ( talk) 05:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Image kept. Nomination was WP:IDONTLIKEIT. - Nv8200p talk 03:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #1. Use of the copyrighted logos could be replaced with text. - Nv8200p talk 19:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. I have strong doubts that the uploader was affiliated with the website this image was taken from. When the image was first upload, the summary was ". . . used with permission." The summary did not specify GFDL and no evidence of permission of any type was presented. - Nv8200p talk 19:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. There image is not significant to the article. There is no commentary on the stamp or the stamp's artwork in the article. - Nv8200p talk 22:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. Image is not significant in a list. - Nv8200p talk 22:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. Image is not significant in a list. - Nv8200p talk 22:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "In 1994, the United States Postal Service introduced a Billie Holiday postage stamp" is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. - Nv8200p talk 23:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "In 2003, the United States Postal Service honored him with a postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Nv8200p talk 22:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "1995: The United States Postal Service issued a stamp in his honor." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 18:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. There is no text in the article about the stamp. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 18:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On September 11, 1996 the U.S. Post Office issued a Count Basie 32 cents postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 18:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "In 1993, the U.S. Post Office issues a Dinah Washington 29 cent commemorative postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 01:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On January 10 2007, the United States Postal Service announced that Fitzgerald would be honored with her own 39 cent postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 14:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted Fails WP:NFCC #8. Neither of the two articles ( Cultural depictions of Elvis Presley and Return to Sender (song)) this image was in when I reviewed this IFD discussed the visual appearance of the stamp or the story behind the selection of the image, making the image insignificant to the articles. - Nv8200p talk 14:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. " 1995: The United States Postal Service issued a stamp in his honor." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 14:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "Carver appeared on U.S. commemorative stamps in 1948 and 1998" is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 14:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image kept. My interpretation is the nomination was withdrawn when the image was removed from the Hanukkah article. The other usage of the image is in philately related articles, which is generally considered appropriate fair use for copyrighted stamp images. - Nv8200p talk 19:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On November 7, 1988, the United States Postal Service released the H. H. 'Hap' Arnold 65 cent stamp bearing the likeness of Arnold." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 18:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted Fails WP:NFCC #8. The image is not necessary to understand the text. - Nv8200p talk 15:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On September 17, 1994 the U.S. Post Office issues a Howlin' Wolf 29 cents commemorative postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 04:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On February 1, 2002, The United States Postal Service added the image of Langston Hughes to its Black Heritage series of postage stamps to commemorate both the centennial of Hughes' birth and the 25th anniversary of the Black Heritage series." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 04:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. There is no text in the article about the stamp. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 01:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "In 1996, the U.S. Post Office issued a John Henry 32 cent postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 04:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On May 4, 2005 the United States Postal Service issued the American Scientists commemorative postage stamp series, a set of four 37-cent self-adhesive stamps in several configurations. The scientists depicted were John von Neumann, Barbara McClintock, Josiah Willard Gibbs, and Richard Feynman." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 16:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "Forty-four years after Jolson's death, the United States Postal Service acknowledged his contribution by issuing a postage stamp in his honor. The 29-cent stamp was unveiled by Erle Jolson Krasna, Jolson's fourth wife, at a ceremony in New York City's Lincoln Center on September 1, 1994. This stamp was one of a series honoring popular American singers, which included Bing Crosby, Nat King Cole, Ethel Merman, and Ethel Waters." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 17:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Although a derivative work, it is a donated piece of artwork belonging to the city of Yonkers. Deleting the image for this reason, would be like removing all images of the Statue of Liberty for "derivative" reasons. Ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.122.66.225 ( talk) 18:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC) reply
< January 15 | January 17 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was:
That's merely your opinion.-- 71.232.156.181 ( talk) 05:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Image kept. Nomination was WP:IDONTLIKEIT. - Nv8200p talk 03:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #1. Use of the copyrighted logos could be replaced with text. - Nv8200p talk 19:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. I have strong doubts that the uploader was affiliated with the website this image was taken from. When the image was first upload, the summary was ". . . used with permission." The summary did not specify GFDL and no evidence of permission of any type was presented. - Nv8200p talk 19:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. There image is not significant to the article. There is no commentary on the stamp or the stamp's artwork in the article. - Nv8200p talk 22:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. Image is not significant in a list. - Nv8200p talk 22:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. Image is not significant in a list. - Nv8200p talk 22:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "In 1994, the United States Postal Service introduced a Billie Holiday postage stamp" is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. - Nv8200p talk 23:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "In 2003, the United States Postal Service honored him with a postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Nv8200p talk 22:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "1995: The United States Postal Service issued a stamp in his honor." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 18:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. There is no text in the article about the stamp. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 18:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On September 11, 1996 the U.S. Post Office issued a Count Basie 32 cents postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 18:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "In 1993, the U.S. Post Office issues a Dinah Washington 29 cent commemorative postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 01:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On January 10 2007, the United States Postal Service announced that Fitzgerald would be honored with her own 39 cent postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 14:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted Fails WP:NFCC #8. Neither of the two articles ( Cultural depictions of Elvis Presley and Return to Sender (song)) this image was in when I reviewed this IFD discussed the visual appearance of the stamp or the story behind the selection of the image, making the image insignificant to the articles. - Nv8200p talk 14:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. " 1995: The United States Postal Service issued a stamp in his honor." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 14:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "Carver appeared on U.S. commemorative stamps in 1948 and 1998" is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 14:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image kept. My interpretation is the nomination was withdrawn when the image was removed from the Hanukkah article. The other usage of the image is in philately related articles, which is generally considered appropriate fair use for copyrighted stamp images. - Nv8200p talk 19:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On November 7, 1988, the United States Postal Service released the H. H. 'Hap' Arnold 65 cent stamp bearing the likeness of Arnold." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 18:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted Fails WP:NFCC #8. The image is not necessary to understand the text. - Nv8200p talk 15:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On September 17, 1994 the U.S. Post Office issues a Howlin' Wolf 29 cents commemorative postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 04:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On February 1, 2002, The United States Postal Service added the image of Langston Hughes to its Black Heritage series of postage stamps to commemorate both the centennial of Hughes' birth and the 25th anniversary of the Black Heritage series." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 04:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. There is no text in the article about the stamp. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 01:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "In 1996, the U.S. Post Office issued a John Henry 32 cent postage stamp." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 04:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "On May 4, 2005 the United States Postal Service issued the American Scientists commemorative postage stamp series, a set of four 37-cent self-adhesive stamps in several configurations. The scientists depicted were John von Neumann, Barbara McClintock, Josiah Willard Gibbs, and Richard Feynman." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 16:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was:
Image deleted. Fails WP:NFCC #8. "Forty-four years after Jolson's death, the United States Postal Service acknowledged his contribution by issuing a postage stamp in his honor. The 29-cent stamp was unveiled by Erle Jolson Krasna, Jolson's fourth wife, at a ceremony in New York City's Lincoln Center on September 1, 1994. This stamp was one of a series honoring popular American singers, which included Bing Crosby, Nat King Cole, Ethel Merman, and Ethel Waters." is understandable text without the image and is not enough commentary to warrant use of the image. Also, Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images item 3. Copyrighted stamp images can be used for identification of the stamp (For example Five cents John Kennedy), not its subject. - Nv8200p talk 17:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Although a derivative work, it is a donated piece of artwork belonging to the city of Yonkers. Deleting the image for this reason, would be like removing all images of the Statue of Liberty for "derivative" reasons. Ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.122.66.225 ( talk) 18:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC) reply