The list was removed by Cowlibob via FACBot ( talk) 00:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC) [1]. reply
This list was promoted in 2005. It contains hardly any inline citations, which is a very significant defect. The citation style is not clear: explanatory footnotes and citation footnotes are mixed in the "Notes" section and there are four items in the "References" section (none of these four are properly formatted references). Except for two obituaries, all of the references are in Spanish. Of course, foreign language references are permissible, but that limits potential editors to add inline citations to those who understand Spanish. AHeneen ( talk) 03:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Closing- no work done, and consensus pretty clearly not going to change anytime soon. -- Pres N 15:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 02:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC) [2]. reply
There are some very big problems with many of the "tallest buildings lists" that are currently featured. I think List of tallest buildings in Austin specifically no longer meets featured list criteria. Specifically, two whole sections (under construction and approved) are completely unreferenced. There is an outdated tag from 3 years ago not addressed. There are many dead links, very messy citations, images have no alt-texts, and many of the buildings in the main list are unsourced. It has been neglected for years now and it shows. This would take a lot of work to bring it up to standards again sadly... Delist Mattximus ( talk) 00:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by Cowlibob via FACBot ( talk) 00:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC) [1]. reply
This list was promoted in 2005. It contains hardly any inline citations, which is a very significant defect. The citation style is not clear: explanatory footnotes and citation footnotes are mixed in the "Notes" section and there are four items in the "References" section (none of these four are properly formatted references). Except for two obituaries, all of the references are in Spanish. Of course, foreign language references are permissible, but that limits potential editors to add inline citations to those who understand Spanish. AHeneen ( talk) 03:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Closing- no work done, and consensus pretty clearly not going to change anytime soon. -- Pres N 15:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 02:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC) [2]. reply
There are some very big problems with many of the "tallest buildings lists" that are currently featured. I think List of tallest buildings in Austin specifically no longer meets featured list criteria. Specifically, two whole sections (under construction and approved) are completely unreferenced. There is an outdated tag from 3 years ago not addressed. There are many dead links, very messy citations, images have no alt-texts, and many of the buildings in the main list are unsourced. It has been neglected for years now and it shows. This would take a lot of work to bring it up to standards again sadly... Delist Mattximus ( talk) 00:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC) reply