(Redirected from
Wikipedia:Editor review/ilikepie2221)
ilikepie2221
ilikepie2221 ( talk · contribs) I'm an editor here at wikipedia. Even though I spend more time reading the articles then editing it usually, but I do edit more then 10 edits a week. I recently just got off a Wikibreak, so I'd like to be reviewed. DA PIE EATER ( talk) 01:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Reviews
- First review, yay! Well, I've seen just a couple of your edits, and they look good. However, if you are looking towards adminship, than I don't think you are even close to ready. 500 edits is okay for a three month user, but i know someone with 5000 in just 5. So, keep up the good work! :) -- Meldshal42 (talk) 13:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hello. I came here having seen the link in your signature: the yellow in the signature doesn't show up very well for me and is slightly distracting on talk pages. I'd guess the same goes for other users, so you might want to consider changing it for readability. Best, Olaf Davis | Talk 16:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Agree with Olaf...wikitext appears as 3 lines of signature on my comp. See ya around.
smooth0707 (
talk) 20:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- 3 lines??? Oh wow, how big did you set your font as? For me, its only 1 line.
TALKIN
PIE EATER
REVIEW ME 14:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- He meant 3 lines while in the editing box. I also find your signature in block letters very unappealing.
OhanaUnited
Talk page 05:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well, even though I was hoping for editing type advice and not signatory advice, I changed it. It's only two lines now, and looks way better. Pie is good (Apple is the best) 21:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- He meant 3 lines while in the editing box. I also find your signature in block letters very unappealing.
OhanaUnited
Talk page 05:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- 3 lines??? Oh wow, how big did you set your font as? For me, its only 1 line.
TALKIN
PIE EATER
REVIEW ME 14:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- My creation and small expansion of GMF AeroAsia is probably my best edit yet. I'm pretty new to Wikipedia, so I was really impressed about what work I did with the article. I also created the article Big O (Ferris Wheel) and Adlair Aviation. I feel better about my work in Adlair Aviation, because its a tiny airline in the Canadian Artic, but for Big O, I think I could've done more.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Yes. In the article Athens, under the section Pollution and environment, I had an arguement with El Greco about the waste management problem included. He said that its not significant information since it was over a year ago, but its clearly significant as many online news websites stated this news. I approached him on his talk page, and he was happy to add the information again.
(Redirected from
Wikipedia:Editor review/ilikepie2221)
ilikepie2221
ilikepie2221 ( talk · contribs) I'm an editor here at wikipedia. Even though I spend more time reading the articles then editing it usually, but I do edit more then 10 edits a week. I recently just got off a Wikibreak, so I'd like to be reviewed. DA PIE EATER ( talk) 01:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Reviews
- First review, yay! Well, I've seen just a couple of your edits, and they look good. However, if you are looking towards adminship, than I don't think you are even close to ready. 500 edits is okay for a three month user, but i know someone with 5000 in just 5. So, keep up the good work! :) -- Meldshal42 (talk) 13:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hello. I came here having seen the link in your signature: the yellow in the signature doesn't show up very well for me and is slightly distracting on talk pages. I'd guess the same goes for other users, so you might want to consider changing it for readability. Best, Olaf Davis | Talk 16:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Agree with Olaf...wikitext appears as 3 lines of signature on my comp. See ya around.
smooth0707 (
talk) 20:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- 3 lines??? Oh wow, how big did you set your font as? For me, its only 1 line.
TALKIN
PIE EATER
REVIEW ME 14:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- He meant 3 lines while in the editing box. I also find your signature in block letters very unappealing.
OhanaUnited
Talk page 05:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well, even though I was hoping for editing type advice and not signatory advice, I changed it. It's only two lines now, and looks way better. Pie is good (Apple is the best) 21:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- He meant 3 lines while in the editing box. I also find your signature in block letters very unappealing.
OhanaUnited
Talk page 05:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- 3 lines??? Oh wow, how big did you set your font as? For me, its only 1 line.
TALKIN
PIE EATER
REVIEW ME 14:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- My creation and small expansion of GMF AeroAsia is probably my best edit yet. I'm pretty new to Wikipedia, so I was really impressed about what work I did with the article. I also created the article Big O (Ferris Wheel) and Adlair Aviation. I feel better about my work in Adlair Aviation, because its a tiny airline in the Canadian Artic, but for Big O, I think I could've done more.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Yes. In the article Athens, under the section Pollution and environment, I had an arguement with El Greco about the waste management problem included. He said that its not significant information since it was over a year ago, but its clearly significant as many online news websites stated this news. I approached him on his talk page, and he was happy to add the information again.