The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC) [1]. reply
Has 9 inline citations, of which only two are actually sources, the rest are notes. The formatting in the age section needs some serious reworking, and most of the unofficial presidents need further explanation as to the circumstances that led them to get that classification. Top contributor not notified, as they were checkuser-blocked years ago. Hog Farm Talk 15:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC) reply
I have boldly removed list of vice presidents by (1) age (2) longest/oldest living (3) timeline, as all of these lists are indiscriminate collection of trivial lists. Anyone who disagrees is free to apply WP:BRD. As for the main list, I have reformatted the list, and have added various sources for all the vice presidents. If the structure and sourcing appears fine, I can do the same for "Unofficial vice presidents". The work remaining to do:
– Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 18:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Most of the reformatting things have been done. ALT text is added. The only issues left are:
– Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 14:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC) reply
At this point, the nomination has been open for 2.5 months, with substantial work done and no votes to delist. As such, I'm going to close this nomination as kept; if anyone feels it still does not meet the criteria, it can be renominated. -- Pres N 23:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC) [5]. reply
This 2007 promotion is not anywhere close to the standards that would be expected today. The location notes material is riddled with original research, and there may be other issues with problematic content, as well (I've never seen the show). Hog Farm Talk 05:57, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Since discussion doesn't seem to be going anywhere, I would move to delist. If it doesn't meet the criteria for a standalone list, it fails FLCR #3C. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 17:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC) reply
After 3 months, consensus to delist and no work done. Delisting. -- Pres N 23:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC) [1]. reply
Has 9 inline citations, of which only two are actually sources, the rest are notes. The formatting in the age section needs some serious reworking, and most of the unofficial presidents need further explanation as to the circumstances that led them to get that classification. Top contributor not notified, as they were checkuser-blocked years ago. Hog Farm Talk 15:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC) reply
I have boldly removed list of vice presidents by (1) age (2) longest/oldest living (3) timeline, as all of these lists are indiscriminate collection of trivial lists. Anyone who disagrees is free to apply WP:BRD. As for the main list, I have reformatted the list, and have added various sources for all the vice presidents. If the structure and sourcing appears fine, I can do the same for "Unofficial vice presidents". The work remaining to do:
– Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 18:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply
Most of the reformatting things have been done. ALT text is added. The only issues left are:
– Kavyansh.Singh ( talk) 14:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC) reply
At this point, the nomination has been open for 2.5 months, with substantial work done and no votes to delist. As such, I'm going to close this nomination as kept; if anyone feels it still does not meet the criteria, it can be renominated. -- Pres N 23:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot ( talk) 00:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC) [5]. reply
This 2007 promotion is not anywhere close to the standards that would be expected today. The location notes material is riddled with original research, and there may be other issues with problematic content, as well (I've never seen the show). Hog Farm Talk 05:57, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Since discussion doesn't seem to be going anywhere, I would move to delist. If it doesn't meet the criteria for a standalone list, it fails FLCR #3C. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 17:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC) reply
After 3 months, consensus to delist and no work done. Delisting. -- Pres N 23:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply