- Reason
- A good quality photo of the subject showing the plumage from side on which is good for identification purposes. Taken at night and a wild bird - best image on wiki of the species.
- Articles this image appears in
- Creator
- Benjamint 11:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support as nominator -- Benjamint 11:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Crop in original version is aesthetic, but should be fine. Oppose additionally cropped version (edit 1) - does not improve thumbnail zoom all that much, and takes away the aesthetics. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 19:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous. Do not support crop at all! Ick!-- Blechnic ( talk) 04:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Beautifully lit, wonderful definition and great composition, excellent in every respect Capital photographer ( talk) 08:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomfriedel ( talk) 03:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Excellent detail. — BRIAN 0918 • 2008-07-14 13:51Z
- Support good detail, crop the right side of the picture so bird is in the middle TALKIN PIE EATER REVIEW ME 16:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support- very detailed and well taken, should be a featured pic.-- S R X 23:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support with crop on right side. Becky Sayles ( talk) 00:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support with preference for original. Nice details. Muhammad (talk) 17:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support crop Dwayne Reed ( talk) 18:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak support crop I actually find the head on flash lighting leaves the image lifeless and and flat. I do not understand the opposers to the crop, this is WP, not commons, the big black space to the right adds nothing to the enc value and here its regular for people to want images cropped to subject rather than trying to be artsy with composition. Mfield ( talk) 00:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support per mfield. Greener Cactus ( talk) 20:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Tawny frogmouth wholebody444.jpg MER-C 04:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Reason
- A good quality photo of the subject showing the plumage from side on which is good for identification purposes. Taken at night and a wild bird - best image on wiki of the species.
- Articles this image appears in
- Creator
- Benjamint 11:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support as nominator -- Benjamint 11:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Crop in original version is aesthetic, but should be fine. Oppose additionally cropped version (edit 1) - does not improve thumbnail zoom all that much, and takes away the aesthetics. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 19:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous. Do not support crop at all! Ick!-- Blechnic ( talk) 04:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Beautifully lit, wonderful definition and great composition, excellent in every respect Capital photographer ( talk) 08:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomfriedel ( talk) 03:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support Excellent detail. — BRIAN 0918 • 2008-07-14 13:51Z
- Support good detail, crop the right side of the picture so bird is in the middle TALKIN PIE EATER REVIEW ME 16:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support- very detailed and well taken, should be a featured pic.-- S R X 23:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support with crop on right side. Becky Sayles ( talk) 00:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support with preference for original. Nice details. Muhammad (talk) 17:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support crop Dwayne Reed ( talk) 18:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak support crop I actually find the head on flash lighting leaves the image lifeless and and flat. I do not understand the opposers to the crop, this is WP, not commons, the big black space to the right adds nothing to the enc value and here its regular for people to want images cropped to subject rather than trying to be artsy with composition. Mfield ( talk) 00:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support per mfield. Greener Cactus ( talk) 20:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Tawny frogmouth wholebody444.jpg MER-C 04:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)