Thanks for the kind words. I found the article when I was going through the ICE links pointing them at the appropriate destination pages since ICE is now a disambiguation page. slambo 18:01, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I thought it best to leave you a message about the edits on the above article to explain why they have been removed. If you check on the article there are a number of messages stating that firms should only be added if a verifiable source is also provided, and that any firms added without a source would be removed. Unfortunately no sources were provided for any of the firms you listed and so they have had to be removed. Please note that if any of the groups you listed are Ultras then they should be listed on the Ultras article. Thanks and best wishes. ♦Tangerines♦· Talk 17:06, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, this English wikipedia is getting worse on a daily basis. Migdejong 09:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I saw that you prodded the article as "Horrible language", which isn't really a valid reason to delete. Do you not think that it might have been better to tag it with something from Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup#Plain old editing? I knew the article was there as I had already made some edits to it. However, because the editor's first language is not English I didn't want to keep editing it at the same time as him. I felt that to do so would possibly discourage a valid editor if I was correcting his English all the time. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:29, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- You are right. Thanks for your work. I was just a bit shocked to see my pictures in such a context. But, thanks! Migdejong 16:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Yes, to the best of my knowledge, Wikipedia's software changed to allow the lowercase "i" in iPod from IPod. Hucz 21:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- It's the lowercase template that does the trick. Migdejong 01:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:G-14.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Qwghlm ( talk) 01:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
What you did is propose the article for deletion. That is a separate deletion process, somewhere between the regular deletion discussions and speedy deletion. I have added the correct templates to Vereniging Basisinkomen and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vereniging Basisinkomen. A ecis Brievenbus 13:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, Bedankt!
Thanks for uploading Image:Sweet 75.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn ( talk) 20:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. |
Hi. When you recently edited Leutes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dike ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Joris Mathijsen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ajax and Primera División ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 04:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Migdejong. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words. I found the article when I was going through the ICE links pointing them at the appropriate destination pages since ICE is now a disambiguation page. slambo 18:01, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I thought it best to leave you a message about the edits on the above article to explain why they have been removed. If you check on the article there are a number of messages stating that firms should only be added if a verifiable source is also provided, and that any firms added without a source would be removed. Unfortunately no sources were provided for any of the firms you listed and so they have had to be removed. Please note that if any of the groups you listed are Ultras then they should be listed on the Ultras article. Thanks and best wishes. ♦Tangerines♦· Talk 17:06, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, this English wikipedia is getting worse on a daily basis. Migdejong 09:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I saw that you prodded the article as "Horrible language", which isn't really a valid reason to delete. Do you not think that it might have been better to tag it with something from Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup#Plain old editing? I knew the article was there as I had already made some edits to it. However, because the editor's first language is not English I didn't want to keep editing it at the same time as him. I felt that to do so would possibly discourage a valid editor if I was correcting his English all the time. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:29, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- You are right. Thanks for your work. I was just a bit shocked to see my pictures in such a context. But, thanks! Migdejong 16:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Yes, to the best of my knowledge, Wikipedia's software changed to allow the lowercase "i" in iPod from IPod. Hucz 21:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- It's the lowercase template that does the trick. Migdejong 01:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:G-14.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Qwghlm ( talk) 01:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
What you did is propose the article for deletion. That is a separate deletion process, somewhere between the regular deletion discussions and speedy deletion. I have added the correct templates to Vereniging Basisinkomen and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vereniging Basisinkomen. A ecis Brievenbus 13:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, Bedankt!
Thanks for uploading Image:Sweet 75.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn ( talk) 20:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. |
Hi. When you recently edited Leutes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dike ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Joris Mathijsen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ajax and Primera División ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 04:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Migdejong. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)